Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:38:10 PM
sentencing, sentences, arson, poodles
...
I've seen a lot of descriptions of the rioters lately. It seems they're the disaffected youth, the angry unemployed, the ignored middle class, black, students, West Indians, the children of immigrants, or just maybe Old Uncle Tom Cobley and all. I'm not sure if they're all wrong or all right but if you take a look at the list of people being charged and have a quick squiz at the wanted posters or Youtube vids, you quickly start to get the definite impression that there is no category for the rioters other than 'rioter'.
Meanwhile, after all the pathetic sentences being passed on rioters so far, it's good see a slightly heftier sentence being handed out. A woman who slept through the riots and didn't know a thing about them till the following morning has been given 5 months for accepting the gift of a pair of panties from someone who did take part in the riots.
I know different judges will hand out different sentences, but this is starting to get ridiculous. Receiving stolen goods may be worth 5 months inside, I don't know, but I do know that being the one that smashed and burned real people's property then stole the goods in the first place is deserving of a whole lot more.
I'm beginning to think that the media are only giving us the 'best of' the sentencing. In fact I really need to believe it or I may start to get depressed.
Oh, and to anyone who came here looking for something about poodles. Sorry. I fibbed.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:19:31 AM
TV, Australia, broadcasting, arson
...
So Australia's on fire and the UK's under water. The fires have destroyed 700 homes and the UK government has authorized the destruction of 700 homes to build an airport extension. The fires have caused almost 200 deaths... OK, we had to get involved in two wars to match that.
Has anyone (UK based) noticed how all the news has to be related to us? I've just been watching a harrowing feature on the Victoria State fires and the probability that half of them were started deliberately, and at the end of it the newsreader came on to reassure us that to date, as far as they knew, no Britons were amongst the casualties.
I realise that some people may be concerned about friends or family over there, but the news isn't the place to reassure them, it sounds for all the world as though as long as we're all right Jack, nothing else really matters.
On the other hand I've just watched a CBS half hour news summary that didn't even mention the fires in Australia. Surely they're not galled because Australia's got bigger fires than they had? Then you get Sky and Fox News broadcasting all the news that won't anger Rupert Murdoch and Five News broadcasting news for women at 5pm and news for men at 7pm...
Thank goodness for the World Service on steam radio.
Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:12:51 AM
Cutty Sark, fire, arson
So someone set fire to the 'Cutty Sark', the only remaining wood and iron sail powered clipper in the whole wide world, and still in near mint condition.
I think the operative word in that last sentence was 'Wood'.
Now I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm pretty sure that most people on the planet have heard of arsonists. They burn stuff for the fun of it. Lord alone knows why, you see one fire you've seen them all from where I'm standing, but maybe they're all secretly fascinated by fractals and/or Brownian motion and could stare at the patterns in the fire for all time given the opportunity. If this should be the case then I would suggest a suitable punishment for arsonists would be enforced viewing of the sun through binoculars, or being dropped into a forest fire with only a bucket of water for company.
Whatever the reason, we have to accept their existance amongst us, they're not like aliens. You wanna discuss the existance of aliens we can chat about it forever, and I'm betting that the aliens themselves will be amongst those arguing that they don't exist, just to throw us of the scent. Watch yourself guys, I'm onto you.
Arsonists on the other hand know that we know that they exist. They keep burning stuff, and people tend to notice things when they go up in flames. I know I do.
So why weren't the people responsible for the upkeep of the Cutty Sark ready for them? It seems to me that if you're looking after something big and valuable and wooden, you have to know that there's a chance that someone's going to try to set fire to it at some point. This is why fire-retardent chemicals were invented. If they'd been around at the time of the Cutty's maiden voyage I'm sure they'd have doused the ship in them themselves.
I remember when we first moved here, we painted fire-resitant chemicals all over every bit of wood in the place before we repainted it.
No, hold on. That was turpentine substitute...
Oh corks.
Tomorrow I'm off to invest in a vat of fire-resitant chemicals. I'm actually rubbish at DIY, my idea of do-it-yourself is to wait until I'm asked to do a job, then replying "Do it yoursef", but in this case...
I reckon mum'll make a pretty good job of it.