Alfred Vargas Blog

Everything about my mind!!

Subscribe to RSS feed

Who Will Direct The Hobbit?


Source

With grief over the departure of Guillermo del Toro as director from the Hobbit subsiding, it's time to begin talking about who should take over.

One of the names becoming suggested for the gig is David Yates — who most recent credits consist of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Harry Potter and also the Half-Blood Prince, and the two forthcoming Harry Potter and also the Deathly Hallows movies. Yates has denied that he has been offered the job, but I do not think it would be a terrible choice. As a guy who watches the Harry Potter movies frequently, I’ll say that Order from the Phoenix wasn’t my favorite when it was very first released, but it has grown on me with repeat viewings. Half-Blood Prince, while it left out lots of material from the book that ought to happen to be in the movie, is probably one of my favorites through the Harry Potter series. And you can’t blame Yates. The movie was two and a half hours long and still left out lots through the book. You could almost argue that movie should happen to be split in two like Deathly Hallows. The only other worry would be about Yates going from one franchise to the next, jumping directly from Harry Potter to the Hobbit. Even Christopher Nolan took a break after Batman Begins with The Prestige and following The Dark Knight with Inception.

Other than Yates, the other name that appears the only logical option will be that of Peter Jackson, who is apparently becoming courted by Warner Bros. and New Line to once again return towards the Shire. At this point, the only thing that appears to be holding him back is commitment to other projects at other studios. Jackson is writing the Hobbit scripts with Guillermo del Toro, Philippa Boyens and Fran Walsh. Other projects consist of the two Tintin movies which Jackson is making with Steven Spielberg.

Orlando Video Production

Anne Hathaway to Star in Fairytale Movie

Actress Anne Hathaway is no stranger to starring in movies with a fairytale theme. The 27 year-old star of “Ella Enchanted” and “The Princess Diaries” is set to play the lead role within the upcoming movie “One Day”. The movie will be based about the well-liked British novel by David Nicholls.

The movie is reminiscent of Cinderella and tells the story of working-class Emma, played by Hathaway, who meets a rich and charming boy named Dexter about the day of their high school graduation in 1988. The pair bumps into one another each and every day for the following 20 years. The role of Dexter will probably be played by Jim Sturgess, a British actor who has starred in the movies “Across the Universe” and “21″, as well as “The Other Boleyn Girl”.

The novel by Nicholls was a best-seller in England, and also the author will also write the screenplay for the film. Oscar nominated director Lone Scherfig will direct the film for Focus Features. Scherfig is familiar with film adaptations, as her previous work has included the film “An Education”, based on the memoir by Lynn Barber. Filming for “One Day” will begin this summer and is scheduled to be released in theaters next year.

E-Canada Now

'Toy Story 3': Hope the movie is better than its app

The other night I watched the last half hour of "Toy Tale 2" on TV. So what if the children were in bed? It's one of my all-time favorite movies--go ahead and laugh--and I can't wait for "Toy Story 3," which opens Friday.

Needless to say, I was jazzed when Disney's free of charge "Toy Tale 3" app arrived yesterday. That is, I was jazzed until I ran it; what a depressing, disappointing, borderline insult of an app.

Here's what you'll discover inside:

Woody's Wild Ride
Woody's Wild Ride is a pretty lame-looking action game that's clearly aimed at young kids. I have no problem with that. However, my problem is that its $3.99 in-app purchase cost.

Toy Story Mania
Mania is really a batch of "Toy Story"-themed carnival games inspired by the eponymous attraction at Disney World. How many games do you get? The Wii version has 30, but this app doesn't specify how many games you get, it could be 30, could be three. Cost: $4.99.

So far, this "free" app will cost you $9 if you wish to do anything meaningful with it. It's supposed to have comics as well--no doubt for an additional charge; nevertheless, as shown within the above video, I can't find them anywhere.

The "Toy Tale 3" app does have a few freebies, such as "Toy Tale 3" trailers, in-app access to the "Toy Story 3" mobile Web website, virtual pins you collect by buying stuff, and a tool that turns your iPhone or iPod into a wireless controller for "Toy Story 3: The Video Game," but only for the Mac version. Thanks, but I'm a Windows user.

The apps sole redeeming feature is Woody's Greetings, which creates a personalized message, including your child's name, based on answers to a handful of questions. Wait a second! That's not even Tom Hanks' voice! In fact, all of the voices in the app are from sound-alikes.

Perhaps I'm being too harsh, but I was so impressed by the "Toy Story" Read-Along titles, to say nothing of the movies themselves, that I just expected a lot more. I think little kids will rapidly get bored with this app, if they're not confused by certain areas from the interface. Also, the bait-and-switch tactics--the app is free of charge! No it's not!--is sure to annoy parents.

Please, please, please let the movie be better than this. I'm confident that it will be; nevertheless, I guess we'll all have to wait till Friday to discover out.

News CNET

Blockbuster CEO: Bankruptcy-Loan Talks Part Of Contingency Planning

Blockbuster Inc. (BBI, BBIB) Chief Executive Jim Keyes on Wednesday acknowledged the movie-rental chain is seeking short-term financing to stay afloat in bankruptcy should the organization fail to restructure outside of court. In an interview, Keyes described the discussions as "contingency planning." According to people familiar with the matter, Blockbuster is in discussions with senior bondholders about up to $150 million in so-called debtor-in-possession financing that would assist the chain operate were it to file for bankruptcy. Keyes declined to discuss the specifics of any discussions. He described the talks as one of "a quantity of options" Blockbuster is weighing to rework its much more than $900 million in debt. The company's "preferred option" would be to get new cash from 1 or much more strategic investors, Keyes said. He declined to name any possible partners. Keyes emphasized that "speed is of the essence" in any restructuring the organization pursues. According to a individual common using the matter, Blockbuster would likely try to file a "prepackaged" or "prearranged" bankruptcy if it has to restructure in court. In such bankruptcies, a organization lines up approval for a bankruptcy strategy from numerous creditors in advance of a filing, having a goal of limiting its stay in court. "Our objective would be to improve our balance sheet as quickly as feasible," Keyes said. "This is really a dynamic industry," he said. "This isn't a time to sit on the sidelines for six months while the technology side of our business is dramatically changing daily. The balance we're trying to achieve now is to have the fastest transaction, ideally out of court, that leverages new strategic investments." Blockbuster has been in talks with lower-ranking bondholders owed roughly $300 million about converting their debt to equity and giving the organization new money, according to people common with the situation. Those bondholders had offered to give Blockbuster $30 million, but the organization wants at least $100 million, leading the talks to break down. The discussions are continuing but haven't made much progress in recent weeks, people familiar using the matter have said. The people mentioned that Blockbuster would try to get those bondholders to convert their debt to equity in concert with a money infusion from a strategic partner. Ought to Blockbuster fail to reach a deal on that front, it would most likely file for bankruptcy having a strategy for senior bondholders owed some $630 million to convert some of their debt to equity, people common using the matter have mentioned. Blockbuster has more than $40 million in financial debt payments due July 1. As of April, it had about $110 million in money and cash equivalents. It posted a $65.4 million loss within the first quarter. Keyes declined to say whether Blockbuster would make the payments due July 1. "We have satisfied all of our obligations within the past and..
.we have been working very aggressively on our liquidity and cost savings to ensure we have adequate liquidity to satisfy our obligations," he mentioned. "The payment's not due until July 1. We're working on numerous various options and we're in active discussions with our bondholders correct now." Blockbuster has restructured before only to face financial debt concerns anew. Within the fall, Blockbuster raised $675 million in high-yield bond debt. Investors attracted to the bonds' higher 11.75% interest rate helped Blockbuster issue about twice the debt it had originally sought. The organization used the proceeds to repay its bank obligations. But at the begin of the year, Blockbuster reported disappointing financial results and that financial debt started to trade at distressed levels. The company soon re-engaged its longtime restructuring advisers at investment bank Rothschild Inc. and tapped law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges, which has a prominent bankruptcy and restructuring practice. Keyes declined to comment on comparable-store sales trends since the organization reported first-quarter results on May 13. "I can tell you our results now are somewhat mixed," he said. Blockbuster has seen "favorable results" from movies for which it enjoys a 28-day distribution advantage over rivals Netflix Inc. (NFLX) and Coinstar Inc.'s (CSTR) Redbox service, he said. Blockbuster has had "some less favorable results" for movies that rivals can release the same days as Blockbuster. The company doesn't anticipate closing more stores than it has already outlined, Keyes mentioned. Keyes continues to believe Blockbuster can sell its international businesses--with or without a resolution to its balance-sheet questions. "It's a path we're still on," he said. "That process will continue regardless from the path we take on the balance sheet." He said the sale process isn't being delayed by efforts to recapitalize. "This isn't a fire sale," he said. The Wall Street Journal

The Karate Kid Google Movie Reviews Are Wrong?

If you do a search in Google for [karate kid movie] up comes a one box result for The Karate Kid movie. But it has only a two star review on average from users. Why?

Should you dig deeper and look at the Google Reviews for that movie, you will see reviews on "Bollywood movies." According to Wikipedia, "Bollywood is the informal term popularly used for the Hindi-language film industry based in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. The term is often incorrectly used to refer to the whole of Indian cinema; it is only a part of the Indian film industry."

The Karate Kid is not a Bollywood, so why is Google showing reviews for Bollywood movies here?

Here is a screen capture:



Movie Review: The Karate Kid (2010)

The number one stupid complaint individuals give within the midst of this sequel/remake craze, besides the fact that they shouldn’t do them, is that as well numerous movies from our childhood are being ruined. I never understood that logic. You like the films you like, for whatever reason it may be. No matter how bad it is, nothing that comes after it's enough to take away whatever it was that made you like it within the very first place. The franchise might be tainted, but the movies within that canon that you loved aren’t impacted. For instance, if this Ghostbusters 3 movie ever gets off the ground and sucks, the very first one will nevertheless be a classic.

I’ve reexamined a lot of my favorite movies from my youth lately and realized that a lot of them really aren’t that great. I liked them at the time and that has carried more than to me still liking them, but usually for nostalgic reasons. I am unapologetic about it, but truth be told, they are what they're. That said, comparing a current remake to one we hold dear from back within the day doesn’t generally have a fighting chance for that really reason.

Then there’s the new The Karate Kid.

We internet types possess that sense of entitlement where we can complain up one side and down the other about everything from script to screen, but when it comes time to watch the film, we have to judge it based on a finished product. And I’ll be damned if I didn’t like it more than I ever thought possible despite each and every unfair inclination to the contrary.

The original story is all but unchanged. Dre Parker (Jaden Smith) and his mother (Taraji P. Henson) relocate to China simply because of her job and Dre has difficulty adjusting to his new surroundings. He finds a girl that likes him, a bully that doesn’t, and spends a good deal of time obtaining his ass handed to him every time he steps out of his house. He finally turns to Mr. Han (Jackie Chan), who reluctantly befriends him and teaches him how to defend himself. And so goes the quest for respect.

Look, The Karate Kid is not perfect. It paid homage without having copying every last detail and there were some nice nods to the source without having being too cute, however it is about a half hour as well long, it’s brimming with cheesy sentiment about each and every 15 minutes, and technically the film isn’t even about karate; it is kung fu. You know, technically. But it works for the exact same cause the original did. They're both as predictable as the day is lengthy and the backbone of just about every 80s movie you love is about rooting for the underdog, but these movies are about the relationships between the student and also the teacher. The fighting was pretty cool, but Daniel and Mr. Miyagi’s friendship was the foundation for that original film. Exact same goes here. Mr. Han and Dre are the heart of the new film.

It was excellent to see Jackie Chan really acting rather than letting his usual more than the top repertoire of unfunny humor and martial arts carry him. His performance won’t ever end up being as iconic as Pat Morita’s Mr. Miyagi, but he downplayed it sufficient, and with sufficient subtly, to make certain you didn’t hate him for trying. The jury is still out on whether or not Jaden Smith’s career will end up more like Ralph Macchio or his famous father, Will Smith. For now, I vote for the latter because the kid’s got some chops.

So you're saying following all that complaining about the cast and also the trailers, when you actually see the film it turns out that we web snobs do not always know what we are talking about? I do not know if I would go that far, but it is nice to be surprised occasionally, isn’t it?

Geeks of Doom

Hollywood Stock Exchange: Are We There Yet?

Like an archaeologist fleeing a rolling boulder, Hollywood found itself looking for any way out Monday when the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission approved the actual box-office futures contracts that will probably be traded on Media Derivatives’ MDEX exchange. With tentative plans to launch trading on Sony’s upcoming heist movie Takers, it looks like Hollywood’s worst nightmare—aside from getting an NC-17 on a family comedy—could well come true. Nevertheless, the M.P.A.A.’s got one last card up its sleeve: Sen. Blanche Lincoln inserted an explicit ban on box-office trading into the mammoth “Bite Me, Wall St.” reform bill. Nevertheless, in a conference call Monday, Media Derivatives C.E.O. Robert Swagger promised to head to Washington and do his greatest Jimmy Stewart impression to get the ban removed before the bill is passed. But even if it passes, the new media exchanges could still be grandfathered in, and an actual, working Hollywood stock exchange is searching more and much more like a reality. So, Hollywood finally has to ask itself: is this a Michael Bay-sized asteroid heading straight for the heart of Hollywood, as the M.P.A.A. et al. think, or a monetary Dark Knight that could help lure leery investors back to an business desperately in require of new money?

Should you purchase into Swagger’s David v. Goliath narrative, the goal of tiny, benevolent MDEX isn’t just to have an excuse to gamble on Brad Pitt’s rakish smile or Peter Jackson’s epic framing—an open, transparent market would aggregate everyone’s opinion about any given film—be it informed or uninformed—to give a best-guess prediction as to which movies are financial winners. With this info out within the open, skittish investors will be willing to pour more cash into an industry that, to most outsiders, currently looks like a black box of con artists. The old adage has it that Hollywood, perennially struggling to break even on pricey films, is usually looking for the next sucker enamored by Tinseltown’s glare to give it cash, no questions asked. Nevertheless, when the economy’s within the tanker, and everyone’s suddenly feeling more prudent with their dough, the glamour of investing in films takes a back seat to the require to really make smart investments. Theoretically, an open marketplace will make Hollywood a smart(er) investment. Investors can pour cash into projects, and then hedge their risks when things look bad. Certain, maybe those investors will probably be lesser suckers than a wealthy oil Sheikh who’s just in search of tickets to a film premiere, but given the state of the industry these days, couldn’t Hollywood use the money?

Secrecy and Hollywood go together like Leo and Kate. There appears to be a general feeling that a film in gestation needs to be kept away from the glaring spotlights of investors searching for any info about a project—a leaked script, production stills, rumors of fighting on set—that would then apply undue pressure and hurt the project. Furthermore, the procedure of obtaining butts in seats is a extremely managed affair: studios exist to produce and manage buzz, and a stock exchange would be another perception for Hollywood to deal with. Worse, the fear appears to become that a market could be manipulated to create a film seem like a loser by someone with a stake in seeing it fail. But as James Cameron has proven time and time again, it’s feasible to make a mega-budget film with rumors and criticism swirling well in advance of release and still have it make billions of dollars. If MDEX’s argument that a transparent marketplace will help film finances doesn’t specify how exactly that will function, the M.P.A.A.’s fears that the MDEX will hurt films and filmmaking are equally ill-defined. The biggest concern seems to become that the box-office futures market would give film pirates much more incentive to obtain pre-release copies of the movie and hurt its opening weekend. But anyone who takes a stroll down L.A.’s Santee Alley most likely knows film pirates have about all the incentives they require.

In truth, no one truly understands what will happen until it happens—which it looks like it will. However, you better think that the studios will most likely soon figure out how to create the market function to their advantage. For those who remember, the business was equally fearful of the revolutionary concept within the 80s called “home video.” (You can’t let people really OWN films!) Now, the studios just wish you’d keep purchasing DVDs to maintain them alive through the recession.

Vanity Fair

Brolin jokes and drives “Hex”

“Jonah Hex” has never been a Batman or Superman style property. In fact, according to Josh Brolin who stars as the post Civil War avenger in Friday’s film version, the graphic novel has in no way been stable as a story as various writers and time refashioned it.

All that became clear at a Four Seasons Hotel press conference this past Sunday in L.A. exactly where Brolin often joked as if he was at a midnight poker table with buddies. While he dominated the proceedings, he wasn’t accompanied by director Jimmy Hayward, producer Andrew Lazar and Megan Fox, who costars as Lilah, the hard-working whore who is Hex’s comfort zone after his wife and son are brutally murdered within the film’s opening moments. Jonah is an irresistible force, of course, bent on vengeance but he also has a supernatural element exactly where he can touch a corpse and, briefly, bring it back again to life for a conversation.

I had been surprised by “Jonah Hex,” that is fast (under 90 minutes), stylish and enjoyable. The shock is seeing Brolin as Hex whose entire right cheek is really a symphony of melted flesh including a piece of skin that stretches from his upper lip to his lower, type of a like a rubberband over his mouth. Believe Clint Eastwood’s The Man With No Name meets Dark Man.

Here are a couple of highlights:
Question: JOSH, You are Functioning From a SCRIPT Along with a GRAPHIC NOVEL BUT WHAT WAS IT LIKE TO BRING A Kind OF SUPERHERO Towards the SCREEN THAT HADN’T BEEN FILMED Before? AND MEGAN, WHAT WAS IT LIKE To obtain AWAY FROM THE ROBOTS?
BROLIN: What robots? Oh, that is a various one. At least stemming from a comic guide that is had three lives and wasn’t necessarily really successful I just loved the idea that it refused to die. It had been a survivalist comic guide. But that allowed us to take luxuries and do what we wanted to complete as long as we had the blessing of the comic guide artists. The core of the character is there but then we kind of go off on all these various tangents, were allowed to.
FOX: I like working on action films. I like functioning on films which are comic guide based, that have this type of theme because you will find points which i watched or loved when I was a kid. So it wasn’t really about obtaining away from the robots, if that’s what you were saying. I enjoyed producing both films.

Query: JOSH CAN YOU COMMENT ON THE CHALLENGES From the MAKEUP AND WHAT It had been LIKE DEALING WITH THAT PROSTHETIC ON A DAILY BASIS?
BROLIN: It was a pain in the ass. It is not even that we didn’t have the money but that we chose to go practical with it. Lon Chaney

View more by clicking this link

Robert Pattinson Tonight Show Jay Leno interview video (2010) - Twilight Eclipse movie newsVampire Edward Cullen aka Robert Patt

Vampire Edward Cullen aka Robert Pattinson stopped by the Tonight Show with Jay Leno for an interview leading as much as "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse" movie (YouTube videos below). The interview starts with plenty of screaming female fans and Jay bringing up how he got to speak with Pattinson's mother and father. Pattinson's mom and dad were in the audience for the show too.

Jay Leno definitely asked Pattinson some different questions than the standard "tell us about your character and how he's different within the new movie". Pattinson gave some excellent insight into his parents and their interaction with him about his movies and fame. He said his dad emails him some great tips and suggestions. Dad looked over the Twilight script and mentioned it seemed like a mixture of "Jaws" and "Superman". Pattinson said his dad sends him emails about different things, and he reads one from his cell phone on the air about how to impress a woman. Dad looked a little red-faced within the crowd. Of course Jay brought up Pattinson's nude scene in film for Rob to discuss in front of his mother and father too!

This is 1 of the better recent Pattinson one-on-one interviews leading as much as "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse". Pattinson talks on many topics outside of what's usually asked at all the other interviews. I enjoyed hearing the stories about his mother and father role in his life and how they view his career. Certainly seems like supportive mother and father for this young celeb, when we hear about other celebrity mother and father who aren't so nice, or try to exploit the fame.

Gather News

Toy Story 3' Movie Review

Animation, particularly when it comes out of the Disney/Pixar stable, is 1 of those areas of filmmaking that regularly inspires the phrase, "They don't make them like they used to." Within the case of Toy Story 3, nevertheless, it's much more accurate to say, "They have in no way created them like this." It's certainly not unheard of for an animated movie to be good, for a Pixar film to be excellent, or for that third film in a trilogy to become outstanding (though that's the rarest of the three), but in the situation of Lee Unkrich's movie, the sheer degree at which it exceeds at all 3 is not just rare, it's unprecedented.

Eleven years have elapsed since Woody (Tom Hanks), Buzz (Tim Allen) and all of Andy's favorite playthings' had their last adventure. Or, rather, eleven years have elapsed because Andy stopped playing with his toys. Buoyed by Woody's never-failing devotion, the gang are all optimistic that Andy will elect to bring them with him to his first year of college, but as that fateful, empty-nest day approaches, it becomes clearer and clearer that the only toy that will be making the trek to school is Woody. The rest are all, by a series of unfortunate events, consigned to reside out their remaining days at Sunnyside daycare. Things are actually looking up for the neglected entertainers until they realize just how careless the ankle-biters are when it comes to playing with toys.

Unfortunately there is no escape in sight for that lovable personalities Pixar has been refining for over a decade. Lotso Huggin' Bear (Ned Beatty) runs a tight ship at Sunnyside; the new toys are just going to have to be sacrificed to the aggressive toddlers so the old veterans can have a relaxing time with their much more mature counterparts. Eventually Woody catches wind of what type of life his old pals are being forced to reside and Toy Story 3 quite brilliantly becomes a riff on classic prison escape movies as Woody seeks to breach Lotso's security measures and bring his bunch back to Andy where they belong. And while this on-the-run chunk from the movie is some of the most thrilling material Pixar has ever delivered, it is also some of probably the most touching.

Unlike most sequels, not a moment of Toy Story 3 feels artificial. There's no sense that Pixar decided to make a third film simply because they knew that the box office would gladly support another entry; no sense that this is a cash grab (unlike a certain green Ogre's most recent trip towards the big screen). All of those typical sequel pitfalls are carefully avoided by a swelling sense of finality. Toy Story 3 isn't just another adventure with these characters-- there's no doubt that this really is their final adventure, their final hoorah together. Director Lee Unkrich and screenwriter Michael Arndt meticulously lead the audience along with baited breath the entire time, culminating in a life-or-death scenario for the toys that's much more heartfelt and genuine than most live-action films can ever muster.

It is astonishing how the creative team at Pixar can make you forget that what you're watching is all a bunch of digital wizardry. Maybe it's the 3D this time around, maybe it is that this is their most accomplished technical feat to date (you will find single shots at a landfill that pack in richer detail than the entirety from the pioneering first movie) that makes Toy Story 3 such an immersive experience, or perhaps it's simply simply because Pixar treats its property, which is ostensibly for kids, with the utmost sincerity. The result is an overwhelming success, the rare kind of movie that, were it a human becoming, would be your greatest friend.

1 could reasonably make the situation that Toy Story 3 may be the single best animated film ever made. I wouldn't outright agree with such grandiose claims, but it's definitely not a baseless proposition that you'd be laughed at for bringing up. However, with part 3 now tucked under Pixar's belt, 1 could present an even much better case that Toy Story may be the best film trilogy ever created; a claim I am far more comfortable signing on the dotted line for.

Hollywood Movie Review
February 2012
M T W T F S S
January 2012March 2012
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29