Skip navigation.

exploreopera

| Help

Sign up | Help

Aunty Sez - A San Francisco Treat

Whistling Girls and Crowing Hens get heard.

Updating Avatars - 04-13-08

I don't use this blog all that much. It's set up as an example for the CITYzens of CITY-Computers at Yahoo Groups. I was going around updating the avatars I have online. The picture I have been using was taken in 2005 and it doesn't represent me now.

Oh I just noticed I got an angry comment on my sharing "California the poorest state". I hate to burst the commentor's bubble but California school systems rank 48th out of 50 in the United States. It isn't the best as the commentor maintained. The article I shared said "when you're poor in California, you're really poor." meaning the price of housing and everything else is so high that getting out of poverty is expecially difficult. There's just too many of us here in California.

I've been to Mississippi, my father was born and died in Mississippi, and sure, he paid $200 a month for a broken down doublewide in Jackson. That's rental in Jackson. A one bedroom here in San Francisco goes for over $1,500, if you can find one. If I lived on a fixed income I'd move to a state where the over all cost of living was less expensive. But then again the hustle potential there is lower in equal portion.

San Francisco used to be a blue collar town, good union town, where working families could find a job that paid a wage that could get the family a rental. Those days are gone. I didn't come up with the stats in that article, silly goose boy. I just shared them. So don't get all high and mighty on my blog, like I care, it took me a year to get around to seeing it.

Woke up too late to go protest

I can't help but feel I'm an example of the American public, over sleeping and missing a protest rally to beef about the "Escalation". How many of us feel totally overwhelmed with how the world is going to hell in a handbasket, with jets on it?

I mean, really, what can one individual do when faced with global warming? I'm doing my part in not owning a car and taking public transit. I'm doing my part in reducing my carbon foot print and doing the "reduce-recycle-reuse" dance. I've changed out my light bulbs to be energy efficient. What more can a grandmother do?
http://www.carbonfootprint.com/


I mean, really, what can we do facing a national debt that is a ticking Time Bomb. Oh do check out this site...
http://www.time-bomb.org/

As if we don't have enough to worry about, America is bankrupt. If the American government were a corporation, all the politicians would already be in jail. Any economic expert on the government payroll who has dared to raise their voice about the national debt has been FIRED.

Clinton left us with a budget surplus. Want to know what our national debt is, check out this website and get your free National Debt Clock to put up on your website.
http://zfacts.com/p/461.html

Ah well, I may have over slept for the protest rally but I feel less guilty after sharing these links, it's the least this grandmother can do.


Had a car crash? It's all in the stars, study says

By Naomi Kim
From Yahoo News


TORONTO, Dec 13 (Reuters Life!) - Never mind how careful you are behind the wheel or how long you've been driving, the signs of the zodiac may be bigger factors behind your ability to avoid car crashes -- or why you have too many.

According to a study by InsuranceHotline.com, a Web site that quotes drivers on insurance rates, astrological signs are a significant factor in predicting car accidents.

The study, which looked at 100,000 North American drivers' records from the past six years, puts Libras (born September 23-October 22) followed by Aquarians (January 20-February 18) as the worst offenders for tickets and accidents

Leos (July 23-August 22) and then Geminis (May 21-June 20) were found to be the best overall.

"I was absolutely shocked by the results," said Lee Romanov, president of Toronto-based InsuranceHotline.com, who also wrote the book "Car Carma" which touches on the correlation between astrological signs and driving ability while doing the study.

Romanov originally wanted to have some fun by examining astrological signs as a possible cause for the variance between insurance companies quoting high and low rates but didn't expect to find anything interesting.

"Now, changing postal codes is far less significant to me than drivers of certain astrological signs," she told Reuters on Wednesday.

Even age, another variable for determining insurance rates, is less of a consideration to Romanov. The cutoff line for being considered a higher risk driver is 24 years of age; 25-year-olds are considered not-high risk.

"I'd rather get into a car with a 24-year-old Leo than a 25-year-old Aries," Romanov said.

Leos, described along with the study results on InsuranceHotline.com/a10.html, are "generous, and comfortable in sharing the roadway."

Aries, on the other hand, "have a 'me first' childlike nature that drives Aries into trouble."

"I wasn't believing in it before," said Romanov, "but I would think twice before getting into a car with an Aries."


I could have told them that and saved them the cost of the study. Think about how it was when they were housing new military recruits by birthday. A barracks full of Geminis all talking at once into the middle of the night. LOL

San Francisco Love Fest - 09-23-2006

Feel the Love, BayBeee!

http://www2.sflovefest.org/

Calif. sues carmakers over global warming

,

Calif. Sues carmakers over global warming

By Michael Kahn


SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California sued six of the world's largest automakers over global warming on Wednesday, charging that greenhouse gases from their vehicles have caused billions of dollars in damages.


The lawsuit is the first of its kind to seek to hold manufacturers liable for the damages caused by their vehicles' emissions, state Attorney General Bill Lockyer said.

It also comes less than a month after California lawmakers adopted the nation's first global warming law mandating a cut in greenhouse gas emissions.

An automaker trade group called the global warming move a "nuisance suit." Car manufacturers have also held up California state rules to force cuts in tailpipe emissions from cars and trucks with legal action of their own.

The lawsuit names General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., Toyota Motor Corp., the Chrysler Motors Corp. U.S. arm of Germany's DaimlerChrysler AG and the North American units of Japan's Honda Motor Co. and Nissan Motor Co. Ltd..

"(California) just passed a new law to cut global warming emissions by 25 percent and that's a good start and this lawsuit is a good next step," said Dan Becker, director of the Sierra Club's Global Warming Program.

Lockyer told Reuters he would seek "tens or hundreds of millions of dollars" from the automakers in the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Northern California.

The lawsuit seeks monetary damages for past and ongoing contributions to global warming and asks that the companies be held liable for future monetary damages to California.

It noted that California is spending millions to deal with reduced snow pack, beach erosion, ozone pollution and the impact on endangered animals and fish.

"The injuries have caused the people to suffer billions of dollars in damages, including millions of dollars of funds expended to determine the extent, location and nature of future harm and to prepare for and mitigate those harms, and billions of dollars of current harm to the value of flood control infrastructure and natural resources," it said.

Ford deferred comment to the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which called the complaint a "nuisance suit" similar to one a New York court dismissed.

"Automakers will need time to review this legal complaint, however, a similar nuisance suit that was brought by attorneys- general against utilities was dismissed by a federal court in New York," the industry group said in a statement.

Toyota declined to comment as the company evaluates the lawsuit. The other automakers had no immediate comment.

David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, a nonprofit organization that provides public research and forecasts into the industry, said it would be tough for the industry to immediately meet demands from some critics.

Adoption of diesel engine emissions technology or gasoline- electric hybrids comes at great cost and improving gas mileage also likely means smaller lighter vehicles, trade-offs that are not attractive to consumers, he added.

"These are not free technologies, they are very expensive," Cole said. "Most people are price sensitive."

In the complaint, Lockyer charges that vehicle emissions have contributed significantly to global warming and have harmed the resources, infrastructure and environmental health of the most populous state in the United States.

Lockyer -- a Democratic candidate for state treasurer in the November election -- said the lawsuit states that under federal and state common law the automakers have created a public nuisance by producing "millions of vehicles that collectively emit massive quantities of carbon dioxide."

Carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases have been linked to global warming.

"Voice of Wired," Dead at 43


Monday, Jul 31, From http://www.mediabistro.com
"Voice of Wired," Dead at 43
Wired former deputy editor William Goggins collapsed during the San Francisco Marathon and died of apparent heart failure. He was 43.

The avid runner had just passed the 24-mile mark of what was to be his first 26.2 mile race, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

Wired editor-in-chief Chris Anderson told the Chronicle that Goggins' "mark on Wired was profound."

"Think of him as being the smartest, fastest, wittiest person you've ever met," Anderson said. "That's Bill."

New S.F. law requires construction companies to recycle

,

SAN FRANCISCO - A new city law mandating the recycling of construction materials took effect this week and it has already boosted production for several local waste-management companies.

The Construction and Demolition Debris Recovery Ordinance, introduced by Mayor Gavin Newsom and Supervisor Fiona Ma, took effect Saturday and requires that all contractors in the city send their waste to a certified facility instead of straight to a landfill.

Construction waste generated in San Francisco, which includes wood, metal, sheetrock, concrete, asphalt, bricks, cardboard and hard plastics, accounts for more than 100,000 tons of landfill every year, according to SF Environment, the city's environmental agency.

Many in construction already reuse and scavenge materials or send their waste for recycling but Supervisors hope the ordinance, passed in February, will increase the amount of materials recovered by eight percent.

With the new law taking effect, workers at a Norcal Waste Systems, Inc. center have been working extra hard, according to spokesman Robert Reed.

Three crews sorted through 400 tons of waste today alone, and in the coming days a fourth crew will be added, Reed said.

There are at least ten facilities in San Francisco that accept waste for recycling, and several more are located throughout the Bay Area.

Only about 65 to 70 percent of construction waste is recyclable, according to Reed. Workers sort through the waste by hand as it rolls by on a conveyer belt. They also use shaker screens and magnets to separate reusable materials.

Asphalt and concrete are crushed up to build new roads and sidewalks, metals can be melted down, and wooden materials can be chipped up and sent to power plants to generate energy.

SF Environment provides a list of certified drop-off spots on its Web site www.sfenvironment.com.

Energy: Wiser on the West Coast

, ,

Energy: Wiser on the West Coast

By Christopher Palmeri

It was six years ago this summer that the great California energy crisis began. The state hadn't built enough power plants to meet demand. Rogue energy traders swooped in, prices soared, and the state's largest utility went bankrupt.

The crisis branded the nation's most populated state as a energy-industry basket case. "What's the difference between California and the Titanic?" recently convicted former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling once joked. "The Titanic went down with the lights on."

Now, as temperatures creep up in much of the country and the peak air-conditioning season begins, it's worth noting that from an energy perspective, there's much good happening in California. More than 30 new power plants have come online in the past six years, generating 12,000 megawatts. The California Energy Commission estimates that it will have generation reserves of more than 20% this August, nearly three times what's required should power usage spike.

The better story, though, lies on the demand side of the equation, or what the state's fitness-focused governor might call portion control. Since California began aggressively pursuing energy efficiency in the mid-1970s, the state's per-capita electricity usage has remained flat at around 6,500 kilowatt-hours per person. In the rest of the country, consumption has risen from 8,000 to 12,000 kilowatt-hours in the same time frame. In terms of carbon emissions, that's the equivalent of keeping 12 million cars off the road.


Utilities On Board.
How does California do it? Here's one way: The state requires that fluorescent bulbs be used in new construction or major remodels in many rooms of the house. Fluorescent lights are more than four times more efficient than incandescents, so if you're remodeling a kitchen, laundry, or bathroom in the Golden State, you have no choice. The standards are part of a massive set of statewide building codes called Title 24 that was passed in 1978. They get toughened every couple of years or so, and consumers get used to them. "They kind of accept it and move on," says Santa Monica architect Aleks Istanbullu.

California has also succeeded by getting utilities involved in conservation. The state's big electric distributors shell out hundreds of millions of dollars every year in rebates to consumers who install more energy-efficient air conditioners, refrigerators, and heating systems. The rebates, budgeted at $2 billion between now and 2008, are intended to save $5 billion in power purchases. "Before we invest in traditional pipes and wires, we have to implement these programs," says Anne Shen Smith, senior vice-president for customer relations at San Diego Gas & Electric. "It's the equivalent of avoiding three new power plants."

Utilities are also required to get more of their power from renewable sources, such as wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal. In 2002, California instituted one of the most extensive renewable programs in the country, requiring 20% of power from such sources by 2010, up from 10% today. The utilities are also being allowed to earn their regulated rate of return on new "smart meters" that collect customer-usage information in real time, allowing the energy providers to recommend ways for them to cut costs. "California's unique," says Greg Ander, chief architect for Southern California Edison. "Utilities have gotten very aggressive since the meltdown."

White-Roof Initiative.Politicians have gotten into the game, too. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who is campaigning for reelection in November, has jumped on the green bandwagon, earmarking $2.8 billion over 10 years to put small solar systems in place. His "Million Solar Roofs" program, started in January, provides cash to homeowners who choose to install such systems.

The state has other initiatives in the works. California Energy Commissioner Arthur H. Rosenfeld, who has been called the father of energy conservation in the state, says his office is now working on regulations that would require all new roofs in the state to be white, because they absorb less heat and cut air-conditioning bills. "The pharaohs and the Greeks have known this for 5,000 years," he says. Regulations presently call for flat roofs to be white. The state is working with roofing manufacturers who have created pigments that mimic the energy-saving nature of white so that the regulations can be extended to sloped roofs and tiles by 2008.

It may seem goofy, but what happens in California usually doesn't stay there. In the mid-1970s, California was a leader in pushing for more efficient appliances. Similar federal standards came into effect in 1992. The result is that even as the average size of refrigerators has increased, the power they use has fallen 75%, to roughly 400 kilowatt-hours per year. It's funny how fast things can turn around. It's not California that's sinking anymore.

Remember the "Diggers" San Francisco 1966

,



http://www.diggers.org/

The Freegans posted below is not a new phenomena, it's just a self centered one. The "Diggers" of San Francisco did the same thing but on a grander scale and fed hundreds of people for free for over two years. Check the "Diggers" link and read about how this all came about.

Wikipedia: Diggers (Theater)

"Freegans" forage for food in bins

By Kate Kelland, Fri May 26, 9:27 AM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - Ross and Ash are about to dig in to a meal of chicken rogan josh, king prawn makhani and rice, chicken balti and naan bread followed by pineapple, strawberries and grapes for dessert.

All of which came out of a bin.

"Everything I eat comes from dumpsters," Ash says. "For me it's a logical lifestyle choice. It's such a natural thing to use up that waste."

Some call them "dumpster divers," others brand them "skip lickers," but Ross Parry and Ash Falkingham like to count themselves among the Freegans -- a growing band of foragers who seek to live entirely from the waste of others.

In this brief trip to a small supermarket skip in southeast London, they have recovered enough food to provide themselves -- and several others -- with an impressive evening meal, as well as bread, muffins and teabags for the next morning's breakfast.

Freeganism, derived from the words "free" and "vegan," is spreading to Britain from the United States, where one of its founding fathers, Adam Weissman, has set up a Freegan information Web site to persuade others to join him.

"TOTAL BOYCOTT"

Weissman describes Freeganism as "a total boycott of an economic system where the profit motive has eclipsed ethical considerations."

"Instead of avoiding the purchase of products from one bad company only to support another, we avoid buying anything to the greatest degree we are able," he explains on the site.

Falkingham, a 21-year-old Australian, sees Freeganism as a way of forcing the world to wake up to what it is wasting.

"Nine million people die every year of starvation ... and while that's happening, we are literally destroying food," he says.

There are no exact figures for how many people are choosing to live a Freegan lifestyle in Britain. Despite the name, not all those who opt to live this way are strictly vegan.

Falkingham and Parry, who is 46, have been roaming Britain since last October, pursuing their Freegan lifestyle in cities from Manchester and Leeds in the north, to Plymouth in the south.

They eat, sleep and live in a beaten-up old van which is equipped with mattresses, a stove, a sink, carpets and even a heater all taken from skips or wreckers' yards.

Falkingham wears a watch recovered from a bin behind a charity shop, his boots were taken from a retailer's skip and the pair say they have found computer parts, furniture and even an MP3 player in dumpsters.

They have no jobs and no money but see very little need for either.

"When you first start off, you think 'how am I going to live without a wage?'," says Parry, who has been living a Freegan lifestyle for more than 20 years.

"But our priority is to work for love to make the world a better place, and we want to have more time to do that. The less time we spend chasing a salary, the more time we have to do what we really believe in."

"There's so much excess in this society that you don't have to worry about where the next meal is coming from."

MILLIONS OF TONNES OF WASTED FOOD

According to research, more than 30 percent of the 17 million tonnes of waste that goes to landfill in Britain is food waste.

Fareshare, a charity which delivers surplus food to the homeless and other vulnerable people in need, says around a quarter of that is perfectly good, edible food.

"Last year we redistributed 2,000 tonnes of food -- that helped provide 3.3 million meals and helped around 12,000 people -- but that is still just the tip of the iceberg," Fareshare spokeswoman Maria Kortbech Olesen told Reuters.

Fareshare, which distributes food given by some of Britain's biggest food retailers such as Marks and Spencer and Sainsbury's which would otherwise go to waste, sympathizes with Freegans, but is concerned at their sometimes risky methods.

"What they are trying to address is basically the same thing as we are," says Kortbech Olesen. "There is a lot of waste and we have to do something about it."

"But you have to be careful. Freegans take food from bins, and they can never know whether that food is safe."

Falkingham shrugs off any concern about getting sick.

"I think I have only once been ill from eating food from bins -- I got diarrhea," he says. "But I like to push the limits with what I eat."


August 2008
SMTWTFS
July 2008September 2008
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930