Skip navigation

Sign up | Lost password? | Help

荒诞者共和

ABSURDIST REPUBLIC

Posts tagged with "Social Elite"

Shanghai noir

,

Todd Crowell
Asia Times
Jul 12, 2007


HUA HIN, Thailand - At the beginning of Qiu Xiaolong's mystery novel When Red Is Black, Chief Inspector Chen Cao of the Shanghai Police Bureau is sitting in an elegant bar, sipping French wine with a property developer.
His name is Gu, the chief executive officer of New World Group, and they are discussing a business proposition. "You have to translate this business proposal for me, Chief Inspector Chan, not simply for my sake but for the city of Shanghai."
The project that Gu wants to sell to American investors is to raze a neighborhood of old shikumen houses, replacing them with a row of private luxury apartments. "It's a grand project," Chen agrees. "Have you gotten approval of the city?"
"Of course, the city government is all for the project. When the New World goes up, it will not only enhance the image of our great city but also bring in huge tax revenues."

Read more...


The Leadership of China’s Four Major Cities: A Study of Municipal Party Standing Committees

,

Cheng Li
China Leadership Monitor No. 21
Hoover.org


The leadership of China’s four provincial-level cities—Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing—is arguably the most important sub-national decision-making group in the country. The top leadership positions in these four major cities are high-powered steppingstones for further promotions. For this reason—and also for these cities’ pacesetting role in China’s economic and sociopolitical development—factional politics has been particularly dynamic. Recently, senior leaders of all these cities went through a major reshuffling. This article focuses on the newly reappointed municipal Party standing committees, including their organizational compositions, members’ generational attributes, and factional distribution of power. This analysis previews leadership changes in the upcoming 17th Party Congress.

Download the PDF (604K)


The Political Implications of China’s Growing Middle Class

,

Joseph Fewsmith
China Leadership Monitor No. 21
Hoover.org


China’s middle class has developed rapidly over the past three decades. If one assumes that there was no one, or at least very few people, who could be considered middle class in 1978, there are now probably around 50 million people who can be considered middle class. Although the emergence of such a group in three decades is impressive, given the size of China’s population, it will be many years until we can speak of China as a middle-class society. In the meantime, despite indications that the middle class is more participatory than their economically less well off neighbors, there is no indication that the middle class—much less the wealthy—desires to challenge the political status quo. The fact that many more people identify themselves as middle class than can be reasonably classified as such by sociological criteria indicates that large swaths of Chinese society identify with middle-class aspirations. Alongside many fissiparous tendencies in China, this is one trend that suggests social cohesion.

Download the PDF (159K)


Hong Kong: Ten Years After The Return To China

, , , ...

EastSouthWestNorth
31 May, 2007


note: Jimmy Lai is the founder of the Next Media Group, which owns such printed media as newspaper (Apply Daily), weekly magazine (Next Magazine) etc in both Hongkong and Taiwan. Before he entered into the media business, he has sold down all his shares in his listed asset, Giordano - a causal knitwear brand with significant business exposure in the mainland - which he was also a founder, some time after the 1989 Tiananmen incident.

(Apple Daily) Hong Kong Ten Years After The Return To China. By Jimmy Lai. May 30, 2007.

[in translation]

At the time, I was very afraid. People kept telling me that as soon as the People's Liberation Army enters the city, they will arrest the counter-revolutionaries. Someone said 3,000 arrests. Someone else said 400 arrests. Yet someone else said a hundred plus. Even the usually calm and cautious Yeung Wai-hong was semi-credulous about these rumors. I was thinking: even if only twenty or thirty persons are arrested, I must be on that list.

Read more...


Lung Ying-tai: If You Want Peace, You Must Not Keep Hurting Taiwan

, , ,

EastSouthWestNorth
May 18, 2007


(China Times) If You Want Peace, You Must Not Keep Hurting Taiwan. By Lung Ying-tai (龍應台). May 18, 2007. Public speech on May 17, 2007 at Cambridge University, England.

Read more...


The Far & Wide Weekly Interview of Lung Ying-tai

, , ,

EastSouthWestNorth
May 22, 2007


On May 17, 2007, the famous writer, scholar and Taiwan Tsinghua University and Hong Kong University professor Lung Ying-tai was invited by Cambridge University (UK) to deliver a speech (in English) about getting more international space for Taiwan. The speech was published in China Times (in Chinese) from which a translation was made available at this website: If You Want Peace, You Must Not Keep Hurting Taiwan. After the speech, Professor Lung was interviewed by <Far & Wide weekly> researcher Michael Anti and she explained her views about cross-strait politics, responsibility for political speech, etc. Here is the translation of the interview.

Read more...


Spiked! -- The Wendi Rupert Story

, ,

ABC.net.au

While ABC news online can find room for gossip, The Fairfax press can\'t fit in an extensively researched article on Rupert Murdoch\'s wife.
One of the few profiles on Wendi Deng was in the Wall Street Journal.
The Journal went on to report how young Wendi split Jake Cherry from his then wife, marrying him before dumping him for a younger man.
Rupert was said to have been most upset by the story.
So perhaps a few at the august Wall Street Journal would have felt a vague chill when they heard that Rupert now wants their paper.
But as the takeover bid was being launched, here in Australia, rumours were rife that Murdoch had exercised some influence over a profile of Deng by freelancer Eric Ellis.
Here\'s part of Ellis\'s story that you won\'t be reading in the Good Weekend magazine, because Fairfax - in which Rupert held a 7 and a half percent stake until today - has spiked it.
\"...A Star executive…remembers her interaction with…Robert Bland. Bland seemed to be going places, controlling a crucial revenue centre...The day after she\'d been introduced to him…he was walking down the corridor in front of Wendi\'s office. Laughs the executive, \"Wendi, this intern rushes out and grabs Bland\'s greasy ponytail...And she gives it a yank and says in this squeaky voice \'Hi Robert! I\'m Wendi! Remember me? I\'m the intern\', and she just cackles with this kiddie laugh \'Hahahahaha.\'\"
— \"Cheers to Wendi!!\" by Eric Ellis\"
It\'s not an especially friendly profile.
Eric Ellis presents a portrait of a young woman with stars in her eyes, spying opportunities, with not a lot of talent to back up her quest.
Fairfax\'s spiking of the Deng story is remarkable because it commissioned it, and it owes a lot of money for it.
More than a few suspected someone leant on the Good Weekend to leave Rupert and his family alone.
The decision to dump the story made news - at least in Britain where Rupert is dominant.
But here, the whispers led Age and Herald staff to demand an explanation.
\"Our concern is whether the decision to pull the story was made on editorial grounds alone, or whether it was provoked...by individuals at board level. The spiked...article has now achieved more notoriety...than it would have had it been published...
— Letter from the Age Independence Committee to Andrew Jaspan (Editor-in-chief of the Age), 3rd May, 2007\"
Well it was an odd decision.
Fairfax hasn\'t always been squeamish about \'Rupert and Wendi\' stories.
The Financial Review recently reported on the feud over the Murdoch family trust.
And alongside the news story, there was this.
\"Wendi\'s path from cultural revolution to wife of media mogul.
…She had met Jake Cherry, an American working for Guangzhou Engineering Factory, and his wife Joyce, who sponsored her to study in the United States. Jake Cherry divorced Joyce and married Deng in 1990. They divorced in 1992 and Deng completed an MBA at Yale…
— The Australian Financial Review, Wendi\'s path from cultural revolution to wife of media mogul, 24th-25th March, 2007\"
No offence taken then.
Perhaps the difference now came down to who knew the Good Weekend had commissioned a Wendi Deng profile.
Andrew Butcher knew. He\'s News Corporation\'s Senior Vice President for Corporate Communications in New York.
It\'s hard to believe that Murdoch\'s mates on the Fairfax board - Ron Walker and Mark Burrows - wouldn\'t have heard about this encounter with Butcher, long before Eric Ellis sent his story to Australia.
\"News Corp\'s public relations officer Andrew Butcher seems anxious. I email a request to interview Wendi, and Butcher responds \"Jesus...you\'re scaring the shit out of me with this serious letter. Please don\'t treat me like a corporate flak.\" He turns down the request on her behalf…She\'s not an executive at the company...and doesn\'t intend to become an executive. Her primary role is as a great mum to two cute kids.\"
— \"Cheers to Wendi!!\" by Eric Ellis\"
But Andrew Butcher told us, though he was aware that Ellis was writing about Wendi Deng, that...
\"Not only have I not raised concerns with anyone at Fairfax, I wasn\'t even aware that Eric Ellis had filed his story...I don\'t know why Good Weekend decided not to run the piece, but if the extracts that have been leaked...are any indication it\'s because the story was dull...Rupert has certainly not applied any pressure to anyone on this profile…To my mind, Rupert is no more sensitive of gossipy coverage of his wife than any other husband.
— Email from Andrew Butcher (Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications, News Corporation) to Media Watch\"
Well that\'d be news to former Fairfax CEO Fred Hilmer.
\"When Rupert Murdoch wrote me a personal letter saying Fairfax coverage of his family was beneath contempt, I let a number of people see it.
— The Fairfax Experience, by Fred Hilmer, page 147\"
Good Weekend editor Judith Whelan has copped the flak for axing the Ellis story.
And was happy for management to tell staff...
\".. this was my decision and...it was based on editorial judgments. As always, those judgments are for me to make and I do not enter into public discussion about them
— Email from Judith Whelan (Editor, Good Weekend) to Fairfax staff\"
But combine Rupert\'s sensitivities, with Rupert\'s 7 and half per cent of Fairfax and you\'re guaranteed to get everyone talking - if you drop a story about Rupert\'s wife.
And baulking at publishing a story on the decision doesn\'t help.
The Age\'s Matthew Ricketson battled to get an article in The Age about the \"editorial\" decision.
When eventually he did - it was a straight down the line account of what management said had happened.
So was there board interference?
Did either Mark Burrows or Chairman Ron Walker lean on anyone to get the Ellis story killed?
Ron Walker tells us...
\"No, there\'s no truth at all in it. I\'m not prepared to discuss Fairfax\'s business with anyone. We pride ourselves on the independence of our newspapers. Okay?
— Statement from Ron Walker (Chairman, Fairfax Media) to Media Watch\"
Fairfax management has moved to assure all that nothing untoward happened.
\"Our editors make the editorial decisions, and we stand behind them and their integrity.
Neither the CEO nor the Board makes or overrules editorial decisions.
— Email from David Kirk (CEO, Fairfax Media) to Alan Oakley and Andrew Jaspan\"
Yet no-one has explained what \"editorial judgments\" led to a long running and expensive project suddenly being deemed unworthy of publication.
Surely it could have been saved with a bit of judicious editing.
But concerned Fairfax staff were forced to accept their management\'s line.
\"We welcome Mr Kirk\'s statement that neither he nor the board ``makes or overrules editorial decisions\'\', and Ms Whelan\'s assurance that the decision was hers and ``that it was based on editorial judgements\'\'.
— Statement from the Age Independence Committee, 4th May, 2007\"
Well let\'s face it, to have said otherwise would have been to cast doubt on the integrity of a colleague.
There are echoes in this episode of the controversial decision-making over Jonestown, here at the ABC last year.
Chris Masters\'s book was also \'commissioned\' and also \'dumped\'.
The ABC Board also found someone to cop the flak.
Picked up by an independent publisher, it\'s still in the best sellers list.
And Ellis - like Masters - might walk away with a smile on his face.
There\'s talk of book deals and the Monthly has bought the Deng profile for next month\'s edition.
That\'s it from me tonight. Thanks for your company.
And we\'ll see you in two weeks.

(It is the Transcripts from Episode 11, 2007. See the video and the original of the above quotes here)


Yu Dan: defender of traditional culture, force for harmony

,

Joel Martinsen
Danwei.org
May 8, 2007


There\'s a profile of CCTV Lecture Room sensation Yu Dan in yesterday\'s LA Times. From the article:

She switches with ease between teaching ancient wisdoms glorifying nonmaterial wealth and coaching commercial television on how to produce hit shows. She talks with the authority and formality of a Communist Party official, yet she engages her listeners with personal anecdotes about how her daughter might learn more about the world playing with a bottle and cap than from all the expensive toys in the house.

Yu credits her early classical education with giving her the confidence to believe in herself. She acknowledges that not everything about Confucius is relevant today, but she doesn\'t think it\'s fair to dwell on the negative.

\"There is a lot of prejudice against Confucius for being too conservative or backward,\" Yu said.

\"He teaches love and tolerance, for example, and don\'t force others to do what you would not want to do yourself, how to develop harmonious interpersonal relationships. Are these ideas really that out of date? Are these not useful to our lives today?\"


Yu\'s willingness to pick and choose what she likes from The Analects, and in some cases to misread what the text is actually saying, has drawn criticism from more orthodox interpreters. The Times story quotes Tsinghua\'s Daniel Bell knocking Yu\'s \"feel-good, apolitical version\" of Confucius, while other critics are more nit-picky, complaining that the media professor\'s \"insights\" should be better-grounded in scholarship.

Media critic He Dong a column in BQ weekly examining the true motivations of the anti-Yu Dan crowd:

Who is Yu Dan threatening?
by He Dong / BQ

Yu Dan, an especially articulate woman PhD and professor, became a nationwide sensation for going on CCTV\'s Lecture Room program to talk about Confucius and Zhuangzi. And she\'s not popular solely on TV - afterward, she was hot in the bookstores, too. Yu Dan\'s Insights on the Analects sold over 1.5 million copies in the blink of an eye. Yu Dan\'s road to success really has many PhDs and professors angry. So questions about her and problems with her lectures quickly started assailing her on the Internet. At the same time, there were three strong demands: the media must immediately cease its adulation of Yu Dan, Lecture Room must immediately cease broadcasting Yu Dan\'s programs, and Yu Dan must apologize to the entire nation.


Detoxifying Yu Dan
So who were these people instigating this small cultural demonstration? Careful inspection of its origin reveals nine PhDs and MAs from Peking University and Tsinghua University. There\'s an old Chinese saying that goes, \"A scholars\' rebellion takes ten years or more\"; when scholars form an alliance, they do not wait to launch a revolt against others, but rather dissolve into internal struggles for nine years.

When Yu Dan started speaking on the Lecture Room program, I never expected that the literati would be the first to rise up in fury and protest against her. Yu Dan is opening up a road to television for those bagua teachers, telling people not to bury themselves in stacks of old papers - they should really be deeply grateful to her!

I had thought that perhaps there might be a few television hosts who would rise up and express their displeasure with Yu Dan. For instead of PhDs and professors, she is truly threating those TV hosts who amuse the masses with idiocy all day. I personally witnessed the scene when Yu Dan signed books in Beijing at the Xidan Book Building: she really had the whole town out waiting impatiently! What does such a sensation imply? It means that the audience has become tired of talent competitions and entertainment programs, so a TV show that\'s a bit intellectual and cultured without being dry and uninteresting sweeps up the audience into fevered anticipation as soon as it makes itself known. It\'s obvious that the audience for certain types of cultural TV shows is not limited to Beijing, it is springing forth from all areas of the country.

Those hosts turning somersaults and making faces on TV - are they aware of the crisis that threatens them? No, not at all. They still continue, intoxicated with talent shows and amusing themselves to death! Even when the audience\'s expectation and needs for a new type of television program are staring them in the face, responsive hosts do not appear. Into this, Yu Dan exploded into popularity as a program guest-host.

However, most perplexing is the fact that the TV hosts, who by rights should be sweating bullets, are instead still wallowing in stupid entertainment, and those professors of history and culture, who should be rejoicing, can\'t wait to jump up with unrestrained indignation. Really. It\'s the flood waters swamping the Dragon King\'s temple - family members don\'t recognize each other.

So how should these people afflicted with jealousy and narrow minds be cured? The nine PhDs vehemently cry, \"Immediately cease broadcasting Yu Dan\'s programs, and have her apologize to the entire nation.\" The latent meaning is this: immediately invite the nine wise, valiant PhDs to appear on Lecture Room and promote them on a national scale. Then Chinese culture will have found its savior!

But should the audience really have to pay for their sour grapes?
* * *

Talent competitions and other mindless TV programs have been the focus of official criticism recently; SARFT and other regulatory agencies are attempting to raise the bar for television to drive clean up vulgar, bottom-feeding shows, so Yu Dan seems like she\'d be a breath of fresh air.

But is she truly apolitical, as Daniel Bell says? Writing in Southern Metropolis Daily, Zhao Yong arrives at the conclusion that Yu Dan\'s scholarship is calculated to uphold the mainstream government line, and she suffers so much abuse because she doesn\'t bring anything else to the table. Some excerpts:

Why are we always correcting Yu Dan\'s mistakes?
by Zhao Yong / SMD

[The books] all say that Yu Dan made some mistakes in her lectures on The Analects and Zhuangzi, like explaining \"small man\" (小人) as \"child\" (小孩子). Definitely a mistake, but there\'s little point in correcting this kind of error. The saying goes that you can\'t have a book without mistakes. So mistakes in speaking, in writing, or in printing aren\'t anything to be surprised about....

However, people persist in \"correcting\" Yu Dan. Are there perhaps other problems in her lectures?

After Yu Dan went big, she took part in a web chat on Sina, and one of her responses resonated. The host asked her whether The Analects was required reading for a harmonious society, and Yu Dan responded, \"Actually, The Analects are quite mainstream; that is, many things in The Analects are ideas brought up by our harmonious society today.\".....Looking through relevant explanations in her Insights, perhaps we can find an awakening. Yu Dan says, \"China has always seen harmony as beautiful. And what is true harmony? Exercising tolerance of others, blending together while sustaining different voices and differences of opinion\" (p 62); \"The mental state of the doctrine of the mean is everything situated in harmony. This harmony is when all heaven and earth is in its place (p 110); \"We often hear people complaining that society is not fair, that their lives are difficult. Actually, instead of blaming everyone but yourself, why not examine yourself?\" (p 49) - Oh, turns out that this book talks about the importance of the \"harmonious society.\" If you blame everyone but yourself, your voice sharp and loud, then everyone will be fraught with anxiety; if everyone remains in their places, thinking behind closed doors at night, performing self-inspections three times a day, then this would probably gradually enter a beautiful phase of harmony. Looking at it like this, we really can\'t underestimate the insights Yu Dan has gained from The Analects. It may be an entertaining document produced out of the Lecture Room program, but why can\'t it be the political document that mainstream ideology has been waiting for? The new moderator of Lecture Room, Wang Liqun, said that when Yu Dan lectured on her insights from The Analects over the National Day holiday, it came out swinging. The reaction was huge after it aired, and caught the attention of the government. The old guy\'s really cute, telling the media such secrets. What ought we to do?

Some might ask, is it wrong for Yu Dan to take old things for new uses, for living scholarship? No, no one will say that she\'s wrong. That the thought of Confucius and Laozi became the mainstream discourse through successive dynasties says that they do indeed possess something that mainstream discourse may make use of. So there is absolutely nothing wrong with Yu Dan\'s very mainstream desire to make the harmonious society borrow the climate of The Analects. What\'s wrong is that she\'s a scholar, a classic intellectual according to the western definition. And as an intellectual, she ought to have her own system of discourse and means of expression. We\'ll not talk here of Said\'s \"speak truth to power\"; rather, we\'ll go back to Max Weber\'s standpoint, scholars that take academics as a \"vocation\" ought to maintain a certain neutrality of values. But we cannot see this in Yu Dan\'s Insights. In this way, her position immediately becomes suspect: when she stands speaking on the Lecture Room dias, it is obvious that she appears in the person of a modern academic, but why is it that her thinking and her lecturing resemble a scholar-official from the feudal society? A member of the modern intellectual class has undoubtedly undergone the baptism of the May Fourth New Culture Movement, yet you\'ve made your explanations like the vestiges of the old society. How can this please people?

Recently, the media asked Chen Danqing for his views on Lecture Room. He said that Lecture Room was a product of drills - there\'s only one voice, only one tone, only one format, and he couldn\'t take it. \"I finally watched Yu Dan\'s program. Her gestures and tone are all guided by CCTV. I cannot bear that stuff.\"


China turns to Confucius, with a modern twist

,

By Ching-Ching Ni, Staff Writer
LA Times
May 7, 2007


A professor\'s fresh look at the ancient sage is a bestseller in a nation where a booming economy has left some feeling spiritually bereft.

Beijing — CONFUCIUS famously considered a good woman to be an illiterate woman. The ancient sage might want to eat his words: More than 2 1/2 millenniums after his death, he\'s back in vogue, thanks in no small part to a Chinese woman with a PhD.
Confucius, meet Yu Dan.
But make it quick. The professor is so busy these days she barely has time to go home and see her baby daughter.
Since the publication of her enormously popular book on the teachings of Confucius late last year, Yu has been racing from college lectures to book signings, TV appearances and speaking engagements. The public can\'t seem to get enough of this overnight sensation who has turned dusty old Confucian teachings into a Chinese version of \"Chicken Soup for the Soul.\"
\"I never expected this,\" the smartly dressed 42-year-old said in a hurried interview from the back of the black Audi taking her to the airport. \"In the 21st century, our value system is changing; people are faced with a lot of confusion and choices. The classics are not just fossils. They are a value system that can help us find answers to modern-day problems.\"
For more than 2,500 years, the Confucian doctrines of filial piety, moral righteousness and hierarchical relationships were the guiding principles of life and government in China and most of East Asia. Then the Communists came to power and Chairman Mao declared Confucianism counterrevolutionary and his Red Guards ransacked temples dedicated to the philosopher.
Today, China is charging ahead with dizzying economic growth and breathtaking social change. But many believe the world\'s most populous nation has lost its moral and spiritual anchor. Enter the wisdom of Kong Fuzi, or Master Kong, as Confucius is known in China — interpreted by a woman.
\"I\'m amazed,\" said Hong Huang, a cultural commentator and publisher of fashion magazines in Beijing. \"Her success has a lot to do with the fact that modern China has an identity crisis and spiritual crisis. The only value system we have today is money. Everybody is looking for the Chinese meaning of life.\"
Confucius\' collected teachings, called \"The Analects,\" are written in classical Chinese and are nearly as incomprehensible as Latin is to the average English speaker. But Yu\'s book, \"Insights on the Analects,\" is conversational and full of modern-day applications.
When Confucius talks about the qualities of a good ruler, for instance, Yu connects it to the life of the average man. Confucius asks his students about their aspirations. Instead of praising the most ambitious for wanting to run a big country with a vast army, he supports one who merely wants to enjoy a fine spring day with friends.
Yu says everyone has dreams, but too many people are so busy working that they have no time to figure out what they really want out of life. \"Just because you have a successful career does not necessarily mean you have made your dreams come true,\" she writes.
To illustrate, she tells the story of three field mice preparing for winter. One gathered food, one built shelter and the third did nothing but play. Winter came and there was plenty to eat but nothing to do inside the hideaway. That was when the third mouse made himself valuable by telling stories from his days of fun and games.
Yu\'s book has sold more than 3 million copies in four months, making modern Chinese publishing history and beating out the country\'s other top seller, the Harry Potter series. Bootleg videos of her television lectures and speeches, an unfortunate sign of popularity, are prominently displayed here next to American hits such as \"Desperate Housewives\" and \"The Devil Wears Prada.\"
YU recently completed an 18-city tour during which she autographed 39,000 copies of her book, twice sitting for stretches of 10 hours. \"I saw so many people waiting in line,\" she said. \"Once it was really windy. Another time it was snowing and past midnight. I kept going out of conscience, even if I felt like passing out. They were there not for me. They were there for Confucius.\"
Confucius is indeed enjoying a huge revival — and is even endorsed by the Communist Party that once tried to erase his influence.
\"Maybe 99% of Chinese people today never read his writings, but Confucian values are steeped in our culture,\" said Miao Di, a professor at Communication University of China. \"The worst example might be his views on women, which is believed to be the basis for our patriarchal society, where male chauvinism prevails despite recent improvements on gender inequality.\"
Even before the Communists came to power in 1949, Chinese intellectuals had begun to question his teachings, blaming them for keeping China from embracing modern science and Western notions of democracy.
Confucius-bashing reached a peak during the Cultural Revolution of 1966-1976, when schools banned \"The Analects\" and mobs tortured scholars for teaching a book that for centuries had served as a philosophical primer for this nation.
Today, even President Hu Jintao is preaching a \"Harmonious Society,\" based on the Confucian values of unity, morality and respect for authority.
The Communist Party\'s legitimacy is at stake as it tries to contain the dark side of the economic miracle that has led to a dangerous income divide, rampant corruption and rising social unrest. Rehabilitating Confucianism allows the government to show it cares about resolving these social conflicts in a benevolent way without ceding too much ground in terms of political freedom and institutional reforms.
Beijing also has seized on the sage\'s good name in foreign policy initiatives designed to soften the perception of a rising China threat. It has set up Confucius Institutes in more than 50 countries and regions to promote Chinese language and culture, much like France\'s Alliance Francaise of France and Germany\'s Goethe Institute.
But none of this official promotion compares with the grass-roots Confucian fever Yu has ignited.
Yu is a sometimes imperious woman who wears her hair short and her fitted coats buttoned to the neck. The media studies professor likes jazz and soccer and can quote passages of classical Chinese poetry and proverbs.
Her best-selling book is a compilation of the seven lectures she gave over a week last fall on CCTV, the state-run network, which reaches every corner of this vast country. The scheduling of her show couldn\'t have been better — lunch hours during a weeklong national holiday when most Chinese are home eating meals in front of the television.
IN the beginning, the choice of a little-known professor from Beijing Normal University who studied ancient Chinese literature as an undergraduate was considered a risky proposition.
\"Not many people knew who she was. We worried she didn\'t have enough star power to attract a wide audience,\" said Song Zhijun, one of her editors at the China Publishing House.
But the media-savvy Yu knew what she was doing. She leavened her lectures with stories about interpersonal relationships, self-awareness and the pursuit of happiness.
Yu\'s TV performance was so refreshing that the lectures were published as a book, which has become a self-help bible.
The country\'s swelling prisons were among the first to hire her as a speaker. Businesses bought her books in bulk to distribute to employees. One county ordered more than 10,000 copies and made the book required reading for each official, said Zhu Anshun, another of Yu\'s editors.
\"We live in a world with a lot of headaches, and she provides some answers,\" said Gong Fan, a 26-year-old graduate student who was waiting outside Yu\'s classroom with a couple of friends hoping to get autographs. But Yu breezed by without stopping.
Yu has become such a phenomenon that she has drawn the scorn of some scholars who say her pop psychology has little to do with real Confucianism.
One group of professors called on her to resign and apologize for reducing the classics to fast food. During a book signing in Beijing, a man wore a T-shirt reading \"Confucius would be annoyed.\"
\"Chinese people live in a high-pressure society. Her message is, \'Don\'t worry what others think about you. It matters how you feel in your heart,\' \" said Daniel Bell, a professor of political philosophy at Qinghua University. \"Not only is this simplifying Confucius, it is very misleading interpretation. Confucius is about social and political commitment. She provides a feel-good, apolitical version that goes against the main message of \'The Analects.\' \"
In her defense, Yu has said she doesn\'t claim to be an expert on Confucianism. She is merely sharing some of her personal thoughts, and people are entitled to agree or disagree.
\"Confucius emphasizes the cultivation of inner self not for the purpose of abandoning social responsibilities but rather so one can be of better service to society,\" Yu writes in her book.
Yu discovered \"The Analects\" as a child when the classics were considered forbidden fruit.
\"I grew up during the Cultural Revolution in a cultural desert with nothing to do,\" Yu said. \"I\'m grateful to my parents, who sheltered me behind our family courtyard and taught me calligraphy, poetry and the classics.\"
This traditional upbringing, however, did not keep Yu from pursuing a life brimming with contradictions. She switches with ease between teaching ancient wisdoms glorifying nonmaterial wealth and coaching commercial television on how to produce hit shows. She talks with the authority and formality of a Communist Party official, yet she engages her listeners with personal anecdotes about how her daughter might learn more about the world playing with a bottle and cap than from all the expensive toys in the house.
Yu credits her early classical education with giving her the confidence to believe in herself. She acknowledges that not everything about Confucius is relevant today, but she doesn\'t think it\'s fair to dwell on the negative.
\"There is a lot of prejudice against Confucius for being too conservative or backward,\" Yu said.
\"He teaches love and tolerance, for example, and don\'t force others to do what you would not want to do yourself, how to develop harmonious interpersonal relationships. Are these ideas really that out of date? Are these not useful to our lives today?\"


Wikipedia: Profile of Wendi Murdoch (also as Wendi Deng or Deng Wenge)

, ,

Wikipedia

Wendi Murdoch. Originally Wendi Deng (simplified Chinese: 邓文迪; pinyin: Dèng Wéndí, originally 邓文革; pinyin: Dèng Wéngé; born 1969 in Xuzhou, China) is a former Vice President of Business Affairs at News Corporation’s Asian satellite television operation and is married to its chief executive Rupert Murdoch, one of the most powerful media owners in the world.

Read more...


November 2009
M T W T F S S
October 2009December 2009
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30