My OperaThe final nail in the global warming coffin.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:48:29 PM
Before I tell you about the attached peer review paper I will tell you about the UN IPCC. The mainstream media often say that the IPCC is made up of 2,500 of the worlds top scientists. That's simply not true. The fact of the matter is, the IPCC is made up of 600 scientists, and 1,900 policy makers (politicians of the member states that make up the UN). Many of the 600 scientists do NOT have sufficient degrees in the relevant fields that the UN places them in. The ones that do have relevant qualifications, in most ocasions do not agree with the findings and resign. And when you get into the Lead Authors, it gets worse. I found this article that tells you more:
“The paucity of information was hardly surprising: Not one of the lead authors had ever written a research paper on the subject! Moreover, two of the authors, both physicians, had spent their entire career as environmental activists. One of these activists has published "professional" articles as an "expert" on 32 different subjects, ranging from mercury poisoning to land mines, globalization to allergies and West Nile virus to AIDS.
"Among the contributing authors there was one professional entomologist, and a person who had written an obscure article on dengue and El Nino, but whose principal interest was the effectiveness of motorcycle crash helmets (plus one paper on the health effects of cellphones).”
Now, does this sound like the organisation to trust in the matter of global warming?
But this is the best we can get, right? I mean, according to ALL the mainstream media outlets, these are the worlds top scientists. The science is settled. To deny global warming is to deny the holocaust. There isn't another side in the global warming debate. The debate is over. Only a few scientists don't believe in man-made global warming. And those that don't believe in it are being paid by the oil companies. Well, according to the aforementioned peer review paper, all this is wrong.
This peer review paper has been read by at LEAST 31,072 scientists. We don't know the full number because only American scientists, with a minimum of a Bachelor of Science degree in relevant fields of science were aloud to sign the petition that accompanied the paper. I'm sure there are thousands of other scientists with Associates of Science degrees who agree with this paper, as well as many more BS, MS & PhD scientists throughout the world.
To put that into perspective, the IPCC has 2,500 people (it's wrong to call them scientists because the majority are politicians). The petition that accompanied this paper was signed by 9,021 PhDs (the highest degree one can get). Now, remember, that's PhD scientists in the US alone. The full numbers for other degrees are as followed; 6,961 MS; 2,240 MD and DVM; and 12,850 BS or equivalent academic degrees.
The IPCC has restricted access to the names and degrees of their researchers. Only a few have leaked out. This is not science. Science is open and free for all to see. The people who wrote this paper and circulated the accompanying petition put it all on their website, which is free, open, and written in a simplified English so us non scientists can read it. They even have the list of all 31,072 scientists (as well as their degrees) who have signed the petition. If that's not science, I don't know what is. You can find it all here.
Now, Al Gore calls scientists who don't agree with him "Flat Earthers". If you remember, the Church denied the science that proved the Earth was round. Does this representation of "Flat Earthers" sound like people like me and the 31,072 scientists that use real data instead of overbloated computer models?? Or the people, like Al Gore, who are denying that 31,072 scientists disagree with them.
The IPCC is clearly not a scientific organisation. They do not abide by the structure of established science. They abide more with the ways of politics (more fascist that democratic), not science. But then, the clue is really in the name, the InterGOVERNMENTAL Panel on Climate Change.
The BBC have not as yet published an article on this peer review paper (trust me, I looked for it). Fox News had one article about it. And few other mainstream media outlets dared touch it. But it is out there. If you simply Google “30,000 scientists”, the first page will be nothing but this paper.
So please, now that you've read the background of this peer review paper, have a read of the actual paper (which you only need a basic knowledge of science to understand). And remember, 31,072 scientists with a Bachelor of Science degree or above in the US agree with it.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Once you look beyond the science, you start to see that it's not about saving the Earth, it's about enslaving the Earth. Al Gore has called for, in the United States Congress, a global tax on carbon. When asked which forms of carbon, he replied, “All forms.” (that's on record, you can Google it, watch the videos). One would naturally assume that “all forms” of carbon would include the carbon dioxide that all animals, including humans, breathe out. If they tax that, it means they are putting a price on your life. Turning your RIGHT to breathe into a privilege.
It's not just Al Gore who's calling for it, Barack Obama, just a few days ago, called for a global tax on carbon. The science has gone out the window in favour of pseudoscience and political policies designed to enslave you.
Spread this information around before the UN (which is clearly a fascist regime, if they do politics in the same way they do “science”) are forcing you to pay to breathe. Because just imagine what they'll do to you if you can't pay their tax on life. It's not a very nice picture, is it?
~Christopher Toms.
Click here to read the full peer reviewed paper as a PDF.
“The paucity of information was hardly surprising: Not one of the lead authors had ever written a research paper on the subject! Moreover, two of the authors, both physicians, had spent their entire career as environmental activists. One of these activists has published "professional" articles as an "expert" on 32 different subjects, ranging from mercury poisoning to land mines, globalization to allergies and West Nile virus to AIDS.
"Among the contributing authors there was one professional entomologist, and a person who had written an obscure article on dengue and El Nino, but whose principal interest was the effectiveness of motorcycle crash helmets (plus one paper on the health effects of cellphones).”
Now, does this sound like the organisation to trust in the matter of global warming?
But this is the best we can get, right? I mean, according to ALL the mainstream media outlets, these are the worlds top scientists. The science is settled. To deny global warming is to deny the holocaust. There isn't another side in the global warming debate. The debate is over. Only a few scientists don't believe in man-made global warming. And those that don't believe in it are being paid by the oil companies. Well, according to the aforementioned peer review paper, all this is wrong.
This peer review paper has been read by at LEAST 31,072 scientists. We don't know the full number because only American scientists, with a minimum of a Bachelor of Science degree in relevant fields of science were aloud to sign the petition that accompanied the paper. I'm sure there are thousands of other scientists with Associates of Science degrees who agree with this paper, as well as many more BS, MS & PhD scientists throughout the world.
To put that into perspective, the IPCC has 2,500 people (it's wrong to call them scientists because the majority are politicians). The petition that accompanied this paper was signed by 9,021 PhDs (the highest degree one can get). Now, remember, that's PhD scientists in the US alone. The full numbers for other degrees are as followed; 6,961 MS; 2,240 MD and DVM; and 12,850 BS or equivalent academic degrees.
The IPCC has restricted access to the names and degrees of their researchers. Only a few have leaked out. This is not science. Science is open and free for all to see. The people who wrote this paper and circulated the accompanying petition put it all on their website, which is free, open, and written in a simplified English so us non scientists can read it. They even have the list of all 31,072 scientists (as well as their degrees) who have signed the petition. If that's not science, I don't know what is. You can find it all here.
Now, Al Gore calls scientists who don't agree with him "Flat Earthers". If you remember, the Church denied the science that proved the Earth was round. Does this representation of "Flat Earthers" sound like people like me and the 31,072 scientists that use real data instead of overbloated computer models?? Or the people, like Al Gore, who are denying that 31,072 scientists disagree with them.
The IPCC is clearly not a scientific organisation. They do not abide by the structure of established science. They abide more with the ways of politics (more fascist that democratic), not science. But then, the clue is really in the name, the InterGOVERNMENTAL Panel on Climate Change.
The BBC have not as yet published an article on this peer review paper (trust me, I looked for it). Fox News had one article about it. And few other mainstream media outlets dared touch it. But it is out there. If you simply Google “30,000 scientists”, the first page will be nothing but this paper.
So please, now that you've read the background of this peer review paper, have a read of the actual paper (which you only need a basic knowledge of science to understand). And remember, 31,072 scientists with a Bachelor of Science degree or above in the US agree with it.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Once you look beyond the science, you start to see that it's not about saving the Earth, it's about enslaving the Earth. Al Gore has called for, in the United States Congress, a global tax on carbon. When asked which forms of carbon, he replied, “All forms.” (that's on record, you can Google it, watch the videos). One would naturally assume that “all forms” of carbon would include the carbon dioxide that all animals, including humans, breathe out. If they tax that, it means they are putting a price on your life. Turning your RIGHT to breathe into a privilege.
It's not just Al Gore who's calling for it, Barack Obama, just a few days ago, called for a global tax on carbon. The science has gone out the window in favour of pseudoscience and political policies designed to enslave you.
Spread this information around before the UN (which is clearly a fascist regime, if they do politics in the same way they do “science”) are forcing you to pay to breathe. Because just imagine what they'll do to you if you can't pay their tax on life. It's not a very nice picture, is it?
~Christopher Toms.
Click here to read the full peer reviewed paper as a PDF.
(75%)
