Potential Energy

Will I ever fulfill it?

The Elevator Dillema

I recently spend a few days visiting a client whose office was on the second floor of a building. I generally just took the stairs up and down, but a majority of the people in this office seemed to prefer the elevator.

I generally feel a slight sense of superiority over (and contempt towards) people who routinely use the elevator for one or two flights. Why squander all that mechanical power and energy for such a trivial task, particularly one offers a mild bit of exercise as well? (Not to mention, the stairs are almost always faster!)

One day I was heading out to lunch, and just as I stepped in the lobby, I saw two people getting on the elevator to go down. They offered to hold the door, and I said, "No thanks, I'm using the steps." And then it occurred to me: was I wasting energy by taking the stairs? Presumably elevators are counterweighted against a "typical load", so if the weight of the car and two riders is less than the counterweight, lowering the car actually means extra work to lift the counterweight. There would be a fixed amount of energy opening and closing the doors and just making the pulleys go round, etc, but this elevator's making the trip with or without me.

So, would I have actually saved the elevator a small bit of energy by riding it?

<YOU'RE IT/>Tagged Stiff

Comments

devansdevans186 Friday, February 23, 2007 10:21:28 PM

Who cares about the energy savings.......you are saving yourself by getting the exercise of the stairs.smile

Lagged2Death Saturday, February 24, 2007 4:58:29 AM

How poetic. Potential Energy indeed.

My guess is that (sadly) the elevator uses some electricity to move either up or down. There would be a bent geek appeal in adopting a policy of riding the elevator, down only, saving up the energy you had made with your own muscles, to eventually serve some larger project.

This says that counterweights are usually set to about the weight of the car at 40% capacity. Which seems like a lot, really. 40% of, say, twelve people is almost five people.

Hydraulic elevators don't have counterweights, and when they descend, the potential is just wasted. There's probably a doozy of a joke or a pithy saying or something to be made of that, but that never was my forte.

Richardmusickna Monday, March 19, 2007 3:28:55 AM

I think L2D has it right - and so does Devans! smile

SmoothP Monday, March 19, 2007 1:15:44 PM

To my defense, I'd like to point out that the elevator dilemma was more of a theoretical musing than any real concern for energy savings. I will admit though that there are a couple of idealistic neurons in the back of my head that wonder about the cumulative savings might be from lowering hundreds of humans dozens of floors every day in a large office tower. (These are the same neurons that make me recycle my cans and write to my congressmen...)

Write a comment

New comments have been disabled for this post.