9? 12? 24? Things Get Complicated...
Monday, August 21, 2006 11:32:13 PM
The thing is, if they want to include this 'lil bugger in the list, they have to change the definition of "planet".
So, the guys in white thought a lot and came up with this:
- The object must be in orbit around a star, but must not itself be a star(duh!)
- It must have enough mass for the body's own gravity to pull it into a nearly spherical shape

SO does this means zodiac has to change?
Now if we accept Mr 2003 UB313, we would have to accept 2 more: Ceres and Charon. Yup, same Charon as in Pluto's moon... Now Pluto & Charo would be a team: a "double planet".
Wait! things get even more complicated! There's a candidate list that contains somewhere aorund 12 more names... thats 24. 24! good thing i dont have to learn the planets in the school again. I wouldn't know which is first, 2003 EL61 or 2002 AW197...

Read it in BBC News









