Posts tagged with "football"
Friday, 12. June 2009, 00:11:38
crisis, ferdinand, rio, finance
...
...In Rio.
Title courtesy of 'Tenuous Titles R Us'.
There's a footballer with a backwards name. I think when he was being Christened the preacher had the surnames first on the card, and when he called out "Rio, Ferdinand" his mother misunderstood and said "No. The other way 'round you fool".
Whatever. The point is that with my total ignorance of anything even remotely sporty (Even Sporty Spice) I was unable to tell the difference between one imported sportsman and another. I thought he was the one who has just been sold by Manchester United to some other club for £80 million. Actually it appears it was
some stupid old tarParis Hilton's new boyfriend, Cristiano Ronaldo. Still. 80 mill for one guy, whatever his name is... and I heard it on the news so it's gotta be true.
The next thing I heard on the news was that the workers at the Vauxhall and LDV motor vehicle companies shouldn't expect the government to bail them out.
You know what's coming next. If footballers are worth that much why don't we just sell Man. U? The money we'd get for the whole set would more than pay to keep what's left of Britain's manufacturing base for the duration of the depression and then some, and it's not like we actually need them. We have footie teams coming out of our earholes. They're everywhere. All we'd have to do is to shuffle all the other teams up one to fill the gap. I guarantee, no one would notice.
Then after a few polite months grace Stockport County could change their name to Manchester United, The Chapel St. School XI could become the new Stockport, and next year's input can be the new Chapel St. FC - which they would have done anyway.
And the world thinks Gordon Brown is the financial genius.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Note to self. Remember to change the title before posting.
Sunday, 18. January 2009, 19:40:06
transfer fees, football, insanity
It's true. I don't swear. I say things like "Fargling", or "Holey shirt!", and when I do that everyone knows... well, that I'm swearing. So what's the point, aside from keeping this text inside of the XXX boundaries? Let's just say what I really mean.
It's ******* ridiculous. There's a ****** world recession going on, thousands are dying in Zimbabwe, Palestine needs medical aid and fast, Sudan is still on the verge of total genocide, Aids is wreaking havoc in... a-a-and you don't really need me to go and list all the world's crisis spots, you've heard and read about them all just like I have.
Yet all's well with the world. Manchester City football club has bid £100m to buy 'Kaka', less well known as Ricardo Izecson dos Santos Leite. He's a farg... sorry ******* footballer, for *********! He entertains the public by kicking a ball around, which he reportedly rather enjoys doing, for a couple of hours a week. If he does transfer he'll be paid a reported £500,000-a-week (That's 83p, or $1.23, a second). Can anyone think of anything he can ethically and legitimately spend that kind of money on?
Last season Man C. bought Real Madrid's Brazilian star Robinho for a British transfer record-breaking £32.5 million. Let's be honest, that kind of money was an insult to every needy person in the world, but really, is this new guy really over three times better than the last one? Are the club maybe planning on sacking the rest of the squad and letting Kaka win all their matches on his own? For that kind of money he **** well better.
Anyone overlooking the River Hudson a few days back might have witnessed one Chesley Sullenberger pilot an Airbus into the river, saving the lives of everyone on board and probably a fair share of the inhabitants of surrounding NY real estate. I'll let you into a little secret.
He isn't paid anything like half a ******* million quid a week.
Wednesday, 19. November 2008, 01:19:51
handball, sports, Maradona, football
...
'Dirty' Diego Maradona has defended his foul-ball goal against England which it seems we've still not forgiven him for by pointing out that we won the 1966 World Cup on a disputed goal which he reckons everyone could see didn't go over the line.
I believe you've all got the hang of my inability to understand the appeal of competitive sports by now? Agree with me or not you can't have missed that I know slightly less than next-to-nothing about any sport on the planet.
It must therefore be obvious to everyone on the planet that if even I can see the fault in his logic then it should be fairly obvious to Maradona as well.
Well, unless he's back on the cocain and ephedrine anyway...
Firstly, even I know that we won that game 4-2, so if the goal hadn't been allowed we would still have won, and secondly it was just a disputed goal. The ref made his decision and both sides accepted it, there were no declarations of foul play, just heated discussion about whether the ball crossed the line or not. Maradona on the other hand (No pun intended) was watched by the whole world flicking the ball into the net with his hand. Even he doesn't deny it. The only three people who didn't see it appear to have been the linesmen and the referee. People are still arguing about the 1966 goal, no one disputes Maradona got away with one giant foul. Indeed certain people actually applaud it.
There's the Argentinians, obviously, who saw this as some kind of revenge for the Falklands conflict, but then there's the Scots, who it seems will celebrate anyone or anything that puts one over on the English. I think they're just miffed because eveytime one of their kings ruled Britain he promptly became English...

To me it seems like a kind of strange thing to do, to celebrate the fact that the only way to beat us was to cheat seems rather like admitting that we were better than them, but what the heck? Like I keep saying, 50% of the people watching any competitive sport are going to come out of it feeling bad.
Where's the fun in that?
Why then do I get so much pleasure out of shouting "Handball, Maradona!" at every suitable opportunity? I even wrote a song in which those two words were the whole lyric. I must be unique. I'm the only person in England who's getting any kind of pleasure out of being cheated out of our place in the World Cup.
Wednesday, 21. May 2008, 23:23:43
penalties, football, sorts, madness
As I may have mentioned once or twice before I'm not really into competitive sports, but being a good little Hazel Grove lad I was, of course, a little miffed to find out that Manchester United had won the Euro Cup. I was however, completely agog to discover that they only won after extra time and 14 penalty kicks.
Is it just me or are penalty kicks a really really really peabrained, ludicrous, mind numbingly stupid rissole of a way to decide who is the best team in Europe? You play God knows how many matches against Lord knows how many other teams from all over Europe and when you finally make it right though to the final you decide the result on penalty kicks???
Why not just toss a coin? It's quicker, easier, and only marginally less skillful. In fact, why bother with the game at all? Just get the two teams into a TV studio and get them all to play rock, paper, scissors. That way no scheduled TV programmes get pre-empted, Rupert Murdoch doesn't make a fortune out of pay-to-view TV, and thousands of fans are thousands of quid better off and can therefore help the nation to spend their way out of the looming depression.
You know it makes sense.
Sunday, 25. November 2007, 02:46:18
croatia, fa, gah, football
...
I think I've made my position on competitive sports pretty clear in the past, but just at the moment there's no getting away from the English football team losing to Croatia. I mean, c'mon, there's people dying out there, there's banks collapsing before our very eyes, there's two CDs of confidental information appertaining to almost 50% of the population of the UK, and football kicks off the news? (No pun intended.... really....).
Our typically British solution to this debacle is to sack the manager.
Just how brainless is this nation? The manager is the guy in the middle. He's not out there on the field playing like a tortoise with a wooden leg and a drink with his name on it back in the bar, and neither is he one of the guys with the money who run English football. Why aren't they sacking a few of the players who made such a pig's earhole out of what the newsreaders maintain should have been a walk in the park? And not just any park either, a really, really nice one with lots of flowers and sunshine in it.
Then again, who picked this guy to be the manager in the first place? Are any of them about to walk the plank? Is the sweet FA entirely populated by dimwits who seriously believe that although they picked the wrong man for the job, it's not their fault? Am I going to have enough question marks to finish this blog?
I'm getting the impression, just at the moment, the we just look for excuses to blame people we don't like for stuff they have little or no control over. It's not the manager's fault that a load of expensive players who everyone agrees should have walked it, didn't walk it, or even crawl it on hands and knees, any more than it's Gordon Brown's fault that some twit despatched two CDs full of sensitive information out into the wild blue yonder.
If a bunch of "European peasants" (Not my description) can beat a bunch of English millionaires, maybe the solution is to dock the millionaires some of their millions. Bring them a little closer to peasanthood maybe?
And I'm talking about the FA as much as the players here.
Tuesday, 3. July 2007, 16:46:04
sport, football, capitalism, rant
...
So, in view of my generally low opinion of sports and my overwhelming dislike of pretty much any political system on the planet, here's a blog about football and capitalism.
This is a quote from the BBC news site.
"Charlton Athletic are to announce the shock closure of their women's team. The club's entire women's section - senior teams, academy and centre of excellence - are to be scrapped.
The decision is part of drastic cost-cutting measures being carried out following the club's relegation from the men's Premier League last season. Women's team manager Keith Boanas confirmed to BBC Sport: "All the staff involved in the women's set-up have had their employment terminated." An official club statement is to be made next week but on Friday, Charlton chief executive Peter Varney released a statement outlining a "significant level of cuts" at The Valley.
Captain and England defender Casey Stoney, angry at the closure of the women's section, said: "I'm disgusted with the club - the men get relegated and we get punished. The club's only trophies in recent years have been won by the women's team - and in the last four seasons we were the only side apart from Arsenal to win major honours. Seven weeks ago we played in front of a record crowd at the FA Cup final - that's now our last match and I'm totally gutted for everyone involved on the women's side."
In other words the men's team get relegated, this means that all that lucrative TV money all but dries up and they have to make cutbacks, but the unsuccessful men's team are still the biggest earners so the losers are the (3rd in the league) successful women.
There are so many things wrong with this that it's hard to know where to start, let alone when to end. It proves that there's no point in being good at what you do, it's being popular that counts. Anyone else noticed that that applies to pretty nearly any business you can think of? It shows that the top clubs are way too greedy for their own good. They use their power and influence to make sure that they get the bulk of the money, and that therefore there will never be anyone who can compete with them to interfere with that cash flow. Anyone else noticed that this isn't restricted to football?
What's sad is that there will be scores of people up in arms about this, and not one of them will consider that it's the fault of the system.
I don't doubt that a backer will leap in from somewhere to make a hero of himself and save Charlton's women from ignominy, but he's gonna be somone else with more wealth than anyone could possibly deserve to have spending money that could be used to help out people who really need help while the system of over-rewarding the guys who already have too much just money rolls on...
It's being so cheerful as keeps me going.