Physics
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:47:09 PM
I remember one puzzle from that book, which is related to a monkey and a shooter. The puzzle goes like this... There is a monkey sitting in a tree. A shooter aims with his gun exactly on the monkey and is ready to fire the bullet. At the moment, the bullet is fired and its sound is heard by the monkey, the monkey drops (or falls) down from the tree in order to escape from the bullet. Now the question is, whether the bullet would have hit the monkey or not?
For a person who has not learnt physics properly, the answer would be "the monkey will escape from the bullet". But for a person who learnt physics with understanding, the answer is "the monkey will be surely hit". Here, the velocity of sound in air and the projectile motion of the bullet are related and the answer is arrived at, using the principles learnt in physics. The velocity of sound in air is around 380 m/s. So, by the time the monkey heard the sound of the leaving bullet from the gun, the bullet should have reached 380 metres in a second. Also, due to the gravitational force from the earth, the bullet that has left the gun will not travel parallel to the ground, but will tend to go towards the earth, which means that the bullet will trace a projectile motion. Hence, the bullet will be tracing an arc like path towards the ground, rather than a straight line. Hence, with these two combinations, the bullet will hit the monkey even when it drops down from the tree. Gravitational force don't see partiality and it is the same for both the monkey and the bullet. Seems interesting to know the terminologies of physics when explained in an elementary way with knowledge applied to real life instances. Right?
There were numerous such simple problems on physics in that book, which I really missed it. We would have learnt so many terms in physics even till our high school level. But mostly, it was memorized or learnt just for the sake of reproducing it in the examination. With little more efforts and research during that stage of life, we could have learnt physics (or even any other subject) easily.
I still remember my 3rd year of my college, when I was roaming around the electronics shops to buy a diode. Diode is a very elementary or basic component of electronics. Even I learnt about diode in higher secondary physics and experienced in the laboratory experiments, I felt what a real diode is, only when I purchased it by myself from a electronics store. I didn't do anything with that diode. But I was proud that I had a diode with me. I can proudly talk to my parents and my non-technical friends telling that I bought a diode. I felt proud, because none of my family members or my non-technical friends know what a diode is, and hence I am their master then. Haha. I used to talk using that word 'diode' as if I am casually talking
(as if I am always living and sleeping with diode and as if diode is my bread and butter).
I even hated diode many times, because I really did not know what a diode can do (even though its uses are listed in text books). Only when some experiments were carried out in the rectification of AC to DC, its use was evidently shown via oscilloscope. Then, I started to love diode
Everytime I did an experiment in my college electronics laboratory, I was with the fear that something will burst somewhere. I don't look for the readings taken from the experiments. I wait for the moment for my diode or transistor to burst due to over current. And sometimes it happend too. But such fear went off when the studies progressed and the concept was understood. And to my surprise or ability, my first job was as an electronic engineer, which I did not continued due to some reasons. Now, I am on the other direction, being a mechanical engineer 
Science is interesting, same like life






















