I've long researched and ranted against
Content Farms, The "information" on these sites is at best highly questionable, and at worst dangerous. Imagine searching for information on your health problems and coming across a professional looking site replete with "advice" about your symptoms, and medications. These sites are legal, show up in top Google rankings, (they always find a way to rank in spite of Google trying to stop it,) and there are now not just hundreds, but thousands of these 'shady' sites. TRIOND alone based in Israel and calling itself a "publishing company" has hundreds. They use Google Adsense to provide income to the "writers". They do not pay for articles, nor are any of the articles "tested". I have been calling for content farms to be forced to place a banner disclaimer stating that the site is exactly that, a CONTENT FARM.
Notwithstanding the fact that one of my own sites has constantly been refused an adsense account (any site I own linked to a particular email address is refused in spite of the fact that my sites are full of totally original content written by me and copyright owned by me, it irks me that Google still cannot address the problem.) It's not hard! Just identify the sites as content farms in the search results. As a professional writer producing well researched articles based on accurate information I can no longer make an income from original material. Within hours of posting an article which may have taken hours, or days to write and cross-check, my work appears on CONTENT FARMS spun to the point of nonsense and complete inaccuracy. "Spun" mostly by non English speakers in India, Nigeria, China, Russia, (the list goes on.) Just one of my articles can be "spun" millions of times, and posted on content farms, they might make the "writer" a fabulous $10 a month, but in (say) Vietnam, where the annual income is about $1000 a year that's a whole heap of lolly. In recent years companies have sprung up that
purchase articles. These companies then post the nonsense on hundreds of sites, and reap the Google adsense cash. (This has caused me to cancel my adwords account, since I found that my ads appear on content farms and because I am not a big advertiser I don't really get much choice about placement. Imagine one of my ads generating thousands of 'hits' and not a single sale. The stats look good on my account of course, but the 'clickers' have no intention of buying anything. How much do the companies buying articles pay? The majority pay
$3 for a 600 word article with a minimum of 5 articles. 3000 words for $15! Article spinning software, article writing software is cheap, and it really doesn't matter if you can't speak English so long as the articles can pass
Copyscape scrutiny.
Let me show you an email I received today (links removed). Oh, before I do that, I can't see why Google can't just provide a small piece of information in their search stating THIS SITE CONTAINS FARMED CONTENT. No complex algorithms required.
They know who these sites are, so why not INFORM THE PUBLIC. Anyway, the email I received today from one of the most successful "marketers". I have NO animosity towards this company, and what they do is not illegal even though they sell a product that can take THIS article, spin it a few thousand times, and plug it into one of the thousands of content farms to reap the Google Adsense 'rewards. It can even be "spun" in such a way that these words become a promotional article in favour of content farms! That's more scary than having my income reduced to almost zero. DISCLAIMER: Links in this article are NOT intended to promote any product or service. They are provided ONLY for information related to this article.
Graham, never write another article again! Hi Graham,
What if you could punch a button and get a new article
every time, an article that would ALWAYS be AT LEAST
75% unique from every other article ever produced
when you hit that button?
And what if each article produced was HIGH quality,
human-edited, and about 500 words long?
You could post fresh content to your blogs, get TONS
of backlinks to your site (all on highly unique pages
of content), get traffic from article directories
and web 2.0 properties -- you name it.
Wow, what a benefit THAT would be!
Even if you prefer to write 100% of the content
on your "money" sites, there's no sense in spending
that kind of time on content you need for building
links to rank in Google -- not if you could get
a quality push-button article in seconds!
This is not a fantasy, Graham. I've got a tool
that lets you do JUST THAT.
It's called a "Super Spun" article. It's a 100%
human-edited (every word) document that is built
around of a series of complementary articles.
This is how a Super Spun article is produced:
1. Ten high quality, 500+ word, complementary
articles are created.
2. Each article title is rewritten 10 times
(100 titles total).
3. Each paragraph of each article is rewritten
10 times.
4. Every sentence of all resulting paragraphs is
rewritten 10 times.
5. All of the titles and sentences are checked
for quality by a team of skilled Editors --
every single word.
6. The titles, paragraphs and sentences are put
together into a spin-formatted document.
Do you know how many HIGH QUALITY article variations
these documents are capable of producing?
Hold your breath, Graham, because it's:
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
In math terms, that's one nonillion (or, for
European mathematicians, one quintillion). I
can't even begin to comprehend how large that
number is.
THAT'S the number of article variations you can get
from ONE of my Super Spun articles.
Ready to take a look? I have to warn you, I don't
have very many available right now. These suckers
require a SERIOUS amount of work. But I'm eager
to have you take a look, so here's the link:
LINK REMOVED BY AUTHOR
(After reading the information on the page, click
the "VIEW INVENTORY" link at the bottom to see
what's available.)
*** WHAT ABOUT DUPLICATE CONTENT? ***
So a Super Spun Article can generate a bazillion
variations. So what? As an Internet Marketer
or Search Engine Marketer, what you're probably
interested in is duplicate content, not variations.
Let's talk about duplicate content, then.
A typical Super Spun Article has 30 sentences in
it. The odds of any two articles generated from
the Super Spun document having one sentence in
common is one in one hundred, or one percent.
One sentence out of 30 is a little more than 3%
of the content. That means that for every one
hundred articles generated from the Super Spun
document, the odds are that two of them will
have 3% duplicate content. That's certainly a
number that the search engines, can live with.
The odds of any two articles having two sentences
in common is one in one thousand. So for every
one thousand articles generated from the Super Spun
document, two will have about 6.5% duplicate content.
Still a fabulously small amount in the eyes of the
search engines.
Three sentences in common (roughly 10% duplicate
content)? One in ten thousand.
Four (~13%)? One in a hundred thousand.
Five (~17%)? One in a million.
So a high percentage of duplicate content really
isn't a problem with Super Spun documents.
Ready to take a look now? Here's the link again:
LINK REMOVED BY AUTHOR
(After reading the information on the page, click
the "VIEW INVENTORY" link at the bottom to see
what's available.)
*** HOW ABOUT COPYSCAPE? ***
Ah, yes, Copyscape. The Holy Grail of unique
content in most marketers' eyes is having Copyscape
come back with "No results found." If you achieve
that, your dreams come true....
So how well will articles generated from Super Spun
documents perform in Copyscape? Very, very well, but
not perfect (and they don't have to be perfect).
As outlined already, there's a 1% chance of any two
generated articles sharing about 3% of content.
Copyscape will find that 3% if it's on a page
indexed in Google somewhere.
In completely practical terms, after a Super Spun
article is used hundreds or thousands of times,
Copyscape will probably locate a variety of documents
that match one, maybe two sentences topping out at
about 15% of what Copyscape thinks is "duplicate"
content. (The duplicated sentences will rarely be
the same in the documents Copyscape finds.)
The actual duplicate content will likely be less
than 10%, but Copyscape will throw false positives,
claiming that a few common phrases that happen to
be in both articles are also "duplicates" and
adding that to its total percentage.
But even if there was genuinely 15 full percent
of duplicated content between the two articles,
that is seriously within the comfort zone of the
search engines.
I don't speak for Google, of course, but it's
been my experience that even 30% of duplicated
content is not a problem -- and the chance of
there ever being 30% duplication between two
Super Spun article generations is so small as
to be virtually impossible (the odds are about
one in ten billion).
*** WANT TO SEE SOME EXAMPLE ARTICLES? ***
I wouldn't expect you to believe my claims of
high quality without being able to see some
sample articles output by the Super Spun
documents, of course.
So hop on over to the site, read more about
how the documents work (if you want to),
and then click the "VIEW INVENTORY" link at
the bottom of the page.
Next to each available Super Spun article is
a link to view two samples generated by that
document. I think you'll like what you see.
Here's the link one more time:
LINK REMOVED BY AUTHOR