The Elevator Dillema
Friday, February 23, 2007 7:48:44 PM
I generally feel a slight sense of superiority over (and contempt towards) people who routinely use the elevator for one or two flights. Why squander all that mechanical power and energy for such a trivial task, particularly one offers a mild bit of exercise as well? (Not to mention, the stairs are almost always faster!)
One day I was heading out to lunch, and just as I stepped in the lobby, I saw two people getting on the elevator to go down. They offered to hold the door, and I said, "No thanks, I'm using the steps." And then it occurred to me: was I wasting energy by taking the stairs? Presumably elevators are counterweighted against a "typical load", so if the weight of the car and two riders is less than the counterweight, lowering the car actually means extra work to lift the counterweight. There would be a fixed amount of energy opening and closing the doors and just making the pulleys go round, etc, but this elevator's making the trip with or without me.
So, would I have actually saved the elevator a small bit of energy by riding it?












devansdevans186 # Friday, February 23, 2007 10:21:28 PM
Lagged2Death # Saturday, February 24, 2007 4:58:29 AM
My guess is that (sadly) the elevator uses some electricity to move either up or down. There would be a bent geek appeal in adopting a policy of riding the elevator, down only, saving up the energy you had made with your own muscles, to eventually serve some larger project.
This says that counterweights are usually set to about the weight of the car at 40% capacity. Which seems like a lot, really. 40% of, say, twelve people is almost five people.
Hydraulic elevators don't have counterweights, and when they descend, the potential is just wasted. There's probably a doozy of a joke or a pithy saying or something to be made of that, but that never was my forte.
Richardmusickna # Monday, March 19, 2007 3:28:55 AM
SmoothP # Monday, March 19, 2007 1:15:44 PM