海龟浮上海面

HONGKONG FOOL SHANGHAI MAN

A Harmonized Arbitration

, ,

In a mass production factory, protested by their customers, the quality contoller is being punished by the administration for not letting the ill-quality products pass.

The ill-quality product has been guaranteed of its buyer, who considers only of the 'produce-of-the-factory' label but not its quality; or the buyers are actually paying to process their own product in return for a label.

Should we not see their petition as some kind of 'consumer rights protection'?

To put it to the court of arbitration, I solemnly suggest:

(a) the factor's board of directors who failed its quality controller, being guilty of not disclosing its 'unwritten rules', shall withdraw its 'punishment' on the QC and beg for a pardon;

(b) all petitioners shall either take or leave their product, as they have to honor their previous contract;

(c) the products in question, being idle in this case, have no say what so ever;

(d) considering there may have buyers who care also of their product's quality, to resolve this dilemma situation, at least two types of contract will have to be available in the future, before both parties enter into a processing agreement.

This argumentative case happened in China.


Further Reading:[list1]
[*]Harmony means everyone gets a passing grade (Danwei.org)[/list1]

CyclingTo Drink or Not to Drink?