Skip navigation.

It's just life

So why get all worked up about it?

Posts tagged with "consciousness"

The life of Peter: A consciousness evolution example

Now that I've gone through the consciousness evolution models, maybe it's time to describe it through an actual real-life example. This will make it easier to understand for myself and whatever poor souls are still following my rants.

This is a long post - it has to be if I'm to explain it in a good and proper way (also, I'm killing time being home sick from work).

So let's start at square one. The unsuspecting victim of my fictitious life story is little Peter, born on 3rd of July 1958.

Little Peter was born, as all other children on the Beige level of consciousness. He cared about little else than being fed and when he wasn't happy he would scream. Everyone would look at him and go "oooh, aren't you cute, so innocent and pure", but little Peter had no sense of identity yet so he did not understand much of what was going on.

Little Peter grew a little and started playing with the toys that his parents had put on his crib. Peter thought these were real creatures, that they were alive just like his parents, and especially that little goblin one the parents so stupidly had put up - if Peter didn't treat him nice, Peter would be very sorry. Peter was at this point in life purple.

Peter grew a little more and started understanding a little better what was going on around him. Peter was two when his innocence evaporated and he became a right little bastard. He would challenge his parents all the time and test the boundaries of what was acceptable. But his loving parents didn't budge - if Peter did something wrong, Peter was told. And Peter would throw things around and scream. Peter was red.

Peter entered school and started getting friends. He entered the boy scouts and Sunday school where his strange teacher told him that he was lucky to have Jesus in his life, because then everything was okay. Peter thought this was somewhat strange, but also found it quite comforting, as he wanted everything to be okay. Peter had unwittingly turned blue.

Peter got older and his work started being marked. And as it turned out, Peter got very good marks. But so did some of his friends, and they started competing. And the more Peter got into getting good marks and learning, the more he forgot about religion. Peter graduated among the top 5% of his school (just beating the marks of his best friend Max to his great satisfaction) and decided to study economics - he was clever and he knew it and wanted to make money. Peter was comfortable at orange - so much to learn and so much money to make, but when that big stock trade he made at 27 went wrong, his ass got fired and his name tarnished. He couldn't handle it. He got depressed and his life started crumbling. Noone would hire him, and he felt so alone in the world. One day, while walking home after wandering the streets aimlessly, he decided to get some weed to space out from his troubles a little. He had enjoyed it in university so why not. And boy, was it great. He enjoyed it so much in fact that he only a few months later sat in his small apartment (it looked nothing like the big penthouse he once owned) injecting heroin into his veins. Peter had been so long at orange that when the value structure failed him, it was too much to handle.

Peter soon had spent his money and he started breaking into houses, robbing people (mainly people in the same predicament as himself) on the streets, entering bar brawls over petty change, generally being an aggressive bastard. Peter was so focused on getting his next hit that he had, bless his soul, descended back to red. And it was all the fault, he thought, of a heartless consumerist society.

Peter of course ended up in jail. That was in 1988. And there came his wakeup call. What was he doing to himself? What had happened to his dreams, his talents. He was a resourceful guy, you know. So why was he in jail? Not long after a missionary came to the jail, as missionaries sometimes do, and offered to give him the gift of Jesus. Sure, things used to be easier back then, and Peter was feeling pretty low, so he accepted Jesus back into his life.

Peter was on his best behaviour, after all, he didn't want to disappoint Jesus and his new Christian friends, so only half a year later he was back out on the streets. He worked hard to clean up his act, was a law-abiding citizen and went to prayer meetings several times a week. He started contributing in Church and everything seemed to be easy again, right and wrong had been clearly defined by the Lord and it was all a matter of following the rules. But still, at the very back of his mind, he felt a bit funny about it all. Because Peter was blue again, and having once been orange, that felt funny indeed.

He felt even more funny when he met his best friend from the school days again. Max had come out of the closet since then and was openly gay. Peter told Max with enthusiasm about Jesus, but Max told Peter that "Jesus hates people of my sexual orientation". "What do you mean?", said Peter and went back to his Christian friends who confirmed Max's statement by the extremely painful "Peter, Jesus hates faggots". Peter's world crumbled again before his eyes, and the very same day, Peter booted Jesus out of his life. Jesus was a fucking bigot who knew nothing about Max. Max was a great guy, in fact Peter loved Max (in a very heterosexual way) and if Jesus couldn't see what Peter saw, he must be blind. Peter didn't want to worship an ignoramus and so entered another personal crisis.

Peter emerged not much later having shed his blue colour and started to work in a supermarket. Peter was good at his job. He knew where everything was and was extremely hospitable to all his customers. He was in fact so good at his job that when the store manager was about to leave a year after Peter started the job, Peter got the position. Peter felt life had meaning again, that his talents again came to good use. His background in economics were useful in the job, and the store became one of the most profitable in the entire company. That did not go by unnoticed so soon Peter was relieved of his store managing duties and was asked if he wanted to come work at HQ to work with the strategy of the business. Peter of course accepted, as Peter was again on the rise in more ways than one. Peter was well and truly back to orange, and having dipped briefly back to red and blue, he was stronger than the last time.

But Peter hadn't given up on his Christian friends, after all they had been good friends in a time of need, so he and Max went to one of the prayer meetings. When they spotted him, they were all grins, but when they saw his friend Max, who dressed as he screwed (gay that is), they shamefully stayed away. The preacher came up on stage and both Peter and Max giggled at his little act, but when he screamed "We have a sinner among us! Let us pray to exorcise his demons and bring him back in the loving fold of Jesus Christ!", they stared at each other in shock and left the building to the cacaphony of hallelujahs and praise the lords! Blue was gone forever.

Peter's career was hugely successful, but even though he made lots of money and had a great apartment again, he wanted his life to have more meaning, so he started working with drug rehabilitation. He would talk to addicts and he would go around in schools explaining the dangers of drugs. His boss at work wondered what he was doing shooting off from work every once in a while on unannounced business and shrugged his shoulders when he told him. "Well, as long as it doesn't impact negatively on your performance here" and left it at that.

But in a sense it did. Because the more Peter worked with anti-drug programmes, the more he realized that the mentality at work was in fact the very same mentality that had driven him to take up drugs in the first place. He knew that he was only valuable to the company as long as he performed well and that they didn't really care about him as a person. Heartless bastards! Eventually, Peter decided to resign from a promising career - he was indeed only weeks from a managerial position - to pursue more meaningful things. Peter now saw that blue and orange were enemies of humanity, that the were the major reasons for the desperate plight of the planet and he went fully into idealist work. Peter had well and truly become green.

Peter now saw it all so clearly, all the things that were wrong with the world, all he had to work towards was rid the world of these evils and replace them with a fair and humane system, one in which all are equal, no matter their religious, political, social or ideological background. Peter was psyched, he had finally found purpose. It felt right for sure this time. But in the organizations that he was active in, he felt a lot of frustration - the meetings went a lot like this "I have a great idea, let me explain." Idea is explained. "How do you all feel about it?" "Well, I don't mean to hurt your feelings or anything, but I don't think this is exactly the most sensitive idea I've ever heard". "Murderers have feelings too you know". "And don't say black person, it's African American - please don't be so racist. You're hurting my feelings". But it didn't matter you know, because they did good work. They talked to people - and they talked some more. And no feelings were being hurt. What more can you ask?

Peter was stuck at green for quite some time, not making much progress towards his stated ideals, but all the time being convinced that he couldn't get better than this! But one day Max introduced Peter to a new friend of his. Max had clearly changed a little lately, Peter wasn't sure whether he had become more offensive or more sensitive, but anyway - his new friend Mike was a successful businessman, but he had once been a Zen monk. Businessman and Zen monk? Haha, what a combination Peter thought. Peter asked what Zen monks did and Mike answered "well, we mainly work with our hands and meditate". "What do you do when you meditate", Peter asked? "I just sit. Nothing more". Just sit, Peter thought, surely there's more than that! But Peter was curious and decided to meet up with Max and Mike on Saturday for some meditation and discussion. And somehow, Peter would talk Mike out of his business-venture.

Peter's legs were aching. Oooh, how painful, how sorry he felt for himself. And his mind was racing, so fast, and everywhere at once! Just be quiet will you! A gong sounded and he breathed a sigh of relief. Finally. Peter spoke somewhat distraught "You know, Mike, I don't know if I know how to meditate! I couldn't stop thinking and my legs were aching so bad." Mike grinned and said with a giggle "so just sitting is harder than you thought is it?". Peter realized what Mike had just said and how it reflected on his thinking earlier that week, and a light went on his mind. They stayed there for a while, discussing how to meditate, philosophy, the nature of the Universe etc. It was all new to Peter, even though it did to some extent remind him a little of what had happened back in the church. But it was different somehow, free of judgement, guilt and bad feelings.

Peter started playing with meditation and kept meeting with Max and Mike. Peter learned through his practice that you see what you are and that a mind that is out of control is not to be trusted. Slowly his meditation practice deepened and his heart started opening up to all his past experiences. All of a sudden he could see, so clearly now, how everything that he had ever experienced had contributed to this very moment, how it all had been instrumental to the feeling of this Eternal Now. Oh, how could he have missed it? It hit him like a truck in the heart.

He went back to his former congregation and after sitting through another prayer meeting with people dropping crying to their feet, he went to the preacher and said "thank you", knowing full well he would not understand it. The preacher was a narcissist, stuck in his own selfish ways, his only reason for being a preacher the ego-boosting feeling of being important, of being God's right-hand man. But he had been instrumental to Peter's growth so Peter thanked him, he thanked them all and left. He thanked his drug dealer, he thanked his former boss for firing him after the deal went wrong, he thanked everyone he could think of. And he meditated and reflected on the meaning of it all.

As it turns out, Peter, after having taken the leap into 2nd tier consciousness, in 2001 rediscovered his Christian heritage and is now following a contemplative practice as taught by progressive thinking Christian mystics. Zen Buddhism was an important part of his growth, but his heart was more in the Christian tradition. Early in 2005, he formed his own congregation, which now has almost fifty members and regular prayer meetings together with their friends in the local Tibetan Buddhist sangha. Peter has found a new purpose in life and little does he know that in 2008, he will be called back into the business world by progressive companies who want a way for their employees to focus their minds and open their hearts to make more money in a better and more ethical way.

What's next for Peter after that, noone knows, but it's possible that on the fourth of March, 2012, he will realize while making love to his wife, all of a sudden and with the impact of a thousand supernovas, that he is not separate - that each and every being he interacts with is in fact not different from him, that they ARE him, as he is them. He will see this in a literal sense, not as a mere philosophical concept, but as Ultimate Truth, as God, and from that day, Peter will be liberated from all the suffering he once knew, possessed by a freedom so vast that others will think him crazy. And who knows, maybe he will be, but what does it all matter when you're in the eternal embrace of happiness.

Stages of consciousness #2

I would like now to complete my study of consciousness evolution on this blog. I already did a blog post on this, but then using a different system to the one I'm used to.

Let me try now to make sense of the system I'm more familiar with, Spiral Dynamics. The model was developed by Don Beck and Christopher Cowan based on the work of psychology professor Clare Graves and was popularized by Ken Wilber (whose perspective lead to the evolution of SDi - Spiral Dynamics integral).

It's vital to understand here that these stages do not describe types of people, they describe ways of thinking that live within people. Consider it a toolbox, not elitism.


Spiral Dynamics

Beige (archaic-instinctual, identity not yet fully formed)
The beige level of consciousness is the first and least sophisticated level available to human beings. It features a barely developed sense of I, meaning it has little sense of being separate. Beige consciousness is basically only concerned with the most basic needs, food, water, sex, security etc.

Key word: Survival
Seen in: Infants, senile elderly, the starving etc.
Cultural impact: 0.1 percent of the population, 0 percent power

Purple (magic-animistic, identity not yet fully formed)
The purple level developed when human tribes first met. This traumatic experience required them to reorient themselves in the world and form new forms of civilization. Purple believes in magic; spirits of nature or the ancestors fly around casting spells and curses. Purple can develop irrational relationships to inanimate objects based on the idea that all objects, alive or otherwise, posess a soul. Can appear to some (myself included) to be a higher level of consciousness than it actually is.

Key word: Magic
Seen in: Voodoo curses, good luck charms, third world tribes etc
Cultural impact: 10 percent of the population, 1 percent of the power

Red (egocentric, individual)
At this stage, a separate sense of self distinct from the tribe develops. With this new-formed identity comes the wish to perpetuate its power and as a consequence red consciousness generally uses violence and aggressive means to barge ahead in life. The world is a dangerous place and to perpetuate the power of identity, all enemies must be destroyed.

Key words: Power and respect
Seen in: Terrible twos, feudal kingdoms, James Bond villains, Nazi Germany (part red, part blue), wild rock stars, Lord of the Flies etc.
Cultural impact: 20 percent of the population, 5 percent of the power

Blue (mythic, group)
This consciousness level leaves behind the chaotic narcissism of red in favour of law and order. Blue features very defined values, black and white, true and false, good and evil, saint and sinner. Violating the agreed upon code of conduct has very serious consequences, going to hell, being executed, imprisoned, exiled etc. There is only one way to think about things and the social structure is very hierarchical. Dogmatic religion and submission to a supernatural being, everything is predestined, sacrifice now to obtain later.

Key words: Purpose, justice
Seen in: US administration, Republican party (part blue, part orange), patriotism, boy and girl scouts, fundamentalism, codes of chivalry and honor, ethnocentricity
Cultural impact: 40 percent of the population, 30 percent of the power

Orange (rational, individual)
At this stage of consciousness, the individual starts questioning the idea that everything is predestined. Perhaps there is no God in the sky that has everything all figured out. Man then starts taking responsibility for his own life and starts seeking his own answers and ways ahead in life. This level of consciousness is meritocratic - your worth is not based on who you are, but what you can do, and thus worldcentric (a black man is worth just as much as a white man if he has the same skills). Science rules the day and the mystery of existence is all but gone, the world is a well oiled machine that is there to be used, even at the cost of the planet.

Key words: Skill
Seen in: Capitalism, fashion industry, the Western Enlightenment (Renaissance), fame and superstardom
Cultural impact: 30 percent of the population, 50 percent of the power


Green (postmodern, group)
With the emergence of green in the 1960s, came a sensitizing to the plight of the human race. Blue and orange have been destroying the planet through creating saints and sinners, winners and losers, and green seeks to deconstruct these value structures to better humanity. At this stage, emotions become more important than logic, decisions are reached through reconciliation and consensus. Take care of the planet, be a good person and don't be so greedy. Green fails to see the stages of consciousness it traversed to get to its current state and is extremely bad at making decisions, because it's incapable of deeming one thing better or worse than another. Everything is an egalitarian mush from which little truth and action can be extracted. Green is often incapable of making the changes it idolizes.

Key words: Deconsctruct blue and orange, preserve the planet and be nice
Where seen: Democrat Party (part green, part orange), Political correctness, Greenpeace, animal rights, human rights issues, free health care, United Nations
Cultural impact: 10 percent of the population, 15 percent of the power

Yellow (integrative, individual)
This is the first stage of 2nd tier consciousness. 2nd tier is described by its awareness of the existence of different levels of consciousness. It sees that all levels have a place in the world and that the purpose of 2nd tier consciousness is to use whatever tools are available to traverse the ladder of evolution to help people at whatever stages they're at. Hierarchies are reintroduced: Knowledge and competency should supersede power, status and group sensitivity. Flexibility, spontaneity and functionality have the highest priority. A belief in intuition.

Key words: Evolution through flexibility
Where seen: Rarely, mainly in individuals, but to some extent in the growing number of integral businesses
Cultural impact:1 percent of the population, 5 percent of the power


Turquoise (holistic, group)
Consciousness that unites feeling with knowledge. Believes in universal order, but not based on external rules (blue) or group bonds (green). Often involves emergence of cosmocentric spirituality. Global consciousness - it's possible to make money while taking good care of the planet and workers. In fact, it's not only possible, through the turquoise perspective, it is seen as the BEST way to make money. Uses the entire spiral, can access any stage at will and can read between the lines. The insight of turquoise into human nature is so vast that it can be perceived as being psychic, even though that is not necessarily the case.

Key words: Global consciousness
Where seen: In rare individuals who have integrated spirituality with the rational world of science and matter
Cultural impact: 0.1 percent of the population, 1 percent of the power

More stages (Coral) yet to come as humanity evolves further.

Bear in mind that my understanding of this model is still incomplete, so this article may contain inaccuracies. In any case, this blog post will be vital for some of my future posts on the current world situation.

Next up - why the Democrat party with its significantly higher level of consciousness than the Republican party failed to capture the minds and hearts of Americans in the last election.

Completing the AQAL model: Quadrants, states and types

,

So let's finish this AQAL business. I admit to not having much knowledge about it and that writing these posts is mostly an educational tool for increasing my own understanding of the topic.

Anyway, here we go:

AQAL: Quadrants
Quadrants is the foundation stone of the map of reality that the AQAL model paints. The quadrant model is exactly what it sounds like, four parts (holons) making up a greater whole. The two upper quadrants are individual whereas the two lower quadrants are collective. The two left quadrants are interior while the two right quadrants are exterior.

UPPER LEFT - I/Subjective/1st person
This is the interior dimension of the human being, including thoughts, emotions, spirituality, intuition, logic etc. It is basically the quadrant of consciousness and represents our day to day experience at whichever level we're at.

UPPER RIGHT - IT/Objective/2nd person
This is the interior of the human biological organism, that is our body. Literally every part of the human body: the brain, hormones, tissue, muscle, organs etc make up the body of the upper right quadrant.

LOWER LEFT - WE/Intersubjective/3rd person
This is the intersubjective space, the WE space, where we find things such as culture, shared history, ideologies etc. A phenomenon like the Renaissance happened in a WE space, albeit a
surprisingly small one.

LOWER RIGHT - ITS/Interobjective
Now this last quadrant is still a bit hazy to me, but it's basically the domain where the WE space touch the material world of reality. How do human beings best organize to meet the challenges of everyday existence? Structures like the nuclear family, tribes, empires, nation states (and that which comes after) fit into this quadrant. So do the modes of said structures, like agrarian, industrial, informational etc. Functionality is the purpose, what is the most efficient way.

These four quadrants are commonly reduced to the big three: I, we and it/Art, morals, science/The beautiful, the good and the true.

AQAL: States
A state experience is essentially having a taste of a level of consciousness which the psyche has not yet been integrated on. These are commonly referred to as religious experiences and have the potential to infuse and expand the mind through direct experience of the Mystery. However, as a state (as opposed to a stage) is a temporary experience, it will - when it is over - be interpreted from the current stage of consciousness of the individual. This could lead to e.g. a Mythic/fundamentalist individual having a transpersonal state experience believing he has actually spoken to Jesus, when the truth was much deeper.* That is, a direct experience of truth, of non-duality can be dragged down to the stage of fundamentalism where it can potentially strengthen the narcissistic drive of the confused individual (there's nothing to drive people crazy quite like a license to kill granted by God). However, generally these states lead to positive results, whether it is a near-death experience, a feeling of deep union with nature or a sexual partner or indeed God or the universe; states can act as catalysts to launch individuals onto the next stage of the consciousness ladder.

* Which is not to say that suggesting you have spoken to Jesus is in itself ridiculous; it just so happens that nine out of ten (okay, maybe that's unfair - let's say three out of four) people who make this claim have a relationship to God which is about as advanced as that which kids have to Santa Claus. When you REALLY speak to Jesus, you don't say, as you know that such a claim pulls the experience into the relative world of concepts where the truth of the experience is lost. Any preacher who runs around on stage shouting Halleluja is therefore by default a fraud.

AQAL: Types
Types is sort of tacked on at the end of the AQAL model. The model would stand well without types, but it does ingest some humility in the model. It is more than anything an indicator of the AQAL model's inherent incompleteness; no conceptual map can encompass all of reality, Truth itself. Types is basically the "other" section of the AQAL model where things such as gender, Jungian archetypes etc are paid homage to. They all represent very real parts of reality, but they don't significantly affect the other parts of the model (e.g while Men and Women have different bodies, we have, at the end of the day and given the right conditions, the same opportunities).

That completes the AQAL model. I will take a break from this consciousness yapping now, time to loosen up a little.

Stages of consciousness

, ,

Now, I promised in my last installment of this series of blog entries on consciousness evolution to dig deeper into the AQAL model, but I wanted to flesh out the stages a bit better first as they're so instrumental to what this is all about. The text below is borrowed from Integral Instititute's HOLON newsletter and is yet another nuance on this type of framework. The colours it used were a bit unfamiliar when I first saw them as Ken Wilber's more common system uses slightly different colours, but in essence it is all the same. However, to increase my own understanding of these stages, I will write another installment fleshing out these on my own at a later stage. But for the time being, feast your eyes on Integral Institute's own cutting edge explanation.

Infrared (archaic—a proto 1st-person perspective)
infrared Altitude signifies a degree of development that is in many ways imbedded in nature, body, and the gross realm in general. Infrared Altitude exhibits an archaic worldview, physiological needs (food, water, shelter, etc.), a self-sense that is minimally differentiated from its environment, and is in nearly all ways oriented towards physical survival. Although present in infants, infrared is rarely seen in adults except in cases of famine, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events. infrared is also used as a kind of catch-all term for all earlier evolutionary stages and drives.

Magenta (egocentric—able to take a 1st-person perspective)
Magenta Altitude tends to be the home of egocentric drives, a magical worldview, and impulsiveness. It is expressed through magic/animism, kin-spirits, and such. Young children primarily operate with a magenta worldview. Magenta in any line of development is fundamental, or "square one" for any and all new tasks. Magenta emotions and cognition can be seen driving cultural phenomena such as Burning Man, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, or superhero-themed comic books or movies.

Red (ego-to-ethnocentric—able to take a 1st- to 2nd-person perspective)
Red Altitude is the marker of egocentric drives based on power, where "might makes right," where aggression rules, and where there is a limited capacity to take the role of an "other." Red impulses are classically seen in grade school and early high school, where bullying, teasing, and the like are the norm. Red motivations can be seen culturally in Ultimate Fighting contests, which have no fixed rules (fixed rules come into being at the next Altitude, amber), teenage rebellion and the movies that cater to it (The Fast and the Furious), gang dynamics (where the stronger rule the weaker), and the like.

Amber (ethnocentric—able to take a 2nd-person perspective)
Amber Altitude indicates a worldview that is mythic, and mythic worldviews are always held as absolute (this stage of development is often called absolutistic). Instead of "might makes right," amber ethics are more oriented to the group, but one that extends only to "my" group. Grade school and high school kids usually exhibit amber motivations to "fit in." Amber ethics help to control the impulsiveness and narcissism of red. Culturally, amber worldviews can be seen in fundamentalism (my God is right no matter what); extreme patriotism (my country is right no matter what); and ethnocentrism (my people are right no matter what).

Orange (worldcentric—able to take a 3rd-person perspective)
In an orange worldview, the individual begins to move away from the amber conformity that reifies the views of one's religion, nation, or tribe. The orange worldview often begins to emerge in late high school, college, or adulthood. Culturally, the orange worldview realizes that "truth is not delivered; it is discovered," spurring the great advances of science and formal rationality. Orange ethics begin to embrace all people, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal...." Ayn Rand's Objectivism, the US Bill of Rights, and many of the laws written to protect individual freedom all flow from an orange worldview.

Green (worldcentric—able to take a 4th-person perspective)
Green worldviews are marked by pluralism, or the ability to see that there are multiple ways of seeing reality. If orange sees universal truths ("All men are created equal"), green sees multiple universal truths—different ones for different cultures. Green ethics continue, and radically broaden, the movement to embrace all people. A green statement might read, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal, regardless of race, gender, class...." Green ethics have given birth to the civil rights, feminist, and gay rights movements, as well as environmentalism.

The green worldview's multiple perspectives give it room for greater compassion, idealism, and involvement, in its healthy form. Such qualities are seen by organizations such as the Sierra Club, Amnesty International, Union of Concerned Scientists, and Doctors Without Borders. In its unhealthy form green worldviews can lead to extreme relativism, where all beliefs are seen as relative and equally true, which can in turn lead to the nihilism, narcissism, irony, and meaninglessness exhibited by many of today's intellectuals, academics, and trend-setters.... Not to mention another "lost" generation in students.

Turquoise (worldcentric to kosmocentric—able to take a 5th-person perspective)
Turquoise Altitude marks the beginning of an integral worldview, where pluralism and relativism are transcended and included into a more systematic whole. The turquoise worldview honors the insights of the green worldview, but places it into a larger context that allows for healthy hierarchies, and healthy value distinctions.

Perhaps most important, a turquoise worldview begins to see the process of development itself, acknowledging that each one of the previous stages (magenta through green) has an important role to play in the human experience. Turquoise consciousness sees that each of the previous stages reveals an important truth, and pulls them all together and integrates them without trying to change them to "be more like me," and without resorting to cultural relativism ("all are equal").


Indigo (continues and deepens kosmocentric—able to take 6th-person perspective and higher)

Evolution and development continues growing, and we have no reason to believe it will stop with the stage that we are at now. We have indicated all of these higher possibilities with the next color in the rainbow after turquoise, which is indigo.

Full text here

The evolution of consciousness

, , ,

So, I believe it's time for me to introduce the concept of consciousness evolution in this blog. It sounds so exotic and esoteric, doesn't it, this very fact that there is an evolution to our consciousness. But it's ever so basic, ever so simple. It works like this - Hitler was mean, Gandhi was less mean. There's a difference in consciousness. However, whoever would suggest that Hitler was stupid is way off. He was a brilliant reformer, a brillian rhetorician, yet he was essentially, if you subscribe to the validity of the term, evil. Gandhi was also a brilliant reformer, a brilliant rhetorician, but he on the other hand was good-hearted.

So, we already see that goodness/badness doesn't necessarily depend on the capacity of a person's intellect. So we have already, using Ken Wilber's AQAL model, touched on two fundamental concepts - levels and lines. Let's look at them more closely:

AQAL: Levels
A level is a concept that refers to the overall development of an individual's consciousness. When a large portion of an individual's psyche is integrated on one particular rung of the consciousness ladder, we say their consciousness is on this level. These levels refer to broad observations of the consciousness of the individual and correspond, depending on what system you use, to a certain type of evolutionary framework. One of these reads as follows (low level consciousness at the top, highlevel at the bottom)

  • Archaic
  • Magical
  • Egocentric
  • Mythic/Ethnocentric
  • Rational/Scientific
  • Pluralistic/Postmodern
  • Integral
  • Transpersonal

I will break down the meaning of this in more detail later on, but right now, without having given this much thought and analysis, we could put Hitler stuck between the chairs of egocentric and ethnocentric while putting Gandhi on integral.

AQAL: Lines
Even though it's very easy to generalize, reality isn't as simple as we'd like to think. The idea of lines suggests that we have multiple lines of development that don't necessarily move in tandem. Some of these include:

  • cognitive
  • ethical
  • aesthetic
  • psychosexual
  • spiritual
  • kinesthetic
  • affective
  • musical
  • spatial
  • logical-mathematical

This part of the AQAL model suggests that you can have a very high development in one line, but a very low level of development in another. Taking the example of Hitler, let me guess my way through the five first items on the list:



Cognitive
Highly developed. He was smart.

Ethical
Almost not developed at all. If you happily send millions away to their certain deaths, you have issues.

Aesthetic
Highly developed. He was an artist and Nazi symbolism was highly aesthetic - one of the best feats of branding in history.

Psychosexual
Hardly developed. I'm guessing here, but this is Freudian territory and there is much to suggest that Hitler had a very complicated relationship with his parents. I don't think he was much of a lover to put it that way.

Spiritual
Moderately developed. It may come as a surprise that I don't say he had no development, but Hitler was in fact, in his own perverted way, a bit of a sparetime mystic. He was interested in Hinduism as showcased by his use of the ancient Hindu symbol the swastika. This symbol can still today be found on the diplomas of Indian universities and Buddha statues - the symbol hasn't been tarnished there in the same way as in Europe. Hitler is also known to have practiced yoga and was 100% vegetarian. These things may seem incredibly strange, but I think his moderate development in the spiritual line together with has lacking development in the ethical line was an extremely explosive combination. Many people in history have used concepts from Eastern spiritual philosophies to cause tremendous damage to the world (e.g. Zen buddhism and kamikaze pilots)

The understanding of the concept of lines sheds light on the abuses seen in the Guru phenomenon. It's possible to be highly evolved spiritually, but hardly developed in psychosexual terms. A dangerous combination to say the least.

Right, that's my first post on the AQAL framework which I will be using on my blog in the future. In the next installment, I will discuss quadrants, states and types to flesh out the model

The paradox of the Modern Mind (looking closer at the human brain)

, , , ...

I just contributed this post to a thread in the philosopher's corner on the topic of Fear of the Unknown and came to like it so much that I decided to post it here.

----

I believe this is a very complex issue. However, it's also very interesting so worth spending some time on. I would have to disagree with the notion put forward by Words that fear is learnt behaviour and curiosity is natural. I think both are natural, but on different levels of our psyche and brain. The fear impulse is centered around the brain stem (the black bottom part of the illustration), which is the least evolved - in a Darwinian sense - part of our brain. It's referred to as the reptilian brain as it is essentially not more advanced than that of a reptile. The presence of this part of our brain is part of the huge paradox of it, as its mode of operation is in extreme contrast to the more evolved parts of our brain, the cerebral cortex. That mass of neurons and electricity is extremely advanced and has a virtually unlimited data-processing capacity, enabling what we refer to as the Modern Mind.

So at the bottom of our psyche is this extremely basic stimulus-response, fight-or-flight driven "lump". And you will find that the less evolved the consciousness of a human being is, the more they operate from the reptilian brain. For instance mass murderers, gang members, rapists etc will have their consciousness operating more from their brain stem than more well accustomed people. This means, however harsh it may sound, that some people are essentially reptiles in human bodies. Why do you think the snake in the Garden of Eden is such an appropriate image?

So basically, we have two levels of operation here - we have the cerebral cortext consciosuness that wants to evolve and then we have the reptilian part of the brain that wants to survive, whatever the cost. And you see, the unknown is a sort of death that the reptilian brain cannot handle, so it shuts down, becomes afraid and sends you, modern man or woman, into a state of panic. The interesting part here is that the advanced consciousness enabled by the cerebral cortex takes this current-moment (brain stem consciousness is never in the past or future) primordial emotion and complexifies it, so that we rationalize with extremely complex reasoning why it makes sense to base our future experience on the fear that the brain stem just experienced. So when the brain stem experiences a lot of fear (which it will later not be able to remember) and the cerebral cortex integrates it in the emotionality of the person, you have anxiety, depression etc. The most basic sentient being can be afraid, but it takes a high level of development to get to irrational emotions like anxiety and depression.

And see, this is why it is such a victory every time we conquer our fear of the unknown, as what we really do is evolve, conquering our reptilian brain and reclaiming our lost humanity in the process. So the harsh verdict is that a person who doesn't on a conscious and constant level keep confronting the unknown will actually on a very literal level be less human. A lot of the mental disorders in today's society stem from this very fact, every human being is drawn to evolve - as that is the directionality of consciousness itself, but when the brain stem's impulses become too powerful and the reptile takes over, this essential evolution is halted. And the pain of not evolving is the worst a human being can experience - you know, being a reptile ain't all what it's made out to be.

So there you have the inner conflict between the cerebral cortex and the brain stem - and the paradox of the human mind that keeps the drama going. Now that this has been made clear, let me confront the notion put forward by socrates sidekick that "The fear of the unknown helps us not exceed our natural limits,leading to a pleasurable existance, while exploration has in no way made our life easier." I claim, and I'm willing to put my life on the line to defend this notion, that a pleasurable existence is IMPOSSIBLE to attain without confronting the unknown.

So let's look at the downside of exploring the unknown. Yes it's true, our exploration of the unknown has lead to many disconcerting discoveries, but what you will find is that the discoveries that we don't like all that much today (guns, atomic bombs etc) were generally invented by a much higher level of consciousness than that which ended up using them (exemplified by the heart-shattering quote by Robert Oppenheimer, watching the first nuclear explosion lighting up the sky reciting the immortal words from the Bhagavad Ghita

"...now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds..."

If you ever heard this recording, you will hear from the tone of his voice that the world was literally crumbling around him in recognition of the evil he has let upon the world). The consciousness that invented the atomic bomb was clearly operating at an extremely complex cognitive level whereas the people we are worried will use them on us someday will primarilly be doing it from their reptilian brain. So feel free to call terrorists snakes, because you will essentially be telling the truth.*

So we have two choices, confront the unknown, death itself and follow the ever evolving train of consciousness - becoming ever more human (and indeed divine) in the process, or turn your back on it, cuddle up in your nice reptilian bed and stay a snake forever.

The choice is yours.

* (FOOTNOTE) However, the issue of terrorism is of course a lot more complex than that as the film V for Vendetta so poignantly points out. The mere fact that we label someone a terrorist doesn't mean that they work from a lower-level consciousness than us. It could in fact be that we have taken the liberty to define right and wrong when no such right had been given us, and that our definitions are so far off the mark, so ... evil ... that those individuals we'd like to label as terrorists are in fact operating at a higher level consciousness than us. In today's world, it seems to almost exclusively not be the case (even though it's hard to imagine someone operating at a lower level of consciousness than the US administration, I know), but in the future, the terrorists may actually be the good guys.
November 2009
S M T W T F S
October 2009December 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30