Skip navigation.

First Things First

...But not necessarily in that order.

Of old newspapers and historical trivia

, , ,

Found (via an email from a RootsWeb list) a fascinating website today: Old Fulton NY Post Cards. The name's outmoded, since the site offers access to some 10 million scanned pages from newspapers all over New York State with (with an emphasis on the eastern part of the state).

Here's an interesting anecdote from the March 6 1953 edition of the Niagara Falls NY Gazette:

When Senator Joe McCarthy came to New York last Saturday for the televised hearings of his investigating committee, he went to the Federal Court house by BMT subway. He got lost for 30 minutes in the New York underground. McCarthy, incidentally, had to fly to an airfield covered with snow, and was assigned to a small plane which had skis. He told the pilot he was sorry to have him make this trip in such bad weather. "Oh, I'm delighted to do it," the pilot replied. "Five more flying hours, and I'll get my own pilot's license."



Cue the rim shot!

The site, by the way, will prove interesting to those (like me) interested in things historical and genealogical.

There's a storm coming

, ,

This article in The Economist talks of several things -- but there's one aspect of the economy, and of politics, which I've felt strongly about for a long time:

Many working-class men have lost their jobs. Those who are still employed have seen their wages stagnate and their pensions shrivel in the stockmarket crash. Their health insurance is insecure, but they don't trust Congress not to make it worse.

Meanwhile, they can see that one group of Americans has been practically unaffected by the recession: government employees. Their hours have not been cut, their benefits are gold-plated and they are almost impossible to sack. In good times, few Americans notice these things, but in bad times, the disparity grates. Cops and firefighters can retire in their 40s and draw defined-benefit pensions for life. With overtime, one tenth of the police in Massachusetts made more than the governor's annual salary in 2006, according to the Boston Globe. Including benefits, the average employee of New York City makes more than $100,000, according to Forbes, while some Californian prison guards “sock away $300,000 a year”.

And what do taxpayers get for their generosity? The bad bargains get all the publicity. Union contracts force the postal service to pay thousands of unneeded workers to do nothing. In New York, public-school teachers who can't be trusted to teach but can't be sacked either are paid to sit and do crosswords.



Check out your state's (and your town's or city's) statistics. How many government employees are there now versus a year ago? If your case is typical, you'll find that it's only down slightly -- if at all.

How's their pay? If your case is like most, they got a raise of about 4% -- because, after all, that's what they got last year, and it wouldn't be fair for them to take a pay cut.

Did you take a pay cut? Are you even working?

Now check out your tax bill. Has that gone down?

You see where it's going. At what point do we tell our political leaders "Enough!" Because until and unless we do, they won't take on the unions -- and you'll pay for it.

How to destroy a state's economy

, , ,

Unlike the previous post, this is not a parody. This guy is the chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party -- a state which has the nation's highest unemployment rate. He knows how to
bring Michigan back:

First, we’re proposing that all employers in Michigan be required to provide affordable, quality health care for their employees and dependents or pay a penalty. We have more than 1.2 million people in this state who do not have health insurance. Many of those people are employed but their employers do not provide health insurance.


Most likely because they can't afford it. And ObamaCare isn't gonna help in the long run.

Second, we believe the minimum wage should be increased from $7.40/hour to $10/hour. ... Study after study has proven that raising the minimum wage would not deter job creation in our state.


Sure they do. I'd love to see them, because I seriously doubt they really show that. But okay, let's take this guy at face value: if that's the case, why not boost the minimum wage to $50/hour? Or $100/hour? That'll solve the problem! For about a week, before businesses -- who, unlike this tool, know damn well that there's a direct correlation between cost and profit -- go out of business.

Next, cutting utility rates by 20 percent would be a significant savings to both consumers and businesses.


No doubt. Of course, it'll kill the companies that provide utilities, along with the suckers who invested in them.

Much more could be said, and The Blog Prof says it.

"We need Big Government"

,

"Make my own health-care decisions? Why?"
One of the better-done parodies I've seen in a while.

That Obama school speech kerfuffle

, ,

President Obama is slated to address the nation's schoolchildren (most of them, anyway; not all schools are back in session yet) with, apparently, some sort of inspirational exhortation to stay in school, study hard, etc.

Why is this so controversial that many parents are vowing to keep their children out of school that day? Might have something to do with initial reports that teachers would be assigning 'lesson plans' asking the children about how they can help President Obama:

Teachers can extend learning by having students write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president. These would be collected and redistributed at an appropriate date by the teacher to make students accountable to their goals.


That struck some people as pushing an agenda. I don't see it myself (and I have kids in school), but I can't blame people for being suspicious; this administration has pretty much squandered its reservoir of goodwill. People just don't trust this guy. Even some former supporters don't like him so much as they did when they voted for him.

And a big, big reason why is that this administration, and the Democrat-ruled Congress, openly denigrates, insults, and condescends to those who disagree with Obama. We saw it time and again, and it was particularly vicious when they denounced Tea Party protesters as "mobs" (and, in Congress, "brownshirts") and worse. Then they wondered, mouths agape, as the people started to turn against them. They haven't learned anything. We're still seeing that arrogance today:

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs blasted the president's critics today for questioning the propriety of Obama's speech to schoolchildren.

"It's a sad state of affairs that many in this country politically would rather start an 'Animal House' food fight rather than inspire kids to stay in school, to work hard, to engage parents to stay involved and to ensure that the millions of teachers that are making great sacrifices continue to be the best in the world," Gibbs told reporters on Monday.


Yeah, there's nothing as persuasive as crude insults, is there?

This administration, once hailed as cool, is impossibly tone-deaf. Let's browse the first few comments from that article in The Hill:


This would never have happened if people did not dislike the president so much. There are many reasons for that, and Glibbs needs to take responsibility for some of that dislike he has helped create, because of his sour attitude, along with the inexperienced, off-timing and condescending reputation those around the president have helped create. Glibbs response to this should be kind and understanding toward the voters, not hostile. Consider them ALL sincere. This constant demeaning attitude shows his own lack of understanding regarding his position and his complete lack of confidence in himself and the president. Every time he insults voters, whatever side they are on, the polls go down. Instead of being nasty he needs to, himself, try to become a likeable person. So does Obama. This is what a person with an honest agenda and good communication skills must do in the face of such opposition.Without an honest agenda, however, these mistakes are often made in communications.
BY tropicgirl on 09/07/2009 at 14:26

It's not a matter of "liking" it's a matter of "trusting." I voted for him, regret it. The bottom line, "We - most of the American People" now, do not trust him.
BY LindsyS on 09/07/2009 at 14:29

I want to be Bluto then!YAY! FOOD FIIIIIGHT!!!!Wa it. whut? Did the President just compare himself to the rich fraternity? The ones no one likes. Because they act all pretentious and know it all? Oh, and they were total bullies too, beating people up. Is that REALLY the image Gibbs wants to give? Wow, O. Your message machine needs more than a tinker. It's need a complete overhaul.
BY Jeff Barea on 09/07/2009 at 14:34

Gibbs is not helping the President by talking down to anyone who disagrees.
BY Ron T on 09/07/2009 at 14:35

So now we're not just mobs or unAmerican, we're depraved Animal House actors in this circus show? I don't think so. Getting a little tired of the WH and Dems calling us names to detract from the issues.
BY K. Wright on 09/07/2009 at 14:36



Many comments, page after page of them, express similar sentiments. Poll after poll shows this administration's approval rating sliding; many have him at less than 50% -- a drop that most recent presidents took years to achieve. Way to go, O!

After his speech to America's schoolkids, Obama should address his own administration. The message: Grow up.