My own self

Loki's sensible nonsense of nonsensical sense

Don't Ever Judge A Show By Its Pilot

, , , , ,

Really, don't ever. The amount of things that are different between the creators' combined sales-pitch to their network and sales-pitch to their fresh audience laying out premises, characters, relations and backstories and your average episode six months (or, if you're really lucky, six years) later are staggering. Sometimes, you hit something where the first episode is actually very telling (I'd say The West Wing is a very good example there), but it is the exception, not the rule. You cannot tell how a show can be by its pilot.


So it is thus dreadfully premature when I say I love Kings. It is the best pilot I've seen since Easy Money early last fall, and honestly, it's probably even better than that. The reasons? Well, let's list them.

It re-tells the story of King Saul and King David of the Old Testament, one of the truly great epics that is hidden in that treasure of a book. It has everything; war, intrigue, religion, politics, prophets, sex, scandal, divine music, great heroes and fallen Chosen Ones. This would be awesome all on its own. But Kings takes it one step further. A bold, stunningly daring step that I am still unsure if I approve of (I love period pieces), but that I'm loving nonetheless. It takes place in the modern world.

Not our modern world, but one with made-up countries and made-up rulers living in made-up cities fighting made-up wars. This is the big caveat that makes this change of venue possible, but that might also be the shows' failing. Will the average viewer be able to buy into a world that looks so similar to our own, but isn't? Time will tell.

The setting, however, is brilliant. It lets the show move all these incredible elements from the Old Testament into a modern situation, where the power of religion is matched by the power of the corporations, and where King Silas (Kings' King Saul) finds himself trapped in the middle at the same time as a young upstart named "David" is suddenly getting everybody's attention. They get to look at current, real-life issues, but do so in a context where we have people who have to wait for the king to rise before they get out of their chairs and Divine Revelations flaunted publicly by the same king of national television.

The show, thus, is extremely ambitious.

Now don't get me wrong. It isn't the strongest pilot I've ever seen. But it's a very, very, very good one. Very good one. And while you shouldn't judge a show by its pilot, I'm already all but ready to declare this my new favourite current show this spring when Battlestar Galactica finds its closure on Friday.

Oh, and by the way, I don't believe I mentioned, Kings has Ian McShane in the lead role.


Yeah, that's right. You're wasting precious time reading this when you could be watching McShane be a bloody king for a full double-episode. Why do you think I didn't mention it until now? You'd have never read all of this post if I opened with that.

So, who does this remind you of?Watchmen - the movie

Comments

Amrasananas Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:50:02 PM

I'm very glad you liked it, Loki. It makes me feel like I'm on a winning streak in recommending you stuff lately smile


Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:10:33 PM

Yay! I'm dreadfully sorry that I don't recall, but, what was the previous thing you've recommended me recently that you're now referring to?

Amrasananas Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:51:07 AM

It might not count for *you*, but there was a LOST ep (The Life & Death of Jeremy Bentham) that I said you'd really like, and you did despite Sarah saying it was kinda bland.

Oh, and Watchmen, if that counts cheers

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:54:18 AM

I'm not sure if it counts when it's stuff I would have watched without your recs, no... but if it makes you happy. ^^

Anonymous Sunday, March 22, 2009 1:18:47 PM

Shirgaal writes: "Kings has Ian McShane in the lead role." Kings is officially on my list. This show sounds almost too good to be true, and I really hope it's not hit with the cancellation stick. I think the fact that it tqakes place in a modern setting makes it very interesting and daring. It makes me think about these modernizations of classic Shakespeare pieces, though even that doesn't put me off this show. Looking forward to checking it out. :D

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Sunday, March 22, 2009 2:07:30 PM

It'll be a quick watch, too, as everything is looking like it'll be cancelled rather hyper-quickly.

The modern setting seems to me done in a double-edged attempt at making it more relatable to the viewer whilst being able to discuss and showcase some unique current issues (the power of corporations, for instance). The only problem I have with the modern setting so far is that their and their enemies' modern military seem to be using clueless tactics that's been outdated since the invention of the machine-gun... but you can live with that. It's not a show about armies, anyway, it's about people and politics.

Glad you're wanting to check it out. Personally I'm hyping it up too much in my own head, as I'm basically drooling with anticipation for tonight's new episode. I want more Kings now!

Anonymous Sunday, March 22, 2009 7:36:38 PM

Shirgaal writes: "It'll be a quick watch, too, as everything is looking like it'll be cancelled rather hyper-quickly." Bah, fucking typical. "The only problem I have with the modern setting so far is that their and their enemies' modern military seem to be using clueless tactics that's been outdated since the invention of the machine-gun" Hm, do not like the sound of that. Then again, if it takes place in an alternate version of our world, then they might just get away with it. Downloaded the pilot, and will probably watch it sometime during the following week.

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Sunday, March 22, 2009 8:14:23 PM

The military-stuff - It's not VERY obvious. More a case of my being a little anal.

As for the cancellation, it's not cancelled yet. It just looks bleak, with the pilot having gotten very low ratings combined with them possibly deciding to air two episodes next week instead of one... But there's always hope, right?

Anonymous Sunday, March 22, 2009 8:19:58 PM

Shirgaal writes: "It just looks bleak, with the pilot having gotten very low ratings combined with them possibly deciding to air two episodes next week instead of one... But there's always hope, right?" Of course, I mean, let's face it... The Wire never achieved killer ratings, and ran for a whole 5 seasons, with a pretty epic conclusion.

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Sunday, March 22, 2009 10:01:43 PM

Yes, but The Wire was on HBO. Kings, while it looked and felt like an HBO or Showtime-show, is on NBC...

Amrasananas Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:25:00 PM

Regarding the military aspect of the pilot (this info is all second-hand so it might be complete bollocks for all I know): Historically, the Philistines were known as "masters of machines and metal", while David's army was mostly - if not all - footsoldiers. So while the tanks vs. men didn't make sense from a modern perspective, it makes a weird kind of sense if you're trying to recreate the myth properly.

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Tuesday, March 24, 2009 6:10:38 PM

That's pretty interesting. And a fair point. But it doesn't really remove the whole silly-aspect of the in-world (non-)sense of the situation...

Terje "Smith"TheTerje Wednesday, March 25, 2009 5:58:37 PM

Hmm, I remember reading something about this somewhere, but I just can't remember where. SFX, for some reason, perhaps?

Anyhoo, gonna make a mental note of this and see if I can get around to watching it once I get over my current West Wing obsession. (4-5 times since late September. Seriously.)

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Wednesday, March 25, 2009 7:42:56 PM

You'd like it. It's like Rome, but with more politics instead of all the annoying violence and sex. bigsmile

Terje "Smith"TheTerje Thursday, March 26, 2009 12:10:26 PM

Actually, I found the soap elements of Rome to be much more annoying that the sex and the violence. I wanted political intrigue, dammit, and they gave me The Troubled Life And Marriage of Lucius Vorenus, Primus Pilus. p

But I'm mostly kidding. That does sound like a stellar show. (Probably not gonna start following it on a weekly basis, though; I've found I prefer concluded or mature shows that I can watch by the buchetload without running the risk of running into an abrupt and annoying halt or pause in the narrative...)

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:01:56 PM

Well, it's struggling with ratings, but they've apparently shot the entire first season, so I'm feeling relatively confident that even if cancelled, we'll get the whole thing on DVD at some point.

And I agre on Rome, I just consider the sex and most of the violence to be (major) parts of the soap elements.

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:01:57 PM

Well, it's struggling with ratings, but they've apparently shot the entire first season, so I'm feeling relatively confident that even if cancelled, we'll get the whole thing on DVD at some point.

And I agree on Rome, I just consider the sex and most of the violence to be (major) parts of the soap elements.

Terje "Smith"TheTerje Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:54:56 PM

Assuming the first season doesn't end in a matter resembling the West Wing season 1 finale, I suppose that wouldn't be too bad.

And if you interpret "sex" as "things pertaining to sex" and not just "sexual intercourses", which is the only reasonable thing to do, I guess, then I agree.

Georgius the PeasantLoki Aesir Thursday, March 26, 2009 3:03:06 PM

I think the actual intercourses are part of the soap drama stuff too - just like I don't consider violence to not be part of war. p

How to use Quote function:

  1. Select some text
  2. Click on the Quote link

Write a comment

Comment
(BBcode and HTML is turned off for anonymous user comments.)

If you can't read the words, press the small reload icon.


Smilies