Posts tagged with "I implore you"
Thursday, 5. November 2009, 14:28:19
expectations, megalomania, I implore you, Non-Whedon-Television
...
Everyone's looking to play an angle.
On the sage counsel of the entity I think of as
Rkuang, I sat down a couple of weeks ago or so and checked out
Damages. My motivation? Threefold.
One, everything I could find of information on it seemed appealing. Ruthless lawyers, complex intrigue, an utter lack of moral absolutes... Sounds good, no?
Two, Glenn Close.
Three, Ted Danson.
So, check it out I did, and with an immediacy that'd put Lucky Luke's right hand to shame, I was hooked. The show virtually seethed with complexity. If I were watching this on a week-to-week basis, I have no idea how I would have kept it all straight. Watching it all in a week and a half made that easy, but... I'm worried how I'll fare with season 3.
So how is it complex, you might ask? Well, each season has an on-going main story that the episodes spend most of the time on. This story uses cut-scenes very cleverly to repeatedly make you think one thing is happening, when truthfully the scene turns out to have meant something else entirely. Sure, you see a lot of these twists coming - at least I did - but there is just so delightfully
many of them, there is no way you can see them all. On top of this comes a "x months in the future" frame-story, filmed in dystopian colour-schemes, which shows you out of context fragments of what will happen to the characters down the line. These little glimpses affect the way you watch the main plot deeply - and the next little glimpse of a future scene will almost always turn what you were thinking topsy turvy.
Add to this the fact that most of the characters on the show are scheming bastards, and you've got a mixture that can't but engage.
As for the actual stories and characters, it is all very good. Without giving much away, I think my initial gut-comparison on Twitter still describes this rather well -
Damages is somewhere floating in the creative middle-point between
Profit and
State of Play. (
My review of the former - I sadly haven't gotten around to writing one for the latter, but it is an
excellent BBC miniseries, go see!)
Rarely do you find a better cast - more or less every actor impressed - but the one who in the end impressed me the most was in fact neither Danson nor Close, though they were of course both stellar, it was Zeljko Ivanek. (One of the main baddies of
24's legendary first season, one of the few good things about
Heroes' third season, and also a fantastic guest star actor having been on popular shows such as
Lost,
Ally McBeal,
House MD,
True Blood, and a million others) Never having seen him in this close to a protagonistic role (gun to my head I'd call him the show's third in line for the title, at worst fourth), I was deeply impressed. Fantastic character, fantastic actor, fantastic arc. But really, he doesn't stand out that much - because these guys are all good.
Even the "innocent" lamb for the slaughter played by Rose Byrne impressed. Instead of being the stereotypical nice person the viewer is supposed to identify with, she rather played the role of showing what happens to an intelligent but decent person if she's thrown into a cutthroat environment such as this show's. One very excellent way to watch the show is as a tale of the gradual but inevitable corruption of this character, and it is exquisite. To give a final example of how good the actors on this show are? Well, by the end of the second season, we've seen two regulars from
The Wire and two from
Deadwood pop up as either regulars or recurring character. And that's not even mentioning the movie-actors they bring in.
The show's main strength, of course, is Glenn Close's Patty Hewes, the other protagonist next to Byrne's. An ends-always-justifies-the-means kind of woman with a towering intellect and just enough morals not to be a psychopath, she's the hub around which the show circles. Suffice to say, unless you're going to hire Ian McShane, you can't really find a better focal point for any show.
In conclusion, a few words on the show's progression - the second season is slightly less intense than the first, and the conclusions, though nicely wrapped up, feel less deliciously entwined and interconnected. This is understandable for a whole host of reasons, not the least of which is the mere fact of being a second season after such an incredible start as this show had. While still very good, very entertaining, and still spilling over with great actors, you're hereby warned, season 2 is not quite as ingenious as the first. But compared to most other shows it is still like asking the archangel Michael to engage in a fistfight with Donald Duck. (Except in this case, Michael would likely in truth be Sammael disguised as the Devil pretending to be Gabriel in a convincing Michael-costume. Or something. Donald's so screwed.)
It's not my favourite show of all time, and since I've seen some damned good TV in my day, it won't reach the top five list, either. But I can honestly say I feel
bad about that, that's how good
Damages is. It
should be on a top five list somewhere, because that's how hooked I am. But it is definitely in top 10. I'm not sure who it'd be pushing out, but good riddance. Being beaten out by Close, Danson and Ivanek is a badge of honour in my book.
"If you were a man, I'd kick the living dogshit out of you."
"If you were a man, I'd be worried."
Highly recommended.
Friday, 29. May 2009, 23:09:07
Non-Whedon-Television, rant, I implore you, quote of the day
How would you like a show where the Ice Truck Killer from
Dexter was the protagonist, only instead of killing people he just wanted to control them?
If you're anything like me, you're currently drooling incontrollably, so you should find a towel to put over your keyboard for protection before you continue reading this review of
Profit.
Revenge is pointless. It's a tool for the weak. And you're not weak. Not anymore.
- Jim ProfitNow this was a thoroughly pleasant surprise! And out of nowhere, too. Whilst surfing Wikipedia and IMDB for the further works of the writers of some of the best
Angel-episodes, I decided to check out the resume of the show's co-creator David Greenwalt. Lo and behold,
Angel was not the first show he co-created, as he in 1996 together with a John McNamara made the short-lived Fox-show
Profit.
"Short-lived" all to often means "too good to appeal to a mainstream audience", so added to Greenwalt's name, my interest was already stirring. Then I see that the title character Jim Profit was played by Adrian Pasdar, who I knew fondly from his parts on
Judging Amy and
Heroes.
Some more checking, and it turns out the ever-eminent Keith Szarabajka (recently the growly copper in
Dark Knight, fellow Whedon-fans will remember him as the morally ambigious
Angel-villain Holtz) was another regular on the show.
Wikipedia described
Profit as a forerunner of darker and more morally dubious TV-shows in general and protagonists in paticular, listing
Nip/Tuck,
Dexter and
Mad Men as later successes in the same vain.
Alright, so I was sold. Now, I've never seen
Nip/Tuck, largely because I suspect I'm much too tender for it, but I have seen the other two, and while the comparison to
Mad Men in my opinion is way, way off, the comparison to
Dexter, well, isn't.
Profit, like the more recent
Dexter, uses a psycopath and/or sociopath as its protagonist, making the viewer root for someone who at best is of dubious moral integrity and at worst is the personification of all that is evil. The difference is that where Dexter is obsessed with killing, Profit is obsessed with controlling. But beyond this main difference in premise and M.O., there are many similarities. They both narrate their respective shows, bringing the viewer into their world through them. Profit even addresses the camera directly in the beginning and end of every episode. Where Dexter had his cop dad teaching him to live out his needs and fit in with society, Profit has a drug-addict con-woman stepmother from whom he indubitably learned many a trick. (A stepmother who is also his long-time lover - the show is seriously depraved). The shows have a thoroughly different feel to them, though, and the supporting cast and the episode plots are vastly different between them, so if you've seen
Dexter, there's not a big worry of
Profit feeling as a rehash.
As mentioned, Profit is obsessed with controlling, making him a perfect fit for corporate America. Gaining a leg in the door on the top floor of what's basically the proto-Wolfram & Hart (the classic Big Scary Morally Bankrupt Supercompany for those who haven't seen
Angel), Profit's mission in life is to control and protect this corporation who played an integral part of his childhood trauma.
In a mere nine episodes - only four of which originally aired - the mythology still has the time to build rather extensively, and you get to know many characters quite well. My favourite is probably Profit's hesitant accomplice Gail (Lisa Darr), a woman he originally blackmails into helping him, and then corrupts a little more with every episode. Her constant struggle between the benefits of helping Profit and the moral issues of performing the tasks he asks of her is all the more delightful in lieu of her gradual realisation that she's actually quite good at it - and that thus, she also partly enjoys it. But there are a myriad of interesting and fascinating characters to delve into on this show.
It's difficult, still being under the spell of fresh "ooh, this is so much fun!"-feelings but trying to write an objective review. The show isn't perfect, by any means. To bring the comparison with
Dexter further, this show is ten years older, looks much less sleek, and is sometimes a little clunky. Especially its visuals of things done in computers are sometimes a little... overly corny. But, I mean, come on, it was made in 1996. Considering that,
Profit was impressively ahead of the curve in more ways than one, and I for one have thoroughly enjoyed it. The ending, while not a proper nor probably even half-way intended one, still ended up tying together a lot of plot-threads, and for those interested in more, the creators have let on some plans of what would have happened in a second season that can be read on
the show's Wikipedia-page.
I don't think I've ever discovered, seen, and reviewed an entire TV-show in two days before. But I did with this one. And while it is rather old, it
is actually out on DVD-people, so go buy. Or catch it on Chiller, Wikipedia informs me they're currently airing the full series.
Friday, 1. May 2009, 01:19:06
Non-Whedon-Television, Jade, always-wanted-to-do-that, pessimism
...
Just for anyone who might wonder, the show (click
here for my post about its pilot), whilst miraculously still not formally cancelled, has been moved to this summer, where its piss-poor ratings will look a little less shitty next to exclusively reruns of more popular and far less interesting shows. Also for anyone who might wonder, every single episode that's aired before they moved it has delivered on the promise of the pilot. I watch ungodly amounts of American television, and of all the current shows, this is my favourite by far. (Even
Pushing Daisies is a far cry behind, though I will admit that's probably due to it being less up my alley genre-wise than
Kings). Of the six episodes aired so far, only the one failed to leave me completely overwhelmed, and even that one was a cut above most other shows I currently watch, especially now that
Battlestar is done. I need to go to giants of Television Past to find suitable shows to compare
Kings to, but I won't, as it will just crank your after this post unreasonably high expectations even higher than they already are. Suffice to say that if good dialogue, an interesting world, compelling acting and lots of delicious politics and intrigue with a very well done layer of the religious and spiritual sprinkled in sounds made for you - not to mention Ian Mc-bloody-Shane owning every television screen he has ever appeared on -
Kings is a show you should go watch, and a show you should go watch
now. Though of course you can't, because they booted it to mid-June. So catch it this summer, or get it on DVD once it is cancelled as these ambitious and impeccably well done shows always are. I implore you.
Monday, 9. March 2009, 20:56:44
webcomic, politics, I implore you
World War 2 - The 101-courseSlightly skewed with the big focus on the US over USSR, but it's not like that's not an element they could be consciously paraodying all on its own for all I know. And the drawings are wonderful. I think my favourite is the downright epic rendering of the USSR's failed effort at conquering Finland.
Thanks to
Amras for providing me with this link.
Saturday, 7. March 2009, 22:56:30
expectations, doomed optimism, time, I implore you
...
I know, I'm posting very rarely lately. Three reasons for that. One, I'm lazy. Two, I have a ton of writing to do with regards to my master's thesis. And three, I watch a heck of a lot of TV.
On that note, even though I'm full-booked TV-wise until, well, September-ish very likely, I figured I'd have a run-down. You might remember
this list from last spring. It's been very thinned out since then, my having seen Brisco County Jr., Dexter, How I Met Your Mother, Mad Men, The Tudors and half of Young Indiana Jones Chronicles (the rest is part of why any new stuff will have to wait until September) since then. A few new ones have been added, of course, so here's the list as it stands right now:
Alias
Brotherhood
Burn Notice
Dark Angel
Dirty Sexy Money
Drive
Dr. Who/Torchwood
Entourage
Farscape
Joan of Arcadia
Life
Medium
Monk
Moonlight
Jericho
Journeyman
Justice League
Oz
The Pretender
Quantum Leap
Red Dwarf
Sanctuary
The Sarah Connor Chronicles
Sharpe
The Shield
Six Feet Under
Supernatural
Tru Calling
Of these, I would currently like to prioritise the following five:
Brotherhood
Burn Notice
Sharpe
Justice League
The Shield
But which one of them first, that's up to you people. There is also the matter of carry-on-votes from last time:
Farscape (2)
The Pretender (1)
The Sarah Connor Chronicles (1)
Thus, I make the following ruling. One remaining vote last time equals qualification for the ones up for considering now. Farscape goes directly on the list with a vote in place due to its two carry-ons. If anyone wants to add another show to this list, let me know - if two of you want to add the same one, I'll even add it to the list of the ones that can be voted for.
Brotherhood
Burn Notice
Farscape (1)
Sharpe
Justice League
The Pretender
The Sarah Connor Chronicles
The Shield
Commence helping me waste more time daily, please!
Friday, 26. September 2008, 22:30:16
quote of the day, I implore you, Non-Whedon-Television
I have an erection... Let the trial begin. I'm ready.
- Denny Crane,
2x10: Legal DeficitsMaking up for the only 17 episodes long first season,
Boston Legal's second season rolled in on a grand total of 27 episodes - and never once felt dull.
Most of the backgrond-cast of season 1 are phased out - some gradually, some brutally - and new characters are introduced. Of the old ones - aside from the ever-present Shore and Crane whom I shall get to in a moment or two - season two sees a continued focus on Shirley Schmidt, but also finally lets Brad Chase and Paul Lewiston into the spotlight. I will refrain from mentioning which of the other ones disappears and when because, well, it's unnecessary spoilers. There's a host of new characters, most notably a new secretary, Melissa Hughes, and an associate attorney, Denise Bauer. Two junior associates are given attention early on in the season, but then also phased out. In other words, the cast is changed around quite a bit.
However, the addition in particular of Denise is welcome. The character is interesting and well done, and she fills a role similar to Lori's in season 1, but more interesting. Seeing more of Brad Chase is always good, though I still feel they put him up in scenes with Alan Shore far too rarely. And Schmidt is of course incredible.
Seeing more of Paul Lewiston, however, is a dream. There should me more, much more. My absolute favourite character after the two flamingoes, I truly hope they'll keep on expanding his role.
As for the flamingoes themselves; Denny Crane and Alan Shore are still the core, soul, heart, backbone, kidney and the very worn out liver of this show. They're scenes on the office balcony at the end of nearly every episode is always a treat, and Denny Crane is just as much, if not more, of his awesome self as he was in season 1. Alan Shore, though, is mellowed down. His snarky and unapologetic demeanour gets trimmed down around the edges, the focus shifted to his more morally admirable qualities. I find this to be a shame - however, they did show signs of putting his snarky sides back in focus towards the end of the season. The rest of him is as brilliant is ever. There's a kindness to this character that's truly touching, and all the sweeter for when it's peaking out through an uncaring fascade. I thus hope they'll bring the fascade back more strongly next season.
While absolutely fantastic each on their own, the show
really shines in the scenes between these two, depicting the ever-growing friendship they have. Season 2, whilst bringing an added focus on this friendship, also puts more weight than season 1 on the ethical, philosophical and political issues that rise from their courtroom cases and their personal lives alike.
A thoroughly enjoyable show that has gotten me quite addicted. So much so that I'm finishing this review right now so I can go watch the first episode of season 3.
Sunday, 21. September 2008, 21:10:19
quote of the day, politics, expectations, I implore you
...
"Feel free to mock me all you want, but don't you dare ridicule our troops."
"Just so I'm clear, I should feel free to mock you?"
David E. Kelley is probably the most famous for
Chicago Hope and
Ally McBeal. I never watched the former, but I remember the latter fondly from my teens and whenever I've caught a rerun in recent year, I've never been disappointed. Those are very far from his only escapades into television creation, however, and the long-running
The Practice is thus only one out of the many shows of his I've never seen. When it came to its end, it spawned a spin-off,
Boston Legal. Despite my inclination to watch everything in proper order, I was recently talked into checking this show out. While I must admit I still wish I'd started at the beginning, with
The Practice, I am in no way regretting this, as it is a highly intelligent and highly entertaining piece of televised storytelling.
Where
The Practice is reputed to have been serious and
Ally McBeal was littered with absurd fantasies, funky lawsuits and crazy characters,
Boston Legal finds a neat pathway between the two. Almost every episode has at least one, usually several, interesting and intelligent points of social or political commentary, but the characters are quirky and silly enough that the humour - if only rarely the crazy - I recognise from
Ally McBeal is apparent in just about every single scene.
The two main draws to this show are William Shatner's eminent performance as Denny Crane, over-the-hill rabid Republican superlawyer with an ego the size of the Atlantic Ocean and a brain that's starting to fail him, and James Spader equally stunning portrayal of the direct, witty, resourceful and, well, intolerably smug Alan Shore, the man whose behaviour as an utter bastard is only matched by the kind and caring heart that drives him deep down. These two characters are legendary on their own, but the interplay and dynamic
between them is frequently nigh on perfect television.
These two would be more than enough to make me watch the show, but there's more. The cast of supporting characters, while somewhat underdeveloped as a whole, shows a lot of promise. In particular I hope to see more of Mark Valley's idealistic Brad Chase and Rene Auberjonois' superbly no-nonsense Paul Lewiston as we go along. Another stellar performance is Candice Bergen as senior partner Shirley Schmidt, entering the show halfway through the first season and giving every indication of becoming a major presence as the show continues onwards.
The little peek I've had at season 2 so far promises even more focus on the issues and the politics rather than the inter-office drama, which actually suits me fine, and I look forward to it. The dynamic duo of Spader and Shatner is simply so awesome that their very presence makes every plot they're in character-driven enough.
Every once in a while you start watching a show that just flat out entertains you to the core of your bones, and you fall a little in love with it. I have every awareness that this review is written during such a fit of affection, and is thereby probably a little overly positive. Let me therefore just add that there are some issues with this show, mainly in the underdeveloped and underutilised cast of secondary characters. But honestly, you don't fall this strongly for a show after a single season for no good reason. If you liked the comedy and characterisation of
Ally McBeal and think a slightly more realistic take on the same would be for you, or you have an interest in a show that's genuinely fun whilst exploring real-life issues of politics and ideology in today's USA, you should be as excited about this show as I am. And if neither of those things sound appealing, then, well, you should still watch it just for every single scene that ends with the words "Denny Crane".
Tuesday, 2. September 2008, 18:12:55
this-blog, studies, self-pity, I implore you
...
I've never been one for sharing personal information online, and I'm not about to start now. However, I've been asked quite strongly today to post something or other in my weblog here, and as I'm not feeling like reviewing anything on my rather long list of stuff to get around to writing posts on, that means it has to be on some whim of my own instead. As I additionally don't have any specific thought, idea, objection or opinion about anything in particular going on these days that would make for a post on its own, that kind of means I just have to give an update of who I am and what I am doing these days. Those of you who could not be less interested, and I'm sure that within the modest confines of this weblog's readership there's a lot of you, well, just don't read behind the cut. Thanks.
Read more...
Wednesday, 20. August 2008, 13:44:49
doomed optimism, always-wanted-to-do-that, lists, Non-Whedon-Television
...
For reasons unknown even to myself, I've decided to write a post listing seven TV-shows eminently awesome and incredible, but that was always without a shot of reaching my list of my top five absolute favourites no matter how good they'd be. I'll tell you a little bit about each of them, why they're awesome and you should see them, and why they'll sadly never manage to climb to the top of my own lists - often through no real faulting of their own. And why seven? Well, hey, it's a lucky number, maybe it'll give me enough luck to make someone check one of these shows out because of the list.
The WirePossibly the best show I've ever seen, if I were to completely ignore my genre-preferences and other biases, though I do think that
Deadwood would probably still have it beat. There's never a weak episode on this show, not a one. The the season plots are so vast as to more give an impression of a single gigantic five-episode-miniseries (each episode being an entire season...) than a truly episodic TV-show like I as a viewer have been trained to expect from just about every other show I've ever seen. To me, this show's basically only failing is that it is too real - this isn't a century or a millennium old history, this isn't a story involving witches and warlocks or dragons and griffins, this isn't set in space or featuring larger-than-life people dressing up in costumes and beating up criminals. Characters aren't larger than life in this show, they're just people like everyone else. Which is awesome, by all means. But it isn't my preferred brand of tea.
BlackadderBrilliantly sarcastic, the different incarnations of E. Blackadder have to a one been entertaining. I do admit to some issues with the very first series, it being halfway too childish for me and halfway too intelligent with all its Shakespearean references, but the rest of this show is a childhood favourite still going strong. The plots aren't always as interesting and the jokes do sometimes seem uninspired or repetitive, but the truly brilliantly funny moments make up for this. My favourite will probably always be the fourth series,
Blackadder Marches Forth, set in the First World War, and as educational and poignant as it is silly. Where the other series do try to have some measure of parody or clever presentation of a period long past, I feel none of them manage it as perfectly as the fourth. This show is funny if you like wit, sarcasm and cunning bastards, but it could never reach the top of any list of mine being a comedy show with little to no character development or personal drama.
The West WingWhile a good bit more variable in quality than
The Wire,
The West Wing is still a true gem of television. The fifth season might be a little hard to endure after the initial brilliance of the first couple of seasons, but I promise you, by the end in the seventh this show was long since gone awesome again. If it had been set in 1850 or on the continent of Westeros, this could probably have a shot to be my favourite show ever. Clever discussion of political issues, partisan characters with different biases, the political quagmire of never getting anything done, idealism met by realism, this show had all that a show about the White House's senior staff
should have. (I'll also cheat and throw in a mention of the other show of Sorkin's I've seen and loved,
Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, which does the exact same thing for behind the screen TV-politics as
West Wing does for behind the scenes world politics)
Judging AmyI know, I know, putting that on this list makes me look like a girl, but it was good, people! I have never rewatched it and cannot tell you for sure I'd like it as much today as I did six years ago, when I had watched an admittedly tiny fraction of the good shows I've now seen to compare it with, but I remember this show very fondly as clever, engaging, and very much feeling like it had characters who were, to a one, real people. Balancing very well the protagonist's courtroom cases in the juvenile courts with her and her mother's personal lives, ideals and beliefs, I remember both laughing and crying during several episodes of this show.
WonderfallsIncredibly well made, let me tell you that. Witty, intelligent, with fun characters and good plots. It's even got some fantastical elements. But it's just too quirky to ever really completely win me over. The drama is good, but not awesome. The comedy is good, but too off-beat and not the central point. The issues are interesting, but there's not enough action in the execution of the plots surrounding them to drag me in. It's one of those odd shows where I go "yeah, I like this, this is super well done, and I'd like even to rewatch this many times, sure, but I don't think I'll ever quite love it" because it's lacking a certain something ineffable to be the right kind of show for me. It's indubitably awesomely well done, though, and if you haven't, you should check it out.
DexterThis show does on paper have it all - bigger than life characters, development of said, intricate season plots, engaging individual episodes, humour, drama
and action. When I say it could never reach my personal top five list, it's due to the premise - it's a show locked to one protagonist. I prefer ensemble shows for their much wider opportunities for interesting dynamics and less dependency on clever plot twists. Of course, the fact that it's neither a period piece nor fantasy or sci-fi doesn't help much. But the show is truly awesome, and catching up on the first two seasons over the course of two weeks have been one of the more memorable TV-experiences of my life.
The InsideAs I mentioned in
my review of the first season of
Dexter,
The Inside is a dark show, and to me, that's its failing. I'm faint of heart and mind, I can't take watching something too dark or upsetting and still truly enjoy it. That being said, the characters, the plots, the manipulations of the awesome, awesome character played by Peter Coyote, this is something as rare as a police show that's not only watchable, but eminently engaging. It's too dark for me to truly love it though - it might even be too dark for me to ever rewatch it. Certainly not alone. But it's very good, and it's a deserving mention on this list.
That's that. Hope that some of you will end up checking out at least one of 'em. They all deserve it.
Monday, 4. August 2008, 11:15:20
Angel-referances, I implore you, self-pity, pessimism
...
"Ooh, but gosh, what will happen if you and Cordelia are wearing the same colour?! It would be, you know, a thing!"
- Rupert Giles, WatcherThe three-and-a-half-minute-promo (with the original cast voicing all the characters, except for Buffy herself) of this show set between episode 7 and 8 of Buffy's first season (but with the changed history of having Dawn there) that was shopped around to no avail some three years back is available on YouTube.
Recommended.
Wednesday, 23. July 2008, 20:17:39
expectations, always-wanted-to-do-that, Jade, movie-report
...
Uhm.
Eh.
Er...
I...
Ah, there's...
Hrm.
So, I've seen
Dark Knight.
Specific spoiler-free review after the cut (spoilers generalizing about themes or moods of the movie etc will probably abound, difficult to say anything at all about anything without that) followed by a clearly separated paragraph with spoiler-laden comments that should be easy to avoid.
Read more...
Wednesday, 16. July 2008, 12:35:20
I implore you, expectations, always-wanted-to-do-that, time
...

Well, it's been up for over a day now, and anyone who hasn't seen it yet should
go do so immediately. 'Cause MY GODS, with the funny.
The world is a mess and I just... need to rule it.
Thursday, 3. July 2008, 15:42:39
I implore you, movie-report, Jade
This animated science fiction movie from 2000 has an incredibly impressive list of directors and writers - a list I was not aware of myself until after I'd seen it. The directors? Gary Goldman and Don Bluth - the two ex-Disney animators (both were involved in the animtaion of The Rescuers and Pete's Dragon, Bluth additionally had his hands in Robin Hood, The Sword in the Stone, and others) who's made such major animation successes outside of Disney together as The Land Before Time, An American Tail, The Secret of NIMH and Anastasia. And the writers? John August (Big Fish, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Corpse Bride), Ben Edlund (Firefly, Angel(he wrote Jaynestown and Smile Time!), Point Pleasant and Supernatural) and, well, Joss Whedon.
I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, but I can't help but wonder if I'd have been a little let down had I known about this rooster of brilliance before I sat down to watch it due to incredibly high expectations. Heck, I wasn't even aware it was animated before it started up.
So what is it? Well, it's basically the sci-fi-movie everybody who hated the Star Wars-prequels have been begging for. The movie starts with an alien destruction of Earth, where a very influential scientist must stay behind to save the incredibly important Titan-project. His very young son is hurried off planet with other refugees just in the nick of time. Cut a good decade ahead, and the son is grown up. Then an old co-worker of his father's shows up and tells him he has to save mankind and find the lost Titan-project.
The movie is flowing over with odd and funny aliens, something the Star Wars-crowd probably likes but an issue for me. I never like universes where you only see one single individual from three quarters of the alien species you encounter. It feels phony. Still, they're on the whole rather well made.
Despite this, it's a little dark. Not scary horrid dark, but it's closer to Empire Strikes Back than Return of the Jedi, if you know what I mean. This works well though. It's got a somewhat predictable plot, mediated by some twists you see coming and others you might not. The world that's built seems rich and, with the exception of the ridiculous amounts of different kinds of sentients, believable. There was a couple of choices towards the end where I felt they should've gone darker and less child-friendly, but on the whole the movie was surprisingly daring for an animated movie that clearly doesn't exclusively cater to an adult crowd.
Some characters stand out - the father's old co-worker is a distinct Han Solo-rip off (no attempts are made to hide that), but he works well. His first mate Preed is nothing like Chewie, though, but rather a cold, superior, even omnious alien with a posh English accent. The crew on the ship - and thus the cast that gets mentionable screentime in the movie beyond the main character - is filled out with another human, the main character's love interest, another alien, this one female, the grumpy weapons expert that seems to be fifty per cent Zoe, twenty per cent Kaylee and thirty per cent Jayne, and the incredibly eccentric green-skinned scientist Gune who is just so thoroughly lovably silly you have to like him.
The main character himself is very much the traditional hero-in-the-budding type, but maybe a good bit more reluctant and selfish at first than one'd expect, originating with his abandonment issues with regards to his father. He's not going to stick with you for long after the movie, but he works well enough and isn't annoying like such characters often end up being.
The movie of course looks beautiful - I mean, Don Bluth is involved, it had to - and I'd highly recommend to check it out if you're at all interested in entertaining sci-fi movies. It doesn't reinvent the wheel by a long shot, but it gives it a very good spin.
Weak 8.5/10
Sunday, 27. April 2008, 22:11:18
boardgames, always-wanted-to-do-that, Song of Ice And Fire, expectations
...
On the suggestion of
Obdormio, I decided to write a short review of this game, technically an expansion to
the original A Game of Thrones-game.
The original is probably my favourite boardgame of all time (which is saying a lot, because I play relatively many), based, as the title suggests, on the first book of George R. R. Martin's amazing fantasy-series
A Song of Ice and Fire. A warning, by the way - while GoT is set during the first book and barely spoils the first half of it, and little else, SoS is set far later and spoils much of the first book and maybe parts of the second. If you are planning to read these books but haven't, GoT is a rather safe pasttime-pursuit, but SoS probably isn't.
While the original is primarily intended for five players - and a subsequent expansion-set let you play with six -
Storm of Swords gives you a new board and several new rules tailor-made to transplant the gaming-system of the original to a game for four players. (I will for purposes of this post assume that the reader has at least a superficial degree of experience with the original game)
I've only yet played one game with it, and feel hesitant to be too adamant in my opinions, but so far I'd say it does a damned good job at it.
SoS introduces a lot of new tactical elements, primarily Leaders, two for each of the houses of nobility fighting for supremacy, that give you several new options especially relating to movements; and tactic-cards, which adds one major all-spanning tactic to the concrete orders you place every turn. I was sceptical to the latter, but it worked surprisingly well. Both of these options are available as possible add-ons to the original game as well, but I do believe it would make the game imbalanced and boringly slow if that was done. The one exception, here, might be for three-player-games on the original board, where I've tried out Leaders with what I think could only be described as great success, and am also strongly suspecting would favour an inclusion of the Tactics-cards.
SoS also introduces Allies, an option that is quite interesting indeed and sadly not transposable to the original game. Three powerful non-player houses of nobility as well as Merceneries and Outlaws add their influence to your civil war, and you as the player are always stuck between wanting to spend your resources improving your OWN position, and spending resources to win favour with the different fractions of non-player parties. In our game, interestingly, the second-place player (me, playing Baratheon) basically owed his entire position to his allied aides, while the first-place player (playing Greyjoy) managed completely without them whatsoever. This fact alone has me convinced that this is an excellent addition to the game adding many levels of strategy and choices neeed without really increasing the amount of boring silent sit-to-yourself-and-think-time mentionably.
Another thing SoS does is increase the importance of the three oversized tokens. On the smaller board, the order of play seems more pressingly vital than on the original one, and skimping out on the Iron Throne-bid is thus less easy a choice than before. Additionally, there is a second bidding-phase that sometimes occur, replacing the wildlings, and in some ways being able to break ties in this bid might seem at least somewhat more powerful than in the wildlings-bid of the original game. The Iron Throne-bid is thus adjusted in power and is more on the level of the other two. Additionally, as mentioned, the three tokens are more powerful, as the new Westeros-decks to be used with the SoS-board allow the holders of the tokens to influence the events of the game. This particular element is also useable with the original game, but I'm unsure if it will work as well there - it seems less appealing to increase the value of the first position compared to the second and the third in a five- or six-player game, as where in a four- or three-player game it adds dynamic it would instead simply overpower the leader on each track in the original one. Still, by the same logic, it could be interesting to try out with a three-player-game on the original board.
The floods, allowing some borders (rivers) to be crossed at some points and not at others, is another clever addition to the more crowded four-player board that allows for the nice mixture of planning, odds-calculating and hints of unpredictable luck that this series of games is so incredibly good at. You're never in control of
everything, but you always know what you're not in control of and you always have options to act accordingly to minimise or maximise the influence luck will have on your play. It is, to my dice-hating-heart, ingenious.
Of other elements introduced by SoS is the wildlings-deck, to be used as an optional part of the original game to vary wildling-attack-outcomes if wished. I haven't tried this option out, but I suppose it might have its qualities. I instinctively feel uncertain about something adding more random chance to the game, however. Also included is a new set of House Cards, compulsory for use with SoS but optional instead of the old set(s) with the original game. More powerful than the original but less so than the one from the previous expansion, this new set is custom-made to balance out the added element of power the Leaders bring to the game.
All in all, I greatly enjoyed the game, and I find it had adapted the basic gameplay of the original game onto a new board for a lower amount of players absolutely superbly. Highly recommended for anybody who's tried out the original but often can't get together more than three or four players. (Obviously, this is an expansion, and you need the original game to make use of it, as it doesn't include all the pieces you'd otherwise need. Feel like that should be specified in such a post)
Thursday, 24. April 2008, 19:44:19
this-blog, rant, always-wanted-to-do-that, confusion
...
...which one of these things I will post about next. 'Cause as my list of things to post about is ever-growing, I find it more and more tricky to summon the willpower to sit down and attack it head-on on my own.
Read more...
Thursday, 17. April 2008, 12:05:54
Non-Whedon-Television, I implore you, always-wanted-to-do-that, rant
...
What's there to say? Except Wow. This is some damned good television. Many thanks to
Lothair for nagging me thoroughly and steadily until I started watching it.
The first few episodes of the first season bears what I'm almost starting to think of as the HBO-syndrome - slow start, many characters, little happening. Especially The Sopranos was similar to The Wire in this respect (and in many other, actually). Then, unnoticably, about halfway through the first season, the show's Captivating and you're Committed.
What is The Wire about? Well, it's about Baltimore City, and its corruption and misery. The focal point in the first season is the police department and the drug trade, shifted to (without ever dropping the first two) the docks, unions and politics in the second. The third sees a return to the drug trafficking-focus, but the politics keep being played up very heavily as well. And in the fourth, which I've recently started watching, we get introduced to the disfunctional school-system.
What the show does so well is introducing each of these aspects of the city's problems and spheres on top of each other, causing an eventually very layered understanding of what's going on and how everything affects everything. Most of the main characters are policemen - competent and incompetent, well-meaning fuck-ups and abusive bastards, they've got all flavours - but there is also a sizeable portion of the screen-time given to various criminals, both high- and low-level. And as the series progresses, an increasing amount of politicians start claiming their share of the screen time as well.
Several of the characters are quite awesome. In particular I love Rawls, a magnificent asshole of a high-ranking policeman, Lester Freeman, a silent and manipulative bastard with the best intentions, and even more so Stringer Bell, one out of the two main men behind the West Baltimore drug-operations. Every season introduces new people to the main cast, though, and every season does quite a darned good job of it. And almost all the existing characters all go through very good, interesting arcs - several of my favourite characters in season 4 used to be among the most two-dimensional and maybe even boring ones in season 1.
The plot is intricate, complex and engaging - a tiny bit predictable at times, maybe, but the predictable bits gets drowned out in the richness of all that's going on that you didn't see coming anyway.
A thoroughly recommendable show, and possibly - probably - among the top ten shows I've ever seen. Off the top of my head, I'll describe it as a few small notches over the thematically similar "The Sopranos", for instance, and I'm pretty sure it'd come out swinging after a comparison to geek classics such as "Babylon 5" and huge hits such as "Lost" too - because it might never have the Huge Big Awesome Episode shows like those three serve once or twice per season, but every single episode is as good as the one before it - and often better. And THAT's accomplishment. "The Wire" isn't so much a tv-show with a given number of episodes per season - it's more like an awesome miniseries, where every season is a well over ten-hour-episode.
And with the exception of "Battlestar Galactica", I know for damned sure I'm not currently watching anything remotely comparable to it. And what I've watched before that can compete can be counted on two hands - maybe just on the one. And people? I've watched a
lot of TV.
Monday, 7. April 2008, 17:23:17
time, doomed optimism, always-wanted-to-do-that, people
...
Maybe two of you remember
this post? Way back then, in late December last year, I had a very successful (by this weblog's standards) vote/poll on what shows on my to-watch-list you people thought I should try out first. Well, here comes the sequel.
Since then, I've watched The Sopranos and Arrested Development as well as a Napoleon miniseries, and I'm currently about half-way through The Wire. Additionally, I've started 3rd Rock From the Sun and will continue on and most likely finish that show this summer.
That means I need to decide what to watch once I'm done with The Wire. Right now, I'm leaning in the direction of How I Met Your Mother, as everybody keeps braggin' about it.
Alias
Big Shots
Brisco County Jr
Brotherhood
Burn Notice
Dark Angel
Dexter
Drive
Dr. Who/Torchwood
Entourage
Farscape
How I Met Your Mother
Joan of Arcadia
Life
Mad Men
Medium
Monk
Moonlight
Jericho
Journeyman
Justice League
The Pretender
Red Dwarf
The Shield
The Sarah Connor Chronicles
Sharpe
Supernatural
Tru Calling
The Tudors
Young Indiana Jones
Any shows you feel should be added to or removed from the list, let me know. More importantly, mention the one(s) you want me to watch first and if you feel like it, why. It'll be much appreciated. (I'm also considering adding shows I've always wanted to watch from beginning to end but never did, but have already watched most of the episodes of. Most notably Ally McBeal, Hercules/Xena (cheese!

) and Monty Python's Flying Circus, but unless a lot of you cry out about them I think I'll keep to new stuff for now)
Carry-over votes from the results last time that I haven't seen yet:
How I Met Your Mother (2)
Farscape (1)
Dexter (1)
Vote away, people. It'd make me happy. ^^
Sunday, 10. February 2008, 16:21:59
megalomania, blogs, Angel-referances, I implore you
...
Debatin', rankin' and makin' of lists, always fun. Feel free to
join in.
Tuesday, 22. January 2008, 23:01:49
book-review, doomed optimism, Angel-referances, always-wanted-to-do-that
...
Or is it just the second part of Chapter Two? There was no "Chapter Three" heading in the style of the "One" and "Two"-headings some pages into the previous two issues - it might be significant, and it might not. It sorta makes sense if it is, with the #2 cliffhanger being way more lame and commercial-like than the endings of #1 and #3... but more likely, they've just (stupidly, if you ask me) decided to stop it.
EDIT: Mr. Lynch's answer to me on his podcast seemed to imply that my hopes might be right - it might be that issue 4 will start chapter 3. He didn't say so straight out, but his answer could definitely imply that. Also, apparently, I need to get myself an icon, 'cause the lack of it is suspicious.That tiny little thing aside, I loved this issue. Loved. This. Issue.
I didn't think this comic could deliver on the level of the opening issue ever again - it'd simply be too much to hope for. And while this issue isn't quite there, it has certainly made me readjust my hopes. It now seems very much within reach. 'Cause this issue was rock-solid, and more than made up for the second issue which was pretty okay-but-rather-bland in my tastes - it now rather well serves as a mellow lead-in to this anyway, which retroactively improves it.
So what did I like? Well, I'm not gonna spoil anything, but I loved the ending. (Doubt that more than 5% of the fans reading these comics didn't.) I loved seeing the Loan Shark again, though I didn't really register that that was who it was 'til the second read, I was all caught up in the plot the first time around. By way of the Internet I've also realized (didn't notice it on my own, shamefully) one of the quiet lords in the back is the demon sorcerer who owed Giles a favour back in Buffy's season 3 - or one of his kind, anyway (maybe his wife... ;D) - which is not only a cool throwback, but an interesting portent. Because it would seem like there'd be a reason to choose the one demon capable of removing someone's soul to do a cameo like that...
Oh and what more, what more... right. Illyria and the Big Scaly Person. A dragged-out-fight which could've risked being boring on the drawn page like that if the main focus of the panels turned into incredibly captivating background-action behind Angel grumpily untangling some plotthreads for himself and us in the front. All in all, I'd say this was a fabulous issue, and if someone reading this aren't reading this comic already, they should damn sure start. I loved this show, a tiny bit more than what's healthy I suspect, and it would take a lot for me to be happy with a continuation in any other format than the original - heck, it'd take a damn lot for me to be happy with a continuation in the SAME format, too - but this comic has officially pleasantly impressed and suprised me twice in three issues. (And the second one hit the mark just barely beneath what I'd dare hope for, too.)
Go. Read. Love.
Thursday, 27. December 2007, 20:01:37
Angel-referances, rant, always-wanted-to-do-that, I implore you
...
I mean come on! It includes The Lost Tales AND it's smaller than the old one!
I WANT TO BE RICH ENOUGH TO BUY THIS.
Also,
this fantastical beauty of a box is 50% off at Amazon.com these days, meaning you can get all of Angel for 69,99$ if you're somehow one of the neanderthals who doesn't already own the show on DVD. I can't justify spending even that ridiculously small amounts of money on this since I already have it, but SOMEONE should jump at this for me.
Thursday, 20. December 2007, 18:29:05
I implore you, comments, people, lists
...
Now THIS is simple, people. The blind spawn of an impotent maggot could (almost) do this.
And yes, this is a reaction of outrage after learning the 4400 after their best season to date got, unsurprisingly, cancelled. I'm coping by moving on hurriedly.
I'm gonna list TV-shows I'm currently considering watching from beginning to end when I finish Dead Like Me, and whichever one gets the most votes from people commenting here will be The One I Next Watch - though I reserve the right to break ties as well as the right to give up on a show after the first four or five episodes if I don't like it. Feel free to add shows as suggestions and I'll add them to the list of possibles if I want to. I'd also appreciate it if you described what about a show is good and why you think I should watch it, but I'm not gonna require it.
3rd Rock from the Sun
Alias
Arrested Development
Dark Angel
Dexter
Drive
Farscape
How I Met Your Mother
Journeyman
Justice League
The Pretender
Red Dwarf
The Shield
The Sopranos
Tru Calling
Young Indiana Jones
The Wire
And no. I don't really expect any big surge of people commenting. But hope springs eternal.
Wednesday, 5. December 2007, 16:30:50
expectations, always-wanted-to-do-that, I implore you, Non-Whedon-Television
First off, here's my Recommended Viewing Order:
Babylon 5 (the entire series)
A Call To Arms (TV-movie)
War Zone (1)
The Long Road (2)
Appearances and Other Deceits (3)
Racing the Night (4)
Needs of the Earth (5)
Memory of War (6)
Ruling from the Tomb (7)
Visitors from down the street (8)
Each Night I Dream of Home (9)
The Path of Sorrows (10)
Patterns of the Soul (11)
The Rules of the Game (12)
The Well of Forever (13)
Some of this is the product of necessities, other of what feels like natural flow - and as mentioned in my previous post on the show, the two doesn't always match. "The Long Road", for instance, feels as though it should be closer to the end of the season, but they're wearing the old uniforms and thus it has to take place before "Appearances and Other Deceits". In cases where I've noticed clear continuity-lines, I've placed the episodes in the order that would make this seem as natural as possible. Hopefully, this will be to anyone watching the show based on my recommendation's satisfaction. For the sake of full disclosure,
this is the order recommended by the creator himself, which focuses only on making the story and character-relationships flow and ignores on-screen-continuity issues with the uniforms, if someone'd rather watch it like that.
So what did I think of the show? Quite frankly, I'm very positively surprised. The show's pretty darn good for a show so episodic that they apparently could produce the episodes without a clear order. Don't expect a season plot - though if you watch it in the order I've lined out, there are some hints of it anyway. Partly because of the episodic nature, and partly because it got cancelled mid-season. I placed "The Well of Forever" last partly because I thought it was a fitting season ending episode, so hopefully, you'll feel some form of closure.
Early on the episodes vary a good bit in quality and excitement, but it quickly finds a foothold where all episodes are good or even great. Plus, funny dialogue. While he is no Joss Whedon who makes language itself sound different and better in the mouths of his characters, J. Michael Straczynski has always had a similar if more conventional knack for witty exchanges and quotable scenes, and this is very much present in this series as well as in B5.
The cast is decent, some are even quite memorable, especially the egotistical archeologist prodigy ("The term is prodigy. Seven letters, three syllables. I can see why it might give you problems.") and the mysterious, arrogant and sarcastic technomage ("Well, then, if this is the story of Job, a great deal of people are being inconvenienced for your benefit. Hope you appreciate it.") The captain Gideon is a snarky rogue kind of version of Sheridan and carries the show well - despite his character being somewhat two-dimensional, the actor made me like him.
I'd really recommend this to anyone who watched and liked the
Babylon 5-series, and that surprised me, from what I'd heard before I set out, I didn't think I would. And if you haven't watched and liked
B5, well, then, aside from the obvious point of your taste in shows not being our normal Earth-taste, honestly, what are you doing reading this?
Wednesday, 21. November 2007, 03:52:47
Angel-referances, always-wanted-to-do-that, I implore you
Twenty-two clips gathering all the flashbacks of
Angel and
Buffy the Vampire Slayer into a chronological movie prequel to both series - it's simply awesome. Oh, if only I could watch it all in one go instead of having to get up to click on the next clip all the time...
Everybody should watch this.
Saturday, 17. November 2007, 20:18:16
politics, I implore you
...but by a Higher Authority than me.I just spent a buck on behalf of "Dollhouse". I see some other people spend one on each show they watch, though, might be I'll consider going back to add a few.
Wednesday, 14. November 2007, 22:18:39
people, Obdormio, Jon Stewart, I implore you
...
Thursday, 1. November 2007, 03:55:16
doomed optimism, always-wanted-to-do-that, expectations, I implore you
Friends, Whedonites, Countrymen, lend
this your eyes!
And do not stop 'til you've read it all, people.
Saturday, 27. October 2007, 19:40:16
I implore you, religion, lists, always-wanted-to-do-that
...
So... this Christmas, I'll try very hard to dig through some of my list of purchased-yet-unread-books. So I thought I'd get some recommendations from whomever bothers to give me their input.
For logistical reasons, "Religions of Rome volume B: A Sourcebook" (North, Beard and Price), "Bonehunters" (Erikson) and "The Complete Sherlock Holmes Collection" (Conan Doyle) are disqualified from the list as they're too big and heavy to bring with me for the vacation, and I'm hoping I'll be done with "Jimmy the Hand" (Feist) and "A Very Short Introduction to Machiavelli" (Skinner) by then, but I'll bring four or five other books. The following list is all the remaining books I currently own yet haven't read (most) of, yet still wish to:
Fantasy
"The Darkwar, book 1: Flight of the Nighthawks" (Feist)
"The Darkwar, book 2: Into a Dark Realm" (Feist)
"The Lies of Locke Lamora" (Lynch)
"Phantom" (Goodkind)
"Anansi Boys" (Gaiman)
"The Artemis Fowl-files" (Colfer)
Myth
"Keltiske myter" ["Celtic myths", a 420-page compilation of celtic myths] (Rekdal)
"I begynnelsen" ["In the Beginning", a 380-page compilation genesis-myths from all over the world] (Bringsværd, Braarvig)
"Jorden vår mor" ["The Earth our mother", a 450-page compilation of myths from Native North-America] (Bringsværd)
"Shinto" [a compilation of Japan's oldest myths] (Teeuwen)
Literature on religion
"Approaches to Greek Myth" (Essay-collection, Edmunds w/others)
"Roman Religion" (Essay-collection, Ando w/others)
"Parallell Myths" (Bierlein)
"Comparative Mythology" (Puhvel)
"Bissie - Studier i samisk religionshistoria" ["Studies in Sami religious history"] (Mebius)
"Fornskandinavisk religion" ["Ancient Scandinavian (Norse) religion"] (Näsström)
"Herodotus and Religion in the Persian Wars" (Mikalson)
Historical works
"Makers of Rome" [Nine of Plutarch's "Lives"]
"The Twelve Caesars" (Suetonius)
"The Rise of the Roman Empire" (Polybius)
Literature on history
"A History of Ancient Egypt" (Grimal)
You can write any form of recommendations you'd like, of course, but a list of, say, five or six of these titles, and prioritized from most to least important, would be very helpful. If, like, three or four of you gave me something like that, I'd have so much less of a drag figuring this out.
(By the way, it is my very, very firm hope that I'll manage not to buy a single book 'til all of this is read)
Sunday, 21. October 2007, 20:32:24
general obnoxiousness, people, time, megalomania
...
So, I'm on my first year of my master's degree, this term being the boring compulsory shit. Next year is the writing of the actual master's thesis. But next term is all up for grabs, I can do almost whatever I want with it. Hence my total lack of making my mind up. Keep in mind that no matter what I'll do, these three suggestions are all full-time suggestions but that I'll still take an additional course (in Norse Religion, I've always wanted to and this is kind of my last chance for a long while) bringing the total workload up to 150% in all scenarios).
So... next term... should I...
A. Take fun courses that I know with reasonable certainty I'll get good grades in and learn useful stuff in, but that won't in any way alter or improve my range or depth of knowledge - for instance, should I take courses in, say, Archeology, Rhetorics, Philosophy and/or Classical Literature to improve my knowledge of the Ancient Mediterranean world and supplement the courses I have in Religious Science and History? This is what I WANT to do from a short term-perspective, as this would be both fun and interesting and relatively easy work-load wise. It would, however, limit my ability to write a particularily "serious" master's thesis, as I would not be able to discuss any aspect of any primary source in its original form. Most likely, this would lead to me writing a "fun" assignment on, say, the uses of Ancient Greek religion in modern comic books, for instance, which while fun I'm doubting will really get me anywhere afterwards.
B. Take Classical Greek - that is, the language. Upside is, this'd allow me to work on Greek mythology, which I find to be fun. Downside is, I have no idea whether or not I'll do okay in this, and I know it'll be a lot of work. Upside is, beyond the having great use for some insight into the language as stated above, having some minimal knowledge of Classical Greek is more or less expected if you write your master's thesis on Ancient Greece, and this way I'd not feel like a complete idiot every time someone expected me to know something I don't.
C. Take Latin, full term. This would basically be choosing to work on Roman religion instead of Greek, but that would maybe not be so bad - due to having had a course in the history of the Roman Republic, I feel much more familiar with Roman history anyway. It would mean re-taking a course in Latin I already have before continuing with new stuff, but that might be smart, as I don't remember any of it.
D. Take Latin, half the term as well as one of the fun courses from A. Upsides would then be same as in A and C above, only assuming of myself that I'll remember stuff from last time I took Latin so I won't have to re-take it. However, while this sound enticing, I'm thinking that it might end up being very taxing work-load-wise...
E. Combining B, C or D with attending a lot of lectures from courses in A throughout the term, but not signing up for exams in them.
F. Combining B, C or D with signing up for a couple of A-exams without compulsory activities and attending their lectures throughout the term, but not do any reading or book-purchasing at all and show up for the exams just for the heck of it.
Any suggestions? B&C would be the smart choices, A the fun choice, D and F the attempted compromise combining the best of the two, and E is more of an ideal I won't be able to live up to as there's no way I'll have the self-control to attend lectures I won't have exams in on a regular basis.
I'd really like some input, who knows, maybe some of you'll say something which'll be all helpful. Stranger things have happened...
Saturday, 20. October 2007, 18:06:22
rant, always-wanted-to-do-that, expectations, I implore you
...
Billionaires don't get rich by being stupid, honey bun.
- Anthony StarkThese two volumes collecting the second run of "the Ultimates" (so, really, they're simply volume 3 and 4) are continuing
Mark Millar's tendency to write stuff that's simply awesome. Ohyes. They really are. (There's a reason they got him to write "Civil War"...) This is his final run on the series, the helm will now be taken by Jeph Loeb, who's (in my meager experience) a far more variable writer than Millar but both matches and even outshines him the times he really hits the mark - so I'm hoping "the Ultimates" will keep on shining and not go the way of "Ultimate X-men". The art's very good too, the kind of realistic-but-pretty comic book art that I strongly prefer, huge props to Bryan Hitch.
YOU THINK TOO MUCH!
- The Hulk.While the first run on the series was excellent, I actually like this second one even more. It's got horrible betrayal(s), excessive violence, Hawkeye rocking like only someone called "Hawkeye" can rock, Thor paraphrasing Jesus in every second line he has, the overly posh Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch sporting a disturbing relationship shown just subtly enough that it's charming and cute rather than nauseating, and it's got Iron Man.
Iron Man, who throws off these kind of lines as easily as other people tie their shoes:
I have to warn any terrorists down there that I might be utterly wasted, but I'm still an excellent shot.
Now, I might be biased, but after this and "Civil War" it's my firm opinion that Mark Millar should be chained to a chair writing "Iron Man" for the rest of
his life the world's existence.
Anyone reading it after this rant, by the way, should be aware that it's in the second volume things truly get awesome, the first one is mainly a set up. But what a set up. Ooooh, what a set up.
I'm not saying anymore. People should just read this. The comic moved me and awed me both with tender, personal moments, horrible tragedies and action like nobody's business. It looks and feels as awesome as this kind of flashy multi-cast superhero comic books possibly can - I dare anyone to find me something better. (And I'd love to be proven wrong, too!

)
Also. Any comic book with this line is a comic book any self-respecting Norwegian against membership in the EU is morally obligated to read:
Did you see my little clues? Did you see how clever I was? Norway's not even in the European Union!
- Loki, Norse God of Tricks and Mischief
Sunday, 7. October 2007, 16:46:26
always-wanted-to-do-that, I implore you, general obnoxiousness, Non-Whedon-Television
;_;
It's ooover.
Sniffle.
So, what'd I think? I think the show rocked, is what I think. True, the third season could've been better wrapped up, but it's not like they chose to end it there. I really don't have anything to say that I haven't said before. The plot's solid. The characters rock - E.B. Farnham's personage is only exceeded in how deplorable it is by how dryly hilarious he can be, Seth Bullock is a nice, believable twist on the stalwart hero, Mr. Elseworth is as loveable an old man as Mr. Hearst is eerie, Mr. Richardson is so naïve as to be funny, sweet and sad at the same time, Trixy has a really good character-arc self-reliancy-wise throughout the series, etc, etc, etc. And, as mentioned time and time again, Al Swearengen rocks.
Rocks, I tell you.
So go and watch and stop wasting your time reading this post which is little more than a fan-rave. Imploration given.
Friday, 5. October 2007, 20:23:16
book-review, always-wanted-to-do-that, expectations, religion
...
"Son of Man" is a graphic novel by Peter Madsen (Danish comic book artist famous for his "Valhalla"-series) telling the story of Jesus from Peter's point of view.
And it is stunning.
I really, really loved it. Several scenes were highly impressive both in visuals and in dialogue - this was a truly great read. He covered most of the well-known pieces of Jesus' life, as well as some of the lesser known stories. I could only think of one I missed; the healing of Lazarus. There's even one slight elements hinting to adoptionism in the chapter with John the Baptist, which is interesting that is kept in considering this is apparently a book published by the Norwegian and Danish "Bibelselskab". (Bible syndicate? I honestly don't know how to translate this) However, for all I know of the New Testament, it could be verbatim from the Good Book itself.
Highly recommended to anyone able to read Danish or Norwegian.
1 2 Next »
Showing posts 1 -
35 of 62.