My OperaSunday, January 30, 2011 3:30:59 AM
gud morning everybody
Regular mobile use may cause the ears to buzzzzzz???
Saturday, August 14, 2010 10:08:33 AM
Regular use of mobile phone for more than four years almost double the chances of developing tinnitus-the debilitating condition that cause constant ringing and buzzing in the ears.
A research has found that people those used their mobile for an average of 10 minutes a day were 70% more likely to have tinnitus.
Those who have used their phones on both the ears , and those who had used their mobile for four years or more were twice as likely to have tinnitus, the telegraph reported on Tuesday. Tinnitus which effects millions of people worldwide is considered as a debilitating condition as suffers as may constantly hear a rushing, roaring on high pitch in one or both ears most of the time.
The most common cause is damage to the hearing through trauma or expose to high noise, however it can be triggered by some mental or physical change.
It is thought that the microwave produced by phone may cause this problem. Hans- Peter Hutter, institute of environmental health, university of Vienna experimented on this problem. The conclusion is that if the use of the phone is restricted with the leaving than it will be proven to disastrous to ears.
A research has found that people those used their mobile for an average of 10 minutes a day were 70% more likely to have tinnitus.
Those who have used their phones on both the ears , and those who had used their mobile for four years or more were twice as likely to have tinnitus, the telegraph reported on Tuesday. Tinnitus which effects millions of people worldwide is considered as a debilitating condition as suffers as may constantly hear a rushing, roaring on high pitch in one or both ears most of the time.
The most common cause is damage to the hearing through trauma or expose to high noise, however it can be triggered by some mental or physical change.
It is thought that the microwave produced by phone may cause this problem. Hans- Peter Hutter, institute of environmental health, university of Vienna experimented on this problem. The conclusion is that if the use of the phone is restricted with the leaving than it will be proven to disastrous to ears.
is there GOD?????
Friday, August 13, 2010 1:01:59 PM
IN THIS world everybody is puzzled about the creation of humanity. Some people believe in the existence of the God and some don’t. Some people search for eternal peace through the beliefs in God, but this is an impossible belief because of the chances the plausibility and because science is yet to prove it.
God generally refers to one supreme, holy, personal being. He is the divine unity of ultimate goodness and of ultimate reality. It was not possible to visualize the concept of this perfect being because one can only imagine an image when one has an idea of what that image is suppose to resemble.
With words like perfect, necessary and existent that are built into its definition, it seems impossible to be argued with. Even if the theist could prove in some miraculous way this perfect being’s existence, he still would not be able to link that ‘being’ to being God.
The argument for God’s existence from design has also generated controversy among philosophers and society. It is said that the complex order and design of the universe is obviously the work of an intelligent architect. In Psalm 19 it’s written ‘the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth his work’. Theists have used this well known argument [teleological] for thousands of years as strong evidence for the existence of God. The complex design of the world also points to a grand designer [God].
Five ways of proving which proves God’s existence are – argument from motion, efficient cause, possibility and necessity, the gradation to be found in things and the governance of the world. First argument states that nothing can be set into motion without being pushed by another or an original mover. In conclusion, since the relationship between motion and mover can’t go on to infinity, there must have been a first mover thus enhancing the possibility of the existence of the God.
Assuming that if the universe is randomly formed and there appears to be no design, the theist still believes there is hope within the cosmological arguments of Plato. His argument is based on the obvious. Everyday we observe things moving. Whatever moves is either moved by another or is self-moved. If a thing is self moved it must be eternal. In this argument for being a first cause, this self-mover is God.
Some people question that when the wind blows a hat off a person’s head, does that mean God was responsible for it? No, many things move and with modern technology and science, there is almost an answer for every movement. Ignorance to what caused the first movement should not be a reason to praise the unknown and label this first cause as God, for example, in nature, scientists time after time have tried to predict tornadoes, their next movement and how they will affect the area they hit.
God generally refers to one supreme, holy, personal being. He is the divine unity of ultimate goodness and of ultimate reality. It was not possible to visualize the concept of this perfect being because one can only imagine an image when one has an idea of what that image is suppose to resemble.
With words like perfect, necessary and existent that are built into its definition, it seems impossible to be argued with. Even if the theist could prove in some miraculous way this perfect being’s existence, he still would not be able to link that ‘being’ to being God.
The argument for God’s existence from design has also generated controversy among philosophers and society. It is said that the complex order and design of the universe is obviously the work of an intelligent architect. In Psalm 19 it’s written ‘the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth his work’. Theists have used this well known argument [teleological] for thousands of years as strong evidence for the existence of God. The complex design of the world also points to a grand designer [God].
Five ways of proving which proves God’s existence are – argument from motion, efficient cause, possibility and necessity, the gradation to be found in things and the governance of the world. First argument states that nothing can be set into motion without being pushed by another or an original mover. In conclusion, since the relationship between motion and mover can’t go on to infinity, there must have been a first mover thus enhancing the possibility of the existence of the God.
Assuming that if the universe is randomly formed and there appears to be no design, the theist still believes there is hope within the cosmological arguments of Plato. His argument is based on the obvious. Everyday we observe things moving. Whatever moves is either moved by another or is self-moved. If a thing is self moved it must be eternal. In this argument for being a first cause, this self-mover is God.
Some people question that when the wind blows a hat off a person’s head, does that mean God was responsible for it? No, many things move and with modern technology and science, there is almost an answer for every movement. Ignorance to what caused the first movement should not be a reason to praise the unknown and label this first cause as God, for example, in nature, scientists time after time have tried to predict tornadoes, their next movement and how they will affect the area they hit.
Sandeep Dhama
Friends (396)
Latest comments
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 April 2013June 2013
| ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Recent visitors
Download Opera - Surf the Web with lightning speed, using the fastest browser ever.
Sandeep Dhama is blogging on My Opera
My Opera is a blog and photo sharing community with millions of members. Join now to follow Sandeep Dhama's blog and get your own.