Skip navigation.

It's just life

So why get all worked up about it?

Posts tagged with "AQAL"

Completing the AQAL model: Quadrants, states and types

,

So let's finish this AQAL business. I admit to not having much knowledge about it and that writing these posts is mostly an educational tool for increasing my own understanding of the topic.

Anyway, here we go:

AQAL: Quadrants
Quadrants is the foundation stone of the map of reality that the AQAL model paints. The quadrant model is exactly what it sounds like, four parts (holons) making up a greater whole. The two upper quadrants are individual whereas the two lower quadrants are collective. The two left quadrants are interior while the two right quadrants are exterior.

UPPER LEFT - I/Subjective/1st person
This is the interior dimension of the human being, including thoughts, emotions, spirituality, intuition, logic etc. It is basically the quadrant of consciousness and represents our day to day experience at whichever level we're at.

UPPER RIGHT - IT/Objective/2nd person
This is the interior of the human biological organism, that is our body. Literally every part of the human body: the brain, hormones, tissue, muscle, organs etc make up the body of the upper right quadrant.

LOWER LEFT - WE/Intersubjective/3rd person
This is the intersubjective space, the WE space, where we find things such as culture, shared history, ideologies etc. A phenomenon like the Renaissance happened in a WE space, albeit a
surprisingly small one.

LOWER RIGHT - ITS/Interobjective
Now this last quadrant is still a bit hazy to me, but it's basically the domain where the WE space touch the material world of reality. How do human beings best organize to meet the challenges of everyday existence? Structures like the nuclear family, tribes, empires, nation states (and that which comes after) fit into this quadrant. So do the modes of said structures, like agrarian, industrial, informational etc. Functionality is the purpose, what is the most efficient way.

These four quadrants are commonly reduced to the big three: I, we and it/Art, morals, science/The beautiful, the good and the true.

AQAL: States
A state experience is essentially having a taste of a level of consciousness which the psyche has not yet been integrated on. These are commonly referred to as religious experiences and have the potential to infuse and expand the mind through direct experience of the Mystery. However, as a state (as opposed to a stage) is a temporary experience, it will - when it is over - be interpreted from the current stage of consciousness of the individual. This could lead to e.g. a Mythic/fundamentalist individual having a transpersonal state experience believing he has actually spoken to Jesus, when the truth was much deeper.* That is, a direct experience of truth, of non-duality can be dragged down to the stage of fundamentalism where it can potentially strengthen the narcissistic drive of the confused individual (there's nothing to drive people crazy quite like a license to kill granted by God). However, generally these states lead to positive results, whether it is a near-death experience, a feeling of deep union with nature or a sexual partner or indeed God or the universe; states can act as catalysts to launch individuals onto the next stage of the consciousness ladder.

* Which is not to say that suggesting you have spoken to Jesus is in itself ridiculous; it just so happens that nine out of ten (okay, maybe that's unfair - let's say three out of four) people who make this claim have a relationship to God which is about as advanced as that which kids have to Santa Claus. When you REALLY speak to Jesus, you don't say, as you know that such a claim pulls the experience into the relative world of concepts where the truth of the experience is lost. Any preacher who runs around on stage shouting Halleluja is therefore by default a fraud.

AQAL: Types
Types is sort of tacked on at the end of the AQAL model. The model would stand well without types, but it does ingest some humility in the model. It is more than anything an indicator of the AQAL model's inherent incompleteness; no conceptual map can encompass all of reality, Truth itself. Types is basically the "other" section of the AQAL model where things such as gender, Jungian archetypes etc are paid homage to. They all represent very real parts of reality, but they don't significantly affect the other parts of the model (e.g while Men and Women have different bodies, we have, at the end of the day and given the right conditions, the same opportunities).

That completes the AQAL model. I will take a break from this consciousness yapping now, time to loosen up a little.

Stages of consciousness

, ,

Now, I promised in my last installment of this series of blog entries on consciousness evolution to dig deeper into the AQAL model, but I wanted to flesh out the stages a bit better first as they're so instrumental to what this is all about. The text below is borrowed from Integral Instititute's HOLON newsletter and is yet another nuance on this type of framework. The colours it used were a bit unfamiliar when I first saw them as Ken Wilber's more common system uses slightly different colours, but in essence it is all the same. However, to increase my own understanding of these stages, I will write another installment fleshing out these on my own at a later stage. But for the time being, feast your eyes on Integral Institute's own cutting edge explanation.

Infrared (archaic—a proto 1st-person perspective)
infrared Altitude signifies a degree of development that is in many ways imbedded in nature, body, and the gross realm in general. Infrared Altitude exhibits an archaic worldview, physiological needs (food, water, shelter, etc.), a self-sense that is minimally differentiated from its environment, and is in nearly all ways oriented towards physical survival. Although present in infants, infrared is rarely seen in adults except in cases of famine, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events. infrared is also used as a kind of catch-all term for all earlier evolutionary stages and drives.

Magenta (egocentric—able to take a 1st-person perspective)
Magenta Altitude tends to be the home of egocentric drives, a magical worldview, and impulsiveness. It is expressed through magic/animism, kin-spirits, and such. Young children primarily operate with a magenta worldview. Magenta in any line of development is fundamental, or "square one" for any and all new tasks. Magenta emotions and cognition can be seen driving cultural phenomena such as Burning Man, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, or superhero-themed comic books or movies.

Red (ego-to-ethnocentric—able to take a 1st- to 2nd-person perspective)
Red Altitude is the marker of egocentric drives based on power, where "might makes right," where aggression rules, and where there is a limited capacity to take the role of an "other." Red impulses are classically seen in grade school and early high school, where bullying, teasing, and the like are the norm. Red motivations can be seen culturally in Ultimate Fighting contests, which have no fixed rules (fixed rules come into being at the next Altitude, amber), teenage rebellion and the movies that cater to it (The Fast and the Furious), gang dynamics (where the stronger rule the weaker), and the like.

Amber (ethnocentric—able to take a 2nd-person perspective)
Amber Altitude indicates a worldview that is mythic, and mythic worldviews are always held as absolute (this stage of development is often called absolutistic). Instead of "might makes right," amber ethics are more oriented to the group, but one that extends only to "my" group. Grade school and high school kids usually exhibit amber motivations to "fit in." Amber ethics help to control the impulsiveness and narcissism of red. Culturally, amber worldviews can be seen in fundamentalism (my God is right no matter what); extreme patriotism (my country is right no matter what); and ethnocentrism (my people are right no matter what).

Orange (worldcentric—able to take a 3rd-person perspective)
In an orange worldview, the individual begins to move away from the amber conformity that reifies the views of one's religion, nation, or tribe. The orange worldview often begins to emerge in late high school, college, or adulthood. Culturally, the orange worldview realizes that "truth is not delivered; it is discovered," spurring the great advances of science and formal rationality. Orange ethics begin to embrace all people, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal...." Ayn Rand's Objectivism, the US Bill of Rights, and many of the laws written to protect individual freedom all flow from an orange worldview.

Green (worldcentric—able to take a 4th-person perspective)
Green worldviews are marked by pluralism, or the ability to see that there are multiple ways of seeing reality. If orange sees universal truths ("All men are created equal"), green sees multiple universal truths—different ones for different cultures. Green ethics continue, and radically broaden, the movement to embrace all people. A green statement might read, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal, regardless of race, gender, class...." Green ethics have given birth to the civil rights, feminist, and gay rights movements, as well as environmentalism.

The green worldview's multiple perspectives give it room for greater compassion, idealism, and involvement, in its healthy form. Such qualities are seen by organizations such as the Sierra Club, Amnesty International, Union of Concerned Scientists, and Doctors Without Borders. In its unhealthy form green worldviews can lead to extreme relativism, where all beliefs are seen as relative and equally true, which can in turn lead to the nihilism, narcissism, irony, and meaninglessness exhibited by many of today's intellectuals, academics, and trend-setters.... Not to mention another "lost" generation in students.

Turquoise (worldcentric to kosmocentric—able to take a 5th-person perspective)
Turquoise Altitude marks the beginning of an integral worldview, where pluralism and relativism are transcended and included into a more systematic whole. The turquoise worldview honors the insights of the green worldview, but places it into a larger context that allows for healthy hierarchies, and healthy value distinctions.

Perhaps most important, a turquoise worldview begins to see the process of development itself, acknowledging that each one of the previous stages (magenta through green) has an important role to play in the human experience. Turquoise consciousness sees that each of the previous stages reveals an important truth, and pulls them all together and integrates them without trying to change them to "be more like me," and without resorting to cultural relativism ("all are equal").


Indigo (continues and deepens kosmocentric—able to take 6th-person perspective and higher)

Evolution and development continues growing, and we have no reason to believe it will stop with the stage that we are at now. We have indicated all of these higher possibilities with the next color in the rainbow after turquoise, which is indigo.

Full text here

The evolution of consciousness

, , ,

So, I believe it's time for me to introduce the concept of consciousness evolution in this blog. It sounds so exotic and esoteric, doesn't it, this very fact that there is an evolution to our consciousness. But it's ever so basic, ever so simple. It works like this - Hitler was mean, Gandhi was less mean. There's a difference in consciousness. However, whoever would suggest that Hitler was stupid is way off. He was a brilliant reformer, a brillian rhetorician, yet he was essentially, if you subscribe to the validity of the term, evil. Gandhi was also a brilliant reformer, a brilliant rhetorician, but he on the other hand was good-hearted.

So, we already see that goodness/badness doesn't necessarily depend on the capacity of a person's intellect. So we have already, using Ken Wilber's AQAL model, touched on two fundamental concepts - levels and lines. Let's look at them more closely:

AQAL: Levels
A level is a concept that refers to the overall development of an individual's consciousness. When a large portion of an individual's psyche is integrated on one particular rung of the consciousness ladder, we say their consciousness is on this level. These levels refer to broad observations of the consciousness of the individual and correspond, depending on what system you use, to a certain type of evolutionary framework. One of these reads as follows (low level consciousness at the top, highlevel at the bottom)

  • Archaic
  • Magical
  • Egocentric
  • Mythic/Ethnocentric
  • Rational/Scientific
  • Pluralistic/Postmodern
  • Integral
  • Transpersonal

I will break down the meaning of this in more detail later on, but right now, without having given this much thought and analysis, we could put Hitler stuck between the chairs of egocentric and ethnocentric while putting Gandhi on integral.

AQAL: Lines
Even though it's very easy to generalize, reality isn't as simple as we'd like to think. The idea of lines suggests that we have multiple lines of development that don't necessarily move in tandem. Some of these include:

  • cognitive
  • ethical
  • aesthetic
  • psychosexual
  • spiritual
  • kinesthetic
  • affective
  • musical
  • spatial
  • logical-mathematical

This part of the AQAL model suggests that you can have a very high development in one line, but a very low level of development in another. Taking the example of Hitler, let me guess my way through the five first items on the list:



Cognitive
Highly developed. He was smart.

Ethical
Almost not developed at all. If you happily send millions away to their certain deaths, you have issues.

Aesthetic
Highly developed. He was an artist and Nazi symbolism was highly aesthetic - one of the best feats of branding in history.

Psychosexual
Hardly developed. I'm guessing here, but this is Freudian territory and there is much to suggest that Hitler had a very complicated relationship with his parents. I don't think he was much of a lover to put it that way.

Spiritual
Moderately developed. It may come as a surprise that I don't say he had no development, but Hitler was in fact, in his own perverted way, a bit of a sparetime mystic. He was interested in Hinduism as showcased by his use of the ancient Hindu symbol the swastika. This symbol can still today be found on the diplomas of Indian universities and Buddha statues - the symbol hasn't been tarnished there in the same way as in Europe. Hitler is also known to have practiced yoga and was 100% vegetarian. These things may seem incredibly strange, but I think his moderate development in the spiritual line together with has lacking development in the ethical line was an extremely explosive combination. Many people in history have used concepts from Eastern spiritual philosophies to cause tremendous damage to the world (e.g. Zen buddhism and kamikaze pilots)

The understanding of the concept of lines sheds light on the abuses seen in the Guru phenomenon. It's possible to be highly evolved spiritually, but hardly developed in psychosexual terms. A dangerous combination to say the least.

Right, that's my first post on the AQAL framework which I will be using on my blog in the future. In the next installment, I will discuss quadrants, states and types to flesh out the model

November 2009
S M T W T F S
October 2009December 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30