Opera v Firefox speed test results (Stunning win for Opera)
Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
To make things fair I cleaned out the cache in both browsers: Opera 8 beta2 and Firefox 1.0.1
The results are genuine (the last one is bizarre), but speak for themselves:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/ Opera: 3.453 Firefox: 4.46
http://www.network54.com/Forum/goto?forumid=8980 Opera: 1.61 Firefox: 1.625
http://bbs.adslguide.org.uk/login.php Opera: 0.828 Firefox: 1.15
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/ Opera: 4.563 Firefox: 5.641
http://www.pixcentrix.co.uk/pomo/arts/links.htm Opera: 2.703 Firefox: 3.969
http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php?c=10 Opera: 3.312 Firefox: 3.703
http://my.opera.com/Words/journal/ Opera: 9.328 Firefox: 9.63
http://www.opera.com Opera: 3.62 Firefox: 4.78
http://www.getfirefox.com/ Opera: 2.875 Firefox: 7.328 (!!!!)
So it's a 9-0 win for Opera |(32.292 seconds in Opera overall to 42.286 seconds in Firefox). Even if you strip out that last result, Firefox comes in at 34.958 over 8 sites compared with 9 in Opera.
Test carried out on a Dell Dimension 4400 with 256kb RAM over a 512kb ADSL connection via Linksys WAG54G router.








TreeGo # Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
Do you use the defaults of 8 and 20, respectively?
Nice results.
ICQ_Eagle # Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
Faded_Mantis # Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
Apart form no spyware detected with spybot search and destroy after using Opera to 2-5 a night with IE.
Also when I'm told to get firefox by people i'm glad to say that i'm an Opera user, apart form the speed test that you showed here a PCworld NZ review said this..
"However Firefox was the only one of the 6 browsers we tested (Opera, IE, Mozilla, Netscape, Safari and Firefox) to have an alignment error on a certian page we tested where it alligned the text and pictures wrong.
Words # Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
Max conections 8 Max total connections 20 (this is the default)
Loading: redraw instantly
Java and Javascript enabled
Identify as Opera
Jeffredo # Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
Words # Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
Thanks. That's a good suggestion. Any FF fan care to post instructions on how to do this.
Words # Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
/ Last value in milliseconds (default is 250)
user_pref("nglayout.initialpaint.delay", 0);
The results? (Opera / Firefox)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/ 3.750 / 3.907
http://www.network54.com/Forum/goto?forumid=8980 2.63 / 3.313
http://bbs.adslguide.org.uk/login.php 0.875 / 0.984
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/ 5.344 / 6.47
http://www.pixcentrix.co.uk/pomo/arts/links.htm 2.688 / 4.110
http://my.opera.com/Words/journal/ 7.375 / 7.922
http://www.opera.com 2.906 / 4.188
http://www.getfirefox.com/ 4.765 / 7.78
http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php?c=10 NOT RESPONDING
(additional site to replace mozillazine)
http://www.permuted.org.uk/Paul2.htm 2.172 / 2.515
reisio # Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:00:52 AM
Dare I ask who wrote the article and did the testing? ...dare I look at the source code of a website they've made?
AyushAyushJ # Friday, June 22, 2007 3:27:53 AM
Words # Friday, June 22, 2007 6:28:04 AM