srf fr a lvn'

I'm Aleksander

Subscribe to RSS feed

Posts tagged with "gaming"

Greatest Video Game Music

, ,

What makes a great game epic? The soundtrack. Last Friday we went Super Mario crazy in the office once Erlend started whistling to the Super Mario Theme. Today I came across this gem on Spotify. The world renown London Philharmonic Orchestra playing the best of the best game music. My favorite is the Legend of Zelda: Suite, but there are also a ton of other classics and newcomers there.

Fire up Spotify and enjoy some of the best music in the world by some of the best performers in the world!

London Philharmonic OrchestraLondon Philharmonic Orchestra - The Greatest Video Game Music.

As a Spotify user I'll just add links to that. If someone finds this album on another free service let me know and I'll link to that as well. Click to play in Spotify!

Speaking of game music, I would love to get your input on the best gaming music around! Let the comments fly!

Are we Terrorists?

, , , ...

Oslo 22.07.11 a crazed right-wing madman bombs government buildings and shoots close to a hundred innocent teenagers. Like most Norwegians I was glued to the TV for days trying to make sense of the senseless killings. The horrific acts of a coward, targeting youths with only one committed crime: They wanted to improve the Norwegian society. The senseless acts on Utøya and the bombings in Oslo the same day is nothing but terrorism. The goal of all terrorists is to incite fear and to change society into more control, less personal freedom and. The immediate reply from Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg was "Our answer is more democracy, more openness and more humanity. But never nativity", although I voted for the other guy, I've never been so proud to be Norwegian. I challenge anyone to find any nation with a better response to terrorism.

Now for the part that affects gaming, and in it's turn relates to topics in my blog: The Coop Response. Coop is one of the biggest retail chains in Norway and Scandinavia. They have anything from grocery stores to construction materials. Of course this includes games. Guess who else mentioned games? That's right, the Norwegian terrorist claimed that he played Modern Warfare 2 and World of Warcraft. The immediate response from Coop Norway is to remove not only WOW and Modern Warfare 2, but in total 51 products from all their stores. Video games and toy guns. In effect they brand these as terrorist tools. Per definition all gamers who plays COD:MW2, or WOW are potential terrorists.

World of WarcraftWorld of Warcraft, used as a time alibi by the terrorist.

Gaming is a major part of me and who I am. Being labeled as a potential terrorist just because a terrorist used a game I've played for 6 years as a alibi, well, is not something I like. Read the manifesto, it's right there. The terrorist tells potential copycats that claiming to play games keeps friends off your back, giving you time to plan attacks. He goes on to say that MW2 is a good game to practice attacks. Well, when I was around 6, me and my friends ran around in the forest playing war, I guess it's time to ban sticks as well. After all we did pretty good war simulation with them. I'm of course choosing to bypass the super easy remove the bible as the terrorist it argument here, but you get my drift.

Facts about gaming and violence

  • Clinical psychologist Christopher Ferguson, one of the world leaders when it comes to the link between violence and video games states that "Video games aren't to blame for this tragedy. Nor are games like Doom and Quake to blame for past U.S. massacres like Columbine." In fact, he believes placing the blame on video games whenever a white male is guilty of a killing spree is racist.
  • The US supreme court debunked any relation between gaming and violence as 95% of young males actually have encountered a violent game. It's just statistically likely that a violent offender has played games because games are popular.
  • The Virginia Tech shooter actually never played any games, making him a statistic anomaly when it comes to connecting games and violence.

“Linking the playing of violent video games to a mass homicide when the perpetrator is a young male is like blaming the killing on the fact that he was wearing sneakers [..] The base rate of that behavior is so common that it has no predictive value whatsoever.”
- Christopher Ferguson

These facts have also recently been backed up by one of the most extensive researches ever done on the link between violence and gaming. The report "Understanding the Effects of Violent Video Games on Violent Crime" by Scott Cunningham, Benjamin Engelstätter and Michael R. Ward published April 7, 2011 concludes that "Overall, violent video games lead to decreases in violent crime."

I challenge Coop to revert their decision, explain their reasoning and apologize to gamers world wide for making a wild correlation between gamers and terrorists. Until then I'm not spending .50 cent in any Coop store, and I appeal to anyone with the option to do the same to do so. I'm a proud gamer, and gamers are not terrorists.

Being social with games

,

I originally intended to go on a large scale frontal attack on the "Don't waste your time with video games" comments, however after thinking it over I'd rather be constructive and talk a bit about the term social as most of the "Don't waste your time" arguments seem to take it for granted that gamers and games are by nature not social.

South Park gamingA rather epic stereotyping in South Park.

When people talk about gamers non-gamers tend to think about a overweight teenager. A teenager with with zero friends living with his mom sitting in front of a TV or computer wasting away his life with soda and hot-pockets. No social contact with anyone other than his mom, no real friends, no social skills and or interests shared with anyone at all.

I'm not saying I'm perfect, I have wasted time in front of my computer with a mountain of pizza and soda playing games for a limited time, but I don't really feel that the stereotype applies to me or the gamers I know. Calling gamers anti-social brings a lot of challenges should you try to explain the popularity of multi-player games, as well as gamers enjoying single player games in company. Both things I enjoy more or less on a regular basis.

The problem is the definition of what being social is. Non-gamers tend to see social as a measurement of how many people are gathered at the same location. If you say social to a non-gamer they might think of a party or meeting some friends for a beer (or coffee I guess, but who wants to meet someone for that?). Websters however gives this definition: Social (adjective): "marked by or passed in pleasant companionship with friends or associates <an active social life>". So as long as two people enjoy each others company it's a social experience.

The reason why people think of gaming as a anti-social experience is in fact not that gaming isn't social. I believe that it's because people have a problem seeing how gamers communicate and create a social experience. Video games are just complex versions of the good old poker table. People sit around playing together while sharing stories and having fun. No one would define a poker night as an anti-social event would they? Is playing cards while on holiday not a social experience? Well, gamers do the same thing, we just use a mic to talk as it's more convenient than bringing a computer around to each other. The term social seems to somehow be used as a anti word for gamers, but "normal" people are on their end allowed to be social on Facebook and through social media.

Social settings are not tangible, but can also appear in virtual settings. Almost every game I've played has had either a text based or voice based communication element. The more social the game is the more popular they become. World of Warcraft has 12 million subscribers, all organized into their own groups learning how to act and handle them selfs in a virtual community. In fact gamers tend to have more friends than non-gamers both close and friends in a wider sense.

I do realize how gaming can be seen as antisocial though, if someone says "I have to go home, it's raid time soon." Non-gamers would not understand. However it seems that nobody would object if someone says "I need to go, I'm meeting some friends." For some reason having a set game time where you and a bunch of friends plan to play together with regular gaming times seems to be used as the primary example of gaming being a anti-social experience. The truth however is that most of that time will be consumed with jokes, chatting and having an awesome time with friends.

While that holds true for some gamers depending on the game, there are also other ways to enjoy gaming together. Inviting friends over or out somewhere, just to hang out and play games also tends to be labeled as a antisocial experience. However if you do the same with more social acceptable games such as sing star it's suddenly a perfectly acceptable thing to do. I'm unable to explain why this is, if someone could enlighten me please do.

Despite all this it seems that gaming is slowly gaining ground and thanks to the growing popularity of communicating Online through Facebook, blogs and messenger services the need to be at the same physical location to be social seems to be on the decline. The continued work to make gaming more "mainstream" also helps to remove the antisocial stigma connected with gaming. Facebook and phone games are on the rise, and mostly among people not in the traditional gamer category. Advertisement on TV and the rise in mainstream media talking about games will only help improve on this trend. In fact gaming is even crossing the barrier with the first ever nomination for a Grammy in 2010!

South Park gamingAnyone up for a good old march for gaming pride?

The hardcore gamers still have a long way to go before being accepted, but the rise in social and casual gamers helps tear of the label antisocial from gamers. Further more the gaming industry seems to realize that they need to work to remove the stigma gamers have, I can't wait to see more gaming penetrate "mainstream" society. Until then, gamer pride marches anyone?