photo of Nikio

freelance paradigm

Happy on digital?

Monday, September 28, 2009 5:30:47 PM

, ,

After two years being almost strictly on digital cameras I am having some sort of a an emotional phase. I miss film!!! sad I bought a couple of rolls of really high-end film and rediscovered the magic of it. Better than digital? You be the judge.

Amateur contribution IIOn attitude

Comments

kiyokofutaichigo Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:49:27 AM

sometimes a digital camera gets my photo showing strangely in colors.......
but I can't help, I'm not a professional photographer, and I'm too lazy to use a non-digital camera. XD

Jan LilicneoXE Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:47:51 PM

colors.............smile

Vladasvladas Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:27:13 AM

Not only colors. Halftones, details and resolution are better on a film.

Vladasvladas Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:30:11 AM

As in everything else (CD vs LP and magnetic tape, tube and plasma TV vs LCD), tape vs digital is much better (who understands). All digital technologies simplifies the processing and reduces costs, at the cost of quality.

Jan LilicneoXE Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:32:59 PM

yap

Unregistered user Saturday, October 3, 2009 3:04:38 PM

Grega writes: I came to photography a bit late for film, basically never shot a roll (forget about cheap P&S cameras). But the results, the colours, transitions, grain,... is su much more pleasing then from the digital "successor". Majbe I should go to basement and blow some dust from EOS 1000 (not the best, but it takes rolls) :) @Nikio: Ti si majster za film. Se je možno približati z WB rezultatom, ki jih sproducira film? Ali gre za moje napačno razmišljanje in gre vse skupaj na račun odtenkov (Hue/Saturation)? Če pogledava zgornji primer, se naprimer vidi, da je trava veliko bolj zelena na spodnjem delu frame-a, medtem ko se zgoraj na filmu zgodi tisti prehod in vse skupaj postane topleje. Digitalec ima vse skupaj zelo flat rumenkasto.

Unregistered user Saturday, October 3, 2009 3:28:06 PM

Grega writes: Aja, morda bi bilo bolje če daš za primerjavo na Vivid ali podoben preset, bo bolj podobno.

Nikio Sunday, October 4, 2009 6:43:02 AM

Glede ČB na digitalu je tako, da če pravino osvetliš in pravilno obdelaš, lahko dobiš zelo dober rezultat. To pomeni, podoben dobro osvetljenemu in dobro razvitemu filmu. ČB film ima še vedno največji dinamični razpon in količina detajla, ki jih doseže v temnih ali svetlih delih (glede na sredino) je za ostale medije nedosegljiva (tudi barvne filme, sploh DIA).

Je pa tako; pri digitalu je posnetek šele polizdelek. Tudi proizvajalci senzorjev se zanašajo na to, da boš še malo obdelal, tako da ima spodnja slika še rezerve, kar pa pri diasih ni možno. To je to. Zato je pritisk narediti dober medij še toliko večji.

Shaunak DeShaunak Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:33:56 AM

Ignoring the metering, the resolution of the analogue is so much higher. And it is evident in the picture above.

The image from the digital camera seems a bit 'wider'. Why is that? As far as I know the EOS 1D uses a full size sensor. Why then, does the image arrear a little 'zoomed out'?

Nikio Sunday, October 11, 2009 7:14:45 AM

Am, I did this from hand, I should use a tripod next time. The framing isn't exactly the same, but the view angle is.

Write a comment

New comments have been disabled for this post.