Distracting myself with Michelle Obama's inagural dress choices
Sunday, 7. December 2008, 17:32:35
Or course, there has been mention in the media that the whole inaugural to-do had better be a bit toned down considering the economy. On the other hand, just as the US produced some of its best-ever films during the horrible time of World War II as a desperately-needed form of distraction, I think we all deserve a break from the war, terrorism, & the economy (among many problems facing the US & the world at large). Maybe the whole African-American version of the "return to Camelot" Kennedy years, is not the worst fantasy we can have right now.
Hell, there are worse ways to distract yourself than turning to fashion.
Some of these designs (found on Women's Wear Daily: http://www.wwd.com/fashion-news/dressing-the-first-lady-1875632#/slideshow/article/1875632/1876331 ) are WAY too frou-frou, fluffy, and Nancy Reagan-esque for my taste. Michelle's image seems to be classy & simple, so here are my picks:
For the ball:
My pick for the freezing cold outside inauguration. I LOVE the yellow blocks/stripes on this:
But I think something in a bright red will more likely be chosen because red is a) patriotic (same reason I went for the purple/blue dress) b)a strong color (reason they started dressing Palin in red) c) and it's got that nice warm feeling in the middle of winter:














1 2 Next »
PainterWoman # 7. December 2008, 18:10
Naomi # 7. December 2008, 18:23
lokutus_prime # 7. December 2008, 18:25
Hi Naomi, I remember it well. I remember the court of King Jack and indeed it seemed like Camelot - but it still rained back then. So, it wasn't perfect
Now about these outfits that you show here. May I get in first before the gals flock all over your page here and tell you what they think. I know this is all about Michelle Obama but I imagine others who would feel and look good in these clothes.
The mauve (purple?) creation is just sooo classic sheek and would look good on a "Natalie Wood" figure.
The yellow & white vertical striped outfit is for someone who lives in winter Chicago (cue Michelle Obama). I also love the yellow blocks/stripes on this.
I can't quite figure out the style of the red dress. I have that sort of "is it a bird is it a plane?" mentality when I look at this kind of combination. I imagine Sarah Jessica Parker wanting to be seen out in this one, but she is height-challenged (do I mean she is "short") and this would not flatter her figure.
I wonder what the dress itself looks like once that sur-coat thing has been detached/taken off. I bet it looks pretty neat, more like a bird than a plane.
I'm not Kent Brockman but this is my two cents take on all of this, and I've enjoyed being at your show
Loku
PainterWoman # 7. December 2008, 18:39
I also liked No. 8, but not in white...and 14. That blue is gorgeous.
lokutus_prime # 7. December 2008, 19:00
PainterWoman # 7. December 2008, 19:03
lokutus_prime # 7. December 2008, 19:09
slackwrdave # 7. December 2008, 19:32
For some reason Richard Nixon popped into my mind talking about Pat's "respectable Republican cloth coat" (The Checkers speech, 1952). I wasn't alive back then but have seen it on TV many times.
Fashion's cool. I find it relaxing sometimes.
Matthew # 8. December 2008, 02:23
I can't believe I'm thinking about it!
Angeliki # 8. December 2008, 02:41
ɥʇɐǝp ɟo ssǝɔuıɹd # 8. December 2008, 14:02
Naomi # 8. December 2008, 16:18
I LOVED that series, but something was just not right in the movie. For starters, the fashion left a whole lot to be desired. I'm used to Carrie's off-beat fashion, can deal with it when it makes her look good, but most of her 80+ outfits just didn't do it for me (the wedding dress she finally chose was a winner but the bird/feather hairpiece ruined the classy look). Charlotte looked more prissy than she did in the series (puffy sleeves really don't look good on anyone), Amanda looked more militant that in the series, and they actually managed to make Samantha look matronly! I can only imagine that the designers must have paid so much $$$$ to get their looks into the movie that taste was not a priority.
In addition, I was under the misconception that a major character would meet his or her end in this movie, so I sat there all nervous, freaking out every time a phone rang in the movie for NOTHING!
So, all in all, reasonably good plot, very good acting (except Jennifer Hudson) but it didn't measure up to the beloved series.
Naomi # 8. December 2008, 16:18
lokutus_prime # 8. December 2008, 18:28
Naomi, You're so right. I heard in the press it was supposed to be a movie that would appeal to women but I went along to see it anyway, having watched SITC over the years. I thought it was slow, too much 'samey' dialogue - sort of like watching the series again but without the original freshness and fun, et al.
JSP is getting a tad unbelievable trying to hang on to that 'image' she had in the TV series.... and yet some of the critics reckoned it was a success ( - huh?).
You say the acting was very good but I'm asking, what's to act in a simple scenario that is, to my mind anyhow, past its 'sell by date'.
Don't hit me with a handbag out of the fashion show
Naomi # 8. December 2008, 19:01
lokutus_prime # 8. December 2008, 19:44
Naomi errr. okayyyy .... even though its christmas we are not singing from the same song sheet on that point
Stick me in one of those dresses up there in your blog and give me a believable script and I'll show you what good acting is
Is SJP typical of NYC gals, or am I out of touch with them? (don't answer that!)
LokuSnacksInTheCity
Naomi # 9. December 2008, 18:18
lokutus_prime # 9. December 2008, 23:39
Matthew # 10. December 2008, 05:02
lokutus_prime # 10. December 2008, 14:33
Naomi # 10. December 2008, 18:08
Naomi # 10. December 2008, 18:09
slackwrdave # 10. December 2008, 18:15
Website idea! j/k. Sorry.
lokutus_prime # 10. December 2008, 19:00
Matthew # 10. December 2008, 19:03
lokutus_prime # 10. December 2008, 22:19
when they're funnier.
therefore, yes,
they can get better,
when they're used
without a fetter.
your puns are punny
and the fun
lies in the way
the words are hung.
a joke exploiting
different meanings
constructs a pun
with several leanings.
O counsellor, yes,
puns can get better
if the law of puns
is followed to the letter.
(c) LokuPlayBoyPunny
Naomi # 10. December 2008, 22:23
lokutus_prime # 10. December 2008, 22:33
Matthew # 11. December 2008, 03:29
who excelled in extended rhyme
before a dance
he'd put on his pants
like you and me - one leg at a time
and yet, tripping the light fantastic
was not his most prodigious trick
indeed, his couplets
were as good as it gets,
and his pentameter quite surpassed slick
slackwrdave # 11. December 2008, 04:23
Naomi # 11. December 2008, 13:27
Dave, go here: http://my.opera.com/night%20wolf/blog/amir-acts
You'll thank me.
Matthew # 11. December 2008, 14:00
It's hard to do just one, that's for sure!
lokutus_prime # 11. December 2008, 15:38
There was a man named noah counte
whose witty mind led him to mount
a limerick of smooooothest sound
whose vowels and consonants were found
in circles of sublime surpass
that made a reader swoon, then gasp
"this noah - he who is a Matt -
has plucked the strings of where-it's-at
and I must say I never read or heard
such clever rhyme all set in art-ful word.
Be quick my friends! I counsel you to find
more such limericks from noah's mind"
lokutus_prime # 11. December 2008, 15:41
I also went there but couldn't see what you were hinting at.
However it gave me the chance to enjoy and comment on Amir's excellent blog
slackwrdave # 11. December 2008, 15:43
lokutus_prime # 11. December 2008, 15:49
a reader with a filthy mind
but if the line is made a pun
then there's the 'art'
and, hence, the fun.
Matthew # 11. December 2008, 16:04
Loku, I'm going to have to come back to this after I return from some errands. I feel all flattered and such!
lokutus_prime # 11. December 2008, 16:17
Matt - you deserve it! If I were over where you are I would buy you a cocktail drink, or a budwhoozit (- or a mint julip with a curly straw, if you are an undaring sort of guy)
lokutus_prime # 11. December 2008, 16:59
I know exactly what you mean. I'm not much good at writing ribald limericks.
I tried to scratch one on the wall of a washroom once,
when I was at a gas station. It was a bold attempt to
compete with all the other ribald stuff already
scribbled on the mirrors above the basin.
I never did get my limerick to rhyme.
Matt, Maybe you could help out?
Here's what I wrote:
"He who writes upon these walls
will get an arrow through his elbow "
I guess I'm not really a washroom poet
Naomi # 11. December 2008, 17:59
Sorry Loku, I guess Amir's pic showing a portion of his cute little Perian butt is friends-only access. Same goes for the video he took of himself showing off his muscles.
Naomi # 11. December 2008, 18:00
http://culturesurfer.com/TabbedSpryOolayahtml.html
Note: the menu fonts will be larger. A bit of an issue I have to figure out how to deal with.
lokutus_prime # 11. December 2008, 18:30
But he's on my friends list and I'm on his friends list, so I should be able to access the link, even if it's for friends-only.
Naomi # 11. December 2008, 19:04
Matthew # 11. December 2008, 19:22
You are our guest
so please accept
our hospitality
if you're impressed
that we do our best
then do please note our plea:
"He who writes upon these walls
will get an arrow through his elbow"
he who gropes beneath the stalls
will be swiftly dealt a stunning blow
just heed the urge when nature calls
and save yourself tremendous woe
Naomi # 11. December 2008, 19:40
(particularly the part about groping beneath the stalls. Can't imagine who that would be in reference to.
slackwrdave # 11. December 2008, 19:44
Matthew # 11. December 2008, 20:00
You know me, Naomi - it's all about politics. That was my Larry Craig reference.
Growing up is overrated - even if we have to grow older.
PainterWoman # 11. December 2008, 20:35
Naomi # 11. December 2008, 21:38
Pam, aybe I screwed up the link to Amir's blog. Or maybe I just imagined it all?
Growing up is definitely overrated.
Matthew # 11. December 2008, 22:06