Groovy place

Is "climate science" really science or is it just politics now?

If you have some scientific background and try to analyze problem of "global warming" objectively there is no way you can show that anthropogenic CO₂ is main factor for global temperature of atmosphere. But this is the main thing that politicians and media talks lately. Is problem really so simple and obvious to them? Or is there cheap ideological propaganda in the background?

Anyhow, effects are well known now; Al Gore hysteria, CRU's "hide the decline", ignorance to the scientific facts and great effort to silence skeptics.

But skepticism is fundamental scientific method, right? So how is it possible that some "scientists" don't want to hear for climategate (as CRU scandal is called now) and evidence against AGW? Well this is what politics with too much power (money) causes. More and more scientists today are rising their voice about the problem. You can find some of their research in the following links.

500 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming.

Serious blogs that posts regularly on topics regarding climate science:
http://climaterealists.com/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/
http://climateaudit.org/

Some videos that dares to show GW scam:
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause?
Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off
The Great Global Warming Swindle
Climategate: Dr. Tim Ball on the hacked CRU emails
True News: The Case Against Climate Change

PS: Yes, "hockey stick" graph was faked.