Skip navigation.

Boss Radio

The last of the funk powered trains...

Posts tagged with "rant"

Sergeant goes Strictly AWOL - by Our Entertainment Correspondent

, , ,

I feel cheated, let down, conned, and that was before John Sergeant quit 'Strictly come dancing', so you can imagine how I'm feeling right now.

After all his great pronouncements about viewer's votes counting Sergeant goes and quits. The BBC must be hopping mad, the great man ('Great' as in 'large and rotund') was a true crowd pleaser and was also pulling in vast sums for the Children in Need charity, and they may now have to refund the money to those who voted for for him. Mind you, if I'd voted I'd have told them to keep the money, it's not the kid's fault that Sergeant wimped out.

The thing is, should the other no hopers also fall on their swords then? I can think of a couple of other clodhoppers who don't stand a bonfire in my refrigerator's chance of winning, or at least they didn't before the Sarge did a bunk. What's the point of the programme if competitors who've realised that they shouldn't win just walk off? Why bother with voting? Where's the playground Susie? What's it all about, Alphie? What is the meaning of life, the universe, and everything? How many roads must a man walk down before he admits he is lost?

At least I can answer that last one.

42.

I've had enough of this, I'm going to bed and in the morning it will all have been a bad dream.

Night-night. :zzz:

Stupid ready meals...

, , , ...

...they're never actually ready.

The general idea is that you stick them into a pre-heated oven at a certain temperature, leave them for the stated time period, get them out and eat them. There's usually a microwave option which requires you to stick them in the microwave for a few minutes then leave them until they've cooled down enough to touch then take them out and eat them.

The reality is that you take option 1 or 2, follow the instructions to the letter, take them out and under that delicious exterior they're lukewarm inside. You stick them back in for another time period (I usually aim for about 10% of the original time) and they're still lukewarm (So much for my 10%...) so you turn up the heat (Oven) / check that it's switched on (Microwave) and lob it in for another 10 minutes.

When it comes out of the oven it splashes and burns your fingers, the whole of the outside is burnt, the plastic tray has melted into strange (And possibly saleable at certain art auction houses) shapes, and the interior is now edible. When it comes out of the microwave the result is identical except that now parts of the interior are baked solid and inedible. You may feel that this suggests that ordinary ovens are best, but it is worth bearing in mind that with the microwave you don't waste nearly as much time in ruining your meal.

I've now taken to completing step one with the oven, then having ascertained that the food is indeed undercooked, I shove it into the microwave for 5 - 10 minutes. This fools the food and, I think, makes it angry, angry enough to get very hot under the collar, so it's at this point that I whip it out.

You'll notice that I make no mention of leaving the food until it's cooled down. This is the mistake that I consistently make. The food is now so hot that it splashes and burns me, the dish is so distorted that I can't move without splashing some more and by the time I get it down on a clear surface my fingers have burned rock hard (No guitar playing for me tonight!) and I have to run them under a cold tap. Eventually the food is transferred to my plate, although it never looks quite as good as it did on the packet, and I tuck in. It burns my lips as it goes in, it burns my throat on the way down, and when it reaches my stomach it lies there and burns some more.

Half an hour later my internal workings have had enough of this mistreatment and they direct me in no uncertain terms to Mr. Crapper's place where the food procedes to burn me all over again in a new and really different way.

And to think, some people add curry powder.

You read it here first. Well, maybe...

, , , ...

Last month I blogged about a pair of refugees from Zimbabwe, one of whom explained that they thought the country needed help from the EU because "The Organisation of African Unity... would not intervene because they never did. The most they would do would be to send in soldiers to watch as Mugabe continued to persecute the population. The United Nations would talk a lot but would never intervene because countries like South Africa and China would block it".

Today he was proved right. South Africa, China, Libya, Vietnam, and Russia voted against the US/EU proposal that actions be taken against Mugabe's unelected regime. Their reasons for doing so, or at least, their real reasons for doing so, seem inexplicable. South Africa, as a nation, almost universally agrees with former president Mandella that they should be doing something to oust Mugabe, but for reasons unknown their government is choosing to ignore them. China has a record of refusing to vote for sanctions against oppressive/represive regimes, possibly because to support them would throw unwelcome light upon their own human rights transgressions. In Libya Gaddafi is a little annoyed that the aid he was promised after he 'declared peace' has not all been forthcoming, so maybe this was a revenge vote. Vietnam I can only assume was voting in support of China, but I'm at a loss as to why. And finally there's Russia, whose new president told Britain's Prime Minister Brown that they would vote with the US/EU, then didn't. An action I find to be the most perverse of all. The only explanation I can think of is that ex-president Putin stuck his oar in simply to get up George Bush's nose.

You'll notice that at no time did I suggest that any of these nations actually believed for a second they were doing the right thing. This is because I really don't believe that any of them do. In fact I think that thousands of people are going to suffer horribly whilst their nation is pushed irrevocably, and maybe even irreparably towards chaos for reasons that, by comparison, are totally trivial.

So what else is new?

You learn something new every day...

, , ,

Whether our ancestors knew something we didn't or not I'm not sure, but it seems that the human brain finally finishes 'connecting up' when we reach 21. This means that as far as guys are concerned we're two years past our sexual peak already. Girls on the other hand still have 14 years of knowing just who they are and what they want to wait before they reach their peak. I'm not sure who God was laughing at when he was going over the designs.

What this 21 thing also means is that in most countries of the world we get to vote long before we really know what we're going to want, we can marry years before we know for sure that our partner is the one we're going to desire for the rest of our lives, and girls get an added bonus. They get to get pregnant years before they actually know if they want children, which results in their either having an abortion which they will wish forever that they hadn't had, or give birth to child that they'll blame for ruining their childhood for the rest of the poor sprog's days.

This also explains hippies. No really. Back in the days of the draft all guys spent a couple of years having army, obedience, and the rightness of killing into them. The end of the draft in the UK resulted in a new generation who had nothing to fill those hours with, so they made music. DIY music was big in the UK from the late 50s when UK skiffle just sort of happened, finally reaching a peak of a kind when the former Quarrymen skiffle group became The Beatles and proceeded to conquer the world. Up to this point US kids just accepted that you formed a band, then it broke up while you did military service, came home, got married, and joined the rat-race. This paisley coloured music revolution from over the pond suddenly demonstrated a new direction and the 'Hell no - We won't go' generation was born.

You know what? That's so convincing I almost believe it could be true... If no one comes up with a better explanation in the next 42 minutes I'm going to adopt it.

Meanwhile back at this 'brain becoming fully functioning at 21' thing. I'm thinking this might go some way towards explaining this peculiar seismic shift that we get over here in politics every generation or so. The Conservatives led by the Thatcher sweep to power and can't be shifted for about a decade and a half, apparently supported by a generation of people who just plain don't remember the last time the Cons were in and all the power cuts during 'the winter of discontent'. Then 'New' Labour sweep to power and can't be shifted, supported by a generation who don't remember the last time Labour was in and the raging inflation (Or the offshore radio stations... :raider: ). Now it seems the Conservatives are about to be swept back into power by a new generation who don't recall the almost endless depressions, slumps, and burgeoning unemployment under the previous Conservative reign.

The only problem with this whole thing is, I can quite distinctly remember changing my mind about all sorts of things since I was 21. :mad: If I've just written a whole blog based upon some stupid theory that's about to be disproved I shall be less than really pleased. I might just have to go out and kill someone.

But don't worry. I'll probably change my mind about that.

Oops.

, , , ...

Soooo.... Some naughty office junior in a government office somewhere transferred the names, addresses, and bank details of everyone in the country that has children living at home onto a couple of CDs, and then they got lost in the mail.

It happens.

Exactly what some criminal mastermind could make of that information beggars belief. What a terrorist could do with it is kinda frightening too.

Then there's the paedophiles.

Which makes one wonder exactly how this could happen. We have all kinds of privacy laws over here, any person or oganisation that keeps personal details on a computer has to sign up to the data protection act. It's not like we're unique in this, heck, the internet is full of people promising they have rules, even Opera has them. They promise to keep all our information safe. Now to me that means stuff not intended for universal consumption is kept on a closed system and encrypted into the bargain.

So either all our data isn't being encrypted by the government, or an office junior has access to the encryption key. Or the 'Office junior' wasn't actually an office junior at all.

Apparently all the information that was put onto the discs wasn't required, or asked for, by the intended recipient, but to "Save money" all the information on the required demographic, required or not, was transferred to the discs. Once again I flashback to my time in IT. If someone had legitimately requested information contained on a database in my control, someone (Probably not me, I was always crap at Unix...) would have written a couple of lines of code and only the required information would have been placed on the discs; make that 'disc' since we'd have been putting less than half of the information onto the thing. So I'd not only have saved on precious processing time, I'd also have saved the cost of a CD. Already I'm worth the over inflated wage they'd have been paying me. More to the point, I wouldn't have been sending off a potential time-bomb, and what I was sending out would have been encrypted anyway.

So now we also have to conclude that either the government doesn't have any IT professionals who can write a few lines of code or that their storage system is so rubbish that it can't be programmed.

I begin to sniff cost cutting.

Which is where it begins to get amusing, because in parliament today the leader of the opposition was tearing into the government as though this would never have happened on his watch, which leaves one wondering just where he would have made all the cost savings that his party was proposing in their manifesto. It seems that in the very area in which this blunder occurred his accountants had reckoned they could save tens of millions of quid. Bang go any tax breaks he was planning on giving to his mates out of that little lot then...

The simple truth is that someone somewhere either screwed up big time, or pulled off the greatest criminal coup of all time. It would have happened whoever was in charge and this is no time for political recriminations, it's time to find out what the heck happened and spend some money on making sure it never happens again.

Joining up the dots

, , , ...

As I waited for the physio I browsed through a copy of National Geographic. It was either that, Women's magazines, or admire the view, and since the view to the right was a full length window with a view down (Down... down...) to the road outside, and the view to the left was the open stairwell (Going down... down...) both of which gave me the cringes in the groin, the choice was really rather a no-brainer.

Thus it was that I found myself getting really aggravated over an article which 'proved' that Hip-Hop was directly descended from the African tradition of verbal history. Since Hip-Hop is just the new name for rap (It used to be another name for Go-go. what's going on? I can't keep up...) I think I could just as easily 'prove' that it was descended from the European poetry movement via the Beat Poets of the 50s, but why would I want to? The only way you can 'prove' any of this stuff is by ignoring any facts which don't suit your purpose.

Fault me on this. Johnny Mercer wrote 'One for my baby', Chuck Berry wrote 'Havana moon', and Rosendo Ruiz, Jr. wrote 'El Loco Cha Cha'. Richard Berry took the idea from Mercer, the spirit from Berry, and the rhythm from Ruiz and wrote 'Louie Louie'. It was released as a 'b' side. The Kingsmen covered the song several years later but got it wrong because they couldn't really quite remember it when they 'learnt' it. It was a massive hit and was covered by several other groups including the Kinks. The Kinks' Ray Davis was trying to work out the strange chord in the Kingsmen's version of the song and in the process wrote 'You really got me'. The lead guitarist on the recording of that song was Jimmy Page who was really taken by the sound of the block chords it featured. Page went on to form Led Zeppelin, and promptly unleashed his own version of the block chord. Led Zeppelin are almost invariably cited as the Godfathers of heavy metal.

So if only one of the three characters at the start of the previous paragraph hadn't composed his song, we wouldn't have to put up with all that catterwauling that bad metal bands churn out in pubs and clubs the world over. Does anyone believe that? No Louie Louie: No heavy metal? Of course not. Because for a start I've missed out Link Wray.

Link Wray was the original power chord guitarist, vandalising his loudspeakers to get a more grungy sound a full 10 years before The Kinks' Dave Davis 'thought' of it. Without Wray it's doubtful that The Kinks, The Who, or Led Zeppelin would have thought of power chords.

But someone somewhere would have.

Without Louie Louie or Link Wray music would have developed differently, but not that differently. After all, before Wray Ike Turner's amp fell out of the van and popped a valve, resulting in it giving him a grungy sound as well. I could go on citing new influences all night long because I doubt the list has any end. So did Hip-Hop directly descend from the African tradition of verbal history? Yes, but not only from it.

When you're out in your car you may be going to a place visited by a lot of other people. But they don't all get there by the same route.

Or even the same mode of transport.

Post mortem confirms - Diana still dead.

, , , ...

...but that's not important right now.

The Competition Commision (Or whatever they're calling it this week) has decided that Rubert Murdoch's 17.9% holding in ITV is anti-competitive. Actually that wasn't quite it. What they felt was that as the owner and head honcho of Sky-TV his holding in rival organisation ITV put him in a position to 'Influence' their programming decisions to the detriment of the station itself and the viewing public in general.

I almost heard the whole world gasp in amazement. But I didn't. Even Murdoch himself knew this one was coming, but it was worth it to him to sabotage VirginTV's attempt to takeover ITV. Virgin wasted a lot of money on that attempt and there's no way they can afford another try for a while, so even though Murdoch is certain to lose money on the deal he's effectively hobbled two of his competitors for the best part of year, which is probably longer than he thought he'd get away with, and best of all, the commision didn't actually say how much of a holding in ITV was acceptable, so if he feels like it Murdoch can simply divest himself down to, say a 14.9% holding, and the whole thing starts all over again.

Homer shoulda zapped him when he had the chance.

So you want to be a rock'n'roll star?

, , , ...

I just got back from my first gig in years. I went along to the local pub after being informed that several old friends were going to be there for the blues jam night.

Now this is the sort of pleasure that had previously been denied me by the sheer volume of smoke that used to gather in these venues so when invited to go and sing something I took a stiff drink of ginger beer and made my way onto the stage.

Egad. I'd forgotten what a buzz it was to make music with a bunch of like-minded reprobatmusicians. I got to do 'Good golly Miss Molly' at the piano then later someone lent me a guitar and I got to go up and round off the evening in the style to which I was once accustomed. A splendid time was had by all, and if it wasn't I don't care because I was having enough fun for everyone, even if most of my applause originated from the table at which my mother, sister, and brother-in-law were seated.

You may not believe me, but people have been known to mock me upon occasion for still actually daring to play rock'n'roll. Apparently I should "Hope I die before I get old" and leave the young man's music to the young men.

Get stuffed.

This is my music, I've been playing it for most of my life. It may have been young person's music back in the day, but it's not now because we're all getting older and it's still our music. OK, we don't mind the younger generation having a go at it, but the next person to suggest that I have no right to enjoy myself like this will die. Hopefully a long way into the future when they're old enough to realise what rissoles they were to make the comment in the first place.

Just one more thing...

My fingers hurt...

Was Elvis really the king?

, , , ...

So, who's missed me? Did anyone notice my absence and if not,,, why not?

I've been listening to a local radio station doing a tribute to the offshore radio stations of the 60s. Yup. For the last week I've been listening to the BBC's Pirate Radio Essex. I became a teenager again. The same voices playing the same records with the same irreverence, and most of all wwith the same vast quantities of v. tall water betweeen the DJs and the management.

The interesting thing is that this tiny little station, which was still carrying it's regular programming on FM, restricting the 'Pirate' broadcasts to AM, received many times more listener feedback than any of the other stations on the air, even the nationals. there were even reports of 15 year old girls listening to Rosko on the beach and loving it. Radios were retuning to the station all along the sands as holiday makers realized that something somewhere was going on. They didn't care that Rosko was nearly 65 years old, or that they'd never even heard of half the tracks he was playing, they listened to hear what he was going to do next, and what did he do next? Well, he yelled a lot, laughed a bit, oh and he honked a horn whenever the fancy took him. No one switched, no one flipped, no one turned off. Later there were reports off teenagers screaming at their parents to turn the radio down...

I don't care what anyone tries to say, dismissing this event as a one off that couldn't be sustained, I still say that there is a market for a radio station aimed at the post-war baby boomers and the generation that came after them. All it needs is for someone to give the format a name. Today's broadcasters were all trained in media at university, and they were taught that you gotta have a format...


Oh yeah. The blog title.

It was on the cover of this week's Radio Times.

I feel really tempted to be flip and reply that the title dies when the holder dies, but... If you were around at the time you can't deny that Elvis, like him or not, was the king, and if you weren't around at the time then you got no say so. OK?

Sheesh. What dumb question.

Bet it sells magazines though.

Town in 'Not flooded' shock, horror.

, ,

I guess it's understandable that people who'd just got used to the idea that they hadn't been flooded out when suddenly they were, might be a little miffed about it and want someone to blame, but it seems to me a mite churlish to complain because you didn't get washed out.

The problem the Environment Agency had with this month's storminess was that it was a first. These 'super-rains' are usually a winter phenomenon, in the summer the earth isn't in the same condition and the computer models didn't work. Give them their due, they tweeked our delayed flood into the computer and improved their predictions for further downstream and were able to give a far more accurate prediction for other, more seaward, habitations.

Thus it was that last night the town of Reading prepared itself for the worst, and didn't get it.

Oh sure, they got some flooding, but others had piled up the sandbags and moved the furniture and nary a drop of liquid refreshment crawled under their doors. They interviewed one of these lucky escapees on TV and was he happy? was he relieved? was he snut. He complained about over-exageration and 'typical' over-reaction on the behalf of the authorities and wasn't too happy about the TV companies encouraging them in their endeavors.

Hopefully the Authority have made a note of his address, and next time they won't bother to over-react in his presence.


For some reason no one was taking up the al-fresco option...

Photo © Matt Bullock
Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser
December 2009
M T W T F S S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31