YOU CAN SEE SCOTLAND FROM MY HOUSE

My blog in English

Subscribe to RSS feed

TALK YOURSELF CLEAN

, ,

I have mixed feelings about Political Correctness (PC). They used to be not mixed at all: I hated it. However, I can now see the point on it.

Image: "Damned Cripple", a viral Latin American soap-opera scene, taken from tumblr blog Baseline
As with many political attitudes, there is a sensible and intelligent version, and a simplistic, extremist PC. What I have to say on that respect, being rather ignorant of this things, is not much, but writing it will at least make it explicit.

Read more...

HELPING PEOPLE COME APART

Craig Urquhart is an entrepreneur like those who were in fashion some years ago, when a big idea in the internet plus the ability to make it work could make instant millionaires. Craig came a bit late, at a time when investors are more cautious about the allure of radical internet gambles, but, remarkably, has managed to bring the old days of online novelties back. His big idea: a network to find enemies www.WitsYerProblem.com. Unlikely as it sounds, his idea is already successful, and several thousands users are paying for his find-an-enemy online service.

Read more...

THE UNQUIET EYES OF AYN RAND

, ,


I used to despise Ayn Rand. Not anymore. The first time I heard about Ayn Rand was when I read Iluminatus!, by Robert Anton Wilson. One of the characters in that book was an American writer Atlanta Hope, who had written a monstrous piece about a country (USA) brought down to disaster by statism and redeemed by a bunch of Nietszchean businessmen-heroes. Such book was called Telemachus Sneezed, and was linked in the book to Ayn Rand's famous novel Atlas Shrugged in the sentence "If Atlas can shrug and Telemachus can Sneeze, why can't Satan repent?". Robert Anton Wilson can be counted as an Anarchist, and even as some kind of libertarian, save for his non-trivial ideas about individual identity and property, so he did not plainly reject Ayn Rand's ideology, but he did depict her as some kind of sex-crazied lunatic.

Read more...

CROSSMYLOOF



This train station, with such a beautiful name, deserves an entry. Hope this entry, written with no information whatsoever and being a lame plagiarism from Castaneda years after having read him, is worth it.

Read more...

BREATHE, LOVE, BREATHE


Image: Jean Seberg and Jean-Paul Belmondo playing Patricia Franchini and Michel Poiccard in "Breathless" (A Bout De Souffle). Taken from Everyday Cinephile.

It happens that I had never seen any film from the french New Wave on the silver screen. Until last tuesday. I Knew they were screening it at the GFT a couple of hours before the actual screening, and went for it.

I Have seen another movie from Jean-Luc Godard, which I loved, on a computer screen: La Chinoise. I knew that this one was totally different, only I did not know how; so I did not have much idea or expectation for this film, something I am always happy about before watching a movie.

This text, I make clear now, does not contain any spoiler, and I wrote it carefully to avoid spoiling the watching of the film for the reader; I actually like to think that it can make it better.

Read more...

TO EVERYONE: HAPPY BOGOTAZO!

, , ,


Image: A comic strip from the fifties depicting a funny right-wing version of the murder of Jorge Eliécer Gaitán and the chaos that followed, where all was a comunist plot designed carefully in Moscow. Stolen from the image collection of Juglar del Zipa, a Colombian blogger.

I knew that there was something, besides the deadline to pay the rent, to be remembered about today. Sixty years ago, a charismatic Colombian candidate to the presidency was murdered in very strange circumstances, and the reaction that followed changed the face of Bogotá, the Colombian main city, and even of the country, forever.

I am not going to bore you to death with my political interpretation of this riot, but play a little with the idea of the generalised riot itself. (for that, the best thing would be to have a look at the web)

Read more...

YOU NEED HANDS


Just in case one of my readers wants to know a little more about the situation in Colombia (just a little), I have decided to write a little remark about it, centered in sometying very picturesque (in a banana-republic kind of way) that happened some weeks ago.

It has to do with hands.

Read more...

I'M NOT DEAD (YET)

, ,

It has been a long time since I put anything in this blog. But this is the blog saying "I'm not dead!". I have been trying to write in English, both academic things, and other stuff for the Dead Prose Writers Society of Turnberry Road (a zombie-like mutation from the former philosophical society of Kelvinhaugh Street). But I realise that I really need to try harder. For that reason, I am starting to write again in this blog more regularily. That is why the blog is raising its voice from the grave to haunt the living.

To continue with the ghostly mood, I will comment a ghostly musical (is that posible? yes, it is) and some other worthless subjects.

By the way, it would be unfair not to mention the kind reminding from Frank, the German Retriever, the inmediate reason for resuming my English blogging.

Read more...

THE LOGICS PROFESSOR AND MONTY PYTHON

,


Image: Willard van Orman Quine, one of the most important logicians of the twentieth century.
Seeing how the word "logics" is used in the mass media (a rather unfortunate use, I think) I would like to put an enlightening text about it.
I will transcribe the digression of a logics professor, in his comment of a scene of the movie "Monty Python and the Holly Grail". The scene was about the flaw loaded reasoning of people from a town leading them to the pretension of burning a woman after accusing her of witchery.

This is the digression, transcribed by some Mr. and Mrs. and Mrs. Zambesi:[/b]

Good evening. The last scene was interesting from the point of view of a professional logician because it contained a number of logical fallacies; that is, invalid propositional constructions and syllogistic forms, of the type so often committed by my wife.

'All wood burns,' states Sir Bedevere. 'Therefore,' he concludes, 'all that burns is wood.' This is, of course, pure bullshit. Universal affirmatives can only be partially converted: all of Alma Cogan is dead, but only some of the class of dead people are Alma Cogan. 'Oh yes,' one would think. However, my wife does not understand this necessary limitation of the conversion of a proposition; consequently, she does not understand me, for how can a woman expect to appreciate a professor of logic, if the simplest cloth-eared syllogism causes her to flounder?

For example, given the premise, 'all fish live underwater' and 'all mackerel are fish', my wife will conclude, not that 'all mackerel live underwater', but that 'if she buys kippers it will not rain', or that 'trout live in trees', or even that 'I do not love her any more.' This she calls 'using her intuition'. I call it 'crap', and it gets me very irritated because it is not logical. 'There will be no supper tonight,' she will sometimes cry upon my return home. 'Why not?' I will ask. 'Because I have been screwing the milkman all day,' she will say, quite oblivious of the howling error she has made. 'But,' I will wearily point out, 'even given that the activities of screwing the milkman and getting supper are mutually exclusive, now that the screwing is over, surely then, supper may now, logically, be got.' 'You don't love me any more,' she will now often postulate. 'If you did, you would give me one now and again, so that I would not have to rely on that rancid Pakistani for my orgasms.' 'I will give you one after you have got me my supper,' I now usually scream, 'but not before'-- as you understand, making her bang contingent on the arrival of my supper. 'God, you turn me on when you're angry, you ancient brute!' she now mysteriously deduces, forcing her sweetly throbbing tongue down my throat. 'Fuck supper!' I now invariably conclude, throwing logic somewhat joyously to the four winds, and so we thrash about on our milk-stained floor, transported by animal passion, until we sink back, exhausted, onto the cartons of yogurt.

I'm afraid I seem to have strayed somewhat from my original brief. But in a nutshell: sex is more fun than logic-- one cannot prove this, but it 'is' in the same sense that Mount Everest 'is', or that Alma Cogan 'isn't'.

Goodnight.

I found it very didactic. Now, you can call me male chauvinist pig. Enjoy. YO CAN GET THE SPANISH VERSION OF THIS POST
HERE

IT LETS US UNDERSTAND... WHY?

, ,


Image: Cypher Code, from Principia Discordia

I have been busy by two things. In my working hours there is, of course, my work. And in my leisure time, there is the spanish blog, and all that fuss about the sabotage of the colombian blogs. But I am sick and tired of that. I stated my opinion in too many places, too many times. I want to move on. And I want to move to some more interesting subjects.

Some time ago I found a very inspiring text by physicist Paul Davies, about why we can understand part of the universe at all. ¿should it be like that? Of course, we are a very arrogant species, and some of us actually believe that there is a god who made uf masters of his creation. However the case, I do not feel inclined to think of us, pink apes, as such a big deal among all existing and possible animals, or living beings, for that matter. There is, for me, something misterious about being able to understand so much about our huge and complex universe, a universe that could be perhaps even huger and more complex. Here is the text. I took a very daring risk in transcirbing the text, changin one word for other, with clarity purposes. Later on, I will explain why I comited such a flagrant inaccuracy.

Read more...

June 2012
S M T W T F S
May 2012July 2012
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30