Moonlight - series review
Monday, August 29, 2011 9:41:04 AM
- Josef KostanI left my cell phone here yesterday. Spent 400 years without one. Now I can't go a day.
In autumn 2007 (wait, what, seriously? *double-checks* Sigh, I feel so old) CBS premiered a vampire detective procedural show called Moonlight, with a male vampire-human female romance at its core.
So, crime procedural + angsty vampire romance mush, this should be an automatic instant hit in recent years' climate, right? Well I guess they were 6 months too early to hit the wave or something, because the show was cancelled after a mere 16 episodes.
I've always meant to watch this show - there is a distinct lack of paranormal quality fun on TV out there, and the show sported an executive producer credit by Profit and Angel's David Greenwalt as well as Veronica Mars' amazing Jason Dohring among the regular cast. But initial reviews were [insert politically correct term for piss-poor], Greenwalt left the show for health reasons before it even got on the air, and the show got cancelled before the winds of reputation turned for it.
Having now finally seen it at what I up until 5 minutes ago assumed to be max two years later, I have mixed feelings about this cancellation. Because, frankly, the pilot, the pilot is shite. SHITE. The dialogue and monologue is utterly awful, the plot predictable and un-engaging, and on the whole it comes off as the one thing this show immediately seems like it would be: a really weak Angel-copy. The only scenes which stood out were Dohring's puny two, and while he was great, they hardly made the rest worth the bother.
So why the mixed feelings? Well, first of all, the oh-so-bland main character was given impressive amounts of presence by actor Alex O'Loughlin. Encumbered with dialogue so bad I'm sure Aaron Sorkin was quietly weeping somewhere on account of its mere existence, O'Loughlin actually managed to make the part be more than the pretty boy main character.
And then episode 2 took an enormous step up. Suddenly, the show was simply bland, not awful. The main thing which had improved was the dialogue. It was now DECENT. Not good or anything. But decent. Even had a good joke or two.
Episode 3, 4, 5, 6... more of the same. A predictable procedural, not really worthy of my attention, but with a slight, steady crawl upwards in quality. Also, Dohring kept having a scene or two, like all too rare diamonds glittering in the dust. And the ridiculously uninteresting love interest was somehow becoming slightly tolerable by Sophia Myles' acting. I'm not saying she's an amazing talent, but she clearly knows something about what she's doing. At least O'Loughlin had the main character with the complex backstory to work with, but Myles was taking a two-dimensional turd of a character and making me NOT CRINGE WHEN SHE WAS ON SCREEN. By the end of the season, I almost liked her. Emmy anyone?
But then the show really hit its stride. Mid-season, suddenly, the hints of arc were hints no more. Shannyn Sossamon did a very charismatic turn as O'Loughlin's vampyric maker, some twists actually contained slightly surprising aspects, and I found myself LIKING the show. Eventually, Dohring's character even got a (rather good) episode devoted to him, though it would be the first and last of the kind.
As the Sossamon-arc drew to a (clearly only planned to be temporary) close and a recurring character was killed off with quite frankly surprising emotion, the show turned once again standalone, but it couldn't shake the nigh-on-depth that it had acquired in the mid-season. The final batch of episodes were thus genuinely okay even without the benefits of a powerful on-going arc. The final episode before the cancellation even, probably completely coincidentally, had aspects that made it a halfway decent series finale.
So on the whole, if you like vampires and mysteries, Moonlight is actually not that bad a choice. Skip the awful pilot. It has a lot of important exposition, sure, but you can read that between the lines and in the "previously on..."-segments anyway. You might need to hold your nose a bit for the first four episodes or so which follows as well, but if you're anything like me, you will then gradually find yourself quite liking the show. Oh, sure, there are plot holes and mythological inconsistencies here and there, but please, even True Blood is littered with those and they're on HBO. For what it is, Moonlight is frankly both surprisingly consistent and true to the genre. In 16 episodes, the only supernatural element was and remained vampires. No witches, shape-shifters, warlocks, djinns, nymphs or werewolves were ever even hinted at. This alone was impressive to me. Even Angel never remained that grounded in its own mythology.
We return then, to my mixed feelings. This show should never have made it past the pilot. But once it did, it managed to warrant its own existence and steadily grow and improve. Considering that, the early cancellation really is unfortunate. Moonlight, given a full first season and maybe at least half a second season, could actually have gotten quite great. It was certainly for its entire run headed in the right direction, without ever taking serious turns backwards. So, is it a travesty and a loss on the lines of amazing first-season goners like Firefly and Kings? Not at all. But having seen it, I must admit that I might on occasion find myself missing it a little, nonetheless.








Unregistered user # Tuesday, September 6, 2011 1:16:48 PM
Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir # Thursday, September 8, 2011 7:31:31 AM
I'm not saying this show is very good, though, even if it could have been had it gone on for another year or two. But this show actually made very good use of vampire lore compared to the nigh-superman-like interpretation on True Blood or the half-assed logic applied on Buffy/Angel. The wooden stakes through the heart only paralyzed them (like in Dracula), silver and fire still kill them, and they have reflections and show up on digital film, but not in the old kind of photography because it used silver emulsion. Its consistent mythology, as mentioned above, was one of its greatest strengths.
Veronica Mars is one of the best network series ever made, and of course Moonlight cannot as much as hold a candle to it. I only mentioned it because of the actor connection (and also because they shared an influential executive producer between them, Joel Silver). But Dohring is great in this show too, and by the end it has turned into quite the decent supernatural crime procedural. Absolutely nothing you should prioritise if you have not seen every show on my top... 60 or so list, but definitely something to consider if you like supernatural shows and you're running out of good TV to check out.
Unregistered user # Friday, September 9, 2011 10:54:48 AM
Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir # Friday, September 9, 2011 1:33:14 PM
Characters are the same way - some (Tara, Jason, Sookie) are horribly unfathomably stupid and annoying, others are oh-so-bland bland (Sam, Bill - though both have improved a wee bit over time), and some select few are truly interesting or charismatic (Eric, Lafayette, Nancy (the vampire spokeslady on TV), Russell (appears in later seasons)). The plots tend to be pretty good, at least whenever they do not depend on characters being ridiculously stupid.
All in all, I would not recommend the show - but I would recommend certain scenes and plotlines if they could somehow be removed from the whole (though of course they cannot), so having invested the time in it I have, I am not at all hesitant about staying on. And also, while not in any way a steady curve, the general trend of quality has been going up with every season.
I've not seen Død Snø, as Nazi zombies sound ridiculously boring to me (anything zombie does...) and I'm not big on horror even if zombies were more interesting than they are.
Unregistered user # Friday, September 9, 2011 8:27:09 PM
Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir # Saturday, September 10, 2011 9:32:07 AM
Now, of course you can (and likely many have) make good stories even though the stories have zombies. But as you say, the story then has to be about something OTHER than the zombies. How the people react to trying to escape them, for instance. That's all well and good, but you'd get more or less the same in any kind of catastrophe or invasion movie. The difference between hiding from zombie hordes, alien invaders or the Stasi, it's negligible.
So add my distaste for horror and you will know that no, I've not read The Walking Dead, nor seen Shaun of the Dead.