Skip navigation.

Sign up | Lost password? | Help

My own self

Loki's sensible nonsense of nonsensical sense

Dexter, season 1

, , , ,

People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess.





Many people have recommended me this show based on a book called Darkly Dreaming Dexter by Jeff Lindsey, but I believe main credit for pushing me past the "will try it out sometime"-block and into the "trying it out now"-zone should be handed to Amras Elensar more than anyone else. By funny coincidence, the day before my scheduled watch of the pilot episode, Shirgaal reviewed it as well, a very positive one that would probably have tipped me over had I not decided to watch it already.

I was strongly skeptical at first mainly due to my lack of interest in and the downright unpleasantness of seeing a lot of explicit violence on screen. Oddly, the show didn't have much of it, and most of what there was happened in the first few episodes. Sure, they don't shy away from it, but they usually cut away from the worse acts of violence, just showing the lead-up and, of course, the results, but even the latter category got a little less horridly vivid as the show progressed. I applaud. No need to speculate, right.

The show, you see, is not at all about the violence. It's about the lack of feeling anything that drives the character(s) to it. The main and title character Dexter Morgan is not just the centre building block of the show, he is its epitome, its foundation and walls both, its carrying pillar, its axis mundi. A quote from Jane Espenson's blog springs to mind - "A House without a House at its centre cannot stand" - nor could a Dexter without a Dexter. With that, as on House, comes a myriad of strengths and weaknesses.

This is, to me, the first of show's two main issues keeping me from unequivocally loving it to, if you'll pardon a quite tasteless pun (and of course you will, you're reading my weblog after all and shouldn't be expecting any better), bits. See, I'm an ensemble cast man. I grew up loving Animals of Farthing Wood and Sinbad the Sailor. I got sold on serialized television in my teens through shows like Friends, Angel, Buffy, Judging Amy and Babylon 5. My present-day top favourite TV-shows are to a one marked by a big family of protagonists, each able to carry an episode on their own if they need to - and they're usually given the chance, too.

That's why a show like Dexter or House M.D. have hard times really climbing the ladder of my list of excellent shows. When this much time and energy is spent on the title character, making him look interesting and give him issues to deal with, the other characters have to suffer, and what's left is only degrees of how much So believe me when I tell you - it's still an excellent show, and you should try it out.

The other issue I have with the show is simply one of genre and premise - it's not really for me. I don't mean I don't enjoy it, I do, but I can never enjoy it as much as I would if this took place in Narnia rather than Miami. It's a mental block, a genre preference, a silly boy's silly tastes, call it what you will, but to me, any premise of a story set in present day in the real world will necessarily be less interesting than something that's not. That need not bother the reader though, and I will not bring that up again in this review. Just keep in mind that this is an additional reason for me to be less-than-excited with the show that's colouring what I think of it.

So, what IS this show? Well, without spoiling much beyond the pilot, it's a show following Dexter, a man shaped by a horrid and suppressed childhood trauma and a freakishly intelligent, hard, caring and morally free-thinking adoptive father into a trained killer. He has no emotions, having only the urge to kill, but he channels his need to do so into carefully planned out and just as carefully executed entrapments and killings of other serial killers on the Code his adoptive father taught him. Simultaneously, he was trained to blend in as a normal person, faking emotions, faking human relations, faking affection and attachment. And he's damned good at it, too, just about everybody loves Dexter. But Dexter, sadly, loves no-one.

Or at least, that's how the season starts out. Dexter is living an emotionless life in the forensics of the Miami police by day, being almost a prodigy at analysing dead bodies and blood splatters. By night he is killing off the scum of the Earth, and feeling good about it too. Then comes along the Ice Truck Killer, an, in Dexter's eyes, true artist of murder, and Dexter gets caught up in his game.

The cast is good for a title-character-focused show. Dexter's sister is lacking a little bit in charisma, but I honestly feel that's mostly because her character is an off-putting combination of insecure and overly sure of herself, and not through any fault of the actress'. The policemen in Dexter's life are all interesting enough, the exception maybe being a character I grew quite the distaste for, the local lieutenant. Thankfully she has a superior officer who is a far more classy brand of jackass (reminding me every so slightly of the awesome Rawls of The Wire) and knows how to put her into her place, which produced some of my favourite non-Dexter scenes of the show.

There are only two truly fascinating characters beyond Dexter himself, though - the Ice Truck Killer, and Dexter's girlfriend, Rita. A long-time victim of spousal abuse and single mum to two, Dexter chooses to spend time with Rita because she is damaged and, in a way, empty like him. The awkwardness and tentative steps of their relationship is beautiful and my by far favourite aspect of the show.

The show is heavy on the season mystery while following smaller episode-by-episode plots as well, much like Veronica Mars used to be, but in that comparison, the mystery is a little less captivating and more predictable than Veronica's was despite (or because) getting more attention during the entire season's run. It's still very good, though, and the show as a whole is incredibly addictive.




Now follows the spoilery part of the review, those who haven't seen the season yet and think they will at some point should skip to the last paragraph.

As the season progresses the Ice Truck Killer keeps attempting to undermine Harry's Code in Dexter's head, keeps trying to open up his suppressed memories to reveal, among other things, his adoptive father's somewhat less than truthful behaviour with regards to Dexter's childhood.

Rudy/Brian was very interesting. The problem was, of course, that I felt pretty confident that he was the Ice Truck Killer the second the character came on scene. You could tell that the man in the white coat was a character actor, and not just some random guy, and that was really enough. It's a sad fact, but, dramatically, they HAVE to make the killer into someone that's already introduced on the show to make the reveal exciting enough, and he was the only character who not only grew from a background-character with two lines into one with as much screentime as any other supporting actor, but who was clearly not cast by a nobody-actor.

When they started heaping on hints on him in addition, I actually started thinking he might not be the guy after all, but an intentional mislead. So that the Big Mystery Of The Season really only ever had one real candidate among the cast was saddening. The character himself, though, was awesome, as was the actor. I have to admit that while I obviously realized he had some connection to Dexter’s childhood, once I saw how young he was (and thus he couldn't possibly have been the killer of Dexter's mum) I stopped thinking about that and thus didn’t see his being Dexter’s brother coming until just a short while before it was revealed. So at least they got me a little there.

As loose ends go, the season didn't really leave many except obvious start-ups for season 2, but I do wonder a lot on Brian's need to kill their biological father. It felt as though there was something there that should've been revealed but never was, which bugs me.

The unblocking of Dexter's memories also leading him to feel a little again, thus starting to care for his sister beyond Harry's Code just as Harry's authority was broken down enough in his head for him to consider breaking it, was a very nice and ironic twist. Brian would probably have succeeded in his scheme had he confronted Dexter with Harry's lies without also unblocking his memories - he would've lost faith in his father's Code without regaining some sense of emotion.

This also lead to a very nice - and long in the coming - turn in Dexter's relationship with Rita, as he is genuinely starting to need company in his life. The season finale is very, very good.




On the whole, the season is a beautifully crafted story with very good visuals and at times very funny little mental remarks from Dexter, and my only real complaint isn't truly valid - as it is that I don't think this particular story could be told much better, but that I think they could have made a story more suited to my tastes in stead. As it stands, it is a very successful and almost equally daring piece of work. The only thing I've seen that's remotely similar to this is the very excellent and thoroughly canceled The Inside, but even that wasn't quite as dark as the mere premise of this show. I might not have heard of James Manos Jr. before (Wikipedia claims he's been involved on The Sopranos and The Shield though), but he's made what's easily one of the best made shows I've ever seen, and certainly one of the more addictive ones. I thoroughly enjoyed it, and look forward to the second season - which I will of course be watching right away.

Justice #3Captain Hammer - Be Like Me

Comments

Anonymous 3. July 2008, 23:21

Shirgaal writes:

Excellent review. :)

I agree that these kind of of shows where the entire concept hinges upon the main character have a certain... lacking. With multiple, interesting characters - Like for example Firefly -, the characters speak for themselves, and thus the show need not rely so heavily on an exciting season plot, riddled with suspense.

I too loved the season finale, and found the final scene between Dexter and Brian heartbreaking.

Regarding Brian's murder of their biological father, I have a theory. He may have committed the murder as simply a part of a calculated plan to bring him closer to Dexter, and eventually spending the weekend together, as well as sharing something of a moment together.
The murder could also have been motivated by a feeling of abandonment, and that he was exacting vengeance upon Joe for failing to protect and take care of them.

Very detailed, and solid review. I very much enjoyed reading your thoughts on Dexter's blockage. ;)

Looking forward to hearing what you think of the second season. :)





Loki Aesir 3. July 2008, 23:45

The abandonment is probably a good theory, I doubt that he'd have killed him just as a part in the scheme to get closer to Dexter - he could've reveal Harry's lies without killing their father if he wanted to do so, and he was far too intelligent to do things without reasons.

I do wonder why Harry so wanted to keep Dexter from his biological father, though - possibly to keep him from having conflicting authorities in his very careful upbringing? Or was there some dark secret to his biological father that Harry (and Brian?) knew about?

"With multiple, interesting characters - Like for example Firefly -, the characters speak for themselves, and thus the show need not rely so heavily on an exciting season plot, riddled with suspense."

My point exactly. My main argument for Buffy being on that top five list is just that - an ensemble of characters so incredibly excellent that even the worst episodes work reasonably well due to the interaction between them.


And I look forward to hearing what I think of the second season my own self. Just at the second episode of it yet, though. Missing Brian, but loving that Deadwood's Wild Bill seems to have become a charming FBI-veteran regular in this season.

Thanks very much for reading, and for commenting so extensively as well! Comments like that make bothering with writing such posts feel worth the trouble.

Loki Aesir 3. July 2008, 23:48

Oh, and since I managed to omit him in the review proper - the character of Angel is just so heartbreakingly decent. The show would be much poorer without him.

Anonymous 4. July 2008, 23:27

Shirgaal writes:

Have to remember, though, that Brian killed several women, as well as mutilated a man in order to reconnect with Dexter. Though I consider Brian's sensation of feeling betrayed, to be the strongest motivation.

I think Harry's motivations for keeping Dexter from his biological father could be related to the time Joe spent in prison - Dexter pointing out that his "vietnam tattoo" was actually a prison tattoo.
Also, when Dexter, Brian, Rita and Debra spend the weekend at Joe's house, they note that there are no records of him older than 30 years. This opens the possibility that Joeseph Driscoll is an assumed name, and that he perhaps entered a witness protection program to hid from considerably dangerous criminals - possibly the same criminals that killed Laura Moser.

Hehe. I actually didn't realise that it was Wild Bill, until a couple of episode. They're so entirely different characters. It says a lot about Keith Carradine's acting skills - Or my inability to distinguish actors. Hmm..

I liked Angel a lot, as well. His slick style, romantic behavior, and especially- as you said - his decency.

And it's reviews like this that makes it worth posting comments. ;)

Loki Aesir 5. July 2008, 02:14

"Have to remember, though, that Brian killed several women, as well as mutilated a man in order to reconnect with Dexter. Though I consider Brian's sensation of feeling betrayed, to be the strongest motivation."

You suggest he killed their dad so he could have the connecting-over-his-ashes-moment with Dexter?

"I think Harry's motivations for keeping Dexter from his biological father (...)"

Just saw the season 2-ep where we learn that Harry had a relationship to Dexter's biological mom, that might be related too.

"Hehe. I actually didn't realise that it was Wild Bill, until a couple of episode. They're so entirely different characters. It says a lot about Keith Carradine's acting skills - Or my inability to distinguish actors."

Took me three seconds of "where have I seen this guy before?" in his first scene before I recognised him. He's awesome, though. Actually like him even more here than as Bill.

And it's reviews like this that makes it worth posting comments.

Aww, kind sir, thee maketh me blush.

Anonymous 5. July 2008, 12:21

Shirgaal writes:

Well, not only the ash-spreading moment, but the entire weekend they spent with each other. Their father's death provided him with the opportunity he needed to get up close, and interact with Dexter over several days.

Harry's relationship to Laura Moser is definitely a strong possibility for his motivation.

By the way, finishing The Wire today - Fucking Kenard!? -, and a certain someone's "cameo" near the end of the 9th episode "Late Editions" made be laugh quite loud.

Michael comes rushing into the apartment, and finds Dukie watching television.
"Where you been at, Mike? You gotta see this. There's a serial killer, but he only be killin' other serial killers" - Dukie

I catch a glimpse of the screen and I see Dexter's hands collecting a blood trophy from a victim's cheeks. :D

Loki Aesir 6. July 2008, 15:17

That's right. And in another episode, there was someone watching Deadwood and, if I don't misremember, commenting on all the swearing.


And holy crap, Carradine is awesome on Dexter. Half-way through the season now.

Kaffekatten 16. August 2009, 21:53

Well, well, well. I did like the ending. Suspense in bucketloads.

The build-up went from a good start to far too overt hints. I too figured out who the ITK was very early (as soon as it was apparent he was not just an extra), and said "please, don't let it be him, it's just too freakin' obvious". And I postulated the brother-theory several episodes before it became known. It would have been better if there clues were subtler and the revelation more surprising. The ITK was so much more interesting when he was indeed mysterious. The ending only partly made up for that - I never doubted even slightly what Dexter would choose, and it would have been more interesting by far if he'd been losing his way for some time at that point, being on the brink of and wanting to abandon Harry's Code, even knowing he couldn't do it and survive...

But who knows what the next couple of seasons will bring? Are any of them worse than S1, or does the show keep improving? And are the later seasons also 12-episode, or are we headed into full-blown 22 territory?

Can't wait to see how the situation between Dexter and Nemesis Negro (can't recall his name, even though I know I should - very interesting character despite his a-little-too-convenient black ops background) deteriorates further. Watching Dexter keeping up his facade while investigating what only he knew was himself was my favorite part of the first season, I think, and that slid a little into the background toward the end of the season, for obvious reasons.

Angel and Masuka - perfect sidekicks, even more so together. And I did like LaGuerta, flawed as she may be - maybe her attitude toward Dexter had something to do with it. Nemesis Negro (it's really too ridiculous that the one character whose name I forget is the black guy, goddammit) needs someone he respects to balance him out when it comes to Dexter, I think.

All in all, enjoyable, lots of suspense, but not so much mystery and surprise as I would have liked. I hope Dexter himself can take center stage again now that his brother's out of the picture - I'd like to see what happens if he's really tempted to break the Code, and his sister catches on to him. I guess we'll see once we get a hold of S2. :D

Kaffekatten 16. August 2009, 22:05

Just looked at your S2 review, looks like I'm getting some of what I wanted and some of what I didn't. Less mystery, less inner darkness threatening... but more about Dexter and his hiding to survive. I can live with that, I think, now that my expectations have been set at the right level.

And of course it was Doakes. Duh. In my defense, though, the name doesn't really stick out (while the character itself certainly does - and don't go there P:).

Kaffekatten 17. August 2009, 05:42

Oh yeah, I guess I also miss Dexter's detachment and the pleasure he takes in killing from the early episodes. Watching him become gradually more human is funny, but it also takes away a fascinating aspect of the show. I think I preferred the Dexter who really is nothing but a cold-blooded killer, faking everything yet keeping to the Code, not the Dexter who is slowly, inexorably becoming good, which is familiar, which is boring.

While a desperate-for-survival Dexter which I expect S2 will bring may be even more interesting now that he's becoming less detached and suddenly has something real to lose, I'm going to miss his dark side. If he was still completely detached, he'd still be very anxious not to get caught (because of Harry's lessons) and the consequences for the people who care about him would be just as devastating. It feels like a missed opportunity, a road not taken, by choice. This isn't the show I started watching at the beginning of the season, and it's a loss for the series in my eyes.

Loki Aesir 17. August 2009, 10:39

The need to make Dexter pseudo-nice is ever a problem for the show, they do it too much, but if memory serves, they do bring him around to Bad again quite a bit, maybe particularly in s3. As for quality, no, s2-3 is never as intense as 1, but they are still in no way disappointments - at least not to me.

The show also has an AWESOME history at great central guest-start-of-the-season-characters, the ITK being it for season 1, Carradine in s2, and Smits in the third. This is also my main reason for looking forward to seson 4 (that, and that the slightly changed premise since the end of s3 should hopefully make Dexter more morally difficult to swallow for the audience again) - the central new actor for this season big important New Face is John Lithgow, the awesome lead on the sitcom Third Rock from the Sun. Can't wait to see him do a serious and dark role. :D

As to your question about season lengths, 12 episodes IS a full season, this is a Showtime-show. The seasons are all thus that length. Cable networks like HBO and Showtime operates with 12-13 episode length seasons. (Pick up any example you want - The Sopranos, The Tudors, The Wire, Rome, they're all that length)

Thank you for commenting so thoroughly. Sorry it's been so long since I saw it myself I can't really go in more detail than this in my reply... (There's also the risk of spoilage, of course)

Anonymous 17. August 2009, 19:05

Robert Kuang writes:

Surprisingly, I actually agree with you. Remember way back when I was talking to you about possibly liking this show? After watching the first season, I thought it was a high quality, unique show, but I didn't love it.

While I usually love stories where you see from the perspective of a killer/villain, this one seems to hinge on the fact that viewers LIKE seeing what they do. Again, it's not my usual form, but I can't really stomach it.

Also, I'm a huge fan of ensemble cast mainly for the ensemble stories and the many strings of storylines that present a entire whole. Dexter is definitely lacking in that department.

Loki Aesir 17. August 2009, 19:33

"A House without a House at its centre cannot stand" indeed. As I say above, the ensemble-lack is an issue for me, too.

As is the business of making Dexter acceptable to the viewer. But I still quite like this show. Don't quite love it, but really, really like it. Of the shows starting back up this autumn, I think Mad Men is the only one that's likely to get close to it in quality, and Mad Men is even less of my type of thing than Dexter is. So, despite not loving it, it is definitely a show I'm quite excited about these days, being the for me most interesting of the upcoming season premieres. (With the caveat that "Epitath One" has given me some small hopes that Dollhouse might overwhelm me with awesome this autumn if I'm really, really lucky, but the show's not gotten into Dexter-league yet)

Kaffekatten 20. August 2009, 11:47

I can't help but wondering whether Dexter is a really divisive show. There are those who (like me) WANT the main character to be unlikable and do Bad Stuff so you get a different and fresh experience. I've never been dependent on justifying a character's acts when it comes to identifying with the person. When I watch Dexter, killing is Right in my mind until I turn the TV off. I'm not uncomfortable about it. I know right from wrong and I don't run around doing stuff I see on TV. And I believe that anyone who does is already so far off the deep end that they could probably get just as homicidal from exposure to the color orange.

Then there are those who say "that's not Good/Right/Biblical - I don't care about this character anymore". For my part it'd be a loss if the latter viewpoint gets to dictate a show's plot, but as long as TV is made in America, I fear that it will always be so. Not that I want to see an end of American TV in general, but a decline in the cultural need for happy endings and morality in every story told would make the medium more interesting.

Then again, one only has to look at the debate surrounding video games to see just how far off such a paradigm shift is. Might as well ask for quality sci-fi not getting canceled. *sigh*

Anonymous 20. August 2009, 12:38

Loki writes:

You might really like "Profit", then, to my recollection they do no attempts at giving him redeeming features. But of course, his compulsion isn't killing, and thus does so rather rarely, which probably made it easier for them to think they'd get away with it. (Being canceled with only four episodes aired and only four more produced, they were obviously wrong on that particular subject.) I'm getting more and more bent on having you see it now, just to hear what you think.

Oh, and because I can't not point that out: Killing people is [i]tremendously[/i] Biblical. God's body-count is higher even than Jack Bauer's.

As for your comment's main point, yup, the show probably is divisive in that respect, but its vast popularity indicates it has managed to straddle the gap well enough to keep most who feel like you do and most who feel a little too appalled by his person happy enough to stay on.

Anonymous 20. August 2009, 12:43

Loki writes:

Oh, and there has DEFINITELY been such a decline as you're calling for, even if it might not have gone far enough for your tastes. Just look at shows like The Sopranos, The Wire, Deadwood, Dexter, Rome, and even a network show like Mad Men. All vastly popular, all without clear-cut good and bad, all without a traditional happy ending, though Dexter and Mad Men could admittedly still get one. Not having seen it, I can't be sure, but on the even more mainstream-line, I suspect The Shield is yet another one of these. Compare to the mid-nineties, and you won't find ANYTHING like this, anywhere. Except Profit and, probably, other shows that were also cancelled before anybody got past the opening credits. So the decline you want is totally going on, full steam ahead. Might not be far enough ahead for your tastes yet, though.

Kaffekatten 20. August 2009, 20:34

I know that killing is about as Biblical as you get, most people don't appreciate the irony though. P:

Hm, apart from one episode of Rome and of course Dexter, I haven't seen any of those. I should watch more Rome, I think. If only for inventive ideas on how to treat servant girls. :D

But first I must finish Battlestar Galactica (in mid-S3 now). No idea what kind of ending that show is gonna get, but I'm dying to find out. In a non-spoilery fashion, of course.

Loki Aesir 20. August 2009, 21:10

BSG's ending, without spoiling the content in any way, really divides the fans of the show - most either hate or love it. As usual, I find myself in the very small minority who sort of agrees with both. I rather lean towards loving it, though. But be warned not to have too high expectations - some are thorouhgly disappointed.

Rome is highly recommended. As is The Wire. Both being properly finished and everything. The Sopranos is also very good, but slightly less my thing, with its much more heavy focus on personal drama and psychology and accordinly spending less time on intrigue, politics and moral issues. In quality, though, it can probably measure up to them both, if it's your thing. As for Deadwood, it might be my favourite show ever, DESPITE being canceled without a proper ending. Seriously. I love it THAT much. I love it West Wing-Firefly-BSG-levels and since I rate it over them, probably even a bit more. So go watch Deadwood! Shoo!

Kaffekatten 21. August 2009, 06:04

From the titles alone, The Wire and Deadwood sound like bad shows of the kind I can't bear to watch but everyone else seems to love, probably for the exact same reasons I hate 'em. Just sayin'.

If you could give me a few hints as to why each of these aren't yet another CSI-clone or something else mundane and boring I might be compelled to check them out in time, though. I don't doubt your nose for good TV, but I need to know what they're about in general terms. :smile:

I don't think the Sopranos is my thing either. Did watch some of it, but genuine interest escaped me. It's often so with popular shows, while stuff I absolutely adores get canned two times out of three, it seems.

Thanks for the heads up on the BSG ending. Realistic expectations = good. I have a hunch that the series is meant to be set in our past, where humanity is finally killed off and we are descendants of the Cylons or Cylon-human cross-breeds (sans downloading and other quirks). Right now you're probably laughing at my wild speculation, which will no doubt be proven wrong as we get to S4, but it would be an interesting ending, I think, so I just decided to toss it out here for your amusement. :D

Loki Aesir 21. August 2009, 11:01

The Wire is a five-season case-study in human nature, politics, corruption and morality placed in the city of Baltimore. It is only a cop-show in the sense that one of the groups you look closely at always remain the police force, while others change around. It is in no way a show like CSI or other traditional cop-shows because of this, though. To give you an image: Season 1 focuses on organised drug crime and the cops trying to shut it down, but almost as much time is spent on getting to know the criminals as the cops. Season 2 focuses on the blue collar unions at the harbour, their involvement in illegal trafficking to make ends meet, while still keeping an eye on the cops and the criminals from season 1. The politicians start slowly becoming more important now as well. Season 3 brings the focus back to the drug-dealers and the cops, but with a much stronger presence of political involvement (usually not for the good). Season 4 does a side-step to the school system similar to season 2's look at the struggling unions, while the politics grow ever-more central, and season 5 similarly delves into the press.
The show has no clear-cut good guys, no clear-cut bad guys. It has people trying to do good, and people out only for themselves, but they both exists on both sides of the law. An openly gay black guy who makes a hazardous living stealing drugs and cash at gun-point from the dealers is one of my favourite characters on the show. It's not a cop show. It's a show about the rotting from the inside of a modern American city, and cops just happen to be a part of that.

Deadwood is a show slightly similar in that last sense - it's about the growing frontier community of the town named Deadwood. Pseudo-historical much like Rome in that many characters but not all are real historical people, and many plotlines are based on real events but not all of them are. Every episode covers a day (except for a couple of to-be-continued-cases where two episodes cover a single day), and thus most of the time passes between seasons, not during, as the individual seasons only show us an eventful week and a half of the characters' lives. Its main strengths are the incredibly real feeling of the town and its characters, supreme acting and dialogue, and the lack of distinct good-guys. (You might at times be fooled into thinking there are some, though.) The show has some good people, of course, who do good things, but no heroes in the typical sense.

Both The Wire and Deadwood are dark, serious shows that tries hard for realism and in my opinion succeeds. The shows are about groups of people, their actions, why they make them and whether or not they should. It's not about cops, or drug dealers, or gold miners or saloon-owners, even though a random watch of a random episode could risk giving you that impression. If you watch either of the shows from the get-go, like it or don't like it, you'll never think of The Wire as a clear-cut cop-show or Deadwood as anything remotely like what you used to think of as a western ever again.

The historical setting as well as the presence of Al Swearengen, played above and beyond brilliantly by Ian McShane, is what makes Deadwood my favourite of the two, but both are incredibly textured and incredibly well done. Both of them are frequently compared to novels disguised as TV-shows, and that's probably a comparison that can help you figure out what to expect a little more.

The Sopranos have similarities to the two, but is a little different in my opinion. First of all because it has a rather clear and obvious main character, while the other two are much more heavily ensamble-casts. Second, and related to this, instead of looking at society and society's effect on people, it looks at the individual. The Wire is about Baltimore, or really any modern city, Deadwood is about Deadwood or really anywhere where people get together to build a community from scratch, but The Sopranos is about Tony Sopranos, his life, his choices, his mental health and how his "two families" affect these things. Thus it is more personal, more intimate, and, in my eyes, rather less epic and interesting.

On your BSG-speculations, I wisely refrain from commenting. :wink:

Kaffekatten 21. August 2009, 18:35

That's incredibly helpful. Curiosity piqued, I'll let you know what comes of it. :smile:

Loki Aesir 21. August 2009, 19:21

Hooray, then! And have as much fun as you can with the rest of Dexter!

Kaffekatten 23. August 2009, 10:14

Thanks, I'll comment on your S2 review when we get that far.

Loki Aesir 23. August 2009, 11:15

That's nice of you. There's a review for s3 too, by the way, but for some reason Opera decided to throw the first two back up on top of my weblog when I did small edits (spelling error on one, a missing tag on the other) on the reviews of s1 and 2. Just don't want the lack of a s3 review on the front page to make you think there isn't one. :wink:

How to use Quote function:

  1. Select some text
  2. Click on the Quote link

Write a comment

Comment
(BBcode and HTML is turned off for anonymous user comments.)

If you can't read the words, press the small reload icon.


Smilies

November 2009
S M T W T F S
October 2009December 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30