All the Wyle

rants of man going his own way in this crazy Wonderland

Subscribe to RSS feed

The Game is On

In 2003 the website at Status of Women Canada posted a report commissioned under the program called "where have all the women gone?"(no I am not kidding) which served to dole out big bucks to feminist academics to study just exactly why hardly anyone other than the usual witches ever showed up for feminist events anymore and why was it that hardly any of the new generation of fembots knew the lyrics of "Bread and Roses"

Anyway...three witches at Laval University got some minor witch wannabees to surf the net for them and go off topic on a report commissioned to examine complaints of boys dropping out of school because they were fed up with being bullied for having the key to the city in their trousers...not to mention a suicide rate among men that would have easily gotten the troops pulled out of Afghanistan if that casualty rate was even one tenth as bad...

To their dismay they were finding men on post divorce forums using terms like "feminazi" so they made a recommendation that guys who do that should be made hate criminals....fast forward to this week.

Ken Wiebe of the BC FATHERS website, and former head of the BC Libertarian Party has the three witches in court being sued. The mandarin witches who commissioned the report have all bailed and gone into obscurity and several Liberal feminists, including Sheila Copps are pretty much toast as far as politics goes.

Just got a note from Ken that the trial is proceeding well and due dilligence in reviewing such reports before posting them on the public internet just might possibly....who knows it's up to the judge to say...might have been a little slack......

In my own humble oppinion, "independant anonamous peer review" by other womyn's studies professors will not protect the government from liability in the future....I say my own humble oppinion just based on a couple of decades of "been-there-done-that-got-the-T-shirt-wore-the-T-shirt-out-and-used-it-to-polish-my-old-Volvo" are probably nothing to ....speaking of Volvos....has the other shoe dropped yet on THAT matter? I'll bet the folks who have $150,000,000.00 at stake in this are feeling rather stressed.....

Now for all our adversaries might bad mouth us, or harbour very low oppinions of us....I would say that scorning MRAs just doesn't pay......in my humble oppinion.

PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE ANSWERING THE QUESTION AT THE BOTTOM

Here is the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms cut and pasted in it's entirety from the website at the Canadian Department of Justice. Please read it carefully and then answer the question at the bottom.


Canadian charter of rights and freedoms


Schedule B

Constitution Act, 1982

Enacted as Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11, which came into force on April 17, 1982

PART I

Canadian charter of rights and freedoms



Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

Rights and freedoms in Canada

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Fundamental Freedoms

Fundamental freedoms

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

a) freedom of conscience and religion;
b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
d) freedom of association.

Democratic Rights

Democratic rights of citizens


3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.

Maximum duration of legislative bodies

4. (1) No House of Commons and no legislative assembly shall continue for longer than five years from the date fixed for the return of the writs of a general election of its members.

Continuation in special circumstances

(2) In time of real or apprehended war, invasion or insurrection, a House of Commons may be continued by Parliament and a legislative assembly may be continued by the legislature beyond five years if such continuation is not opposed by the votes of more than one-third of the members of the House of Commons or the legislative assembly, as the case may be.

Annual sitting of legislative bodies

5. There shall be a sitting of Parliament and of each legislature at least once every twelve months

Mobility Rights

Mobility of citizens

6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.
Rights to move and gain livelihood (2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right

a) to move to and take up residence in any province; and
b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.

Limitation

(3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to

a) any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of present or previous residence; and
b) any laws providing for reasonable residency requirements as a qualification for the receipt of publicly provided social services.

Affirmative action programs

(4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration in a province of conditions of individuals in that province who are socially or economically disadvantaged if the rate of employment in that province is below the rate of employment in Canada.
Legal Rights
Life, liberty and security of person

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
Search or seizure

8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

Detention or imprisonment

9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.
Arrest or detention

10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention

a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and
c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.

Proceedings in criminal and penal matters

11. Any person charged with an offence has the right

a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
b) to be tried within a reasonable time;
c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence;
d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;
f) except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment;
g) not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;
h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and
i) if found guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment.

Treatment or punishment

12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.

Self-crimination

13. A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence.

Interpreter

14. A party or witness in any proceedings who does not understand or speak the language in which the proceedings are conducted or who is deaf has the right to the assistance of an interpreter.

Equality Rights

Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Affirmative action programs

(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Official Languages of Canada

Official languages of Canada

16. (1) English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.

Official languages of New Brunswick

(2) English and French are the official languages of New Brunswick and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the legislature and government of New Brunswick.

Advancement of status and use

(3) Nothing in this Charter limits the authority of Parliament or a legislature to advance the equality of status or use of English and French.
English and French linguistic communities in New Brunswick

16.1. (1) The English linguistic community and the French linguistic community in New Brunswick have equality of status and equal rights and privileges, including the right to distinct educational institutions and such distinct cultural institutions as are necessary for the preservation and promotion of those communities.
Role of the legislature and government of New Brunswick (

2) The role of the legislature and government of New Brunswick to preserve and promote the status, rights and privileges referred to in subsection (1) is affirmed.
Proceedings of Parliament

17. (1) Everyone has the right to use English or French in any debates and other proceedings of Parliament.

Proceedings of New Brunswick legislature

(2) Everyone has the right to use English or French in any debates and other proceedings of the legislature of New Brunswick.

Parliamentary statutes and records

18. (1) The statutes, records and journals of Parliament shall be printed and published in English and French and both language versions are equally authoritative.
New Brunswick statutes and records

(2) The statutes, records and journals of the legislature of New Brunswick shall be printed and published in English and French and both language versions are equally authoritative.
Proceedings in courts established by Parliament

19. (1) Either English or French may be used by any person in, or in any pleading in or process issuing from, any court established by Parliament.
Proceedings in New Brunswick courts

(2) Either English or French may be used by any person in, or in any pleading in or process issuing from, any court of New Brunswick.

Communications by public with federal institutions

20. (1) Any member of the public in Canada has the right to communicate with, and to receive available services from, any head or central office of an institution of the Parliament or government of Canada in English or French, and has the same right with respect to any other office of any such institution where

a) there is a significant demand for communications with and services from that office in such language; or
b) due to the nature of the office, it is reasonable that communications with and services from that office be available in both English and French.

Communications by public with New Brunswick institutions

(2) Any member of the public in New Brunswick has the right to communicate with, and to receive available services from, any office of an institution of the legislature or government of New Brunswick in English or French.
Continuation of existing constitutional provisions

21. Nothing in sections 16 to 20 abrogates or derogates from any right, privilege or obligation with respect to the English and French languages, or either of them, that exists or is continued by virtue of any other provision of the Constitution of Canada.
Rights and privileges preserved

22. Nothing in sections 16 to 20 abrogates or derogates from any legal or customary right or privilege acquired or enjoyed either before or after the coming into force of this Charter with respect to any language that is not English or French.

Minority Language Educational Rights
Language of instruction

23. (1) Citizens of Canada

a) whose first language learned and still understood is that of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province in which they reside, or
b) who have received their primary school instruction in Canada in English or French and reside in a province where the language in which they received that instruction is the language of the English or French linguistic minority population of the province,

have the right to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in that language in that province.

Continuity of language instruction

(2) Citizens of Canada of whom any child has received or is receiving primary or secondary school instruction in English or French in Canada, have the right to have all their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in the same language.
Application where numbers warrant

(3) The right of citizens of Canada under subsections (1) and (2) to have their children receive primary and secondary school instruction in the language of the English or French linguistic minority population of a province

a) applies wherever in the province the number of children of citizens who have such a right is sufficient to warrant the provision to them out of public funds of minority language instruction; and
b) includes, where the number of those children so warrants, the right to have them receive that instruction in minority language educational facilities provided out of public funds.

Enforcement

Enforcement of guaranteed rights and freedoms

24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.
Exclusion of evidence bringing administration of justice into disrepute

(2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

General
Aboriginal rights and freedoms not affected by Charter 25. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed so as to abrogate or derogate from any aboriginal, treaty or other rights or freedoms that pertain to the aboriginal peoples of Canada including

a) any rights or freedoms that have been recognized by the Royal Proclamation of October 7, 1763; and
b) any rights or freedoms that now exist by way of land claims agreements or may be so acquired.

Other rights and freedoms not affected by Charter

26. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada.

Multicultural heritage

27. This Charter shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage of Canadians.

Rights guaranteed equally to both sexes

28. Notwithstanding anything in this Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to male and female persons.

Rights respecting certain schools preserved

29. Nothing in this Charter abrogates or derogates from any rights or privileges guaranteed by or under the Constitution of Canada in respect of denominational, separate or dissentient schools.

(93)
Application to territories and territorial authorities

30. A reference in this Charter to a Province or to the legislative assembly or legislature of a province shall be deemed to include a reference to the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories, or to the appropriate legislative authority thereof, as the case may be.
Legislative powers not extended

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

Application of Charter

Application of Charter

32. (1)This Charter applies

a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.

Exception

(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force.
Exception where express declaration

33. (1) Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of this Charter.
Operation of exception

(2) An Act or a provision of an Act in respect of which a declaration made under this section is in effect shall have such operation as it would have but for the provision of this Charter referred to in the declaration.
Five year limitation

(3) A declaration made under subsection (1) shall cease to have effect five years after it comes into force or on such earlier date as may be specified in the declaration.
Re-enactment
(4) Parliament or the legislature of a province may re-enact a declaration made under subsection (1).
Five year limitation

(5) Subsection (3) applies in respect of a re-enactment made under subsection (4).

Citation

Citation

34. This Part may be cited as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

===========================end===============================================================


THERE WE DONE? NOW HERE IS THE QUESTION......WHERE IN THIS DOCUMENT DOES IT STATE OR IMPLY THAT WAGE LEVELS ARE A RIGHT?

Be carefull how you answer this because I was involved in a 14 year court battle over "pay equity" and there are many misconceptions on this issue. The CBC actually knows better than to grind that "gender wage gap" ax handle (and I say ax handle because the head was ground right off that ax some time ago) but the feminist commandeered CBC likes to abuse it's position of tax payer funded referent authority and promote a very bizarre political ideology. As one person put it "Karl Marx in drag".

Much more to come.....

It was not a big conspiracy the part of government, the hillbillies we elect are not nearly clever enough for that. But government appoints academics as it's advisors.

Note...there is no feminist party of Canada...how can it pretend any legal legitimacy if it is not even a registered corporate persona? The Communists have more lawful legitimacy than that.

Note....no measure favourable to feminists has ever been subject to electoral review, they were all enacted as policies.The feminist party was entirely created by Liberal Party "Order in Council", clearly an abuse of that power.

Note....there is no democratic way to remove feminist mandarins.Targeting feminist elected candidates sends a message, but the appointees continue to act as if they were the Gestapo.

Note....with the recent exception of the Canadian Conservative Party, there has never been any policy direction toward sane family law reform.

Note....feminists have infiltrated the policy committees of all parties thereby eliminating democratic choice.

Yes it was a conspiracy....by feminist cuckoos bound and determined to commandeer a nest built by the "patriarchs" they loath, and that was entirely contrary to their liking. For all of their assertions of being superior to men, they have yet to build a nest of their own that is to their liking.

Status of Women were the first set of "appointed advisors" who ever made elected officials afraid to open their mouths.

One of the biggest cuts to funding SOW ever got was during the Mulrooney era when a squad of them went through the Hansard (the official record of everything said in parliament) with a pink highliter looking for anything that was "heterosexist" or "heterocentric" and proposing a repeal of 'parliamentary privilege" which protects the free speech rights of elected officials speaking in the house. Mulrooney said that if they could not find anything better to do with the taxpayer's money he could.

Simple fact is, with the exception of the feminists and liberal manginas who happen to be there, the government finds feminism to be as big a pain in the ass as anyone else does.

Blowing the Whistle on Status of Women Canada....fact is....they do not speak for women.

Status of Women Canada has recently undergone a changing of the guard that indicates the current Harper government is genuinely concerned about a fair and democratic representation of the legitamit interests of the average Canadian woman.

SWC was created by an order in council during the Trudeau era. The people who have occupied it before Bev Ota arrived are an elite coven of witches.

It is my intent to let the world know the REAL truth,no party line bullshit, that has gone on there.

Bev Ota is to be commended.

I will endevour to show that the CBC had a close aliance with SWC that can best be described as "corrupt" and are not to be believed in their coverage of events.

REAL Women Says Status of Women Committee Hearings a Hoax
Most of 27 groups opposed to funding cuts are funded by Status of Women; only 3 groups selected who support cuts

OTTAWA, February 13, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The House of Commons Standing Committee on the Status of Women, on which the opposition holds the majority, is conducting four days of televised hearings on the topic of the potential impact of the funding cuts at Status of Women Canada, a federal government agency.

The Committee selected the groups which were to testify before it. The score: 27 groups who opposed the cuts and a total of only 3 groups who supported the cuts, including REAL Women of Canada. Although REAL Women has extensive background knowledge about Status of Women funding, it didn’t even make the initial selection. REAL Women notes that only after extensive pressure was the Committee prepared to hear it's views on the subject.

The 27 witnesses opposed to the cuts with only a couple of exceptions, are all funded by the Status of Women and according to their testimony, regarded these grants as their “entitlements.” Having no other source of income but taxpayers’ dollars, they described the cuts as “anti-women”, crippling the involvement of women in the public debate in Canada. REAL Women does not receive funds from the Status of Women and maintains its involvement in the public debate solely with the financial support of its members.

It a release Real Women states, "This remarkable lack of balance in the number of witnesses appearing before the Committee raises the question as to why was a review held in the first place, since the Committee’s conclusions are obviously preordained?"

REAL Women continues, "Since the committee proceedings are televised by CPAC, it is reasonable to conclude that the purpose of these hearings is to provide fodder for the upcoming election to attempt to back the claim that the Conservatives are, in fact, 'anti-women.' Not only have these special interest groups of women already received many millions of dollars since 1973 from the Status of Women – now this Committee is spending even more taxpayers’ money paying all the witnesses’ expenses in order to hoodwink the public into thinking that these cuts are offensive to 'women'. The cuts are only offensive to the special interest group of feminists whose extremist views are not supported by mainstream women."

(c) Copyright: LifeSiteNews.com is a production of Interim Publishing. Permission to republish is granted (with limitation*) but acknowledgement of source is *REQUIRED* (use LifeSiteNews.com).

February 21, 2007 3:48 PM REAL Women Says Status of Women Committee Hearings a Hoax


WOMEN IS NOT SPELLED WITH A "Y"!!!!!!
Women when spelled with a "y" is NOT A GENDER!!!!

Women when spelled with a "Y" is a slogan of misandry.

The fact that someone says the word women any number of times does not mean that they speak for women collectively. It just means that their needle is stuck.

Who speaks for women collectively is determined by the ballot box, not by the butch strut.

The previous arrangement was exempt from all electoral review. That is not democracy, that is cuckoo's nest commandeering.

If feminazis speak for women collectively, they should have no fear of forming their own political party and running in elections. They have received more than enough money from the taxpayers over the last 30 years to have a big enough war chest to do that.

Actually, legally speaking, feminism has no lawfull status in the politics of Canada whatsoever.

Nowhere in the Order in Council that created Status of Women Canada is it stated or implied that feminism is by appointment to her majesty the Queen the way Lea & Perrins Worchestershire Sauce is. In fact, such a stipulation would render that order in council totally illegal.

You cannot create a permanently empowered political party by order in council.

Feminism is not a gender, it is a political ideology, that is NOT a matter of oppinion, that is a matter of lawfull fact.

Actually, the Communists have more lawfull political legitimacy than the feminists do, they took the trouble to register as a corporate entity as the law requires.

Legally speaking "feminism" does not exist.

"Feminism"is nothing more than a carbunkle on the arse of the Liberal Party. It is a mutual admiration society of Liberal cronies.

More to come.
February 2012
M T W T F S S
January 2012March 2012
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29