Skip navigation.

It's just life

So why get all worked up about it?

Just to contrast my previous post...

,

...today, current party leader of the Progress party Siv Jensen criticizes the socialist government for intervening in a huge stock option package the CEO of Hydro, one of Norway's biggest companies, was recently granted. She says that at times like these, Norway reminds her of a communist state. Strong words, but I tend to agree. Given the full details of the news story, whether Hydro acted according to the law or sound ethics is questionable. But the government should clearly *not* involve itself with individual cases of dubious business practice - they only lay the foundation and define guidelines to the playing field. Anything else is and should be outside their jurisdiction.

I'm glad that I was given such an early opportunity to nuance my previous fierce statement. Things are always more nuanced than they first seem.

And that's the last time I will touch on politics in a very long time indeed.

Politics and...say what...progress?!A different take on the world situation

Comments

Henrik Falck 8. August 2007, 01:29

But Hydro is going to merge with Statoil, and Statoil's majority owner is the Norwegian state, right? So it does seem to be something the government should involve itself in, as an owner.

Not that I'm approving of states owning (oil) companies, just pointing it out. :wink: And I haven't been given the full details of the news story either, so maybe I'm missing something.

Øyvind Østlund 8. August 2007, 07:01

This reminds me about the big PR scandal when a Swedish government official commented on the failure as Norway being the worlds last communist state, and the whole thing ended up as a headline in one of the big newspapers in the US (or was it UK??).

I won't take side in this topic since I know too little about the case, but it do seem that the "Jante law" (you should not think you are special), still stands quite strong in Norway.


- ØØ -

Eivind Figenschau Skjellum 8. August 2007, 08:17

You have a point, Hefa.

You know Øyvind, I don't know enough about this case either. The danger with commenting on something like this after gaining only cursory understanding of it is that I miss out on the enormous depth and complexity the complete truth has in any of these cases. I mainly wanted to highlight that the picture is a lot more complex than what I indicated in my previous post.

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. If you're not a registered member, please sign up.

December 2009
S M T W T F S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31