Monday, 25. May 2009, 13:49:38
myopera, design
MyOpera themes are changing over time. See how the "Misty" theme looked like originally:

Besides the ugly top bar with the inconsistent buttons (for example, there are THREE different "friends" buttons/links), the theme background has been changed by MyOpera folks lately, who knows why.
Here is how it looks now:
http://my.opera.com/BryanCox/blog/I do not like the "new" background that looks like your granmother's sofa.
Here are the lines to add to your "user.css" to restore it back as it was:
body {background:#B8C2CF url(http://my.opera.com/community/graphics/themes/111/bg1.gif) top left repeat-x;}
#wrap0 {background:transparent url(http://my.opera.com/community/graphics/themes/111/bg2.gif) center 0px no-repeat;}It will work until MyOpera folks don't delete the old files/location.
Wednesday, 20. May 2009, 11:32:43
Martina
Martina holding pens.
There is a pillow behind her but after some moments
she fell backwards and hit the floor with her head.
She doesn't complain much when it happens, she just
stares at you like "hey, what happened?"
She wants to move around but all she can do
so far is her "fish out of the water" imitation.
Monday, 18. May 2009, 09:12:56
Martina
Let go! Let go! You @#@#!
Tuesday, 5. May 2009, 14:05:25
life
And the problem of summer shoes is solved.
Monday, 4. May 2009, 06:21:15
software, windows
I am reading the minimum system requirements from Windows 7 RC:
1 GHz CPU
1 GB RAM for 32 bit 2 GB for 64 bit
16 GB (32 bit) or 20 GB (64 bit) hard disk space
Video card enabling DirectX 9 and WDDM 1.0 o higher.
For versions with Windows XP Mode:
2 GB of RAM
Other 15 GB of hard disk space.
CPU enabling Intel VT o AMD-V.
Now, these are the same system requirements or even a little higher than Vista. The "XP mode" is going to waste even more resources (it doubles the system requirements). So, what is the claimed "revolution"? Where is the "best Windows ever built" (BTW, it was said about Vista as well)? In the best condition Windows 7 will be more responsive than Vista on the same hardware, besides the real difference must be proved on the final version and in real life conditions. But I do not see why people who are keeping XP instead of Vista should be happy of switching to Windows 7. I mean, you must pay for the new license, buy much more powerful hardware to end running your XP "legacy" software in an "emulated/virtualized" XP environment. When you aren't "emulating/virtualizing" XP, you get a slightly better Vista that does not add anything valuable to XP for 99% tasks but runs on a 10 times higher hardware. Besides, over 30 Giga taken in the HD for the clean OS alone. How cool.
On a side note: I am typing this over a PIII 500 - 256MB PC with Windows 2000 (not having a license of XP for this machine). After having installed the OS, all my software, documents and stuff I am using 4 or 5GB over a 15GB hard disk, so I still have about 9GB free. Ok, I can't play games and I can't use latest versions of image editing software or desktop publishing (I never could do 3D rendering). But how many people need to do these tasks? I wonder how much a PC like mine could cost, what people are buying nowadays and why.
Sunday, 3. May 2009, 18:11:02
software, Internet, firefox
First of all, beware the extensions you install. Extensions can be poorly coded and bugged or even made on purpose to introduce any sort of bad stuff on your computer. Extensions can do pretty much everything once you install them.
Then, NoScript promises to protect your computer by disabling javascripts in Web pages. The problem with it is you have only two options, disable everything or enable everything with a blacklist/whitelist of domains. Once you enable, adding the site to the whitelist, NoScript is mostly useless.
Last thing, NoScript author is getting money from advertisement in his Website. Since you can block the advertisement with the ADBclockPlus extension, it changed NoScript installation to hack ADBlockPLus in order to "unblock" the advertisement from NoScript. This is VERY wrong among extensions and it is the usual bad policy to make changes on people's computers without asking permission. Even worse considering NoScript is sold as "security" software.
In short, do not install NoScript, technically it does not add any real security to your Firefox and its author cannot be trusted. To get better security you just add this line to your ADBlockPlus list of rules:
http://*$script,third-party
It will block all scripts that come from domains other than the one you are browsing. Then you can whitelist those domains you really really need. with something like:
@@http://www.blogger.com/widgets/*$script