Money Money
Tuesday, 13. October 2009, 11:00:22
Money - material lust.
Money - that's all they treasure.
Money - in god we trust.
When I lived with money I was always lacking. Money represents lack. Money represents things in the past (debt) and things in the future (credit), but money never represents what is present.
So he's insane then? Not really, more that he's better educated in the ways of the world and a little bitter (aren't we all?) about how people destroy themselves. You see, Daniel has a degree in anthropology that saw him joining the Peace Corps and monitoring the health of an Ecuadorian village for two years. During that time he saw the people of the village adopt new methods of economy, selling the excess food grown in their fields for cash and using the cash to buy things they hadn't needed until they were offered them - televisions, junk food, etc. As he measured their health he saw that his charts showed their health steadily declining as they spent more money on these things. In his own words, "It looked like money was impoverishing them". It was a turning point in the way he viewed the world. Ten years, a bunch of charity work and one Buddhist monastery later Daniel decided that in order to have a happy life he needed to live a free life and not be involved with money at all - a Sadhu in the most capitalist country in the world, in his mind.
But is money that easy to get rid of? While Daniel sees himself apart from the capitalist world he still lives off of its scraps, taking what others have left behind and wouldn't have had if money wasn't involved. And that's probably the reason I felt compelled to write this post and point out this man. A man who preaches regularly about the good parts of living without money, the character building toughness of it all, how it brings you closer to grace and therefore closer to God. A man who is as much a part of the system he reviles as any of us simply for the way he's chosen to opt out. A man who seems to have missed the point.![]()










1 2 Next »
Diabolical # 13. October 2009, 11:18
So he wants to live on both sides of the coin without acknowledging that another side exists.
Furie # 13. October 2009, 11:36
H82typ # 13. October 2009, 11:55
gdare # 13. October 2009, 12:19
Furie # 13. October 2009, 12:50
KYren # 13. October 2009, 14:17
Btw, if he wants to make a family then money counts. He would have to marry a tribal woman if he wants to make a family without money.
Zaphira # 13. October 2009, 15:16
Sure he can live of other people's leftovers and charity, but if those people hadn't be spending money on food...etc...
Anyway. A man that smells like a goat...
Furie # 13. October 2009, 15:38
Zaphira # 13. October 2009, 16:25
Furie # 13. October 2009, 16:34
H82typ # 13. October 2009, 17:00
Zaphira # 13. October 2009, 17:13
Originally posted by Mik in the post:
...
H82typ # 13. October 2009, 17:19
garlingmatthews # 13. October 2009, 17:34
In Ireland, that wouldn't have been possible; there is basically no wilderness. Land possession has made living wild more or less impossible.
My dad and were talking about hygiene. He was telling me that it's what you're used to; showering daily wasn't a possibility for most in the countryside when he was growing up, people bathed weekly; but because that was the norm, that was okay.
The thing is, money is a total convention; it's only worth something because we say it is.
garlingmatthews # 13. October 2009, 17:38
H82typ # 13. October 2009, 17:41
garlingmatthews # 13. October 2009, 17:46
Furie # 13. October 2009, 19:41
Not bad but a bit of a strange concept. Looks like the breath is that of a smoker.
theoddbod # 13. October 2009, 20:02
Dacotah # 14. October 2009, 03:59
Interesting story.
clean # 14. October 2009, 04:15
(I wouldn't wanna use the computer in a public library after him if he smells that bad ...)
clean # 14. October 2009, 04:15
gdare # 14. October 2009, 04:58
Pineas2 # 14. October 2009, 06:40
clean # 14. October 2009, 09:17
Furie # 14. October 2009, 14:28
Don't think I read that Carol. Did I comment there?
David, have you seen his site? Nothing constructive could come from disagreeing with his ways there. I'm willing (if a bit apprehensive) to disagree with the smartest guy in the world as I know you don't gain intelligence by just agreeing with everything you're told. Arguing with someone like this on their own page would only kill a few hours as he tries to outsmart me and prove his way is better than my selfish capitalist ways.
clean # 14. October 2009, 17:22
Dacotah # 14. October 2009, 18:05
It might refresh your memory if I tell you that I said I wished that the world didn't need money. You and others thought that wasn't a good idea. I can't remember who, if it was you or you and others that thought trading would be better then the no money at all idea. Some people would do all the work while others wouldn't for nothing.
rose-marie # 14. October 2009, 19:16
In a way, I think he is indirectly using money, only it's others spent money turned into leftovers and such.
Dacotah # 14. October 2009, 19:35
Furie # 15. October 2009, 09:23
H82typ # 15. October 2009, 09:31
theoddbod # 15. October 2009, 10:16
garlingmatthews # 15. October 2009, 10:23
Furie # 15. October 2009, 10:40
garlingmatthews # 15. October 2009, 13:45
KYren # 15. October 2009, 14:21
Anonymous # 15. October 2009, 16:08
Wow! I didn't realize I'd ever met you, Mik Furie! Sorry, it escapes my memory! Check out most all your data about me... you seem to know things about me I don't even know! OMG, you know me so intimately you even know my personal hygene! Maybe I'm a multiple-personality whore & 1 of my personalities is having intimate relations with Mik, & I don't recall it!
My eyes have really been opened about American media, eroneously called "journalism". Thus far, only ONE, yes, ONE writer (for Details magazine) in ALL American media who has EVER written about me actually interviewed me, in person, & even his facts were sensationalized & distorted, to make it palatable for a fashion-rag audience. EVERY SINGLE ONE of the other droves of articles you see written about me, floating around the net, including this one, are hearsay (2nd, 3rd-, 4th-... 50th-hand info), except for one from Germany. An old-fashioned journalist there had the odd idea of actually interviewing & gathering facts, before publishing). And 2 journalists in Italy also regressed into archaic ways & thought to interview me! Although, I never even met them in person. Maybe my body odor is so strong it wafts even to Europe & they have an intimate knowledge of it, too!
Funny, I'm not even bitter - it all makes me chuckle - because Truth is bigger than us all, and works itself out, even amongst the gossips. People aren't denouncing me, in person, they're denouncing a media image.
Something else to consider: actually read the website, more than a passing sensationalist glance. It's as 1st-hand as you can get on the web:
Dacotah # 15. October 2009, 19:17
Mik, I even posted a link to his websites.
You have two of them don't you Daniel?
Furie # 15. October 2009, 20:01
Why you seem so upset that a little known blog like this, written by someone who hasn't met you, has gotten some information wrong when you say that you're not doing this for sensationalism I have no idea. Perhaps you've isolated yourself from real people for too long and think that a snide starting paragraph is the norm for a comment that states you're not bitter? Perhaps you really do have a book deal in the future and don't want anyone to threaten it by having their own views on your motives? Perhaps you missed the bits where I blatantly agree with parts of your way (even quoting something particularly well said) and only focussed on the bad things in the post? End of the day, I really don't care.
If you can stay polite I've got no problem with you sticking around and educating people here on the facts that I got wrong (although I'm pretty sure I can link to most places apart from your own pages where I got this information, so perhaps you'd be better off dealing with the sources) and your real reasons for doing this in your own words. Hell, if you stay polite then you can have the rare privilege of putting up links to your own things here. It all depends on if you can stay polite?
Pineas2 # 16. October 2009, 06:44
Only three journalists from Europe did not rely on 3rd-hand-info?
I would not wonder if they would have been fired in the meantime.
qlue # 17. October 2009, 21:52
schlaefer # 21. October 2009, 15:30
Zaphira # 21. October 2009, 18:41
Furie # 21. October 2009, 21:02
Zaphira # 22. October 2009, 08:19
rose-marie # 22. October 2009, 09:18
Furie # 22. October 2009, 09:35
rose-marie # 22. October 2009, 09:40
Furie # 22. October 2009, 10:09