Chrome is running
Friday, 12. September 2008, 15:40:57
I finally got some time, so I went on to download it. The installation instruction that I got on the "Thank You" page was kinda weird. Take a look at the text and note that I am using Opera as always, and it shows explanations for Firefox, and Firefox alone.
1. Click OK or Save File in the window that appears.
Don't see a window? Click here.
2. Select Downloads from the Tools menu in Firefox.
A window displaying your downloads will appear.
3. Click Open next to the product in the Downloads window.
Your software will now install automatically. If you need help, click here.
Anyway then the installer downloaded some more stuff and it was set to go.
As they say it is very minimalistic and very sleak. There are some nice effects, but I think they are about right - not too flashy. The browser seems to work pretty fast, loads and displays nice. There are a lot of Opera-like features.
In the first tests I have run, I only noticed that it seems to be missing java support. But it is a beta after all.
All things Google (that I tested) work fine as expected. Calendar, docs, mail...
Facebook seems to work nice. I tested it not becuase I like it very much, but because in Opera it is a bit too slugish for me. (I actually don't like facebook at all, and use it just for contacts. Still it's better than MySpace.)
My brother suggested loading ign.com, because it a very slow site. Interestingly enough it loads faster in Opera than in Chrome. But then again, it really is somekind of a weird site.
And it comes with a built in site inspector of some kind. You can see page elements and their properties nicely, when you hover over the elements in code, they are marked with different color in page, similar to dragonfly/firebug.
Overal, a nice beta.
But I can't stop trying to do mouse gestures in broswers. Sometimes I try it in other applications too, and can't figure out why it ain't working.
















ellinidata # 12. September 2008, 18:36
I am so ignorant on this however my dear friend John in Granada is into it big time! If you don;t mind I will give him a link to visit you,
as for me I just stopped by to say "hello"
thank you for being a loyal reader of mine
nepmak2000 # 12. September 2008, 19:21
Tmho it is too early to run the Google Beta on Linux. Which Linux in particular. I use Ubuntu-Hardy as base under MINT/Alyssa. My 'world' says straight forward: wait to see. Since I have a production-system where I test software, I refuse to take chances with software still to be compiled. Yet, I could give WINE a try. Why do you use the Google browser in the first place?
nepmak2000 # 12. September 2008, 21:07
Quinnuendo # 12. September 2008, 21:19
You are of course right, it is early for Chrome on Linux, probably on windows too.
And I definitely agree that on a production system you shouldn't play much with untested software. I for instance like to test various versions of web applications on my home server, yet I would not install them easily on the web server.
Why do I use it? Well, for one I am what the like to call a geek
On the other hand I am a bit of a web developer. It is not my job, but I have done it a few times, and I like to code pages for my needs. As you probably know, most people who deal with strong web pages that should be viewable in multiple browsers tend to dislike IE.
I haven't seen this error, but I have tried it in XP, not Vista. They say it should work, but then again it is a beta :|
I run a dual Kubuntu/XP system.
ellinidata # 12. September 2008, 21:57
nepmak2000 # 12. September 2008, 22:04
Quinnuendo # 12. September 2008, 22:25
I have heard some good stuff about the future of IE, there are talks that the people writting it are trying to make things better and more into standards, but they have a big responsibility in keeping everything compatible with the old versions. They have a huge client group and can not break the ties with the past easily. We'll see. We can definitely hope.
On the other hand I see Chrome as a posible strong platform for Google apps. A browser they can guarantee will work with everything they have, as it should and very fast. They already have apps that can replace most stuff in a regular office. They could then create the advanced versions for their browser, and regular ones that will work in everything else. If the advanced works in others fine, if not then there is the regular one. Of course this is just a theory
Don't know too much about flash, except that it can be messy
There aren't much music posts, though I was planing a few. They are however nicely tagged
nepmak2000 # 13. September 2008, 20:00
Quinnuendo # 14. September 2008, 19:13
nepmak2000 # 14. September 2008, 21:56
Tabmartel # 2. October 2008, 20:44
I'd be curious to know if you found any spyware in the beta.
Quinnuendo # 2. October 2008, 21:00
And now that I think of it, Chrome is open source and you can build it yourself, so I doubt there are hidden stuff. (http://code.google.com/chromium/)
I'll probably do a scan tomorrow just to see what happens
Tabmartel # 2. October 2008, 21:11
I won't install Chrome anytime soon.. I'm kinda stuck on Opera anyway, even though I do find it lagging every now and then.
Quinnuendo # 2. October 2008, 21:51
I currently use Chrome for some pages that have problems in Opera. I previously used Firefox for that, but Chrome starts up much faster, which is very important when I just want to check something, then shut it down again.
Tabmartel # 2. October 2008, 22:13
Firefox...I haven't used it in ages..I quit using it about a year ago, because it had too many security problems then. (and paches coming out with trojens in them)..
I'm always interested in new browsers, but leery to install anything new. I ussually wait to hear about the bugs, before I have to deal with em...lol
nepmak2000 # 3. October 2008, 07:32
DBabbit # 12. October 2008, 08:48
I am so attached to the Opera Browser, but I'll probably give Chrome a shot just out of curiosity once the bugs are worked out. I quit using Firefox when version 3 crashed my computer, and I have to use IE
Quinnuendo # 12. October 2008, 09:15
IE is plain horrible.
DBabbit # 12. October 2008, 09:27
noah counte # 19. October 2008, 15:11
DBabbit # 20. October 2008, 04:18
Quinnuendo # 20. October 2008, 09:30
The web search business is tough and it would require quite some work. New engines mostly appear for specialized purposes. Microsoft if fighting hard to keep their engine competitive with Google and Yahoo. That is why they were trying to buy Yahoo.
DBabbit # 21. October 2008, 01:38
noah counte # 21. October 2008, 02:37
I'll bet Donny was in the conversation, though. It presented search results as "pages" that you could flip through. Nifty.
DBabbit # 21. October 2008, 03:14
Quinnuendo # 21. October 2008, 09:36
vivisimo presents things in clusters, automatically, but it moved to
http://clusty.com/
and on the other hand there is a full visual experience of
http://kartoo.com/
There are other weird experimental stuff. But when it comes to normal search Google is quite powerful. On the other hand Google also works non stop to create new types of searches, so it is hard to compete.
I personally never really liked Yahoo. Too cluttered.
Beaucoup seems nice on first glance.
noah counte # 21. October 2008, 11:35
Kartoo is neat, but not what I was thinking of. This is goign to drive me nuts.
DBabbit # 22. October 2008, 08:12
Quinnuendo # 22. October 2008, 14:49
noah counte # 22. October 2008, 18:01
noah counte # 22. October 2008, 18:20
DBabbit # 23. October 2008, 22:30
noah counte # 24. October 2008, 02:15