Wednesday, 17. May 2006, 16:54:02
I'm a bi-platform person. Yes. I go
both ways. I need the Windows PC to run my major applications (MATLAB, LabVIEW, gaim) for which, I admit, there
are mac versions. However, me being able to buy an
Apple Macintosh leave alone install stuff which I need valid licenses for is a pipedream at best.
I need the Macintosh for my daily "feel good about myself" moments. And they've got some wicked... ummm widgets... and stuff. Point is, the
trailers play really well on the iMacs. The
slashdot article (last night) about web pages being web compliant got me testing all my browsers (iMac and windows flavors) for ACID2 compliance. I tried Safari on the iMac and it passed beautifully. Firefox on the Mac was awful. So was Opera for the Mac. I didn't try IE for Mac. It's not supported now anyway. Who cares.
On the PC, IE7beta2, of course, was worse than Firefox on the iMac. The latter was atleast making an effort. I won't risk installing Flock on either platform. That thing's waay too buggy. Even for a beta. Firefox on the PC is still, much better than IE7beta2. Opera of course, passes the test.
All of this is fine and good, but what's the point if even after all of this, the opera community website in itself is buggy when run in Opera? Is it my platform? Or is it because I've got too little RAM backing up the processing needed? Whatever the case, sorting images in the photos section is a pain if you want to drag and drop to a particular location. The javascript works fine in Firefox, but in Opera, it's delayed and very much dependent on the number of scroll wheel turns you make. Bloddy irritating. The rest of the page
validates and everything, but it rankles.
Is it the CSS on the photos page or is it just Opera? Like I said, works on Firefox don't it? I ought to take the server monkeys up on this one.