Skip navigation.

exploreopera

| Help

Sign up | Help

Expletive Deleted

Opinionated, polemical, biased... with none of the cussing!

STICKY POST

Contact me!

, ,

Planet Atheism - aggregating blogs by non-believers and freethinkersIf you need to contact me, or perhaps you'd like to make a general comment about my blog, here are a few ways:
A

  • Leave a message in this post (if you need a personal response, don't forget to add your email address). I will try to respond when I can.
  • If you are a My.Opera user, you can send me a mail Message. (Log in first!)
  • Send an email to: Email address.
Atheist Blogroll
(Note: Messages sent to me via email or My.Opera Message may be used or posted in this blog.)

This is spinal trap

, ,

The Internet hates censorship (see Streisand Effect). The more you try to hide your dirty laundry, the more it'll get exposure. In the latest skirmish between free expression and censorship, Simon Singh's post about the quack treatment called chiropractic over at the Guardian was taken down when its "practitioners" sued Mr. Singh in British court. So, what has Mr. Singh written that got the quacks' pissed?
Beware the spinal trap
Some practitioners claim it is a cure-all but research suggests chiropractic therapy can be lethal

Simon Singh
The Guardian, Saturday April 19 2008


This is Chiropractic Awareness Week. So let's be aware. How about some awareness that may prevent harm and help you make truly informed choices? First, you might be surprised to know that the founder of chiropractic therapy, Daniel David Palmer, wrote that, "99% of all diseases are caused by displaced vertebrae". In the 1860s, Palmer began to develop his theory that the spine was involved in almost every illness because the spinal cord connects the brain to the rest of the body. Therefore any misalignment could cause a problem in distant parts of the body.

In fact, Palmer's first chiropractic intervention supposedly cured a man who had been profoundly deaf for 17 years. His second treatment was equally strange, because he claimed that he treated a patient with heart trouble by correcting a displaced vertebra.

You might think that modern chiropractors restrict themselves to treating back problems, but in fact they still possess some quite wacky ideas. The fundamentalists argue that they can cure anything. And even the more moderate chiropractors have ideas above their station. The British Chiropractic Association claims that their members can help treat children with colic, sleeping and feeding problems, frequent ear infections, asthma and prolonged crying, even though there is not a jot of evidence. This organisation is the respectable face of the chiropractic profession and yet it happily promotes bogus treatments.

I can confidently label these treatments as bogus because I have co-authored a book about alternative medicine with the world's first professor of complementary medicine, Edzard Ernst. He learned chiropractic techniques himself and used them as a doctor. This is when he began to see the need for some critical evaluation. Among other projects, he examined the evidence from 70 trials exploring the benefits of chiropractic therapy in conditions unrelated to the back. He found no evidence to suggest that chiropractors could treat any such conditions.

But what about chiropractic in the context of treating back problems? Manipulating the spine can cure some problems, but results are mixed. To be fair, conventional approaches, such as physiotherapy, also struggle to treat back problems with any consistency. Nevertheless, conventional therapy is still preferable because of the serious dangers associated with chiropractic.

In 2001, a systematic review of five studies revealed that roughly half of all chiropractic patients experience temporary adverse effects, such as pain, numbness, stiffness, dizziness and headaches. These are relatively minor effects, but the frequency is very high, and this has to be weighed against the limited benefit offered by chiropractors.

More worryingly, the hallmark technique of the chiropractor, known as high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust, carries much more significant risks. This involves pushing joints beyond their natural range of motion by applying a short, sharp force. Although this is a safe procedure for most patients, others can suffer dislocations and fractures.

Worse still, manipulation of the neck can damage the vertebral arteries, which supply blood to the brain. So-called vertebral dissection can ultimately cut off the blood supply, which in turn can lead to a stroke and even death. Because there is usually a delay between the vertebral dissection and the blockage of blood to the brain, the link between chiropractic and strokes went unnoticed for many years. Recently, however, it has been possible to identify cases where spinal manipulation has certainly been the cause of vertebral dissection.

Laurie Mathiason was a 20-year-old Canadian waitress who visited a chiropractor 21 times between 1997 and 1998 to relieve her low-back pain. On her penultimate visit she complained of stiffness in her neck. That evening she began dropping plates at the restaurant, so she returned to the chiropractor. As the chiropractor manipulated her neck, Mathiason began to cry, her eyes started to roll, she foamed at the mouth and her body began to convulse. She was rushed to hospital, slipped into a coma and died three days later. At the inquest, the coroner declared: "Laurie died of a ruptured vertebral artery, which occurred in association with a chiropractic manipulation of the neck."

This case is not unique. In Canada alone there have been several other women who have died after receiving chiropractic therapy, and Professor Ernst has identified about 700 cases of serious complications among the medical literature. This should be a major concern for health officials, particularly as under-reporting will mean that the actual number of cases is much higher.

Bearing all of this in mind, I will leave you with one message for Chiropractic Awareness Week - if spinal manipulation were a drug with such serious adverse effects and so little demonstrable benefit, then it would almost certainly have been taken off the market.

· Simon Singh is the co-author of Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial
www.simonsingh.net
(Again, H/T to Jim Lippard. He runs an excellent blog!)

P.S. - In support of Simon Singh, I'll be on the look out for his books the next time I go to the bookstore. I already have, and read, The Code Book. It's a must read for those interested in the history of cryptography.

Die spammer enabler die!

,

spam

Today I received four spam messages from some sleazy firm. The email purports to be sent by a certain Sophia Navarro (marketing3_pmi@pldtdsl.net), who seems to be working for the company called Porter and Miles. I don't know who she is, nor am I interested in her "seminars".

But what's worse is that her email provider/ISP doesn't even care. PLDT DSL is probably the biggest broadband company in the Philippines. Whenever I receive spam messages, I would forward the email to abuse@domain-name, along with a short message that the email was unsolicited and commercial in nature (textbook definition of spam). It's an unwritten rule of the internet to have an abuse@ address. But PLDT DSL doesn't have one. So I went to their site, looking for the address for reporting spam. Again, no beef.

So I tried calling them. All the numbers from the site (which are not readily available, so I had to dig deeper) are for tech support and customer support. They don't seem to entertain complaints from non-subscribers. So I settled on filling up a form from their site, with no means of attaching the offending spam messages.

If merely reporting spam messages requires jumping through hoops, less people will be inclined to report. And the ISP can look the other way, happily cashing in monthly checks from spammers.

Science book meme

, , ,

There's a new blog meme going around, and it's about science books (H/T to Jim Lippard). The game's simple, in the list of science books provided, bold the ones you've read, and put an asterisk on those you plan to read.
  • Micrographia, Robert Hooke
  • The Origin of the Species, Charles Darwin (Only read it halfway) *
  • Never at Rest, Richard Westfall
  • Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman, Richard Feynman (I've read his other book, The Pleasure of Finding Things Out)
  • Tesla: Man Out of Time, Margaret Cheney
  • The Devil's Doctor, Philip Ball (I have his other book, H2O)
  • The Making of the Atomic Bomb, Richard Rhodes
  • Lonely Hearts of the Cosmos, Dennis Overbye
  • Physics for Entertainment, Yakov Perelman
  • 1-2-3 Infinity, George Gamow
  • The Elegant Universe, Brian Greene (I have this, just haven't read it)
  • Warmth Disperses, Time Passes, Hans Christian von Bayer
  • Alice in Quantumland, Robert Gilmore
  • Where Does the Weirdness Go? David Lindley
  • A Short History of Nearly Everything, Bill Bryson
  • A Force of Nature, Richard Rhodes
  • Black Holes and Time Warps, Kip Thorne
  • A Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking
  • Universal Foam, Sidney Perkowitz
  • Vermeer's Camera, Philip Steadman
  • The Code Book, Simon Singh
  • The Elements of Murder, John Emsley
  • Soul Made Flesh, Carl Zimmer
  • Time's Arrow, Martin Amis
  • The Ten Most Beautiful Experiments, George Johnson
  • Einstein's Dreams, Alan Lightman
  • Godel, Escher, Bach, Douglas Hofstadter (I have this, just haven't read it)
  • The Curious Life of Robert Hooke, Lisa Jardine
  • A Matter of Degrees, Gino Segre
  • The Physics of Star Trek, Lawrence Krauss (I've read his other book, Atom)
  • E=mc<2>, David Bodanis
  • Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea, Charles Seife
  • Absolute Zero: The Conquest of Cold, Tom Shachtman
  • A Madman Dreams of Turing Machines, Janna Levin
  • Warped Passages, Lisa Randall
  • Apollo's Fire, Michael Sims
  • Flatland, Edward Abbott
  • Fermat's Last Theorem, Amir Aczel
  • Stiff, Mary Roach
  • Astroturf, M.G. Lord
  • The Periodic Table, Primo Levi
  • Longitude, Dava Sobel
  • The First Three Minutes, Steven Weinberg *
  • The Mummy Congress, Heather Pringle
  • The Accelerating Universe, Mario Livio
  • Math and the Mona Lisa, Bulent Atalay
  • This is Your Brain on Music, Daniel Levitin
  • The Executioner's Current, Richard Moran
  • Krakatoa, Simon Winchester
  • Pythagorus' Trousers, Margaret Wertheim
  • Neuromancer, William Gibson
  • The Physics of Superheroes, James Kakalios
  • The Strange Case of the Broad Street Pump, Sandra Hempel
  • Another Day in the Frontal Lobe, Katrina Firlik
  • Einstein's Clocks and Poincare's Maps, Peter Galison
  • The Demon-Haunted World, Carl Sagan
  • The Blind Watchmaker, Richard Dawkins
  • The Language Instinct, Steven Pinker (I have his other book, How the Mind Works)
  • An Instance of the Fingerpost, Iain Pears
  • Consilience, E.O. Wilson (I've only read this halfway)
  • Wonderful Life, Stephen J. Gould
  • Teaching a Stone to Talk, Annie Dillard
  • Fire in the Brain, Ronald K. Siegel
  • The Life of a Cell, Lewis Thomas
  • Coming of Age in the Milky Way, Timothy Ferris (I've read his other book, The Whole Shebang)
  • Storm World, Chris Mooney *
  • The Carbon Age, Eric Roston
  • The Black Hole Wars, Leonard Susskind
  • Copenhagen, Michael Frayn
  • From the Earth to the Moon, Jules Verne
  • Gut Symmetries, Jeanette Winterson
  • Chaos, James Gleick *
  • Innumeracy, John Allen Paulos
  • The Physics of NASCAR, Diandra Leslie-Pelecky
  • Subtle is the Lord, Abraham Pais

I would've added Beak of the Finch by Jonathan Weiner, Chance in the House of Fate by Jennifer Ackerman, Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science by Martin Gardner, Guns, Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond, Just Six Numbers by Martin Rees, Reinventing Darwin by Niles Eldredge, The Dinosaur Heresies by Robert Bakker, and The God Particle by Leon Lederman. Each is a classic of science writing or an important contribution by a scientist. There are other deserving titles but these are the ones I can think of at the moment.

Death Magnetic

, ,

Metallica, my favorite metal band despite all the stupid things they've said and done in the last several years, will be releasing a new album this year. It's gonna be called Death Magnetic and the artwork will look like this:
Death Magnetic
Just now they've released the track listing for the album:
  1. That Was Just Your Life
  2. The End Of The Line
  3. Broken, Beat & Scarred
  4. The Day That Never Comes
  5. All Nightmare Long
  6. Cyanide
  7. The Unforgiven III
  8. The Judas Kiss
  9. Suicide & Redemption
  10. My Apocalypse
My first reaction? The Unforgiven III? WTF?!? Sure, the Unforgiven is a great song, and The Unforgiven II is at least passable. But now they have a third Unforgiven song. When will it end? p:

On a happier note, the band promises that the sound will be closer to their earlier, thrash-metal music. I sure hope so. My favorite album is Ride the Lightning, and I like the title track of that album and Kill 'Em All's Seek and Destroy. C'mon Metallica boys, make good on your promise. You owe me the money I wasted on Load, ReLoad, and St. Anger! :frown:

Copycat!

,

Wow, PZ Myers is posting that someone has followed in my footsteps and "smuggled" a consecrated host from a church. Thankfully, my little act of mischief hasn't caused a similar kind of uproar. And another blogger wants to do it too! I think that's a good idea.

I still have the communion wafer, it's safely stored in an empty Altoids container. If Christians are so desparate to get back consecrated hosts, maybe I could sell it in eBay. Heck, a Christian was willing to pay real money to buy a nonbeliever's (nonexistent) soul!

If you haven't experienced the joys of host desecration, you haven't really earned your EAC decoder ring! p:

R.I.P. George



George Carlin (1937-2008)

Upgrade

,

Go ahead, upgrade to Opera 9.5! :D

Read more...