Skip navigation.

December 2006

( Monthly archive )

Does the OLPC need an open-source browser?

, ,

Opera runs on the OLPC. Cool! A lot of the discussion on Slashdot and Digg was about the open-source requirements for OLPC, which would make it impossible to ship with Opera.

I really wonder how the OLPC users would go about changing the source and recompiling the Gecko-derivative (it is not Firefox) on this cute little box. Wasn't it also supposed to be safe and tamperproof? And if they can change and recompile the gecko-browser, they could also install it separately if Opera would be shipped with the box [1]. So what opportunuties are lost? What am I missing?


[1] Assuming that the targeted children (this thing is not designed for adult geeks, though it hopes to create some young geeks along the way) have access to the know-how and systems to compile this software, and are interested in this. And also assuming that the HTML-based stuff created for this box will be standards-based, not tailored to proprietary extensions of any browser.

9.10 fraud protection compared with other browsers

, , , ...

Asa's blog postings didn't get much comments recently (not that many people interested in space exploration, and it will be some months before FF3 gets interesting), so he posted about Opera 9.10. Even though he wasn't offensive, he's still accused of baiting Opera fans :smile:

On the substance: it will indeed be interesting to see if independent studies will detect differences in protection level between the new browsers, because the three browsers have very different implementations!

IE 7: asks you to enable anti-phishing on first start, uses (IIANM) both heuristics and a whitelist in the browser, and callbacks to servers in Redmont. The latter could be problematic, not everyone trusts Microsoft with their browsing history...

FF 2: doesn't ask, but enables blacklisting with regularly (every hour) downloaded blacklists. Might give OK results if the quality of their blacklists is good, but the timing is important. You can enable real-time fraudchecks using a Google service, but that requires clicking 'OK' on a dialog that tells you Google will store your browsing history... The testing they did themselves show a slight increase in effectiveness after enabling this.

Opera 9.1: doesn't ask, but gives an easy way to check the status of individual sites (if you are curious enough to click the '?' in the address field, you'll find this option). You can enable real-time checking from this dialog (and from the Preferences), where Opera doesn't asks you click 'OK' on a big warning dialog, because there is nothing to want about. Opera doesn't store your browsing information or cookies or IP addresses etc. The only thing the Opera sitecheck server remembers will be what sites the collective Opera users have asked for in the past few days. There is the full documentation available.

Recent research has shown that many phishing scams operate only for a few dozen hours, presumably making most of their victims in the first hours. So it makes sense to use real-time checking against regularly updated servers. None of the tested services get a perfect score, though there are certainly differences. Opera hopes that combining the GeoTrust and PhishTank databases will give at least as good results for our users.

I encourage everyone to register an account on PhishTank, and spend a few minutes every week in verifying suspected phish sites. And I also encourage everyone to install Opera 9.10 for their less websavvy friends and relatives, and enable fraud protection for them!

9.10 is final - and so is Hugin 2.5

, , , ...

Yippee, 9.10 is final. High time to update the downloadable custom setups I've made. I'll try to get this working with my.opera.com's system later, but for now I'll use my own webspace. First one:

Hugin 2.5
Hugin is a custom setup for a dedicated Mail & Chat client. It makes the power of M2 visible in menus and shortcuts and button - and makes it possible to keep mail and browsing separate processes, which has pros and cons. Normal browser functionality is mostly removed, so create a separate Opera installation for this one. You can open weblinks in a simple web tab. But you can also open them in your normal browser installation, with the link context menu. The toolbar and menu should both the installed for this setup to work!

Edit 2007-04-17: the links point to 9.2-compatible setups now





Five stars, must be good

, , ,

I'm subscribed to search-feeds on Technorati and Digg for the words 'opera browser'. The last few days, there has been a large number of search results of course, mostly hailing the arrival of Opera Mini 3.0. Non-English blog entries seem to dominate. I can't read Korean, but with a title of Opera Mini, ★★★★★! it must be a positive review :smile:
December 2009
S M T W T F S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31