Skip navigation.

Log in | Sign up

photo of Lagged2Death

Portable Fiasco

A Ray Of Sunshine In Your Darkroom

The Music Business: Getting It, With Painful Slowness

, ,

I had just downloaded a bunch of MP3 files from 3hive.com, and I queued them all up in WinAmp to listen to while I surfed elsewhere. Some of them were OK, some of them were no good.

Then one came on that I really liked. Slow, sad, folky stuff, the essence of Autumn distilled. Eager to hear more, I looked to see who the singer was.

But I couldn't tell.

The name of the file (selected by the website, not by me) was "DontBeSoMeanJe...mp3.mp3", which is clearly mangled and not much help.

photo cheerfully swiped without permission from justinrutledge.com

Those of us familiar with MP3 files know that they can be (and usually are) tagged with metadata, like the song name, artist name, year recorded, etc. WinAmp can show you that information with the handy "View file info..." option. But no luck; this MP3 file was not tagged.

I went back to 3hive.com and read the titles of the recently-posted songs, looking for a likely suspect. The track turned out to be "Don't Be So Mean, Jellybean," by Justin Rutledge.

So I found what I was looking for, in the end. That's good. But what if things had gone differently? What if I hadn't been able to listen to it right away - would it have been so easy to figure out where it came from? What if I had put this track, along with hundreds of other collected-from-the-web tracks, onto an iPod and gone on a road trip? What if I had e-mailed the track to a friend? How would my friend find out what it was?

Sadly, this is common. In fact, it seems to me that legal music giveaways downloaded from music blogs of all descriptions are actually much less likely to have accurate and useful filenames and metadata than illegal material is.

This bugs me. It's hardly an Earth-shattering issue. It's probably not even a music-business-shattering issue. But it's so obviously in the music vendor's best interest to get this right, and it's easy to get it right - yet it's done wrong all the time. Naming and tagging the file correctly are basic usability issues, but beyond that, they make it easy for interested people to find out more about the music in question. Isn't that the whole point of giving away music for free?

So the lessons for today are:

  1. Name your files well.
  2. If the file format you're using supports metadata, use it.
  3. Listen to "Don't Be So Mean, Jellybean."

    Whopper Hopper?True Story

    Comments

    musickna 4. September 2006, 20:49

    I'm with you all the way on this. I really like to know what I am listening to (and that's one reason why I prefer internet stations to radio - at least you have a little better chance of identifying the artist that way). I have never been able to adopt the 'disposable' listen mentality that I am convinced some people have!

    Lagged2Death 6. September 2006, 15:32

    Ah yes, internet radio. That would be an advantage it has over broadcast radio. That plus the fact that there are internet radio stations that do more than play the same 40 songs over and over.

    Internet radio is something that sounds like an extremely good idea to me, but which I've never really followed as closely as I'd like to. I'm too chicken to listen at the office, and at home I'm quite swamped with more CDs, MP3s, etc, than I could ever listen to properly.

    dantesoft 4. October 2006, 12:53

    The file is now 23996388_599fef6c.mp3.mp3 (6:19, 4.34 MB, MD5:90804828ec306cec3c14026328a18953)

    Still no metadata. But the author introduces himself, the band, and names the song in the beginning.

    Lagged2Death 4. October 2006, 14:12

    But the author introduces himself, the band, and names the song in the beginning.

    Heh, yeah, that occurred to me later, listening to the track again. In this case, I would have been able to find more info eventually anyway.

    There are plenty of cases where that wouldn't work, though. Maybe more musicians should introduce themselves in their recordings. It seems like a huge waste of bandwidth, though.

    How to use Quote function:

    1. Select some text
    2. Click on the Quote link

    Write a comment

    Comment
    (BBcode and HTML is turned off for anonymous user comments.)

    If you can't read the words, press the small reload icon.


    Smilies

    Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser