Skip navigation.

Log in | Sign up

photo of Lagged2Death

Portable Fiasco

A Ray Of Sunshine In Your Darkroom

Advice from ‘America’s worst mom’

Mostly, the world is safe. Mostly, people are good. To emphasize the opposite is to live in the world of tabloid TV. A world filled with worst-case scenarios, not the world we actually live in, which is factually, statistically, and, luckily for us, one of the safest periods for children in the history of the world.

-- Advice from ‘America’s worst mom’

Maybe it's easy for me to say, not having any kids. But I think this needs to be repeated over and over through the world's biggest megaphone, if possible. What's the point of making the world safer if we're going to cower in fear regardless?

Sunscreen

I haven't yet needed any sunscreen this year. But I will, I'm sure. So I was interested in this story.

The difference in UVB protection between an SPF 100 and SPF 50 is marginal. Far from offering double the blockage, SPF 100 blocks 99 percent of UVB rays, while SPF 50 blocks 98 percent. (SPF 30, that old-timer, holds its own, deflecting 96.7 percent).

-- Confused by SPF? Take a Number, New York Times

I've scoffed at the ultra-high SPF numbers on fancy newfangled sunscreen before. And everybody likes confirmation that their prejudices turn out to be more-or-less right.

Watt Seconds

It bugs me that photographers use "watt seconds" as a unit to measure the capacity of electronic flash systems.

A watt, being a unit of power, is defined in terms of time; a watt is one joule per second. When you multiply watts by seconds, you get joules. A joule is a unit that was created for this very task of quantifying energy. Why not just use joules?

We don't measure distances in "mile per hour hours," after all. How do such silly conventions come to be?

Some people actually write "watt/second" when they mean "watt second." That's even worse, because it's not just silly, but wrong; that would joules per second per second, a sort of acceleration.

Jail Time

photo (cc) bloomsberries

I put a man in jail yesterday.

I had some help. There were eleven other jurors, a judge, some sheriff's deputies, and so on.

Although it was a simple case, the trial kept reminding me of the circuitous double-crossing and justified universal paranoia of A Scanner Darkly. The only witnesses at the trial were referred to as "Special Agent [number]" and "Confidential Informant [number]." The law enforcement people involved worked for the "County Narcotics Agency," a body I'd never heard of.

The defendant was accused of trafficking a ridiculously small quantity of drugs, about one gram of cocaine in all. Yet it seems likely he will spend more than a year in prison for a crime that did not shed any blood or cheat anyone of property. It's clear (in part from his own admissions) that he's no kingpin; he seems to be a drug user who sold small amounts to his friends to support his own habit. Unfortunately, his friends turn out to be the sort of people who would sell him to the cops for a miserable US$50.

There are probably thousands more hapless drug abusers just like him, ready to fit right in to the gap he'll leave behind. The remedy of putting him in prison will likely remedy nothing at all, and the whole stupid, sordid little play will unfold again and again, possibly even with the same cast. "Special Agent [number]" claimed to be involved in a few hundred similar cases every year.

It's no fun to watch a person's face as they hear the news that they have been found guilty as charged and are going to prison. Back to prison, as it turned out in this case. I guess it would be even worse to watch a first-timer.

The Dungeon Master of the Rings

,

I'm very late to this particular party, but The DM of the Rings manages to be a send-up of both paper-and-dice style role-playing games and The Lord of the Rings -- at the same time. It's two, two, two parodies in one!

Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser