Skip navigation.

Why I am not buying Nokia N95

,

Nokia N95 is a great phone. Here are the reasons why I am not going to buy it.

Have you ever looked at what Nokia N95 can do? It has a 5 megapixel camera, with auto-focus and Carl Zeiss lens; it can record videos at 640x480 resolution with 30fps; it has built-in infrared, bluetooth, Wi-Fi, GPS, accelerometers, A/V output, radio, multimedia player... Wow, it has so many things that it might be easier to say what it does not have: it does not have a QWERTY keyboard, and it does not have touch-screen.

The "classic" N95 has a microSD card slot, while the "8GB" model has the microSD slot replaced by built-in 8GB memory. The 8GB model also has a slightly bigger screen, and a bigger battery. Unfortunately, though, people at Nokia removed one important feature in order to make room for larger battery: they removed the lens cover.

Hey, it makes no sense... A great mobile phone, with built-in camera of very high quality... and they thought it was okay to leave the lens open to all type of dirt. It makes no sense, people from Nokia might have gone nuts or something... The lens cover is a very important feature! My current phone is Sony Ericsson K750i, and I chose it because it has a decent camera (2 megapixel with auto-focus and macro) and has lens cover.

Since I got this K750i, I've almost never again used my 4.1 megapixel digital camera. Well, 2 megapixels was enough for most photos, plus, the phone is handy, it is always with me, and it always had enough battery to take many photos. On the other hand, the digital camera is kinda big, it was always "hidden" in some drawer, and I never had 2 AA batteries when I needed. Or, when I had, the batteries were almost out of energy.

So, this K750i became my "official" camera.

Nokia N95, if I was going to buy it, would replace K750i as my new official camera. Heck, 5 megapixel N95 is even more than my digital camera (which is 4.1). This means that no, I don't want the 8GB model. The lens cover is too important for me.

So... The classic Nokia N95 is "perfect", right? Well... almost... I thought so, until my friend Leandro made me pay attention to one little detail: the 3G support.

There are 2 different models of classic N95, and also 2 models of N95 8GB. The difference? One model supports UMTS/HSDPA/WCDMA (or, from now on, 3G) on 2100MHz band, and the other model supports on 850/1900 MHz bands.

Then you ask: "So what?"

Well... Here, some mobile operators use one frequency, while other operators use a different frequency. What's more! The same operator uses different frequencies on different regions of Brazil.

This means that, if I buy N95, I will be tied to one or a few operators where I live, or a different set of operators in case I travel somewhere. Since I was planning to use that phone for at least 2 years (my current K750i is now 2 years old), I don't find this very comfortable. I would be spending a lot of money on a great phone that... would not work well if I travel or if I change the operator. This sucks.

(Note: only the 3G would not work, all other phone features would work well, including 2G or 2.5G, which is GPRS/EDGE)

I'm not a fan of Apple, and also I'm not a fan of iPhone (and I guess I wouldn't be happy with an iPhone), but I have to admit that at least here iPhone 3G is better: its 3G support is tri-band.

Thanks to Leandro de Lima e Silva, who told me about 3G bands before I bought the phone. He pointed me to this table of 3G frequency per operator and region, which he found at a post from Garota Sem Fio blog.

Now, just some videos of what people can do with Nokia N95:

Python script works in terminal but not in vi?Please use a sane date format

Comments

Aadil 31. December 2008, 18:39

My new phone is the Nokia E65 which is good enough for me at present. Had I Enough money, I'd have bought the N95 or something in that range. Here in South Africa, tri-band has no inherent value unless you plan on traveling to the USA or some such place since we have no network that uses the 1900Mhz band. :up:.
The lack of a lens cover is a little disturbing though. :insane:

Anonymous 17. January 2009, 02:44

Buss writes:

Vivo and BrT/Oi by the table you linked just use 2100 Mhz.

Anyway, there isn't any state that you don't have an operator that uses 2100 Mhz.

So with a 2100 Mhz mobile phone you could take calls everywhere...

Denilson Figueiredo de Sá 17. January 2009, 16:52

So with a 2100 Mhz mobile phone you could take calls everywhere...


This issue is not related to making calls, which uses 2G instead of 3G. Most phones nowadays are tri or quad band when talking about 2G (GSM/GPRS/EDGE).

So, the issue here is only the 3G support (data connection, internet).

Also, the operator I was going to use was Claro, but still wanted to be able to switch operators if needed.

How to use Quote function:

  1. Select some text
  2. Click on the Quote link

Write a comment

Comment
(BBcode and HTML is turned off for anonymous user comments.)

If you can't read the words, press the small reload icon.


Smilies

January 2010
S M T W T F S
December 2009February 2010
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30