Don't Ever Judge A Show By Its Pilot
Tuesday, 17. March 2009, 14:47:22
Really, don't ever. The amount of things that are different between the creators' combined sales-pitch to their network and sales-pitch to their fresh audience laying out premises, characters, relations and backstories and your average episode six months (or, if you're really lucky, six years) later are staggering. Sometimes, you hit something where the first episode is actually very telling (I'd say The West Wing is a very good example there), but it is the exception, not the rule. You cannot tell how a show can be by its pilot.
So it is thus dreadfully premature when I say I love Kings. It is the best pilot I've seen since Easy Money early last fall, and honestly, it's probably even better than that. The reasons? Well, let's list them.
It re-tells the story of King Saul and King David of the Old Testament, one of the truly great epics that is hidden in that treasure of a book. It has everything; war, intrigue, religion, politics, prophets, sex, scandal, divine music, great heroes and fallen Chosen Ones. This would be awesome all on its own. But Kings takes it one step further. A bold, stunningly daring step that I am still unsure if I approve of (I love period pieces), but that I'm loving nonetheless. It takes place in the modern world.
Not our modern world, but one with made-up countries and made-up rulers living in made-up cities fighting made-up wars. This is the big caveat that makes this change of venue possible, but that might also be the shows' failing. Will the average viewer be able to buy into a world that looks so similar to our own, but isn't? Time will tell.
The setting, however, is brilliant. It lets the show move all these incredible elements from the Old Testament into a modern situation, where the power of religion is matched by the power of the corporations, and where King Silas (Kings' King Saul) finds himself trapped in the middle at the same time as a young upstart named "David" is suddenly getting everybody's attention. They get to look at current, real-life issues, but do so in a context where we have people who have to wait for the king to rise before they get out of their chairs and Divine Revelations flaunted publicly by the same king of national television.
The show, thus, is extremely ambitious.
Now don't get me wrong. It isn't the strongest pilot I've ever seen. But it's a very, very, very good one. Very good one. And while you shouldn't judge a show by its pilot, I'm already all but ready to declare this my new favourite current show this spring when Battlestar Galactica finds its closure on Friday.
Oh, and by the way, I don't believe I mentioned, Kings has Ian McShane in the lead role.
Yeah, that's right. You're wasting precious time reading this when you could be watching McShane be a bloody king for a full double-episode. Why do you think I didn't mention it until now? You'd have never read all of this post if I opened with that.
So it is thus dreadfully premature when I say I love Kings. It is the best pilot I've seen since Easy Money early last fall, and honestly, it's probably even better than that. The reasons? Well, let's list them.
It re-tells the story of King Saul and King David of the Old Testament, one of the truly great epics that is hidden in that treasure of a book. It has everything; war, intrigue, religion, politics, prophets, sex, scandal, divine music, great heroes and fallen Chosen Ones. This would be awesome all on its own. But Kings takes it one step further. A bold, stunningly daring step that I am still unsure if I approve of (I love period pieces), but that I'm loving nonetheless. It takes place in the modern world.
Not our modern world, but one with made-up countries and made-up rulers living in made-up cities fighting made-up wars. This is the big caveat that makes this change of venue possible, but that might also be the shows' failing. Will the average viewer be able to buy into a world that looks so similar to our own, but isn't? Time will tell.
The setting, however, is brilliant. It lets the show move all these incredible elements from the Old Testament into a modern situation, where the power of religion is matched by the power of the corporations, and where King Silas (Kings' King Saul) finds himself trapped in the middle at the same time as a young upstart named "David" is suddenly getting everybody's attention. They get to look at current, real-life issues, but do so in a context where we have people who have to wait for the king to rise before they get out of their chairs and Divine Revelations flaunted publicly by the same king of national television.
The show, thus, is extremely ambitious.
Now don't get me wrong. It isn't the strongest pilot I've ever seen. But it's a very, very, very good one. Very good one. And while you shouldn't judge a show by its pilot, I'm already all but ready to declare this my new favourite current show this spring when Battlestar Galactica finds its closure on Friday.
Oh, and by the way, I don't believe I mentioned, Kings has Ian McShane in the lead role.
Yeah, that's right. You're wasting precious time reading this when you could be watching McShane be a bloody king for a full double-episode. Why do you think I didn't mention it until now? You'd have never read all of this post if I opened with that.






Amrasananas # 18. March 2009, 17:50
Loki Aesir # 18. March 2009, 22:10
Amrasananas # 19. March 2009, 07:51
Oh, and Watchmen, if that counts
Loki Aesir # 19. March 2009, 10:54
Anonymous # 22. March 2009, 13:18
"Kings has Ian McShane in the lead role."
Kings is officially on my list. This show sounds almost too good to be true, and I really hope it's not hit with the cancellation stick.
I think the fact that it tqakes place in a modern setting makes it very interesting and daring. It makes me think about these modernizations of classic Shakespeare pieces, though even that doesn't put me off this show.
Looking forward to checking it out. :D
Loki Aesir # 22. March 2009, 14:07
The modern setting seems to me done in a double-edged attempt at making it more relatable to the viewer whilst being able to discuss and showcase some unique current issues (the power of corporations, for instance). The only problem I have with the modern setting so far is that their and their enemies' modern military seem to be using clueless tactics that's been outdated since the invention of the machine-gun... but you can live with that. It's not a show about armies, anyway, it's about people and politics.
Glad you're wanting to check it out. Personally I'm hyping it up too much in my own head, as I'm basically drooling with anticipation for tonight's new episode. I want more Kings now!
Anonymous # 22. March 2009, 19:36
"It'll be a quick watch, too, as everything is looking like it'll be cancelled rather hyper-quickly."
Bah, fucking typical.
"The only problem I have with the modern setting so far is that their and their enemies' modern military seem to be using clueless tactics that's been outdated since the invention of the machine-gun"
Hm, do not like the sound of that. Then again, if it takes place in an alternate version of our world, then they might just get away with it.
Downloaded the pilot, and will probably watch it sometime during the following week.
Loki Aesir # 22. March 2009, 20:14
As for the cancellation, it's not cancelled yet. It just looks bleak, with the pilot having gotten very low ratings combined with them possibly deciding to air two episodes next week instead of one... But there's always hope, right?
Anonymous # 22. March 2009, 20:19
"It just looks bleak, with the pilot having gotten very low ratings combined with them possibly deciding to air two episodes next week instead of one... But there's always hope, right?"
Of course, I mean, let's face it... The Wire never achieved killer ratings, and ran for a whole 5 seasons, with a pretty epic conclusion.
Loki Aesir # 22. March 2009, 22:01
Amrasananas # 24. March 2009, 16:25
Loki Aesir # 24. March 2009, 18:10
TheTerje # 25. March 2009, 17:58
Anyhoo, gonna make a mental note of this and see if I can get around to watching it once I get over my current West Wing obsession. (4-5 times since late September. Seriously.)
Loki Aesir # 25. March 2009, 19:42
TheTerje # 26. March 2009, 12:10
But I'm mostly kidding. That does sound like a stellar show. (Probably not gonna start following it on a weekly basis, though; I've found I prefer concluded or mature shows that I can watch by the buchetload without running the risk of running into an abrupt and annoying halt or pause in the narrative...)
Loki Aesir # 26. March 2009, 13:01
And I agre on Rome, I just consider the sex and most of the violence to be (major) parts of the soap elements.
Loki Aesir # 26. March 2009, 13:01
And I agree on Rome, I just consider the sex and most of the violence to be (major) parts of the soap elements.
TheTerje # 26. March 2009, 14:54
And if you interpret "sex" as "things pertaining to sex" and not just "sexual intercourses", which is the only reasonable thing to do, I guess, then I agree.
Loki Aesir # 26. March 2009, 15:03