Wednesday, 20. May 2009, 11:37:27
California has a dysfunctional government. The state Legislature is so gerrymandered that I don't think there's one competitive seat in the state. This allows each legislator to vote however s/he likes, which is what leads to train wrecks like the state's $21 billion deficit. I don't have the figures at hand, but as I recall the state's spending has shot up like Topsy in recent years -- along with tax hikes which make the Golden State very unfriendly to anyone who has a job.
They just had a vote on a handful of budget initiatives designed, as usual, to disguise the fact that they want to spend and tax more. Californians, not being stupid, voted them down.
State leaders, naturally, are pissed. Do they plan to roll back any of the spending hikes they've lavished on their pet programs?
Hell, no:
Schwarzenegger had warned that, without budget relief from voters, he would have to take severe steps.
The steps include shortening the school year by a week and a half, cutting tens of thousands of education jobs, eliminating health insurance for nearly 250,000 needy children, laying off 1,700 state firefighters, and withholding $2 billion from local governments, which could trigger cuts in law enforcement and other services.
Defeat of the provisions also could free 38,000 inmates and force the sale of the notorious San Quentin prison.
In the best tradition of hidebound politicians, they'll follow the usual script.
They want spending cuts? Okay, suckers, you got it! They'll cut highly visible spending -- that is, outlays in areas designed to make taxpayers seethe. Next up, they'll close public beaches and parks. At some point they hope, the suckers will protest against those cuts. In response, the legislators will regretfully announce they have "no choice" but to impose more tax hikes.
Will they fall for it? Dunno. At some point, Californians will revolt. Not simply protest, but outright revolt.