Skip navigation.

My own self

Loki's sensible nonsense of nonsensical sense

Posts tagged with "megalomania"

Damages, seasons 1-2

, , , ...

Everyone's looking to play an angle.



On the sage counsel of the entity I think of as Rkuang, I sat down a couple of weeks ago or so and checked out Damages. My motivation? Threefold.

One, everything I could find of information on it seemed appealing. Ruthless lawyers, complex intrigue, an utter lack of moral absolutes... Sounds good, no?

Two, Glenn Close.

Three, Ted Danson.

So, check it out I did, and with an immediacy that'd put Lucky Luke's right hand to shame, I was hooked. The show virtually seethed with complexity. If I were watching this on a week-to-week basis, I have no idea how I would have kept it all straight. Watching it all in a week and a half made that easy, but... I'm worried how I'll fare with season 3.

So how is it complex, you might ask? Well, each season has an on-going main story that the episodes spend most of the time on. This story uses cut-scenes very cleverly to repeatedly make you think one thing is happening, when truthfully the scene turns out to have meant something else entirely. Sure, you see a lot of these twists coming - at least I did - but there is just so delightfully many of them, there is no way you can see them all. On top of this comes a "x months in the future" frame-story, filmed in dystopian colour-schemes, which shows you out of context fragments of what will happen to the characters down the line. These little glimpses affect the way you watch the main plot deeply - and the next little glimpse of a future scene will almost always turn what you were thinking topsy turvy.

Add to this the fact that most of the characters on the show are scheming bastards, and you've got a mixture that can't but engage.

As for the actual stories and characters, it is all very good. Without giving much away, I think my initial gut-comparison on Twitter still describes this rather well - Damages is somewhere floating in the creative middle-point between Profit and State of Play. (My review of the former - I sadly haven't gotten around to writing one for the latter, but it is an excellent BBC miniseries, go see!)

Rarely do you find a better cast - more or less every actor impressed - but the one who in the end impressed me the most was in fact neither Danson nor Close, though they were of course both stellar, it was Zeljko Ivanek. (One of the main baddies of 24's legendary first season, one of the few good things about Heroes' third season, and also a fantastic guest star actor having been on popular shows such as Lost, Ally McBeal, House MD, True Blood, and a million others) Never having seen him in this close to a protagonistic role (gun to my head I'd call him the show's third in line for the title, at worst fourth), I was deeply impressed. Fantastic character, fantastic actor, fantastic arc. But really, he doesn't stand out that much - because these guys are all good.

Even the "innocent" lamb for the slaughter played by Rose Byrne impressed. Instead of being the stereotypical nice person the viewer is supposed to identify with, she rather played the role of showing what happens to an intelligent but decent person if she's thrown into a cutthroat environment such as this show's. One very excellent way to watch the show is as a tale of the gradual but inevitable corruption of this character, and it is exquisite. To give a final example of how good the actors on this show are? Well, by the end of the second season, we've seen two regulars from The Wire and two from Deadwood pop up as either regulars or recurring character. And that's not even mentioning the movie-actors they bring in.

The show's main strength, of course, is Glenn Close's Patty Hewes, the other protagonist next to Byrne's. An ends-always-justifies-the-means kind of woman with a towering intellect and just enough morals not to be a psychopath, she's the hub around which the show circles. Suffice to say, unless you're going to hire Ian McShane, you can't really find a better focal point for any show.

In conclusion, a few words on the show's progression - the second season is slightly less intense than the first, and the conclusions, though nicely wrapped up, feel less deliciously entwined and interconnected. This is understandable for a whole host of reasons, not the least of which is the mere fact of being a second season after such an incredible start as this show had. While still very good, very entertaining, and still spilling over with great actors, you're hereby warned, season 2 is not quite as ingenious as the first. But compared to most other shows it is still like asking the archangel Michael to engage in a fistfight with Donald Duck. (Except in this case, Michael would likely in truth be Sammael disguised as the Devil pretending to be Gabriel in a convincing Michael-costume. Or something. Donald's so screwed.)

It's not my favourite show of all time, and since I've seen some damned good TV in my day, it won't reach the top five list, either. But I can honestly say I feel bad about that, that's how good Damages is. It should be on a top five list somewhere, because that's how hooked I am. But it is definitely in top 10. I'm not sure who it'd be pushing out, but good riddance. Being beaten out by Close, Danson and Ivanek is a badge of honour in my book.


"If you were a man, I'd kick the living dogshit out of you."
"If you were a man, I'd be worried."




Highly recommended.

My Movie Quiz Of Unpredictable Doom

, , , ...

A quiz

, , , ...

Inspired by a sheepish friend of mine, I've made a quiz to see if any of my indubitably geeky readers are geeky in the same exact ways I am.


Let the quizzage commence!


I'm obviously forgetting a whole horde of things I'm geeky about that I feel I should've added, but the format only allowed for ten questions. (If a surprising amount of people were to take it, I guess I could make a follow-up - a sequiz, if you would. You probably wouldn't.) Please comment and let me know how goes it, the two of you who'll bother to even go through it.

I was Black

, , , ...

1. d4 d5
2. c4 Nc6
3. Nc3 dxc4
4. Nf3 f6
5. Bf4 g5
6. Bg3 h5
7. e3 Be6
8. Nb5 Rc8
9. b3 h4
10. Bxc7 Rxc7
11. Nxc7+ Qxc7
12. e4 Bg4
13. d5 Bxf3?!
14. Qxf3 Qa5+
15. Kd1 Nd4
16. Qe3 e5
17. Bxc4 Bc5
18. a4 Qb4
19. g3 a6
20. gxh4 Rxh4
21. d6 Bxd6
22. Bxg8 b5
23. h3 Rh8
24. Bd5 Bc5
25. Bb7?? Nxb3
26. Qe2 Nxa1
27. Bxa6 Qxa4+
28. Ke1 Qxa6
29. Kf1 Ke7
30. Kg2 Nb3
31. Rb1 Nd4
32. Qd1 Qa3
33. Ra1 Qxh3+
34. Kg1 Qh1#
0-1


Congratulate Obdormio on his valiant efforts.
(Even though his armies marched first, the imperialist bastard)

One of my more memorable Skype-chats

, , ,

[02.10.2009 16:00:52] Ørjan!: good afternoon
[02.10.2009 16:01:09] Obdormio: and to you, sir!
[02.10.2009 16:02:59] Ørjan!: aw
[02.10.2009 16:03:02] Ørjan!: I'm a "sir"!
[02.10.2009 16:04:29] Obdormio: yes, you're not quite up to "your honour" yet
[02.10.2009 16:06:07] Ørjan!: where did I score the "sir"?
[02.10.2009 16:06:26] Obdormio: around the time you got a Y-chromosome
[02.10.2009 16:06:47] Ørjan!: odd. Nobody ever called me that when I was wittle.
[02.10.2009 16:06:58] Obdormio: yes, well, politeness is dead
[02.10.2009 16:07:52] Ørjan!: ;_;
[02.10.2009 16:07:57] Ørjan!: I NEVER EVEN GOT TO ATTEND ITS FUNERAL!
[02.10.2009 16:08:06] Ørjan!: What must politeness' family THINK of me!
[02.10.2009 16:08:46] Obdormio: they're all very disappointed
[02.10.2009 16:09:10] Ørjan!: ;_;
[02.10.2009 16:09:16] Ørjan!: I'm sooooorry!
[02.10.2009 16:09:26] Obdormio: I think tact intends to call you out when next you meet
[02.10.2009 16:10:22] Ørjan!: Tact! My old nemesis...
[02.10.2009 16:10:58] Ørjan!: Ever since I hit on etiquette at that Christmas-party...
[02.10.2009 16:11:18] Obdormio: and you know that doesn't fly with her!
[02.10.2009 16:11:31] Ørjan!: Actually, she seemed surprisingly receptive.
[02.10.2009 16:12:06] Ørjan!: She was coming off the rebound from a brief but sparkly fling with Rhetorics, who turned out to be all flair and no substance.
[02.10.2009 16:12:32] Ørjan!: But Tact wouldn't hear of it.
[02.10.2009 16:12:58] Ørjan!: I got the ol' glove-face-glove-face treatment, and was told to receive his second on the morrow.
[02.10.2009 16:13:07] Ørjan!: I tactfully obliged and fled the country.
[02.10.2009 16:13:19] Obdormio: no wonder he's miffed
[02.10.2009 16:14:16] Ørjan!: I sent my old friend Wit to try to mend bridges, but my efforts were squandered when Wit decided to take Offense.
[02.10.2009 16:14:30] Ørjan!: The two of them ruined any chance I'd ever have to make it up with Tact.
[02.10.2009 16:14:51] Obdormio: good thing you had Punning on your side then
[02.10.2009 16:15:08] Ørjan!: Punning never leaves my side, as he's not a tree.
[02.10.2009 16:16:34] Obdormio: fun as this is, I'll have to say brb now
[02.10.2009 16:17:34] Ørjan!: ach, well
[02.10.2009 16:17:38] Ørjan!: all good things must end

An autumn of TV-premieres

, , , ...

It has been pointed out to me - quite needlessly, but also flatteringly, and accordingly I don't mind at all - that there's been a sad amount of updates in this weblog of mine these last few weeks. Months. And what there has been, I'll usually reply with mindful self-deprecation, has been little amusing quotes. No posts of substance.

My posts of attempted substance have usually centred, with some few exceptions, on TV-reviews. I have no capacity this autumn to do many of those. Nor do I have the time to do book-reviews (heck, I don't even have the time to read non-curricular books), comic-reviews, movie-reviews... or, for that matter, the odd nonsense and musings on fanciful topics. I'm in the middle of putting an (unwanted) end to this university education of mine with an attempt to do twice the amount of courses you're intended to. I'm simultaneously digging through the bureaucracies of two countries, trying to figure out the whys and hows of next year without getting anything fatefully wrong. And, people, I still watch all that TV I don't take the time to review.

But tonight, I found myself with the urge to post, as it were, and so I'll do a composite post of what I am, have been, and will be watching this autumn. Some of it's started, some of it's already over, and some of it won't come around for quite a number of weeks yet. So please, come with me down the rabbit hole of much too much American television.


The story so far
As the summer was ending, and my Kings-abstinences were finally starting to subside, a lovely show named Easy Money was also waving its last goodbye. Having only ever gotten to finish eight episodes, this excellent little drama about a family of loan-sharks only managed to get four of them on the air last autumn. When the network finally started dumping the remaining four at the end of the summer nearly a year later, I was delirious to revisit the Buffkins and their morally ambiguous lives. Four weeks later, I was once again left hanging, all the more bitter this time for the certain knowledge there will never be more.

Then the beginning of the autumn proper was marked by the exit of True Blood's second season, which impressed me by being a good step above its predecessor. While I'm still not crazy about the show, it has solidified itself as a show in the upper end of the middle-tier of shows I deem good enough to bother with. Back when I first saw the pilot, I'd honestly not expected it to ever creep up to the midle-tier at all. So congratulations to Alan Ball and company. May your days be many and conveniently clouded.

Finally, Mad Men started back up. And while at first, I was still feeling like before about the show (everything is exquisite beyond belief except the dramatical confrontations and pay-offs), I have by now, especially in light of the most recent episode, started thinking that woah, the show might even be starting to do the big pay-offs right. While I can't claim to watch them all, I have to say, Mad Men is very likely to be the best made show in current American TV. If it is actually starting to improve in the one area I felt it was lacking, the sky's the limit.

Apocalypse, nowish
Boom. Mid-september hit, and so did premieres. Dexter, starting next week, and How I Met Your Mother, already on into its autumn roll, are both stockpile-shows that I'll catch up with come late December, but they're far from alone. New shows and returning shows, September's been a rich month for TV. Almost too rich - they're raining down on me so fast I ended up quoting an Angel-episode just to find a title for this section of the post.

In chronological order, as it were, this month of fresh TV started with Glee. I saw and liked the pilot this spring, and despite its dreary high-school premise, my fondness for musicals combined with the show's great humour is quickly bringing it up among my favourites this fall.

Another newcomer was Community, a half hour sitcom about a lawyer whose college diploma has been discovered as a fake and who ends up having to attend a crappy community college or face disbarment. So far, the two episodes have entertained and shown promise, but the great jokes, while there, are still too far between for a show that tries to be an outright comedy. For a drama, this show'd be hilarious, but for a sitcom, I feel it is a bit lacking. Still, when it's good, it's good, and I'll likely end up following it all fall in the hopes it will get better yet.

On the same day as Community leaped into the fray, Fringe came back with its second season. Crime procedurals don't really enthuse me much, no matter how much the try to disguise themselves as science fiction. But with a couple of really charming characters in a really distinct and unique father-son-relationship combined with an admittedly flawless execution of the plots-of-the-week, the show remains good enough to be worth the bother. With a little luck, the show will trap itself in its own mythos like Lost did, only quicker and with less obvious fillers on the road there. Not among my favourites this autumn, but given my standing investment of an entire season, I'm more willing to follow it further than I otherwise would be. Odds are that by Christmas, I'll have committed to this one for good, even if its basic structure is rather underwhelming.

Then followed another new sitcom, Bored to Death. With only one episode under its belt as of yet, this laid-back HBO comedy centres on a young author stuck with a writer's block on his work with his second novel. He turns to weed and white wine for inspiration, and his addiction eventually makes his girlfriend leave him. In desperation, he starts an impromptu career as an unlicensed private investigator. Yet another show I'm not sold on, but again one that seems to hold some promise. In particular the main character's best friend, a kid comic book artist trapped in a man's body, was hilarious. The show can also boast Ted Danson as a regular, which helps with the draw. Depending on how overwhelmed my TV-plate gets, this one might get the boot, but for now, I'm sticking with it out of curiosity.

Third and last of the new sitcoms I've tried this month is Accidentally on Purpose, where Jenna Elfman stars as a movie critic in her late thirties who gets pregnant on a one-night stand with a much, much younger man. The show was consistently funny - more so than Bored to Death or Community - but had less charm and identity. The pilot felt like it could have been an episode from any given sitcom of the last ten years, albeit a well-written one. However, one should not ever judge a show by its pilot, and once again, I'll be back for at least one more.

House M.D. is also back this month, and true to form, Hugh Laurie's magnificent as the title character. With the exception of a small Robert Sean Leonard-cameo, the remaining regular cast is absent in the double-episode season premiere. While I don't mind the regular cast at all, this is extremely good - because it also means that the premiere doesn't follow the show's regular episode formula. By the sixth season, the medical procedural with the House-twist has gotten incredibly old, and the only reason I'm still watching is because House himself is so compelling. The show, then, is by far at its best when it breaks this formula, and for two blessed hours including commercial breaks, it did so here. Stellar job, people. I can only hope and pray it'll retain a fragment of the awesome when it returns to predictable form next week.

On the very same day, Heroes returned, joining Fringe as the bottom of my barrel of expectations. Interestingly, my low expectations combined with a quite decent episode and Robert bloody Knepper made me quite happy with the premiere. If they keep going in this direction, the season could at least measure up to "volume 4" (the second half of season 3), which was rather decent too. In all honestly - anything that avoids the utter miserable crap that was "volume 3" will be appreciated. I'd even take the aimless-feeling season 2 again if we could avoid that. The trick to enjoying this show seems to be low expectations and accepting that Hiro simply will never die no matter how many stupid things he does, and I'm getting there. At least on the former half of that sentence. And as I said, the premiere was very decent indeed. Downright good in some aspects. I'm finding myself strangely up for more.

The third component to my barrel-bottom is traditionally Smallville which, despite its gradual improvement over the last four seasons (it has started season NINE now, if you can believe that), can never really shake my old, first-four-seasons' worth of "good LORD, this show's bad"-impressions. Admittedly, those first four seasons also had some really awesome nuggets of pure gold sprinkled in, usually involving Lex and Lionel Luthor. With both those characters gone by season 9, it is odd to see how the show can have improved so much on its average episode, and at the same time also never really reach the heights of those stellar masterpieces here and there that originally committed me to the show. Even so, all my prejudices aside, there is nothing to do but admit hands down that by now, for the most part, Smallville is a downright good show. And with the addition of the charming Callum Blue to the cast this season, I might almost forget how much I miss Lex and Lionel. Almost.

Final among the September Arrivals is also the one I've been looking forward to the most. In fact, I just watched it in the middle of writing this post. Dollhouse. An unabashed Joss Whedon-fan I might be, but the first five episodes of season 1 were really nothing special at all. Luckily, the show improved vastly starting with episode 6, and the thirteenth episode was nothing short of epic. This season premiere had a lot to live up to, and in my book, it did. Keeping everything that was good about episodes 6-12 alive and building it to new heights was exactly what I expected and wanted from this premiere, and it was exactly what I got. That, and razor sharp dialogue, great emotional moments, and wonderful characters. I even got an episode plot that wasn't standalone so much as it was a season plot cleverly disguised as a standalone. And Jamie Bamber being awesome and British and mean. And Amy Acker and Fran Kranz blowing my emotional equilibrium with every single scene. And Alexis Denishof as a Republican politician on a righteous rampage. And a hundred other, awesome little things. And beyond it all, looming in the horizon, chillingly conspicuous in its absence of overt reference, was episode thirteen and the both sad and scary taint it puts on every single little plot-development. As last season ended, I was hopeful about the show. As the thirteenth episode got out with the DVD, I got quite enthusiastic. Now, I'm sold for good. This show will be my favourite this autumn, I'm almost sure of it. Now let's just hope that episode 2 won't let down my soaring expectations.

Tomorrow, tomorrow
So is that all? Oh no. Oh no no no, is it ever not. Next month comes Star Wars: The Clone Wars back with its second season, a digitally animated show that in the latter half of season 1 quite surprised me with its (for Star Wars) rather complex stories and ethical dilemmas. I find myself almost embarrassingly excited to see if season 2 will make it even better. Also new in science fiction franchises next month will be Stargate: Universe, the Stargate-series' try at doing a Trek'y show with a darker frame than the predecessors in the vast SG-continuity. While I'm not a big fan of the old two, I've seen every single episode, which amounts to an ungodly amount of hours. There is no way I'm not following that continuity to its end now. Also? Robert Carlyle! So yeah. But still, my expectations are rather low, and checking this out is almost more of a duty I have to my standing previously mentioned ungodly commitment of time to this universe than it is any real interest.

Also in October is the final piece in the Battlestar Galactica-puzzle, as The Plan is released on DVD a good many months before it'll apparently air on Syfy. Seeing as I'm obviously a huge fan, and also wasn't as disappointed by the show's ending as many others were, I'm quite besides myself with anticipation for this promised answer to (hopefully all) remaining little nagging questions.

Finally, Legend of the Seeker will start back up towards the end of the autumn. Can't say I'm at all excited. I love the books, for all their flaws, but season 1 was as big a departure from those books as Quack Pack is from The Life and Times of $crooge McDuck. Entertaining in its own, cheesy, blatantly Xena-esque style and way, but not at all what I was wanting. Nor really a show quite suited for my tastes. Still, there is very little by the way of fantasy shows on air, and I sort of feel I should take what I can get. There's also the undeniable fact that season 1's very best episodes were in many ways rather good, even if the season as a whole was an insufferable cheesefest. So I might end up caving to my completism and deciding to follow this show yet another few steps further. We shall see.


-------

There. My autumn in TV-shows. I'm sure some additional surprises will turn up along the way in one form or another. Of shows airing this autumn, I should probably also check out Entourage, but with the six season head-start it has, that's severely unlikely to happen. Of other old shows, I'm coupling the new stuff with my first ever rewatch of Ally McBeal, where I'm currently mid-way in the penultimate season, and my first structured watch-through of the eminent Batman: the Animated Series. I've recently finished its spin-off Justice League: Unlimited as well as the British The Office, the miniseries State of Play, and a rewatch of the brilliant West Wing, so if you're interested in hearing what I think of any of these things, you should give a shout-out in the comments as I like mentioned probably won't find the time and energy to write proper reviews. (There should be some of West Wing already, though, if you're up to doing a little search).


Hopefully, there's one person out there who actually bothered to read all this. If not, well, that's another hour of my life wasted, I suppose. Cheers! And thanks for reading.

Redde Caesari quae sunt Caesaris et quae sunt Dei Deo

, , , ...

If you like this world so much, keep your fool mouth shut and maybe I'll let you keep it.

Me? I'm going to be a god again.


- Lex Luthor,
Justice League Unlimited 2x12: Alive!

Political compasses

,

The Norwegian elections are closing in, and as usual, it makes me have unreasonable amounts of fun taking political tests online. On this test I got this result:




And on this test, I got this result:


Imperialism and motherhood

, , , ...

Miss Kingsley repeatedly chided the colonial powers for abolishing political systems they did not understand and for then showing pained surprise when the natives failed to reveal a proper gratitude.

The imperial story, she wrote, was very like "that improving fable of the kind-hearted she-elephant who, while out walking one day, inadvertently trod upon a partridge and killed it, and observing close at hand the bird's nest full of callow fledglings, dropped a tear, and saying 'I have feelings of a mother myself,' sat down upon the brood."


- Mary Kingsley on British impreialism in Africa in the 19th century,
as rendered by Basil Davidson in African Kingdoms, page 167-168.

A reminder

, ,

Even though the twitter-feed on this page seems to be unruly at best and completely inept at, er, real, and thus does not show this; my lack of activity here IS somewhat mitigated by my relatively active twittering. Two-sentence reviews of things I don't find the time or will to write out here can be found there quite frequently, as are more typical twitter-updates such as a remark on something I'm reading, disappointment or excitement over some small piece of insignificant news, or a recommendation of a link or similar.

Anyway, I figured there was a slight chance I might have two or three people who still sometimes read this weblog'y thing of mine and who wasn't aware, and maybe one of them would be interested, so consider this post a reminder. I am, of course, at http://twitter.com/LokiAesir .

So that I can link this post if the need ever arises

, , , ...

Sensemaking I won't comment on, but there has never been any doubt of your ability to cast any event in a light that makes you right.


- Obdormio, about me, at 20:54 April 8th 2009.

Show List, Mark 3

, , , ...

I know, I'm posting very rarely lately. Three reasons for that. One, I'm lazy. Two, I have a ton of writing to do with regards to my master's thesis. And three, I watch a heck of a lot of TV.

On that note, even though I'm full-booked TV-wise until, well, September-ish very likely, I figured I'd have a run-down. You might remember this list from last spring. It's been very thinned out since then, my having seen Brisco County Jr., Dexter, How I Met Your Mother, Mad Men, The Tudors and half of Young Indiana Jones Chronicles (the rest is part of why any new stuff will have to wait until September) since then. A few new ones have been added, of course, so here's the list as it stands right now:

Alias
Brotherhood
Burn Notice
Dark Angel
Dirty Sexy Money
Drive
Dr. Who/Torchwood
Entourage
Farscape
Joan of Arcadia
Life
Medium
Monk
Moonlight
Jericho
Journeyman
Justice League
Oz
The Pretender
Quantum Leap
Red Dwarf
Sanctuary
The Sarah Connor Chronicles
Sharpe
The Shield
Six Feet Under
Supernatural
Tru Calling

Of these, I would currently like to prioritise the following five:

Brotherhood
Burn Notice
Sharpe
Justice League
The Shield

But which one of them first, that's up to you people. There is also the matter of carry-on-votes from last time:

Farscape (2)
The Pretender (1)
The Sarah Connor Chronicles (1)

Thus, I make the following ruling. One remaining vote last time equals qualification for the ones up for considering now. Farscape goes directly on the list with a vote in place due to its two carry-ons. If anyone wants to add another show to this list, let me know - if two of you want to add the same one, I'll even add it to the list of the ones that can be voted for.

Brotherhood
Burn Notice
Farscape (1)
Sharpe
Justice League
The Pretender
The Sarah Connor Chronicles
The Shield



Commence helping me waste more time daily, please!

Sine My Opera is stupid and won't allow anything fun

, , , ...

...anyone who for some obscure reason would want to read anything I put through my new Twitter-account c'n do so here instead, in the top right box-thing.

Outrageous (?) statement:

, , , ...

The invention and implementation of the train took all of the adventure out of human culture.



Discuss.

Big day!

, , , ...

Yesterday was a big day! Why? Because I finally watched the one and only The Adventures of Sinbad-episode I missed back when Norwegian television-channel TV2 aired it in my early-and-still-able-to-take-even-the-super-corny-shows-for-awesome-as-long-as-they-were-fantasy-themed-teens! (Also, I didn't pay much attention to the actual English back then, apparently, because the show turns out to have been FILLED with deliciously horrid puns!) It was the season 1 finale, Rumina's Vengeance. I know for sure, because I taped every episode I watched and re-watched them at least twice each.

And oh-my-gods. It explained who this Scratch-guy was way better than his other two episodes. And much more importantly, it resurrected Torak! Torak! And then he survived the episode! And now I'm back in the horrid, horrid limbo-land of cancelled shows! All the litttle plot-threads they had going in season 1 that they largely ignored in season 2! Where did Rumina go, I used to wonder, blissfully ignorant I'd missed an episode until years later, and now suddenly I also have to ask where did Torak go?!

Still, huge day! Big childhood hole was filled. Wonderous. Too bad I couldn't see it back when I would've been able to look past all the corny stuff more easily and truly enjoy it. But still. Wow. Awesomeness by the bucketload, finally getting to see one such giant piece of an admittedly grossly unfinished puzzle.


Hooray!

Iceland is the psychogeographical centre of sanity

, , ,

Life - an update

, , , ...

I've never been one for sharing personal information online, and I'm not about to start now. However, I've been asked quite strongly today to post something or other in my weblog here, and as I'm not feeling like reviewing anything on my rather long list of stuff to get around to writing posts on, that means it has to be on some whim of my own instead. As I additionally don't have any specific thought, idea, objection or opinion about anything in particular going on these days that would make for a post on its own, that kind of means I just have to give an update of who I am and what I am doing these days. Those of you who could not be less interested, and I'm sure that within the modest confines of this weblog's readership there's a lot of you, well, just don't read behind the cut. Thanks.

Read more...

LibraryThing

, , , ...

Oh, Obdormio, what have you gotten me into?




It's a mere handful of my books for now, but suddenly I'll have something better to do one day and it'll grow like nobody's business.

Democracy - Some random musings

, , , ...

If you put me against the wall and push a gun towards my head, I might allow agreeing that democracy is a somewhat functional form of government that, despite a number of obvious flaws, seems to presently be better than most or even all realistic alternatives.

Stress on the "might".

And given that everybody who run things seem to think that democracy can do no wrong - I'll have you know, by the way, that Socrates was very critical of democracy, and that's before they voted to kill him, so there (and do you really think you're smarter than Socrates, Jensen? Stoltenberg? Gahr St-, eh, Solberg? I didn't think so) - my thoughts are, that should be at least somewhat consistent, right?

So how come nobody is proposing making the media democratically run?

I mean, really. The people who tell us what to do are democratically run. The people who punish us if we don't are democratically run. Why aren't the people who tell us what to know?

Why isn't there a rule that says that as soon as some form of media gain an audience-base of a certain percentage of the nation, the chief editor of said media becomes a democratically elected position? Or at least controlled by some board of elected officials? I'm not saying that'd work. I'm not remotely in the vicinity of suggesting that. I'm asking why that isn't seen as equally reasonable as having elected representatives on the school board of private schools, or heck, as having anything run by elected people whatsoever.

The media has a lot of power - more so, in some ways, than many governmental institutions. I'm not talking about making them part of the government here. I'm just asking why, in a democratical society where people go bananas about how great this whole voting-concept is on a pseudo-regular basis, why isn't the principle applied to the people that hand us our information? The information, note, that we then use to go and vote on the basis of. For everything but the source of the information. Is that intuitive? Does that follow the ideals of democracy applied to a society? I don't know - I'm just asking.

And don't come running with some capitalist explanation about the market having a democratical effect on the media unless you're willing to follow that logic to the end. If the guy who tells you what's true and what's important can be elected by the forces of the market, then so can the guy who tows you in for disorderly behaviour. Meaning that you're in favour of privatising the policeforce. And probably the army, too.

The country is run by the beuracracy. The elected officials just sit on top of the pyramid making the big decisions. I'm not suggesting that journalism becomes a job you run for. I'm just asking where the officials on top are.


It is weird, right? I'm just asking.

Gnomen Nursery Rhyme

, , ,

For every thing there ever was there were people,
quite a few.
Someone to think, someone to see, and someone, yes,
to do.

A God to imagine it.
A Goblin to invent it,
A Dwarf to improve it.
Then an Elf to admire and enjoy.

(Yes quite, that's right, just so!)

A Troll to treasure it.
A Man to apply it.
An Orc to abuse it.
Last an Ogre who'll smash and destroy.

(Oh no! Oh my! The woe!)

But finally, then, a Pixie will come,
and play so the shards go astray.
Yet stop, you might say, are we not missing some?

Yes.

Two dozen Gnomes who got rich 'long the way.

Buffy Season Openers

, , , ...

Debatin', rankin' and makin' of lists, always fun. Feel free to join in.

The Ripened Ruler

, , ,

Ave moi.


- C. Iulius Caesar, Asterix at the Olympic Games

Re: the rarity of my posts

, , , ...

I'm currently trying to attend lectures in eight courses, four of which I've actually signed up for. Add to that 1300 pages of rather heavy curriculum on Ancient Egyptian religion as well as another 1300 pages (40 out of which is in bleeding German!) on Roman same, an unwritten 6000-word assignment on the cult and worship of Victoria and an equally unwritten project draft for my Master's thesis, and I'm quite stressed out. All of that is somewhat doable, though.


What really Zaps My Energy is the constant knowledge that I on top of this should be cramming Latin vocabulary and grammar-tables every day, and hardly ever do.


On the bright side, I'm channeling my Need To Remidy My Guilty Conscience By Doing Something Constructive into finally sorting my Magic: The Gathering-cards which have been a complete and unapproachable constant presence of mess on my desktop for three years now. Thinking I've finally reached the collection-size-point where ever colour of magic will need its own folder. Also, yay, they've finally errata'ed all those class-only creatures into having proper creature-types, so now I can sort all the soldiers and knights and clerics and whatnot under Humans. (Every fiber of my being resented a filing system which sorted some cards under "Elves" and some under "Wizards". Shudders.) Hopefully, on a slightly longer-term basis, I will also be able to channel some of this into reading my Stack of Unread Comic Books. However, my stack of unread fiction and non-curricular-nonfiction which I only made some meager progress with this Christmas (better than last year, though!) will probably be on stand-by for now. I just cannot justify sitting down to read anything which isn't about Roman emperor worship or the possibility of an Egyptian pantheism or similar. Sigh.


So, there you have it. This is why I don't seem to have the will to post here lately. That being said, there should at some point, when exactly being very much in the unknown, appear some form of posts on/reviews of the movies Waitress, Dungeons & Dragons, Dungeons & Dragons 2: Wrath of the Dragon God and Hocus Pocus. So the silence isn't for lack of topics.

This has been an Utterly Unnecessary Update (also known as a triple-u), you will now return with my permission to your regularly scheduled activities.

Poor Performance

, , , ...

I got a C.


And the world's not ended.





What's that about?!

Unus, sed leo! - Quality is more important than quantity

,

There was a great controversy among the beasts of the field as to which produced the greatest number of offspring at a birth. They rushed clamorously into the presence of the Lioness, and a Sow who had delivered a whole litter of piglets loudly demanded of her:

"How many sons have you had at a birth?"

The Lioness laughed at her and said:

"One, but that one is a lion."



- The Sow and the Lioness, of the Fables of Aesop.

That's me! Nietzsche is talking about me! (I think)

,

He who lives as children live — who does not struggle for his bread and does not believe that his actions possess any ultimate significance — remains childlike.


- Friedrich Nietzsche,
Daybreak — Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality

Contrastyness and similar animals

, , , ...

This whole posting-at-least-once-a-day-with-a-quote-thing I've been doing appears to be flooding my weblog.


It isn't. It's just that it makes it embarrasingly apparent just how rarely I have anything else I bother to post about.

But don't you worry! There'll be one on the Elizabeth-movies before the end of next week, promise. There's also likely to be one on "Reaper" once I get up to date on it. And there might even come one on the "Day Watch"-movie, but no promises there. Oh, oh, and of course, there's THIS one. Which totally isn't a quote-of-the-day-post at all!

Which, like, ROCKS. In sheer contrastyness.

The MOST

, ,

Reunions are meant to allow the more successful graduates to inform the less successful that is what they are, less than.
You and I are more than. Especially me. I've got my own firm.


I could possibly be the most.

-Richard Fish, Ally McBeal

My webcomic-quoted

, , ,

Together with this, Terje is now quoting this comic-strip of mine in his MSN subnick.

"Eg kunne hatt djupn! DJUPN!"
(approx. "I could have had depth! DEPTH!", a pun on how if he wasn't drawn on MS Paint, he might be three-dimensional in aesthetics and maybe also as a character.)


Thanks. ^^

Quoted?

, , , ...

I've been hesitant with posting this, mostly 'cause I've no clue what the thing I said that Obdormio quoted in his MSN subnick even means. But that's not a good excuse to treat it any different than other things, eh? Because to be fair, I rarely know exactly what whatever I say means. ;P



After my mocking him with his inconsistant complaints regarding his studies and his saying "Ah, you know me so well", this was my response by way of explaining this knowledge:

"I am a student of the human condition, and you've got more condition than most other people put together."


Thanks for the quote, man.

To-Read-List

, , , ...

So... this Christmas, I'll try very hard to dig through some of my list of purchased-yet-unread-books. So I thought I'd get some recommendations from whomever bothers to give me their input.


For logistical reasons, "Religions of Rome volume B: A Sourcebook" (North, Beard and Price), "Bonehunters" (Erikson) and "The Complete Sherlock Holmes Collection" (Conan Doyle) are disqualified from the list as they're too big and heavy to bring with me for the vacation, and I'm hoping I'll be done with "Jimmy the Hand" (Feist) and "A Very Short Introduction to Machiavelli" (Skinner) by then, but I'll bring four or five other books. The following list is all the remaining books I currently own yet haven't read (most) of, yet still wish to:

Fantasy
"The Darkwar, book 1: Flight of the Nighthawks" (Feist)
"The Darkwar, book 2: Into a Dark Realm" (Feist)
"The Lies of Locke Lamora" (Lynch)
"Phantom" (Goodkind)
"Anansi Boys" (Gaiman)
"The Artemis Fowl-files" (Colfer)
Myth
"Keltiske myter" ["Celtic myths", a 420-page compilation of celtic myths] (Rekdal)
"I begynnelsen" ["In the Beginning", a 380-page compilation genesis-myths from all over the world] (Bringsværd, Braarvig)
"Jorden vår mor" ["The Earth our mother", a 450-page compilation of myths from Native North-America] (Bringsværd)
"Shinto" [a compilation of Japan's oldest myths] (Teeuwen)
Literature on religion
"Approaches to Greek Myth" (Essay-collection, Edmunds w/others)
"Roman Religion" (Essay-collection, Ando w/others)
"Parallell Myths" (Bierlein)
"Comparative Mythology" (Puhvel)
"Bissie - Studier i samisk religionshistoria" ["Studies in Sami religious history"] (Mebius)
"Fornskandinavisk religion" ["Ancient Scandinavian (Norse) religion"] (Näsström)
"Herodotus and Religion in the Persian Wars" (Mikalson)
Historical works
"Makers of Rome" [Nine of Plutarch's "Lives"]
"The Twelve Caesars" (Suetonius)
"The Rise of the Roman Empire" (Polybius)
Literature on history
"A History of Ancient Egypt" (Grimal)


You can write any form of recommendations you'd like, of course, but a list of, say, five or six of these titles, and prioritized from most to least important, would be very helpful. If, like, three or four of you gave me something like that, I'd have so much less of a drag figuring this out.

(By the way, it is my very, very firm hope that I'll manage not to buy a single book 'til all of this is read)

Conundrum

, , , ...

So, I'm on my first year of my master's degree, this term being the boring compulsory shit. Next year is the writing of the actual master's thesis. But next term is all up for grabs, I can do almost whatever I want with it. Hence my total lack of making my mind up. Keep in mind that no matter what I'll do, these three suggestions are all full-time suggestions but that I'll still take an additional course (in Norse Religion, I've always wanted to and this is kind of my last chance for a long while) bringing the total workload up to 150% in all scenarios).

So... next term... should I...

A. Take fun courses that I know with reasonable certainty I'll get good grades in and learn useful stuff in, but that won't in any way alter or improve my range or depth of knowledge - for instance, should I take courses in, say, Archeology, Rhetorics, Philosophy and/or Classical Literature to improve my knowledge of the Ancient Mediterranean world and supplement the courses I have in Religious Science and History? This is what I WANT to do from a short term-perspective, as this would be both fun and interesting and relatively easy work-load wise. It would, however, limit my ability to write a particularily "serious" master's thesis, as I would not be able to discuss any aspect of any primary source in its original form. Most likely, this would lead to me writing a "fun" assignment on, say, the uses of Ancient Greek religion in modern comic books, for instance, which while fun I'm doubting will really get me anywhere afterwards.

B. Take Classical Greek - that is, the language. Upside is, this'd allow me to work on Greek mythology, which I find to be fun. Downside is, I have no idea whether or not I'll do okay in this, and I know it'll be a lot of work. Upside is, beyond the having great use for some insight into the language as stated above, having some minimal knowledge of Classical Greek is more or less expected if you write your master's thesis on Ancient Greece, and this way I'd not feel like a complete idiot every time someone expected me to know something I don't.

C. Take Latin, full term. This would basically be choosing to work on Roman religion instead of Greek, but that would maybe not be so bad - due to having had a course in the history of the Roman Republic, I feel much more familiar with Roman history anyway. It would mean re-taking a course in Latin I already have before continuing with new stuff, but that might be smart, as I don't remember any of it.

D. Take Latin, half the term as well as one of the fun courses from A. Upsides would then be same as in A and C above, only assuming of myself that I'll remember stuff from last time I took Latin so I won't have to re-take it. However, while this sound enticing, I'm thinking that it might end up being very taxing work-load-wise...

E. Combining B, C or D with attending a lot of lectures from courses in A throughout the term, but not signing up for exams in them.

F. Combining B, C or D with signing up for a couple of A-exams without compulsory activities and attending their lectures throughout the term, but not do any reading or book-purchasing at all and show up for the exams just for the heck of it.


Any suggestions? B&C would be the smart choices, A the fun choice, D and F the attempted compromise combining the best of the two, and E is more of an ideal I won't be able to live up to as there's no way I'll have the self-control to attend lectures I won't have exams in on a regular basis.

I'd really like some input, who knows, maybe some of you'll say something which'll be all helpful. Stranger things have happened...

Countdowns

, , ,

It occurs to me, suddenly, that I've had these on my weblog for a while now (if you haven't seen them, they're on the bar to the right, somewhat way down, sadly, Opera doesn't seem to allow me to arrange the order of the stuff there, just whether or not they'll be there at all), but I've never thought to ask if any of you know of anything you'd expect me to put on there, which isn't. Which I suppose you all do.


Any suggestions are appreciated - I've come to find that having this list of when what happens this far in advance is surprisingly handy.

Lokka táttur (Loki's song)

, ,

Look what I found! (Those of you who can read Danish (or better yet, one of the original Faeroese versions) should click the link and read before progressing)

Gives a very interesting view of Loki, this, as well as placing him in the interesting context of one out of three gods where the other two are two of the three Norse creators of the world. ('Cause that totally gives me more shakey grounds for considering Loki to be another name for Lodur, the third of the Norse gods who created mankind out of drafting pieces of wood. Which, you know, is awesome.) What's also interesting (and supporting my stand on this, as Lodur is a seemingly far more benign entity than what we know of Loki) is how Loki is more patient and benevolent than his collegues in dealing with humans, helping them even when they fail to obey his commands to the letter. (Also interesting; he's the only one of the three that forsees this eventuality and bothers with designing a backup-plan)


It's odd what some random wikipedia-surfing can make you stumble over. Not only this; but also a nice 18-page essay on JSTOR on the view of Loki in Germanic religion, which I'll read as soon as I find the time and energy. Hee! I'm happy.



Happy, I say.

What I'm doing instead of writing my three gargantuan assignments of the term

, , , ...

http://obdormio.com/2007/09/17/what-im-doing-instead-of-blogging

And yes. This is a debate about the quality of digital drawings of pigs.







Those of you who may have thought I didn't have a life, EAT YOUR WORDS. (Or, well, thoughts. I guess that could be tricky, though. Er, eat your brains?) It is pretty selfevident that only someone with a life can get in a situation that random.
November 2009
S M T W T F S
October 2009December 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30