Kitty's Corner

Subscribe to RSS feed

Posts tagged with "TV"

Twiggy

, , , ...

Some of you might remember that I bought a bunch of movies a couple of months ago. Among other stuff I bought the first series of Muppet Show. I watch an episode here and there, but since the show was first broadcasted in 1976 I don't know many of the actors that were on the show with the Muppets.

The other day I saw and episode with a girl whose name I recognized. That was Twiggy:



Twiggy's real name is Lesley Hornby, and she was born in 1949 in Neasden, London. She is an English model, actress, and singer. At 16, she became the first prominent British teenage model. She was known for her androgynous looks, large eyes, long eyelashes, extremely thin build, and short hair.


Fashion has not been the same since Twiggy first time was photographed by Barry Lategan. Her unique face with some incredibly large and fascinating eyes caught on.

She weighed only 41 kilos when she became a fashion icon. The designers flocked round the boy girl with the long, thin legs, and they started creating teenage clothes - something completely new in the 1960s, when pleated skirts with a length below the knee, blouses and twinsets pretty much had been "uniforms".

Here's Twiggy on The Muppet Show in 1976.

Twiggy has been in numerous films, for instance "The Blues Brothers" (1980) and "Body Bags" (1993), and she was one of the judges in America's Next Top Model from 2005 to 2007.

In the summer of 2009, beauty company Olay debuted its "Definity Eye Cream" campaign depicting Twiggy. Accusations of airbrushing created a stir with the media and public. A website campaign attracted 700 individual complaints. Procter & Gamble admitted to minor retouching and replaced the image.

Here's what made people react. The picture on the left is how she was shown in the ad, and the picture on the right is how she really looked.



No wonder that people reacted so strongly, but I'd still say she still looks pretty good for a 60 year old! up



Funny Captions on TV

, ,

Captions on TV can be quite funny. Not always on purpose, but that only makes in funnier, in my opinion. Here's a bunch that'll hopefully put a grin on your face.

Meet Lanieka, who's obviously doing it wrong:


And Robert, who's never been married. I wonder why... left


Dixie - who also receive a huge congratulations from me! bigsmile


Wesley Snipes has aged very fast lately! left


The stock market. Here's what most people hear:


Here's a really weird text, that I won't try to explain. lol


Speaking about bananas - this caption could have been death by Chiquita!


I've never seen Sesame Street myself, but this is certainly not what I expected it to be! bigeyes


I think the texter just died here! rip


Have a great day, everybody! heart


X-factor 2011

, , ,

Happy new year everybody, I hope you had a great new years eve. I know I did. yes

Yesterday, on the first day in the new year, the Danish version of X-factor began. Some of you might know that I don't watch much TV in general, but I admit that I do watch X-factor and Denmark's got talent. Once a week, usually on Friday evening, I curl up in my blanket, drink Pepsi, eat candy and watch a talent show.

The first shows are always the funniest. That's where all the idiots are broadcasted. The persons that can't really sing, and that have been encouraged to join the show.

Yesterday they showed 17-year old Stephanie. She believed she had a fair chance. But seriously, the girl could not sing. The 'nicer' judged asked her if she was serious about being a contestant, or if she had some kind of bet going on. And the 'nasty' judge said "complete lack of sense of occasion"!
Now, judge for yourself. She starts to sing after 1 minute and 12 seconds:



So, what do you think?

3 minutes and 14 seconds after the video starts, the 'nasty' judge goes out to pee, and he finds Stephanie and her mum outside the studio. He asks the mum why she doesn't protect her daughter from that kind of humiliation. He says to her that she is her daughter's lawyer, and that she owes her daughter an excuse for not protecting her.

I have to agree with him. I have often wondered why so many people who can't sing, are even in the show in the first place. And why some of their friends and family haven't told them that it may not be the best idea in the world. It's humiliation for sure. And my point is, that it's what people want to see! I'm not sure that I'd even watch the shows if they only showed people who could actually sing.

After that the 17-year old twin girls, Rikke and Trine, went on. Very natural, unpolished and sweet. And they could actually sing. They're here, and they start to sing 2 minutes after the Youtube thingee starts:



The judges actually ridicule them to begin with, asking them which little island they were coming from and suchlike, but they're taking their words back afterwards. Thanks for that - the girls didn't deserve to be mocked before even starting singing! At least give people a chance before mocking!

That's it. I'll be there again next Friday, watching more. yes

X Factor 2009

The British talent show "X Factor" has translated successfully to Denmark, but in an unusual step, two of the main judges have said they feel the show is too manipulative.

As the second season of the Danish version of X Factor kicks off, both Lina Rafn and Thomas Blachman from the judging panel have blasted the editing of the show for painting both them and the contestants in a false light.

Lina Rafn is better known as the female vocalist from best-selling pop group Infernal and composer Thomas Blachman is the straight-talking self-styled nasty judge on the panel.

Rafn complained that the editing of the show has depicted her as an eternal cry-baby after one clip of her crying was edited into other episodes repeatedly. She also took issue with the later addition of a music soundtrack to contestants audition songs, which made them appear to be singing out of tune even though they wasn't.

She thinks that it’s cheating. She agreed to appear on the show, because she thought our national broadcaster DR had a different approach to ethics than other television stations.

Her judging colleague Blachman said the producers of the second season of the show were creating "emotional porn" by asking contestants about their experiences with cancer and being abandoned by their fathers. He said he was looking forward to the live shows, which begin airing tomorrow, as he will be able to speak freely without being edited to pieces.

The entertainment editor for DR said that he was always happy to accept the criticism of the judges, but that entertainment shows are about using effects, music and editing to underline the emotional aspect that is already provided by the contestants.

I don't watch much TV in general, but I have been watching X Factor. I especially like the first shows, where all the persons who can't sing, are on. That's so hilarious to watch and hear! bigsmile

Death

,

A 59 year old man died on Danish television last Sunday night. The National Television broadcasted a controversial documentary, where the incurably ill Craig Ewerts voluntarily ended his life in a private hospital in Switzerland.

Broadcasting the programme has caused that the chairman of the programme-ethical council, Mette Bock, has left her job.

She says that the programme "Suicide Tourist" is setting focus on a number of important questions about suicide and active euthanasia that we should secure a good debate about. But the programme does also show close ups of the patient taking the deadly overdose of medicine, and the moment of death. And that is taking it too far, according to her.

The programme-ethical council was not consulted before broadcasting of the programme.


What do you think? Should people be able to choose to get help getting a worthy death by own hand when they are incurably ill?

Monty Python

,

I love Monty Python, I've got most of their stuff on DVDs, and watch it from time to time when I am bored.

Now I just read that lots of people are sharing Python-stuff on YouTube, and that the Python-crew is pretty much fed up with that.

Read what they say:

For 3 years you YouTubers have been ripping us off, taking tens of thousands of our videos and putting them on YouTube. Now the tables are turned. It's time for us to take matters into our own hands.

We know who you are, we know where you live and we could come after you in ways too horrible to tell. But being the extraordinarily nice chaps we are, we've figured a better way to get our own back: We've launched our own Monty Python channel on YouTube.

No more of those crap quality videos you've been posting. We're giving you the real thing - HQ videos delivered straight from our vault.

What's more, we're taking our most viewed clips and uploading brand new HQ versions. And what's even more, we're letting you see absolutely everything for free. So there!

But we want something in return.

None of your driveling, mindless comments. Instead, we want you to click on the links, buy our movies & TV shows and soften our pain and disgust at being ripped off all these years.



The link to the site is here. Enjoy.

I think this is great! Thumbs up for Monty Python! up