Fringe, season 1
Friday, 3. July 2009, 12:15:03
"How long has he been dead?"
"Five hours."
"Question him."
This show was exactly as I expected: Well-made, intricate, cursed with an overabundance of standalone episodes, containing some quite interesting characters, and based on a main plot and premise that is unable to escape the feeling of "haven't I seen this ten times before?" Fringe is another attempt - this one by Lost's J. J. Abrams and two guys who used to work on Hercules and Xena - at the age old "let's do the sci-fi show as a cop-show as well, that'll make it more mainstream"-shtick that's been floating around since The X-files, and as such attempts to, it's pretty well done. That is, though, not saying too much.
To not focus on all the negative right away, I should mention that I absolutely love two of the characters; the brilliant but confused Dr. Walter Bishop and his prodigal jack-of-all-trades son Peter, who between them probably have an IQ higher than Lex Luthor. John Noble and Joshua Jackson bring these awesomely entertaining characters and their complex relationship with each other out and alive in quite impressive performances. They are lucky, though, as their characters are both well thought-out and well written. Some kudos should thus also be given to the three actors rounding out the main cast (Lance Reddick, Kirk Acevedo and Anna Torv), including the main character Olivia Dunham, because they at times actually seem interesting in spite of the writing passing them off as cliches and dreadful bores.
As I seem to have stumbled into the negative again, why don't we look at the structure of the show? Fringe's main problem in my eyes is its slow-paced standalone episode set up. While I understand the need for attracting new viewers through this formula, they endanger themselves of losing old ones. I know several people who stopped three or four episodes in, and had I myself not been a student with a summer vacation to fill, I probably would not have finished this show either. The only season plot of any real interest - predictably enough closely tied to both the Bishop's - was dreadfully apparent after only four episodes, and the hints just kept on flowing. Now, I'm all for foreshadowing, but when the summer finale's big reveal is the same plot-twist I figured out before Christmas, they're not doing it right. It's a very good plot-twist, having vast potential both for emotional character-stuff, and further plot-progression, and it should not have been wasted by spreading it out so slowly that by the time it happened, there was no shock-factor at all left.
The show's science-stuff is very variable. I'm a humanities type of guy, so when I spot obvious scientific impossibilities in the mumbo-jumbo they have Dr. Bishop spew out, that means they are too far-fetched. If you're going to explain everything with pseudo-science, honestly, you need better explanations than what Fringe often offers. However, sometimes it is not too obvious that their theories are all complete ridiculous bullshit, and those times, the show works splendidly - though it is still laughably ridiculous that anyone, regardless of intelligence, would have vast experience in as many thoroughly different fields as Walter Bishop repeatedly demonstrates. I can overlook that, though, in the interest of storytelling convenience. (Also, it makes Walter even more awesome).
All in all, Fringe is a well-made cop-show with a conspiracy-theory standing in for a main plot and science-fiction with a touch of explicit horror scenes standing in for regular criminals. If this sounds interesting, the show's definitely for you. If it doesn't - if, indeed, it sounds unoriginal and trite to the point of yawning, like it does to me - you might want to steer away but for one thing. It's main redeeming feature - and it is indeed very redeeming - is the dialogue, performance and dynamic of the two Bishop-characters, which consistently offers both emotion, drama and humour of high quality. And, by the end of the show, to a less extent the main character Dunham as well, who in all fairness did get some decent character development throughout. I will check out season 2, but unless it improves strongly, this is one show I will not be too sad to have to let go once I'm no longer a full-time student with scores of sparetime.









Anonymous # 3. July 2009, 18:12
Haha, we DO disagree on Fringe. I'm not sure if Fringe will be much different in season 2, unless they dramatically alter the storyline. Given the season 1 finale that's very well possible. Overall, I don't find any of the annoyances you find. For some reason, I'm able to disconnect myself from the science impossibilities, and my favorite character is Olivia. I am attracted to her competence, although Walter is badass. I'm sure all the ideas have been done before, but sci-fi often steps over old ideas (the only recent exception is Lost with its Egyptian stuff) and its the way its produced, executed and written that makes it interesting.
Oh well, here's to hoping season 2 interests you :P
Loki Aesir # 3. July 2009, 18:17
Of course, they could deal with all this in the season premiere and go back to being the exact same show as before. I'm hoping not, though. As I said, the production is really, really good, and many of the characters have vast potential. It's the ideas and some of the plots that to me feel obvious, unoriginal and, at times, outright boring.
Amrasananas # 4. July 2009, 22:48
I only watched half of ep 1 of Fringe, so I can't say much about it. What I saw, I thought was veeery boring, and the characters you mention liking (the father/son deal) just struck me as incredibly cliched. Seems like I did the right thing in not trotting through it.
Will check out that Brotherhood thing though. That one sounded like more my style.
Loki Aesir # 4. July 2009, 23:32
Brotherhood is immensely more your style. As, frankly, is it mine, despite the lack of sci-fi or fantasy in it. Still unsure how you'll actually feel about it, though, as I would have assumed The Wire to be your style as well, and we all remember how that went.
Fringe's strongest card by far is the Bishops, and if you didn't like them in the pilot, you wouldn't later either. More of the same, and the only real reason I stuck with the show. If you couldn't even grow a liking to that bit of it, steering way clear of Fringe was probably a very smart call.
Amrasananas # 5. July 2009, 22:18
Loki Aesir # 5. July 2009, 22:25
But again, that alone is not really quite enough to warrant watching the show, your time is much better spent elsewhere, I'm sure.
TheTerje # 7. July 2009, 20:33
My estimation, based on my extremely limited experience, is pretty much what you said, Loki: a show with some potential, but which needs to get away from the monster-of-the-week concept. I thought what hints of an arc I saw seemed passingly interesting, and I liked the way the episode was nearly impossible to understand for someone who hadn't watched any of it before (I was lucky; I had my sister to ask and a review of the episode in SFX to consult as well).
However, I found the plot of the episode to fall flat on its belly, both in terms of pacing, action and general dramaturgy. They failed, I thought, to properly emphasise the various aspects of the investigation (such as it were), so that the important parts felt pretty much as the not-so-important parts. Then, of course, it's the part about having a psychic or whatever pretty much solve the crime on her own without much non-bureaucratic difference -- and even the bureaucratic differences felt like a breeze, as none of Dunham's superiors really seemed to question her gigantic and unfounded leaps in reasoning. In short, they could learn a lot from Medium.
Probably not a show I'll bother to add to my really exclusive watch list.
Loki Aesir # 7. July 2009, 21:05
Not at all. If you watch this before "The Wire" or even "Boston Legal", I might have to hurt you.
TheTerje # 7. July 2009, 21:34
(Oh dear. If my goal was to avoid being injured, I probably shouldn't have mentioned that I haven't finished BSG s4, should I?)
Loki Aesir # 8. July 2009, 02:43
Amrasananas # 8. July 2009, 17:13
Loki Aesir # 8. July 2009, 17:19
TheTerje # 13. July 2009, 12:42
Loki Aesir # 13. July 2009, 15:05
If you finish only one show this year, alright, let it be The Wire or Deadwood. But if you finish one more after them, I'd put Kings right up there with Battlestar Galactica only slightly in front. And Kings is way, way shorter.
TheTerje # 13. July 2009, 16:20
Loki Aesir # 13. July 2009, 17:04
Loki Aesir # 13. July 2009, 17:04
TheTerje # 13. July 2009, 20:08
Loki Aesir # 13. July 2009, 20:11
Amrasananas # 13. July 2009, 21:40
I second this statement.
And everything else that Loki says. Except that thing about BSG season 3, 'cause that season was just not up to snuff. But Season 4 is well worth the bother, methinks.
Loki Aesir # 14. July 2009, 01:26