Chjris' Global Warming Blog

Quit call over blocked green ad
9 Feb 2009 21:37 GMT



A Northern Ireland minister's decision to block a government advertisement campaign on climate change has led to a call for his removal from office.

The advertisements urged people to reduce energy consumption and cut carbon dioxide output.

But Environment Minister Sammy Wilson claimed the adverts were part of an "insidious propaganda campaign".
I might try to get a hold of him, so I can interview him in my film because this guy is talking a lot of sense.

Calling for his removal, the Green Party said Mr Wilson made "a laughing stock out of Northern Ireland."
That's so funny. . .specially when you think that the whole global warming scam is laughable. The only words that come to mind a 'pot' 'kettle' and 'black'.

Sammy Wilson argued that the Scottish executive had objected and stopped the adverts being broadcast. However, the Scottish executive told the BBC the reason it did not run these adverts was because they are already running their own climate change adverts.

He argued that they were "giving people the impression that by turning off the standby light on their TV they could save the world from melting glaciers and being submerged in 40ft of water".
I like this guy.

He said that was "patent nonsense".

Mr Wilson said he had written to the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) to say that the advertising campaign Act on CO2 "was not welcome".
Damn, we need him in England. I hate the Act on CO2 adverts with the ignorant father that's only being green to save some money, and his ignorant daughter that says, "Are you trying to reduce out carbon emission, dad?" Them adverts really piss me off.

He explained that he did not believe in its message that "man-made greenhouse gas emissions are the main cause of climate change" and that the campaign was contrary to his personal views.
Have a cigar, my friend.

He told DECC: "I do not wish for climate change messages to be promoted by other Whitehall departments here".
I'm so movign to Northern Ireland.

But Brian Wilson, of the Green Party, said the environment minister should be removed from office for refusing to recognise climate change.
It's fucking gospel!! "YOU MUST BELIEVE IN GLOBAL WARMING OR YOU'RE A TERRORIST!!" Hahaha.

"He is a climate change sceptic. We have got to take all measures we can to reduce our carbon footprint. Mr Wilson does not agree with that.
"OMG!! He's got his own oppinion, we must linch him."

"This is totally incompatible with him being minister for the environment," he said.
Or in other words, you can only be a minister if you submit to the bullshit and propaganda.

Friends of the Earth NI director John Woods said: "It's bad enough that we have an environment minister who doesn't accept that human activity is driving climate change, but trying to block advice to people on how they can help tackle it is completely irresponsible.
Oh, it's our good ol', ignorant friends at Friends of the Earth. Look, the global warming scam is NOT gospel. You need to understand that the IPCC only have 2,500 scientists on their books, most of whose bibliographies don't even fit in with the positions their put into. But then, you have over 30,000 scientists, all with PhDs and things in climatology and relevant subject, signing a petition to Congress about how humans are NOT the cause of the warming, and any restrictions on CO2 would HARM the planet rather than saving it.

"The reality is that the overwhelming majority of climate scientists believe that our activities are causing global warming and that urgent action is needed to tackle it."
Hahaha. I can read them like a book. I hadn't read this bit before I wrote the last bit. I mean, if I had, I would have known it would fit in much better here and save it for here. I just want everyone to look at my last comment and then Google something like "30,000 scientist sign petition to Congress saying that global warming is a good thing". . .or something like that. Because I'm really not making it up. I think the BBC actually wrote one article on it. 'One' being the key word. lol.

The Alliance Party and the SDLP have also criticised Mr Wilson's decision.

Alliance leader David Ford said: "The simple fact is that there is scientific evidence, accepted by the overwhelming majority of scientists, that manmade climate change will affect our environment if it is not brought under control," he said.
Scientific evidence like how the 1% of our atmospher that is greenhouse gasses is made up of only 4% carbon dioxide (of which, 10% is man-made) and 95% water vapour?? If you don't believe me, go Google it.



Tommy Gallagher, SDLP, accused Mr Wilson of "political sabotage of an important public awareness campaign".
I'd call it "not forcing government propaganda onto the public".

"We need all the awareness campaigns we can get on this issue, and in particular we need to ensure that efforts to combat climate change do not become victims of the downturn. The minister must be held accountable for his maverick posturing," he said.
Yes, the man should be fired for listening to 30,000 creditable scientists instead of 2,500 who are being PAID BY THE GOVERNMENT. Come on, people, the clue is in the title, 'The InterGOVERNMENTAL Panel on Climate Change'.

Northern Ireland's first minister and party colleague, Peter Robinson, told the Assembly that Mr Wilson was entitled to his opinions, although they did not reflect those of the DUP as a whole.

"He has provoked a debate in Northern Ireland which I suspect would not have taken place had he not made the comments, and every individual must be entitled to their view on the issue.
i hear that. The time for debate is NOT over.

"However, the view of the Democratic Unionist Party is on record and is in our manifesto, and it is that view that we will uphold at the Executive."
Oh, bummer.

BBC Northern Ireland environment correspondent Mike McKimm said: "Mr Wilson has also advised Whitehall that such messages can only be promoted in Northern Ireland with his permission and he wants to see what he terms 'postcode lockouts' used to prevent them 'leaking' into that part of the UK.
Hey, I don't want them leaking into my part of the UK either.

"He also told the DECC that this applies to specific organisations licensed to use the "Act on CO2" brand, including the Carbon Trust.

"Mr Wilson's departmental website says it takes a lead on climate change issues.

Emissions

"His own political party manifesto also makes similar claims: 'The DUP has... called for year-on-year targets in order to achieve reduced Carbon emissions.' (DUP 2007).

Commenting on Mr Wilson's approach to climate change and its Act on CO2 campaign, the DECC told the BBC that human behaviour causes climate change.
I didn't know Ed Miliband was a climatologist!! I thought he was some right-wing barstad posing in a left-wing party to help bring down the nation.

They said their commitment to this campaign was guided by the "best science, the most up-to-date information and the evidence... the only way we can tackle it is by working together"
They must have blinkers on or something, because, the last time I checked, 30,000 was a bigger number than 2,500. You also notice that the BBC only really interviewed green freaks in this article?? I mean, where was Martin Durking?? Where was Nigel Lawson?? Where was Christopher Booker?? Where was Richard North?? Where was Alex Jones?? Where was Chjris Toms?? Where were the 30,000+ scientists that signed the petition to the US Congress?? They weren't even asked because they would have killed this story with FACTS!! Instead, they only go to ignorant green freaks and people getting paid to believe in the global warming scam!! WAKE UP AND SMELL THE FASCISM!! The last time the BBC interviewed Nigel Lawson, they shut him up. I mean, I know it's Jeremy Paxman's style to shut everyone up, but he normally just does it when the person he's interviewing doesn't give an answer, not when they give an answer that the BBC doesn't like. OMG, all these people, they're all laughable. 0.0038%. They think that's making a difference. 38 parts per MILLION!! 0.95%. That's what's making the difference. WATER VAPOUR!! Why don't they go after water vapour?? Two reasons. 1: They can't tax it. And 2: It would bust their scheme to make us all buy expensive hydrogen powered cars that only emit water vapour.