Skip navigation.

My own self

Loki's sensible nonsense of nonsensical sense

Posts tagged with "siblings"

Dungeons and Dragons

,

I've had this movie on VHS for years and years, and some months back, I rewatched it with my youngest brother. It really isn't as bad as everybody makes it out to be.


I mean - it IS bad. Of course it's bad. But it does have some redeeming features, most notably among which are the villains. Jeremy Irons and Bruce Payne star as the, respectively, arch-villainous politician/wizard and the arch-villainous general/warrior. Especially the latter does quite the memorable job in this movie, and his probably the character you'll remember the most clearly a year or two after watching it.

The actual group of protagonists are adequate, but that's it. Justin Whalin and Marlon Wayans do rather decent performances as the Hero and his Best Friend slash Sidekick, though, I'll give them that. Other than that there is little to write home about. There's the compulsory love interest (albeit with an interesting cultural, social AND political barrier between her and the rest of the good guys) who also functions as the group's mage, and there's a Dwarf who more than anything else feels like an ugly and perverted parody of Two Tower's amusing portrayal of Gimli, only released two years before that of course. There's also an Elven Ranger, though she's so mysterious she barely speaks in the movie.

Apparently, the movie's been slandered by fans of the roleplaying-game it's obviously based on for not being true enough to the game. This might be true - I've never actually played D&D. I'm geek enough, however, to have read some old rulebooks and spent some hours of my teenage life googling the stuff, as well as obviously having a rather decent familiarity with the fantasy-genre in general, and to me, it feels rather strongly like a stereotypic fantasy RPG. It's got everything I'd expect, and you can recognise many game mechanics and clichès in the movie if you look for them, which greatly add to the enjoyment of it and is one of the main reasons I actually enjoyed watching this and why I'll probably, some day, watch it yet again.

The movie does hold a few small positive surprises as well, and I honestly think that for a cheap movie's worth of afternoon entertainment, you could do much, much, much worse.

A very strong 5,5/10

Napoléon

, , ,

So, I bought this miniseries for the oldest of my siblings for his 20th birthday, knowing he had watched and enjoyed it with some friends when it aired on Norwegian telly a few years back, and figured I'd sneak myself to a watch-through before I wrapped it.

That was well worth it. While I found the series wanting in several respects, it was all in all a very good experience which indubitably gave me a lot of the basic understanding of the Napoleonic Wars that is too unimportant and interesting for the university to bother with in its Recent History-courses. For the record, I watched the English version - apparently it was filmed in both a French and an English version, being a collaborate effort between French and British (and, I believe, German!) TV. While all the actors thus speak English, several are clearly somewhat uncomfortable with this - but the situation would be ditto awkward if I'd gotten the French copy, no doubt. Apparently, though, the French version is 15 minutes longer - whether it has scenes this version lacks or if it simply takes that much longer to say something in French is not something I can answer, though. No matter what the case might be, this English version has a respectable total running time of 6 hours and 4 minutes, tracing the life of Napoleon from the year 1795 and forwards till his death on St. Helena, the final episode containing some additional flashbacks to his childhood years.

The series is visually stunning. Everything looks shiny and beautiful, the battle-scenes are revulsingly gory while somehow still magnificent in their own grotesque way. And the dialogue is, quite often, very entertaining.

So, in what regards did I find the series lacking? Well, the first quarter of the miniseries is tremendously weaker than the following three - in my opinion. This might just be because the faultings of the series as a whole is so much more apparent in this part of Napoleon's life, though. You see, this miniseries seems to be made as a personal drama first, a historical documentary second, and everything else third. This means that while every grand battle, war, negotiation and treaty is usually mentioned, they're rarely given that much screentime. Far more important, it seems, is Bonaparte's marriages and love-affairs, as well as his mother-issues. In other words, they focus on the person, not on the events. Which I guess is a fine and good approach, but really not what I would've preferred.

This ties closely into the other main regret I experienced watching this - the sinister Fouché (Gerard Depardieu) and even more so the sparklingly slick Talleyrand (John Malkovich) display twice the charisma and interesting characteristics in their alas so few and short scenes that Christian Clavier's Napoleon manages throughout the entire miniseries. And I don't think this is through no fault of Clavier's, who does a very good job - either it's the writers' fault, or it's simply that Napoleon wasn't that interesting a guy... (Noo! He did not just type that!)

But it's not fair to critizise a series about Napoleon because I'd have liked one about, say, Talleyrand and Metternicht, way more.

All in all, this miniseries portrays a charismatic, strong and even kind, yet flawed, man behind the uniform, and thus gives a very human side to one of the main shapers of modern Europe. A man of science, ideals and conscience as well as a man of violence and strategy. If I would rather have had a cold, political intrigue-fest, that is my failing, and not the series'. I'd stamp this as very clearly recommended.

Happy New Year, everybody

, , , ...

Or, hopefully, anyway. I'm not handing out guarantees.

Is this post late, you say? Is this not in keeping with the fine standard I set last year? And what about the Prime Minister Speech Review? Didn't do that one this year, either. Nor did I do the review of the King's Speech which I wanted to do to make up for last year.

Fear not, gentle reader.


Oh, and fear not, violent readers, I hadn't forgotten you, either, I'm just favorizing my gentle one.


Anyway, fear not.


'Cause I've got me some explanations.

I was at my grandfather's this New Year's Eve and Day. So, no internet. Zap. Zilch. Nil. Nada. Splonge. Bupkiss. Bippers. I might have made up some of those words. No net, though. Net-depravement is big around those parts.

He lives in a valley so secluded you had to transport your cars there by boat 'til 1989 'cause there were no roads.

Anywho.

No net, no immediate ability to Report On My Thoughts and such. Also, I've been busy. Busybusybusy. As in the kind of state where you're, you guessed it, busy. (Good guess, by the way, were you peeking ahead?) I've had other stuff on my mind. Plus, this whole (non-)blog-thing isn't as new and fancy and interesting now as it was a year ago. Then again that's life. ("That's liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiife! That's what all the people saaaaay." That commercial has killed my taste in music)

The Prime Minister's Speech, that one I would have done a post on. Had I fracking watched it. I just caught the last five minutes. Probably a blessing in disguise, it's not like they ever say anything new. I caught the King's Speech, though, naturally, I'd be a poor sod of a monarchist if I didn't catch the one time throughout a year the King actually speaks directly to the people. But it's been so long since, now, I can't remember enough of it to comment properly. It was the same old same old with the thematic twist of the year, as usual, but I liked it. It dealt a lot with xenophobia and common decency and that kind of thing. Very humane. Sappy, but that's the point, I guess. Kudos to Harald and his speechwriter(s?).

Just for the record, though, I caught the national anthem after both speeches, and the King's song before his speech, and I rose and stood through all three. I might be a closet nationalist. I might just like the song. Or I might just think it's plain cool to revere something which is purely symbolic.

So, the year. Interesting thing, the year. It's a natural cycle. It's not man-made, like the second or the hour or the century or the millenia. There actually would be such a thing as a year even if we hadn't made up a name for it.

Sorry, I digress. I meant "the PAST year", not years in general, and by believing that was obvious, I seem to have misled myself, 'cause apparently, it wasn't. I need to stop taking everything I write literally.

So, the past year. Well, it's past. And it was a very good one. For me, anyway. They hung Saddam, though. Doesn't seem like the kind of thing you can do. I mean, he's even in the South Park-movie. He's like Cæsar; you just can't picture the guy die. Sure, he's a swine, but even so. He's like an icon. Doesn't ring right, his being dead. Like you kind of can't really believe it. It's scary, that, realizing how frail human life is even when you're the world's possibly best known genocidal maniac. If HE can die, everybody can die. He didn't lose his cool, though. Kudos to him. I'm generally opposed to execution as a form of penalty - I figure that nobody can really know what it entails without having died themselves first - and I kind of think imprisonment for life is the worse sentence anyway. Apparently, though, the Iraqi government was clear on this being to spare the people of him, not to punish him, so, that's a moot point. I just can't quite wrap my mind around his being gone. Even though the world is probably a slightly better place for it.

Other people I have never known, met or really wanted to meet have died this past year, too. The only ones of them to make an impression on me, though, were a couple of actors and the like. Right now I can only remember Sverre Holm and Peter Boyle. Thanks, guys. You've made me laugh.

So, that's the morbid section of this post. Me, I'm good. Good year. Better than good. No major bad occurancies in my immediate family, me included. Good health. Good life, rather good economy. Good getting-my-civic-service-postponed-indefinetely. Good studying. I'm regretting I didn't take an additional course in spring, 'cause one of the two I did take turned out to be far less work than I could have ever dreamed, but still. I re-took an exam in March, and improved my only post-high school grade below B, a D, to a B. One of my prouder moments, that. I had two more exams in June, one in an interesting subject where I got really lucky with the questions on the exam, and one in a dreadfully boring subject where I wrote my bachelor's assignment and somehow did extremely well without having read more than 10% of the curriculum. Summer was nice, but uneventful, maybe. Other than making my webcomic. Of which I'm rather proud, to tell the truth. Otherwise, this summer, I took a short trip with my family like we usually do in summers, and beyond that, I mainly just worked. I'm starting to tire of working where I work in vacations and weekends where I'm home. I'm starting to grow more comfortable there, yes, with the people there and the assigments there and so on, but I'm tiring of it. It's so dreadfully boring. Anyway, on to the autumn, where I took three *very* interesting courses, making for my academically most interesting term since spring 2005, and the two I've learned the results of yet turned out really well, too. January 17th will prove whether or not the third one followed suit. I have hopes. ("He's got HIIIIGH hopes. He's got. HIIIIGH hopes. He's got high apple pie in the sky hopes!" I love Goofy) If it does, it'll be pure awesomity. Personally, too, it's been a great year. I'm very lucky, I have a very easy life and no major worries, never really did have. I hope it'll last a long while yet. I've grown more social, too. This spring, I kind of regressed, I didn't share courses with anyone I know and I didn't really make much contact with the ones I knew outside my courses from before. Right before summer, though, it changed, and I made an effort to keep it up the first few weeks this fall, and voilà, it held. Suddenly, I find myself socializing almost one day or so every week. It's crazy. Nice people, too. Not a lot of people, but very nice people. Obviously. I'm way too picky to keep up seeing people I don't think are very nice. And I incresingly realize, I know a lot of very nice people online, too. You know who you are, but thank you for making my year that much better for having chatted with you and listened to me. So, great year. And in the humble beginnings of October, it got even better. Sure made me glad I don't keep this weblog in Norwegian.

I hope next year will be as good. Or possibly even better. I've signed up for some courses in Latin on top of my full-time studying history, so academically, it's suicide, but I'm hoping it will be a good year even so. This far, it's looking pretty promising.

To all of you out there reading this, happy new year. I wish you all the best. And thank you for all you've done for me in the old one. ^^ Keep flyin', people. I implore you. As does Mal.

Oh, and if any one of you tries making jokes on how late this post is, there will be fatal beatings administered.

V for Vivified story

, , ,

Got the movie ("V for Vendetta", for those not getting that from this post's title) for my delayed birthday-pressie from one of my brothers, and was quite thrilled, not having seen it since it was in the cinemas.

And it's still as good. Damn this movie is good. And even better for always making me love the comic even more. How awesome is that? The movie is so good it makes me like the original - which obviously is even better in most ways - even more.

So let me simply add that it's my very good honour to have seen this, and you may call me awed.

And the sky and all the heavens...

So, we're walking over to my grandparents' (on my dad's side) house, who live a walk the shorter side of half an hour away from my parents, me and my little ten-year-old sister, when she looks up on the night-sky (it's November, so there's night-sky at five in the afternoon) and goes "It looks round."
I reply that that's 'cause it is, and how the sky is another ball around the ball we live on, assuming she knows the basics of our living on a round ball-like planet. And she replies "So, all the countries, they have their own skies?"
I quickly figure out, my sister has never grasped the difference between countries and planets - a little shocking, considering her age, to my mind, but then again, what do I know of the average ten-year-old's grasp of the world. Anyway, she thought Norway was one round place where there lived people, and other places (like "Africa", which was her example) were other "round places". Stumbling my way through explaining the concept of planets in terms she can understand, I feel like she's maybe getting it now, and then we continue walking. Then she goes "is there people on the other planets as well, then?" And I say that, no, not that we know off, 'cause the planets are so far out in space we can't go there. After a digression - on her accord - on the possibility of aliens (and me feeling relieved I explained this well enough she knew where the aliens would enter on the picture) - she marvels on how we can't visit these other planets, she thinks that's really strange. I repeat my attempt at trying to explain the extreme distance and the like, and then I throw in a comment on how there have been people on the moon, so we've gotten that far. She goes "Really? On the moon?" She points at it, and I nod. She continues.
"Coooool. Do you know anyone who's been there?"


I love my sister. I really, truly, totally do.

Watchings Of The Weekend

, , , ...

Well, obviously, I saw some television. "Nytt på Nytt", first, which was better than the last time. They're quite obviously choosing a more aggressive and on-the-edge angle on their humour than in previous years in this season, but this far, it hasn't made the show any worse (though nor has it made it any better), so I won't complain (yet).
And then there was "Løvebakken", which was good, but which I still would like them to stop cutting away such large portions of. They either cut less or edit more seamlessly on Nytt på Nytt these days, but here it is quite obvious, and annoying. Just expand the show with half an hour, for cryin' out loud.
Then I saw that "What women want"-movie with Mel Gibson, which was as entertaining as the last time I saw it. Not a brilliant movie, but certainly not a bad one, well played characters and well done concept.

I also watched some DVD this weekend, mainly bits and pieces of Friends-episodes my younger brother was re-watching for the gazillionth time. But mostly nice ones, I've seen them all so many times now I can usually know if I'm interested to sit down and watch with him or not after seeing half a scene of the episode he's watching. Oh, and the ending of "The Little Mermaid", which he was also watching, yeah, I saw that. And I saw "Just Rewards" (Angel 5x2) with him, actually on my request - he wanted to watch Angel, so I picked an episode I hadn't seen in ages. It was very good, better than I remembered it to be. Something about season 5 is so immensly visually stunning, by the way, it hits me every time I put on an episode from it, and in addition, it had very nice Spike-and-Angel-scenes.

Lastly, I watched "Reservoir Dogs" with my other brother, who hadn't seen it. He laughed quite a bit, I think he liked it very much. I like it better with every time I re-watch it, it's strange, I was kind of lukewarm towards it at first, but it grows on you.

So, that was my weekend, watching-wise. Oh, and I also watched a couple of "The Inside" episodes, but most of the ones I just re-viewed I watched before the weekend. (I actually haven't been in front of the telly that much this weekend, despite what the list above seems to indicate)

A Game Of Thrones Has Been Played, long live the squids

, , , ...

Seeing as Obdormio was in on this one, I thought I should write a wee rapport, in the eyes of the Lion.


The Lion, this time, as it turned out, was me, and boy did I make a piss-poor job at it. First round, I played okay, but with mistakes. Second round, I played fairly well. Third round, I stunk. Fourth round, I stunk again. And after that, I had one obsese little squad of Lannister guardsman trotting around the Riverlands and the eastern Westerland on search for something to do. I played the Lion like an itty bitty kitty.

To be fair, it wasn't all my bad. While I positioned myself wide open for what would be the main blow against me, I still think it was the smartest, albeit riskiest, thing for me to do. Yes, it was lousy done to the other players to do what I did, but that does not make it rational to choose to hurt me, who at that point was the weakest player on the board in all respects, over the player who not only was clearly in the lead, but who would in addition be the sole player to profit should I be targeted.

Of course, I was targetted, and I should have foreseen that. The player making the call was new to the game, the board-positions wouldn't look as obvious to him as they did to me, and he was right in wanting to punish my move, I shouldn't have expected him to have such a grasp on the game and the current situation as to realize that he rationally couldn't do that without effectively handing an already stronger player the victory. It really bugs me ho I often seem to lose games like this from overestimaiting my opponents. Oh, well.

The Kraken, of course, was the strongest player, the Stag being a rather distant second for most of the game. Highgarden was very latent throughout, never really going over into agressive-mode, which, if I should speculate (and why not, I spent most of the game walking in circles with a single over-supplied regiment with nothing better to do), was his main mistake. He played a very fair game up until the three last rounds or so, when he should have brutally expanded navally, either in the west (which he should have done in concordance with a similar naval assault in the northeast by the Stag) or in the southeast. I'd have preffered west were I him, not because the Kraken was the easiest target - it wasn't - but because that could have given him a chance at the Throne, while launching at the Stag would only increase Grejoy's relative power in the game. However, I might be wrong in assuming he could have held Baratheon back if he'd gone up northweast, so maybe southeast was his better choice, I didn't pay it THAT much attention. Anyway, I think Highgarden would have profited from getting more aggressive mid-game. As far as I can recall, aside from claiming Sunspear, Tyrell didn't do one single attack throughout the game, and obviously, that's not right.

The Wolf, now, the Wolf I didn't pay that much mind, so my thoughts there might be way off, but... I think he did rather well. Had I not been given the penalty the Kraken should have gotten, the Wolf might have been fighting Kraken rather closely for the leading position - a fight which could easily have weakened both enough to open for any of the other three players, but probably the Stag, who was both the strongest runner-up and the best positioned player to do so. However, I have one small quarrel with the Wolf - he should, really, really should, have accepted my round 2-offer for an anti-Kraken alliance. While this is obviously easy to say in hindsight, and I agree it wasn't that clear-cut a decision right then and there, I'm pretty sure that would have smothered the Kraken quite nicely - and, I might add, would have weakened the Kraken enough so that when the penalty was dealt to me, the Kraken wouldn't be able to take full advantage, placing the Wolf firmly in the lead. (Overlooking the fact that I wouldn't have bid as I had if the Kraken hadn't been so strong I considered him the only possible choice for the penalty) All speculation of course, but I do think that's how it would have played... and, well, I was right in my assumptions on how the actual game would go, so why not in this speculative one?

All in all, however, the Wolf did well, keeping the Stag at bay, and holding the Kraken off by subtly maneouvering for keeping the Lion weak enough for keeping the Kraken's main interests in the south. A maneouver which in the end, as I foresaw, worked to his disadvantage, but in the early-game, it worked just as he wanted, and kudos to him for that. It wasn't 'til the Ironborn had utterly finished the Lion off they turned their attention to Stark, and, well, up until that point the Wolf had been doing pretty damned well. Of course, that point came, as I knew it would, but... it was still a decent attempt.

All things considered, it was a good and entertaining game, despite my early fall from grace, and (hopefully) I've learned not to overestimate other players. I probably haven't - I didn't last time, or the time before that, or the time before that, etc, etc - but one can hope. And hopefully, next time such a situation arises, there will be a slightly more experienced player making the call. Cause gosh darn it, I did make the right move, had I just been able to convince others of my being right. (And that's veeeery easy, when the only one knowing it instinctively sat at my left hand side and would be the one profiting from it, wisely arguing against what he knew would destroy his already big advantage. Brotherly love indeed. And yet the bastard kept sparing my last little troop for no apparent reason later in the game. I think he felt bad. XD)

Superman has Returned

, , , ...

So, I finally went and saw it. And sheeesh, if they hadn't raised the price for a cinema-ticket yet again, the bastards. Anyway, it was, as was to be expected, good. Singer knows his stuff. While I'm no fan of the older movies, I have to admit, the Superman-theme from them was excellent, and Singer's use of it in this one equally so. Makes me want to hear the even better Batman-theme from Burton's two old Batman-movies in "Dark Knight", but as they are obviously trying to establish the new Batman-movies as independent from the previous ones, that's probably not going to happen.


Anyway, regarding the choice to have "Superman Returns" continue on from I and II with Christopher Reeves, I'm glad for the decision to ignore the later ones. II was bad enough, and I'm not a fan of I, either. They got some good and interesting plot-results from continuing on from the old ones, but also some incoherency in characters, mostly in Lex Luthor's. Luthor, in the old ones, was a git. Here, he is almost as smart as Luthor should be, but he's still having the old movie-Luthor's quirks - small wonder, as he's supposed to be the same one. They've also made a small effort to keep the movie in line with Smallville-continuity, more or less, to reach out to the younger audience whose main knowledge of Superman-mythology comes therefrom. Thus, Lex is as mentioned smarter and cooler. Indeed, Lex Luthor is wonderful in this movie, and though I still prefer both the incarnations of the recent tv-series ("Lois and Clark" and "Smallville", respectively) to this one, he's not in any way shaming the Luthor name, and the actor was wonderful.

As for the title character, Singer actually made me care for him, even root for him, in some very small, short scenes. This is an accomplishment. When Superman is pitted against someone, I usually either cannot seem to care very much, or I root for the other guy, whether he be Batman, Luthor or Brainiac. But here, I care for the guy, I feat I think only Jeph Loeb has done for me before. (It is to be noted, though, that I have read way too little Superman-comics, and thus might well have the wrong impression of the character) True, as my brother complained after seeing it (we watched it together), there was way too much American patriotist propaganda in it, but damn it, this is Superman. He's SUPPOSED to be like that. He's the semi-naïve idealistic goodie-goodie-two-shoes boy scout defending TRUTH, JUSTICE and THE AMERICAN WAY. You get what you should be expecting, is my opinion in this regard.

By the way, as character-moments go, when he tells the people in the plane that flying is still the safest way to travel near the beginning - that's pure awesomity. The guy did a great Superman, and a wonderful Clark Kent.

The acting in general was fine for my eyes, but I'm not a very good critic on acting ability. Kudos galore to Singer for finding a Superman who looked so much like Christopher Reeves I in some scenes almost wondered if they'd cheated digitally.

The plot... could be better, but also could be much worse. All in all, I'm pretty satisfied with the film. I disliked certain smaller aspects, but all in all, it was wonderful, and really showed that the film-makers GOT the character. Still, I would have preffered a lousy "Superman Returns" to have Singer make X3. It is when compared to this I fully realize how much that movie lost on the change of director from 1 and 2. And X-men has a hundred times more interesting and broad character-gallery than Superman does. Superman has Luthor, and maybe Clark Kent and Perry White. X-men has Magneto, Xavier, Wolverine, Mystique, Beast, Nightcrawler... etc. And it is characters Singer is so good at, both in this movie and in his X-men-films. So I'd rather he'd stayed on X-men. If he had, I'm sure we'd get a 4 and maybe even a 5 and a 6.

But, oh, well. It was satisfactory. Not great, but satisfactory. I give it a 7,5/10, which is more than I ever thought I'd give a movie where Luthor loses.

Cause he does.


And it's just not fair.

Giving The Devil His Due - DareDevil, the Director's Cut

, , ,

You have to admit, as taglines go, that one's pretty good.


I'm amazed. That's what I am.


How can anyone - ANYONE - choose the mediocre nonsense they showed in cinemas above this?! This is GOOD. This is better than good; this, my friends, is very good. I'm not sure if I'll give it a "great", but it's damn sure "very good". My brother - who considers the cinematic version one of his favourite superhero-movies, coming in behind "Batman Begins" and the Spider-mans, if I remember correctly - is SO going to love this, I'm going to have to watch it with him just to enjoy his reaction.

Okay, so, the changes. It's been a while since I last saw the "normal" cut (from now on referred to as "the horribly inferior cut" or simply the HIC), but some changes I noticed/got told of and remembered when watching the commentary.

First of all, there's just MORE, of virtually everything. Most notably, there are the following:

- A much longer getting-to-know-DareDevil-scene where among other things the barfight is heavily extended.
- Longer, and thus more intimate, insights into the relationship between Matt and his father, making one care a helluva lot more for both of them than one did in the HIC.
- Generally longer fight-scenes. I don't think there's one important fight-scene in the entire movie not seriously prolonged. This obviously pulls one more into the battles, and furthermore, it lets these supposedly brilliant fighters impress us a little bit more than they did before.
- More fleshed out friendship between Matt and Foggy - which also, of course, fleshes out both of the individual characters, with great warmth and conviction. Foggy is brilliant in all the cut-scenes he's in.
- Some (but not that many) additions to the scenes presenting the Bullseye-character (one especially cool one near the end) and some more scenes with the brilliantly casted Ben Urich as well. There is also an early extended scene showing the full extent of Kingpin's brutality, lending more potency to his threatening presence later in the movie.

There is also the addition of a subplot where Matt gets to be the lawyer helping the underdog and the blind detective, which ties beautifully in to the main plot and makes some things in the ending make far more sense then they ever did in HIC.

Some very few things are also removed, notably the confessional-scene (replaced with an equally good scene were Matt elects NOT to go to confession, even at the direct urging of his priest), which I miss, and the scene were he gets to bed Elektra, which I miss, although for different reasons.

These changes both add to the new subtextual point of the movie, though - that Matt is alone, very alone, and troubled, and I like them. The main-focus being on the romance with Elektra is gone, shifted to DareDevil's crusade against the Kingpin, without detracting from the potency of his relationship with Elektra - maybe strengthening it, even.

All in all, I have but one major complaint, and that is how they exploited their now-higher-rated-movie-anyway to have Bullseye go "I want a fucking costume" instead of "I want a bloody costume", which to me sounds ten times better. But then again, I'm a sucker for British swearing, so... it might just be me.

Everybody who likes DareDevil (who thematically (but not character-wise) is Marvel's version of Batman, if you ask me, which should be argument enough to like him) should go get hold of this movie and watch it. Trust me. It's waaaaay better than the HIC.

8/10, maybe even an 8,5, I need to contemplate this. I'm not positive, it's been too long since watching it, but I think I'd give the cinematic version 5,5 or 6.

A Little Bit Of Postin'

, , , ...

Yeah, I've posted far less than I usually do lately, and that's likely to keep up. Same with the not-being-all-that-much-on-MSN-really.


Speaking of MSN, I've got a new subnicktext: " I think life is just too short to spend your time working someplace where people don't crap their pants at the mere sight of ya." - Dr. Cox.


Speeking of Coxie, part of the reason I've been so little online is, of course, I'm home for the summer, and I've spent my days re-watching Scrubs season 3 and Firefly (that series grows shorter and shorter and better and better for every time I re-watch it ;_;), and playing the campaign on Heroes of Might and Magic V. On the easiest mode, because I'm a wimp in cyber-life, too. Finished the first campaign today, actually, so mwhahaha, done with the silly Haven-people, onwards to Infernal glory. Also, I'm the only one in the house not doing anything at the moment (apart from a few substitute-days, my grossly boring summer-job doesn't begin in another two weeks yet) so I'm usually stuck with making dinner, plus I make it a rule to visit my grandparents (who live a six minutes drive/twenty minute walk away) almost every day, and this together with entertaining younger siblings and helping out with the bare minimum of things my parents expects me to help out with takes up a bit of time, too.

So little time for mindless web-surf, MSN-chat and frolicking on my weblog.


But tonight, I'll conjur up an entry on the Notablog-conworld. Where, of course, I'll in what passes for detail around these parts explain how the Elves were to blame for the long-delayed-part of my long-delayed article.


Fucking Elves.

THE END OF THE SEASON

, , , ...

is upon me. I've had one exam - out of two, the one I had the least worries about, obviously, so that I have the worst one left - my brother has had his confirmation, and all these television-series I for some reason am watching are coming to their seasonal end. Don't read the paragraphs titled with names of shows you haven't seen the latest season finale of yet.

Prison Break:
Good episode, not-so-good season-finale. I felt the cliffhanger was too clumsy and too few threads were wrapped up. But I'm looking really forward to season two anyway.

24:
Amazing, I loved how they finally paid off season 4's ending in the last fifteen minutes.

Veronica Mars:
Awesome. Simply. Awesome.

Scrubs:
Really picked itself up in its last bunch of episodes, loved the two final ones.

Smallville:
Decent ending, now if they only mind not to solve everything with yet another convenient Lex Luthor mindwipe in season 6.

Lost:
Good last bunch of episodes, and they even moved the plot along in them, which has been sorely lacking this season.




As for my exam, I wrote about Krishna's similarities and differences with Shiva, which was more or less the exact assignment I'd have ordered if the teachers phoned me last week and asked me what assignment I'd like on the exam. I've even written a small paper on the exact same subject two months ago. If this one doesn't go well, I'm officially confused. Even more than normally.

The confirmation was splendid. Obviously there are things my mother felt went not-quite-as-well-as-she-hoped, but there always are, and everybody else were to the best of my knowledge very pleased with the day. I even held a small speachy-toast-thingy during the dessert. (I sort of had to - my younger brother (not the one who was the centre of the evening, the one between us in age) was going to hold one, and my not doing the same would look very bad.)

Update

, , , ...

INFINITE CRISIS: Read it. Though it had the common "huge-crossover-series"-issue of being somewhat messy and having too many characters to make it a really excellent story, it was still good. The ending, however, made everything worth the bother, and parts of it is now my subnicktext on MSN.

You made a lot of mistakes. You underestimated Superman. Superboy. Me. But the biggest one? You didn't let the Joker play.

Now who's stupid?

- Lex Luthor





In other news, I've bought and read "Ultimate X-men Volume 5: Ultimate War" and "Volume 6: Return of the King", and am now officially ajour with Mark Millar's writings on the series. I think I'll wait with checking more of the series out until I've bought some other stuff, now.

Anyway, "Ultimate War" was cool. There was a problem with it - I don't really see why it was an Ultimate X-men-volume, it seemed to me it was just as much, if not more, of a "The Ultimates"-volume. Which is fine, of course, as I've said before, Millar's "The Ultimates" is pure genius, but I felt sort of cheated finding out there's in effect an entire volume of The Ultimates I'd never have read if I hadn't read Ultimate X-men too.

"Return of the King" was magnificent. As with "Ultimate War", I got plenty of Magneto, which is always the Numero Uno thing I look for in any X-men comic. The ending conversation between Magneto and Xavier in the plastic prison gave me the shivers, and I laughed out loud at the last page... I love how those two characters both cooperate and war with each other at the same time, and how they both think and function on several levels at the same time, most of them quite beyond the people around them.


Also, I've bought "Gardens of the Moon", first book in Steven Erikson's hugely praised fantasy series, and I've read the prologue and the first chapter. Seems good, I'm looking forward to getting more into this.



Non-reading-wise, I'm nearing the season-end of most the television-series I'm watching. Veronica Mars and Smallville are already done, Lost, Prision Break (dear LORD is that one exciting?!), 24 and Scrubs are all nearing their ends, and I just turned from season 4 to 5 in my watching of Stargate SG-1.

The day before yesterday I went to the cinema and watched "Mission Impossible III. It was entertaining, and at times really cool (like when she got his heart back to pumping and he immediately snapped his eyes open and in less than a tenth of a second had grabbed the nearest gun and was aiming at the open door in the other end of the room XD AWESOMEITY! (for you, Ob)) though obviously not a "great cinematic experience" or anything like that. Still, I liked it better than I and II, especially II I don't really care for all that much. 7/10, I think, though had I written this yesterday, I'd probably have said 7,5. (The first movie I give 6,5/10, the second 5,5)


School-wise, I'm studying for my exam in "Religious science 202: Hinduism" these days, as my youngest brother has his Confirmation-ceremony two days prior to my exam in that subject, and I won't be able to study very much then. I've also gotten feedback on the draft of my term-paper in another subject ("Religious science 201: Systematical religious science", blaaarhg), and it was somewhat... well... it was both positive and disappointing. Positive because the feedback was that I was onto something and that I knew how to present arguments and stuff, disappointing because I was recommended to change the structure of the assignment plus read some more articles before I finish it, which is going to take a lot more work than I'd hoped. I'll have nine days to do it after my Hinduism-exam, though, so hopefully, I'll manage.

Personal, hm, well, I'm still anti-social. :D I'm trying to go to the cinema with one or two of my few local friends at least once every second week or so, though, so I'm not completely shut-out of human contact. Right now I'm looking forward to going home to my parents and younger siblings on Tuesday, to celebrate Norway's national day on Wednesday and my brother's Confirmation on Sunday.

And that was the update.

Melancholy

, , , ...

So, it is the eve of the last day of my self-prolonged Easter Holiday back with my parents and my siblings. Sigh. By all means, I like it in my apartment, I look forward to again being able to plot my every second totally without regard for other people, it'll be cool not to have to have fish for dinner at least once a week again, und so weiter, but, Hel, it isn't the same as being home. Sigh. I feel good when I'm home, for no other reason than for just being here. And with the exception of my youngest brother's confirmation-ceremony, I won't be going home again before the summer holiday - and then I'll have to work, which takes like 50% of the joy out of the entire thing. Sigh.

I should be getting to bed now, I'm getting up in six hours.

Sigh.

Spikeaton

, , , ...

My youngest brother and I have just had a Spikeaton! We have both, relatively recently, re-watched Buffy's second season and "Lovers' walk", the season 3-episode with Spike in it, and we felt like following the chap further on. We also, during our recent "last-third-of-season-5-a-ton", saw "Crush", another Spike-centred piece.

And I'll keep this post spoiler-free for your benefit, Olaf.

So tonight we watched, in order, "Fool for Love" (which was the integral piece we felt missed between "Lover's walk" and "Crush"), "Entropy" (because I mistakenly thought it contained some stuff that turned out to be in the episodes after, but still, not a waste, a lot of Spikey goodness in "Entropy", too), and, of course, "Lies My Parents Told Me". We would have continued with "Destiny" and "Not Fade Away" (honest to God, there's not a character in Angel's season 5 to whom NFA isn't a vital piece of character-arc) had my brother felt up to it, but he wanted to gain a level or two with his new Undead character on World of Warcraft before he went to bed, so I watched a "Scrubs" and then went to weblog about the Spikeaton instead. :D




Anyway, "Fool for Love" - amazing. Simply. Amazing. I'd forgotten just how amazing. "You're beneath me." Sigh. Pure lovelyness. Maybe - just maybe - my favourite non-Joss-sode of the series. And, I think, the single most important episode for Spike as a character, edging out "Lies My Parents Told Me" by a couple of hairs. If it hadn't been for out decided Spike-focused evening, by the way, I'd have put on the Angelsode "Darla" after this one, they're obviously made with watching them back-to-back in mind, but I've never done it. Oh, well, some other time, I suppose.

"Entropy" was very good, too, though obviously not in quite the same league. It made me ache to re-watch "Selfless", though, something I've been meaning to do for ages but never seem to get aroudn to.

"Lies My Parents Told Me"... I love that episode. Objectively speaking, not quite as good as "Fool for Love", but the message it tells... the moral of the episode... the harsh brutality of the lessons learned... they're all so very much in keeping with the brutal realism I prefer in my fiction. (I love "A Song of Ice and Fire" for crying out loud!)

Also, "Early one morning" is one heck of a tune! :D

To conclude, Spike rocks, and though Joss clearly is Boss, Buffysodes by other people can be mind-bogglingly good, too. :D

A Knight's Tale

, , ,

Just re-watched it with my youngest brother, who hadn't seen it before. (This was a trick on my part to get him interested in Alan Tudyk, seeing as I knew he'd love the character of Wat, and thus have another argument when trying to make him watch "Firefly". He adores "Buffy" and "Angel", in some ways even more than me I think, but he has these insane ideas sometimes which he rarely ever backs down from. With "Firefly", he just decided, out of no good reason whatsoever, that he wouldn't like it. And that's it. That kind of illogical behaviour annoys me to no end.)

And by Odin, it was far better than I remembered. I remembered it as "corny but somewhat exciting, and with a couple of hysterical scenes spread thinly around", but hey, it had a virtual rock-slide of cool quotes!

"Better to be a silly girl with a flower than a silly boy with a horse and a stick."

(And, in somewhat defiant response to that one: ) "It's called a lance!. He-llo?"

"Your men love you. If I knew nothing else about you, that would be enough."

"God love you, William. So do I."

"Well, the Pope may be French, but Jesus is English!"

"Uh, betray us, and I will fong you, until your insides are out, your outsides are in, your entrails will become your extrails I will w-rip... all the p... ung. Er. Pain! Lots of pain."

"I don't understand women."
"Nor do I. But they understand us. Well, maybe not you."

"All human activity lies within the artist's scope! ...Well, maybe not yours..."

And my favourite and new MSN-subnicktext:
"Of course I lied! I'm a writer! I give the truth scope!"

Wheeee

, ,

I hate this military-transcript-thing I got myself out of in the worst way imaginable (by trying to be nice) cos it's probably gonna mess up my entire education.




That aside, I'm happy, cos I'm home, and my sister had her tenth birthday, and she's the bestest sister ever. I made maps to her presents for her! :D Good times.

Yawn

, , , ...

Late. Tired.

Got rid of the virus/malware/spyware. Mostly, at least, there's some lingering nuiscances I didn't manage to kill off, but I'll live, and so will the computer. Tolerable.

This is the end of the second-last day of being home with my parents and siblings before I go back to school for spring. Melancholy.

MSN-subnick-text changes again. Quote from same page as last time. New quote is "Suffice to say that Yaweh spent endless hours testing his people's obedience, and they in turn tested his patience to the limit." Already had this one for a day or so, so tomorrow I'll change to "En gang var jeg nysgjerrig, men nå...", which is a quote from this month's Norwegian rerun-issue of the Fantonald (Duck Avenger) - comic, "Project Cold Sun", said by the character of Camera 9, an engimatic yet cool chap to say the least. It translates to something like a very resigned "Once I was curious, but now..."

Non-blog's not being very non-blog'y. Irritation.

Remember to do something about that in next post. Pressure.

Post ending. Bye.

New Year (WHAT AN AWESOME TITLE! I think I should copyright it or something)

, , , ...

Hooray, new year.


Not.


I actually enjoyed the one we just had. Wouldn't mind it having gone on for a while yet. But noooooo. Nature had to come and be all orderly all over my life. I probably threw something in the wrong recycle-bin this year or something, because it is so obviously out to get me for something.

But. New year, new opportunities, new happy days, and, just maybe, new Whedony-goodness. (Yes. This is like the one day of the year I attempt to be positive. Those dear to me are far too dear for me to allow myself even the slightest thought of something bad happening to them in the coming year. So I'll skip that point totally. In fact, this whole parantheses, you're imagining it. Yes. Yes. It is a fiiigmeeent ooof yoooour iiimaaagiiinaaatiiioon. Sleeeeeeeeep.) And also - Are you SLEEPING?! In the middle of my New Year's Day-rant?! GET A GRIP, that's not polite, like, at all!

So, in accordance with all clichès, lets recap 2005! Rah-rah, onwards chaps, for the Empire!

2005 began on a somewhat interestingly unoriginal note, with fireworks, the first of January at 00:01. Boom, it said. Fireworks would do that.
Also, there were some sad people all over, due to the weather-thingies in South-East Asia. (Obviously there are people who nature reasonlessly hates even more than me)
Then, school started. I took Asian religion and Extinct Mediterranean, Mesopotamian & Norse Religion at the University. Somewhere, some kid ate a potato without complaining. And the birds sang. My sister had her ninth birthday, and there was much rejoycing. And some melancholy, obviously, she's not supposed to be a little woman of nine, she's supposed to be our cute little baby! After this, we commenced on Easter. Booh-yeah. Once again, we celebrated the death and rebirth of God by placing small yellow cloth-chickens on top of our televisions and tabletops. (Who said religion lead to thinking inside small, limit-imposing boxes?) THEN. Then came May. Oh May you fair and mellow... First of May, Worker's Day. Not that I gave a crap. Eight of May, some kind of gender-fascism went on, I think. Oh! And then, SEVENTEENTH OF MAY. Norway's National Day! It's like the Fourth of July and Christmas all rolled into one, only without the firworks and the pressies. We walk in parades. Like, all normal people. We just do. We line up, and we walk around, waving flags (though there has been some debate as to the colouring of these flags) and generally being nice and cheery.

Lesse. THEN CAME SUMMER. Swooping upon us with its decievingly un-summery weather and temperatures, it took us all by complete surprise when we finally got some time off from tiresome things like work and school. As for me, I did some exams and went back to doing nothing. Yay. For a few weeks. Then I had to work. I do that in summers, if almost nearly never in other times of the year. Silly need of silly money.

But. Nice summer, all-in-all. My youngest brother turned fourteen and stuff. Then came autumn. New subjects. I took three courses; Introduction to European Politics and History, Introduction to Religios Science and Christianity, Islam and Jeudaism. It would turn out I did far better with the stuff I did in spring, but oh, well.
Batman Begins and Serenity in cinemas, which should be enough to give anyone several happies. Oh, and even though it almost completely ruined the saga for me (Palpatine an IDEALIST? Oh-sodding-please!), Revenge of the Sith deserves a mention for being the independently best movie of the Star Wars-saga. Other movies now that I mention the theme, would be A History of Violence, Sin City, probably Narnia once I get around to seeing it, and Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy which by an astonishing turn of events, didn't suck. It wasn't extremely good or anything, apart from the hillarious opening with the Dolphin-song, but it did a helluva lot better than I'd have guessed. And probably some others that I forget.

Then came Christmas, which has been really nice. By then, my mother had turned fify, my father fourty-nine (he's constantly nagging her about her being in her fifties while he's still young), and my other brother eighteen. And myself, I turned twenty-one. Oh, the horrors of adulthood growing increasingly nearer.

2005. Norway has had 100 years with our royal family. I've had twenty-one-years with mine. God, whomever He, She, They or It might be, bless us, everyone.

MY NON-BLOG AND I: THE SECOND DAY

, , , ...

All hail.



I was at work today. For a little over nine hours. So I'm rather tired. But we won't go into that here seeing as that would be a very blog-like thing to do. And, as previously stated, this is not a blog-like thing. It is, in fact, quite the opposite. Yes. You guessed it.


It is a non-blog-like thing masquerading as a blog-like thing claiming to be a non-blog-like thing.


Confused yet? If not, don't worry, we're just on day two, you'll get there with the rest of us eventually.





Well now. More Game of Thrones today, my brother possibly felt bad for yesterday and arranged a game, and due to some very, very, very clumsy mistakes (one where I somehow ended up thinking 1+3 was equal in total to 2+3, and one where I simply forgot to execute my carefully laid out plan) on my part, my brother once again won. Not that he didn't deserve it, he showed great ability with his calculations. I think I managed a poor third. (We were five players, three of them newbies...)


To quote the Governator, I will be back.

A Game of Moans: The Clash of Plans

, , ,

It turns out, there was no game! XD After waiting for an hour or two, my brother's three comrades showed up. One of them was only going to stay for half an hour, so they decided to play poker until he left and only then commence the board-game. I've played poker earlier today as well as both yesterday and the day before, so I said I'd just sit on the computer until they finished.


But then their game dragged on. It is now close to four hours later, and the guy who had to go in half an hour is just now getting ready to go, and I'm getting ready to go to bed. I'm not disappointed or anything, this kinda solved my problem, but it is kind of funny that despite this whole mess, I'm still not in bed!

That being said, I probably should go do something about that about now.


And to all a good night.

A Game of Moans

, , , ...

No, not in the perverted way. I'm simply trying to make a pun, seeing as I'm somewhat annoyed that my brother's friends chose today of all days to ask if he (and myself) wanted to play a round of board-games. Good board-games, like "A Game of Thrones" which we probably will play tonight - usually take time. And tomorrow is the only day during the entire vacation where I have to get to work at nine in the morning.

Conclusion? Faith's a bitch. (No offense intended towards all the Dushku-lovers out there)



I'll probably get only five hours of sleep tonight. Way too little, of course, and it still won't let me stay up as long as I would had tomorrow been almost any other day of the year.





Anywho. Having ranted somewhat about this blasted conundrum, I'll go over to less blog-like-things, to keep in style with the non-blogyness that hopefully encompasses this, er, blog.

SNOW.

It's white, it's cold, and it's damn dangerous when placed in the wrong spots or appears in the wrong amount, but darn it, it's nice. There's snow outside now. Has been for some time. Still far less than it would have been on the twenty-eight of December ten years ago, but that's global warming for ya. Hopefully this will invoke the wrath of Ymir upon humanity and smite them all asunder. (I do like Knox and count myself out for purposes of health. Of course, he died right afterwards...)

December 2009
S M T W T F S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31