My OperaBlowing the Whistle on Status of Women Canada....fact is....they do not speak for women.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 10:31:13 PM
Status of Women Canada has recently undergone a changing of the guard that indicates the current Harper government is genuinely concerned about a fair and democratic representation of the legitamit interests of the average Canadian woman.
SWC was created by an order in council during the Trudeau era. The people who have occupied it before Bev Ota arrived are an elite coven of witches.
It is my intent to let the world know the REAL truth,no party line bullshit, that has gone on there.
Bev Ota is to be commended.
I will endevour to show that the CBC had a close aliance with SWC that can best be described as "corrupt" and are not to be believed in their coverage of events.
REAL Women Says Status of Women Committee Hearings a Hoax
Most of 27 groups opposed to funding cuts are funded by Status of Women; only 3 groups selected who support cuts
OTTAWA, February 13, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The House of Commons Standing Committee on the Status of Women, on which the opposition holds the majority, is conducting four days of televised hearings on the topic of the potential impact of the funding cuts at Status of Women Canada, a federal government agency.
The Committee selected the groups which were to testify before it. The score: 27 groups who opposed the cuts and a total of only 3 groups who supported the cuts, including REAL Women of Canada. Although REAL Women has extensive background knowledge about Status of Women funding, it didn’t even make the initial selection. REAL Women notes that only after extensive pressure was the Committee prepared to hear it's views on the subject.
The 27 witnesses opposed to the cuts with only a couple of exceptions, are all funded by the Status of Women and according to their testimony, regarded these grants as their “entitlements.” Having no other source of income but taxpayers’ dollars, they described the cuts as “anti-women”, crippling the involvement of women in the public debate in Canada. REAL Women does not receive funds from the Status of Women and maintains its involvement in the public debate solely with the financial support of its members.
It a release Real Women states, "This remarkable lack of balance in the number of witnesses appearing before the Committee raises the question as to why was a review held in the first place, since the Committee’s conclusions are obviously preordained?"
REAL Women continues, "Since the committee proceedings are televised by CPAC, it is reasonable to conclude that the purpose of these hearings is to provide fodder for the upcoming election to attempt to back the claim that the Conservatives are, in fact, 'anti-women.' Not only have these special interest groups of women already received many millions of dollars since 1973 from the Status of Women – now this Committee is spending even more taxpayers’ money paying all the witnesses’ expenses in order to hoodwink the public into thinking that these cuts are offensive to 'women'. The cuts are only offensive to the special interest group of feminists whose extremist views are not supported by mainstream women."
(c) Copyright: LifeSiteNews.com is a production of Interim Publishing. Permission to republish is granted (with limitation*) but acknowledgement of source is *REQUIRED* (use LifeSiteNews.com).
February 21, 2007 3:48 PM REAL Women Says Status of Women Committee Hearings a Hoax
WOMEN IS NOT SPELLED WITH A "Y"!!!!!!
Women when spelled with a "y" is NOT A GENDER!!!!
Women when spelled with a "Y" is a slogan of misandry.
The fact that someone says the word women any number of times does not mean that they speak for women collectively. It just means that their needle is stuck.
Who speaks for women collectively is determined by the ballot box, not by the butch strut.
The previous arrangement was exempt from all electoral review. That is not democracy, that is cuckoo's nest commandeering.
If feminazis speak for women collectively, they should have no fear of forming their own political party and running in elections. They have received more than enough money from the taxpayers over the last 30 years to have a big enough war chest to do that.
Actually, legally speaking, feminism has no lawfull status in the politics of Canada whatsoever.
Nowhere in the Order in Council that created Status of Women Canada is it stated or implied that feminism is by appointment to her majesty the Queen the way Lea & Perrins Worchestershire Sauce is. In fact, such a stipulation would render that order in council totally illegal.
You cannot create a permanently empowered political party by order in council.
Feminism is not a gender, it is a political ideology, that is NOT a matter of oppinion, that is a matter of lawfull fact.
Actually, the Communists have more lawfull political legitimacy than the feminists do, they took the trouble to register as a corporate entity as the law requires.
Legally speaking "feminism" does not exist.
"Feminism"is nothing more than a carbunkle on the arse of the Liberal Party. It is a mutual admiration society of Liberal cronies.
More to come.
SWC was created by an order in council during the Trudeau era. The people who have occupied it before Bev Ota arrived are an elite coven of witches.
It is my intent to let the world know the REAL truth,no party line bullshit, that has gone on there.
Bev Ota is to be commended.
I will endevour to show that the CBC had a close aliance with SWC that can best be described as "corrupt" and are not to be believed in their coverage of events.
REAL Women Says Status of Women Committee Hearings a Hoax
Most of 27 groups opposed to funding cuts are funded by Status of Women; only 3 groups selected who support cuts
OTTAWA, February 13, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The House of Commons Standing Committee on the Status of Women, on which the opposition holds the majority, is conducting four days of televised hearings on the topic of the potential impact of the funding cuts at Status of Women Canada, a federal government agency.
The Committee selected the groups which were to testify before it. The score: 27 groups who opposed the cuts and a total of only 3 groups who supported the cuts, including REAL Women of Canada. Although REAL Women has extensive background knowledge about Status of Women funding, it didn’t even make the initial selection. REAL Women notes that only after extensive pressure was the Committee prepared to hear it's views on the subject.
The 27 witnesses opposed to the cuts with only a couple of exceptions, are all funded by the Status of Women and according to their testimony, regarded these grants as their “entitlements.” Having no other source of income but taxpayers’ dollars, they described the cuts as “anti-women”, crippling the involvement of women in the public debate in Canada. REAL Women does not receive funds from the Status of Women and maintains its involvement in the public debate solely with the financial support of its members.
It a release Real Women states, "This remarkable lack of balance in the number of witnesses appearing before the Committee raises the question as to why was a review held in the first place, since the Committee’s conclusions are obviously preordained?"
REAL Women continues, "Since the committee proceedings are televised by CPAC, it is reasonable to conclude that the purpose of these hearings is to provide fodder for the upcoming election to attempt to back the claim that the Conservatives are, in fact, 'anti-women.' Not only have these special interest groups of women already received many millions of dollars since 1973 from the Status of Women – now this Committee is spending even more taxpayers’ money paying all the witnesses’ expenses in order to hoodwink the public into thinking that these cuts are offensive to 'women'. The cuts are only offensive to the special interest group of feminists whose extremist views are not supported by mainstream women."
(c) Copyright: LifeSiteNews.com is a production of Interim Publishing. Permission to republish is granted (with limitation*) but acknowledgement of source is *REQUIRED* (use LifeSiteNews.com).
February 21, 2007 3:48 PM REAL Women Says Status of Women Committee Hearings a Hoax
WOMEN IS NOT SPELLED WITH A "Y"!!!!!!
Women when spelled with a "y" is NOT A GENDER!!!!
Women when spelled with a "Y" is a slogan of misandry.
The fact that someone says the word women any number of times does not mean that they speak for women collectively. It just means that their needle is stuck.
Who speaks for women collectively is determined by the ballot box, not by the butch strut.
The previous arrangement was exempt from all electoral review. That is not democracy, that is cuckoo's nest commandeering.
If feminazis speak for women collectively, they should have no fear of forming their own political party and running in elections. They have received more than enough money from the taxpayers over the last 30 years to have a big enough war chest to do that.
Actually, legally speaking, feminism has no lawfull status in the politics of Canada whatsoever.
Nowhere in the Order in Council that created Status of Women Canada is it stated or implied that feminism is by appointment to her majesty the Queen the way Lea & Perrins Worchestershire Sauce is. In fact, such a stipulation would render that order in council totally illegal.
You cannot create a permanently empowered political party by order in council.
Feminism is not a gender, it is a political ideology, that is NOT a matter of oppinion, that is a matter of lawfull fact.
Actually, the Communists have more lawfull political legitimacy than the feminists do, they took the trouble to register as a corporate entity as the law requires.
Legally speaking "feminism" does not exist.
"Feminism"is nothing more than a carbunkle on the arse of the Liberal Party. It is a mutual admiration society of Liberal cronies.
More to come.
