Skip navigation.

Log in | Sign up

photo of Lagged2Death

Portable Fiasco

A Ray Of Sunshine In Your Darkroom

Posts tagged with "government"

Accumulating Opportunisms

, ,

I found this story on the systematic gaming of several important headline-making economic indicators to be a lot more readable and interesting than one might expect, given the dry-sounding subject matter. It is, like everything I seem to read these days, depressing as hell.

Based on the criteria in place a quarter century ago, today's U.S. unemployment rate is somewhere between 9 percent and 12 percent; the inflation rate is as high as 7 or even 10 percent; economic growth since the recession of 2001 has been mediocre, despite a huge surge in the wealth and incomes of the superrich, and we are falling back into recession.

-- Numbers racket: Why the economy is worse than we know


But, perhaps oddly, this is the tidbit that sticks in my mind:

Let me stipulate: the deception arose gradually, at no stage stemming from any concerted or cynical scheme. There was no grand conspiracy, just accumulating opportunisms.


"Accumulating opportunisms." What a wonderfully succinct turn of phrase! It's a perfect description of a phenomenon that appears again and again in the friction between all types of human organizations; in governments, in businesses, and even to some extent in churches, clubs, academic departments, etc. It even happens between the subdivisions within each of those things.

Large numbers of actors or agents, each making small, independent opportunistic moves, will re-enforce each other when their interests happen to coincide. The agents might be any size: governments, businesses, committees, the accounting department, or even just Ted from accounting. In any case, arrangements that just so happen to benefit multiple powerful actors become entrenched. An overly-complicated, messy system that benefits the few is built, but by accretion, not design. The system’s very messiness and complexity make it hard to understand, and thus hard to redesign or change. The resulting inflexibility causes other systems that interact with it to yield to its needs, which entrenches the system even further.

This is how all manner of messes seemingly emerge from nowhere and never go away. It’s why our tax system has become so impenetrable that most people turn to expert help. It’s why our medical system has become an expensive, paperwork-choked, error-prone global joke. It’s probably a good part of the reason Microsoft Windows has become a ridiculous behemoth that borders on self-parody.

The results can seem very similar to those of a deliberate conspiracy, but the self-perpetuating mess, the accumulation of opportunisms, is far more common. Sometimes, when people complain that "the system" is stacked against them, they're absolutely right -- no conspiracy necessary.

Papers, Please

, , ,

For better or worse, this machine is the tip of the spear that struck the final, decisive blow against Fascism as we know it. It was the dropper of The Bomb that put a sudden end to the largest and deadliest armed conflict in history.

Or so the American mythos goes, anyway. Many Americans are raised to believe that the US once single-handedly dealt evil an unbelievable smack-down in the biggest wrestling match in history, but may be a little fuzzy on the play-by-play, the players, and even the venue of that particular showdown.



The museum where Bockscar is displayed has an annex located on an operational Air Force base. There was a time when civilians could drive up to the gate of this base, explain they were headed to the museum, and motor merrily on their way.

Today, fifty feet from the enshrined doomsday machine / symbol of American FreedomTM, museum visitors interested in seeing the annex must sign up for the privilege. Identification papers are checked and recorded. Numbered yellow armbands are issued. No-photography-allowed rules are explained. Visitors are counted, re-counted, and line up for a bus ride that includes a serpentine route through rows of anti-tank obstacles at the base's front gate. Everyone must be on the bus back to the main museum 45 minutes later.

I know that these inconveniences are not really a serious threat to important civil rights. But there's something more than a little awkward and strange about standing beside this supposed icon of freedom and doing the American version of "Papers, please." And although this particular restriction isn't very important, the cowardly, paranoid, controlling frame of mind that produced it and that allows it to persist is a danger to freedoms of all sorts, I think.

My wife cheerfully mentioned to the volunteer staff that she remembered being able to drive over to the annex ourselves. The gentleman checking our papers replied, sadly, that yes, there are a lot of things we just can't do any more. I don't know if he was sad that The Terrorists Hate Our FreedomTM or if, like me, he was sad that we appear to be doing this sort of thing to ourselves for no reason at all.

Life Imitates TV

,

This upsetting story from the Toronto Globe and Mail has been all over the place. In case you haven't seen it, it turns out US Supreme Court judge Antonin Scalia finds some valuable real-world wisdom in the violent, paranoid, comic-book rage-fantasy of the Fox TV show "24":

"Are you going to convict Jack Bauer?" Judge Scalia challenged his fellow judges. "Say that criminal law is against him? 'You have the right to a jury trial?' Is any jury going to convict Jack Bauer? I don't think so."

I wish the story was longer. It could use some more direct quotes and some more context. Although the quotes that are included give a pretty poor impression of Scalia, it's hard to nail down precisely what he means by some of his statements as presented here.

But it's unnerving all the same that at a time when the world has no shortage of real terrorism, real torture, and real law to discuss, a US Supreme Court justice decided to instead discuss fictional terrorism, fictional torture, and hypothetical "if I had my druthers" law.

This is just like a bunch of school kids arguing about who would win in a fight between the Dukes of Hazzard and the A-Team. Except they're not school kids. They're really important grown-ups. Arguing about the A-Team.

Did I say "unnerving?" I think the hero of this one TV show I happen to take far too seriously would have said said "daft."

Those Rubber Hoses Can Bounce Back, Can't They?

, , , ...

photo from Wikipedia

It seems to me that the people I know who complain that governments are by nature inept, inefficient, ineffective, corrupt and wasteful are by and large also the people most willing to assign unprecedented levels of authority to those same governments in the name of protecting us from the bogeyman of the day -- anarchists / communists / hippies / drug dealers / internet predators / terrorists et al.

That has always seemed like a contradiction to me. How can one be dead certain that the government can't even be trusted to patch chuckholes correctly while also being dead certain that the government does a fine job of (for example) administering capital punishment? Or managing secret tribunals and domestic spying? Or foreign spying and war-making, for that matter?

Now it could be that I'm oversimplifying these seemingly contradictory attitudes and consequently being unfair. It could be that I'm just flat wrong about these attitudes being a common combination. But I have met more than a few individuals who seem to hold both of these notions at once, with no outward signs of mental distress.

These people are somehow compartmentalizing their ideas, mentally separating "the government responsible for our insanely messy tax laws" from "the government who decides what (and who) to blow up." One is bumbling, craven, and useless. The other is absurdly confident, fierce and strong.

Every now and again, though, a situation crops up that serves as an important reminder that these two sides of government are one and the same:

Imagine a government agency, in a bureaucratic foul-up, accidentally gives you a copy of a document marked "top secret." And it contains a log of some of your private phone calls.

You read it and ponder it and wonder what it all means. Then, two months later, the FBI shows up at your door, demands the document back and orders you to forget you ever saw it.

It's too bad this article doesn't cover more of the "handing a detailed spying report over to the attorneys representing the subject of your spying" aspect of the story, partly because that's funny. It's pretty much the most absurd, most comprehensive way this little operation could possibly have been fouled up, and it actually happened. Truth is still stranger than fiction.

But its also a reminder that governments -- even the terrorist-fighting bits -- are imperfect organizations built of imperfect people. They will abuse their authority, they will let us down when we expect them to protect us. Simply granting governments more authority won't ever change that.

Hacking Democracy

,

I just watched Hacking Democracy on HBO. If you're interested in issues of modern election fraud, it's definitely worth seeing.

It may be one of the most frustrating movies I've seen in a long time, though. It was infuriating to watch a Diebold press-goon successfully change the topic of a discussion away from the accuacy and security of Diebold systems to the "theft" Diebold suffered at the hands of a Seattle grandmother. I wanted to throttle the elections board members who utterly failed to comprehend how lame Diebold's top engineer's assurances were.

Gah. Maybe you shouldn't watch it. It certainly won't help you sleep.
Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser