Skip navigation.

Amerika - Force of Occupation

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." -- Sinclair Lewis

KDE 4 vs Any Version Of Gnome

(Caveat: This post was written while still not entirely awake. It may come across as a rambling diatribe, but the sentiment is still true.)

I'm not as cavalier as I used to be with respect to trying new releases of Linux distros, or cobbling together seemingly discordant pieces of hardware to build a functional machine as I once was. That fact alone has I'm sure led to some manner of atrophy in my "Wow, that's cool" bone.

KDE 4 is going to drive me to Gnome. I don't like Gnome at all, but KDE 4 is just awful. It seems like the developers put too much energy in to trying to make KDE 4 pretty (read: eye candy), but they've also managed to make things difficult to accomplish via the GUI. With all due respect to those who like KDE 4, it seems like things have been dumbed down to a point where most of the configurability that used to be straightforward is now difficult at best. For example, I will grant you that KNetworkManager has never been stellar. However, it has become a series of prompts followed by a "Next" button. I've always felt Gnome made things more difficult for me in its effort to be easy and friendly. Maybe KDE 4 is just such a departure from what I'm used to...no, it sucks. Not that I'm using this name drop for any kind of cred, but anyone remember when Linus Torvalds stated that he encourages “people to just switch to KDE?” Even he has gone to using Gnome.


I for one, don't really care for spiffy graphical effects. What I've seen of MS Vista left me wanting to hurl. That's one reason I've never bothered with the likes of Beryl or Compiz. Pretty is counterproductive! The Proletariat don't need "Pretty" to be great! If I want pretty, I'll download an image of some attractive brunette lady from the Internet and set it as my wallpaper. (I would like to point out that I'm one of those unimaginative dolts who set their screensaver to "blank screen.")

Bah! This whole experience makes me glad that the KDE version of Ubuntu 8.04 is a LTS release.

Just To Be Very Clear About This:Indeed...

Comments

Ruben Garcia 20. May 2009, 04:25

Well, I guess that is the eternal struggle, I always went from one desktop to the other when I used to do Linux but I was more used to Gnome cuz it was the first one I used.

I agree with your opinion about pretty, but unfortunately, some users would rather have pretty than functional.

Blaz Pristy 1. August 2009, 08:13

KDE is crap it looks like some Windows in alpha stage.

0x29a 1. August 2009, 08:20

KDE 4 is indeed crap. KDE 3.x, however is my personal favorite.

Any version of Gnome is a turd at best. If I wanted something that looked like Apple OS-6, I'd run Apple OS-6.

Ruben Garcia 3. August 2009, 05:25

I have tried Ubuntu in my HP computer and on a virtual machine, but i never get to run Gnome correctly, the problem is the sync-refresh of the monitor.

For some strange reason, X-server always dies after I edit the .conf file, however, Kubuntu works very good for me, not on a virtual machine, though.

Shaunak De 13. August 2009, 18:46

Its aways been Gnome for me, and yours and many other similar reviews furthur dissuade me from even trying out KDE4.

How to use Quote function:

  1. Select some text
  2. Click on the Quote link

Write a comment

Comment
(BBcode and HTML is turned off for anonymous user comments.)

If you can't read the words, press the small reload icon.


Smilies

December 2009
S M T W T F S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31