Completing the AQAL model: Quadrants, states and types
Monday, 28. August 2006, 18:42:27
Anyway, here we go:
AQAL: Quadrants
Quadrants is the foundation stone of the map of reality that the AQAL model paints. The quadrant model is exactly what it sounds like, four parts (holons) making up a greater whole. The two upper quadrants are individual whereas the two lower quadrants are collective. The two left quadrants are interior while the two right quadrants are exterior. UPPER LEFT - I/Subjective/1st person
This is the interior dimension of the human being, including thoughts, emotions, spirituality, intuition, logic etc. It is basically the quadrant of consciousness and represents our day to day experience at whichever level we're at.
UPPER RIGHT - IT/Objective/2nd person
This is the interior of the human biological organism, that is our body. Literally every part of the human body: the brain, hormones, tissue, muscle, organs etc make up the body of the upper right quadrant.
LOWER LEFT - WE/Intersubjective/3rd person
This is the intersubjective space, the WE space, where we find things such as culture, shared history, ideologies etc. A phenomenon like the Renaissance happened in a WE space, albeit a
surprisingly small one.
LOWER RIGHT - ITS/Interobjective
Now this last quadrant is still a bit hazy to me, but it's basically the domain where the WE space touch the material world of reality. How do human beings best organize to meet the challenges of everyday existence? Structures like the nuclear family, tribes, empires, nation states (and that which comes after) fit into this quadrant. So do the modes of said structures, like agrarian, industrial, informational etc. Functionality is the purpose, what is the most efficient way.
These four quadrants are commonly reduced to the big three: I, we and it/Art, morals, science/The beautiful, the good and the true.
AQAL: States
A state experience is essentially having a taste of a level of consciousness which the psyche has not yet been integrated on. These are commonly referred to as religious experiences and have the potential to infuse and expand the mind through direct experience of the Mystery. However, as a state (as opposed to a stage) is a temporary experience, it will - when it is over - be interpreted from the current stage of consciousness of the individual. This could lead to e.g. a Mythic/fundamentalist individual having a transpersonal state experience believing he has actually spoken to Jesus, when the truth was much deeper.* That is, a direct experience of truth, of non-duality can be dragged down to the stage of fundamentalism where it can potentially strengthen the narcissistic drive of the confused individual (there's nothing to drive people crazy quite like a license to kill granted by God). However, generally these states lead to positive results, whether it is a near-death experience, a feeling of deep union with nature or a sexual partner or indeed God or the universe; states can act as catalysts to launch individuals onto the next stage of the consciousness ladder.
* Which is not to say that suggesting you have spoken to Jesus is in itself ridiculous; it just so happens that nine out of ten (okay, maybe that's unfair - let's say three out of four) people who make this claim have a relationship to God which is about as advanced as that which kids have to Santa Claus. When you REALLY speak to Jesus, you don't say, as you know that such a claim pulls the experience into the relative world of concepts where the truth of the experience is lost. Any preacher who runs around on stage shouting Halleluja is therefore by default a fraud.
AQAL: Types
Types is sort of tacked on at the end of the AQAL model. The model would stand well without types, but it does ingest some humility in the model. It is more than anything an indicator of the AQAL model's inherent incompleteness; no conceptual map can encompass all of reality, Truth itself. Types is basically the "other" section of the AQAL model where things such as gender, Jungian archetypes etc are paid homage to. They all represent very real parts of reality, but they don't significantly affect the other parts of the model (e.g while Men and Women have different bodies, we have, at the end of the day and given the right conditions, the same opportunities).
That completes the AQAL model. I will take a break from this consciousness yapping now, time to loosen up a little.










