Stormy Seas at Rottingdean (photo special)
Friday, 28. August 2009, 23:05:53
These are a few of the photos from this afternoon. Click on them to zoom.
While the sun was shining, the black-headed gulls gathered
The sea was 'choppy'
The red warning flag was flying, but a surfer was heading out to the waves
The view towards Brighton
The sea and the marina
It was rough out there
Gulls over the seaNo fulmars about today, and no sandwich terns either. A cormorant flew by early in the afternoon, but the most sensible of the birds was a jackdaw which was keeping well away from the sea, preferring (as did we) the shelter by the side of the cliff-top hostelry, and being very determined not to risk leaving terra firma.
Jackdaw, with white featherCamera note: all shots taken with the EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM.



Darko # 29. August 2009, 06:14
Anonymous # 29. August 2009, 06:31
Words -
I am seriously looking into going all DSLR (rather than keep to my FZ50 panasonic bridge).
The camera which tops the list is the EOS 40D for me (NOT the 50D).
I notice you've employed that camera (amongst others) and thought I'd drop you a quick line to ask you about it.
Spec-wise it seems to fit my bill perfectly - you had any concerns re specs?
Also - I hear that the 40D shutter is decidedly dodgy - packing up completely in many new cameras after ten thou actuations (instead of more like 100,000!) Seems to be a common problem with that particular model.
But I played around with one in a shop t'other day, and do like it!
You know I've always been in admiration of many of your shots - and although I know I probably couldn't afford a 100-400 L lens (you had any trouble with dust with that lens?) or even a 70-200 2.8 lens just yet -I do LOVE that camera.
Any WORDs of advice would be much appreciated...
Doug
Words # 29. August 2009, 07:28
Words # 29. August 2009, 07:59
No shutter problems that I can think of. I've had it a year (so around 40000 actuations
The main problem I've had with the 100-400 is the zoom ring going loose (and then going 'tight'). That is a design flaw with the lens. They have a reputation for dust gathering but the impact on images is zero to be honest (the real dust problems with DSLRs are on the sensor, but the 40D (like most new cameras) has a self-cleaning system which helps a lot. A quick use of a blower generally deals with any problems (which only show on small aperture macros and very occasionally on sky shots).
The big costs are lenses, especially those with image stabilization. I've only got IS on two of mine. It's useful in some situations but not essential (a monopod and tilt head can really make a difference with or without IS). Primes will out-perform zooms, but are obviously more restrictive in certain circumstances. The Sigma lenses are generally excellent (and slightly lower priced) alternatives to Canon and are heavily used for wildlife shooting.
The Sony system has in-built IS which I have to admit would be nice. Much praised on the Chthonic Wildlife Ramblings blog here. If I were thinking of an alternative that's the one I would probably look at, as non-IS lenses are cheaper and lighter. That said, I can't see that you'd go far wrong with the Canon (not much between the 40D and 50D from reports I've read).
Adele # 29. August 2009, 08:06
Cynthia # 29. August 2009, 14:44
Words # 30. August 2009, 11:32
Words # 30. August 2009, 11:36
Anonymous # 30. August 2009, 17:42
Many thanks Words.
I know what you mean about the Sony alphas, but the Zeiss lenses are limited and expensive, and I think the Canons fit better in my hands?!
Thanks again,
Doug
Words # 30. August 2009, 19:29
Mark Jones # 3. September 2009, 20:47
Words # 6. September 2009, 17:33