Phrygians
Tuesday, 11. August 2009, 18:18:33
Following the destruction of Hittite Empire by the Aegean migrations, many small kingdoms emerged here and there, and they ruled Anatolia between 1,250 - 750 BCE. Besides these many smaller kingdoms, we know two powerful states, one is Urartian Kingdom that we have discussed in the previous chapter, and the other one is Phrygian Kingdom which ruled from central Anatolian plateau.
Assyrian cuneiforms, late Hittite hieroglyphic inscriptions, Urartian annals and Classical Greek writers have provided much information about the Phrygians. Also, the pottery and other objects found at the sites of Gordion the capital of Phrygians and Pazarli supported the information given by the ancient texts. Based on the writings of Greek and Lydian historians, and also archaeological evidence, we can believe that the Phrygians originated from the Danube area, from where they migrated into Thrace and later crossed the Dardanelles and settled in and around Troy and soon after spread over the western Anatolia. From the exactly same style burial mounds found in Thrace and Gordion, we can trace the roots of the Phrygians first to Thrace and on to the area along the Danube river.
Part of the problem in origins of the Phrygians lies in the various names given to tribes or peoples who may have been Phrygians. For example Mushki, which is frequently mentioned in the Assyrian annals, sometimes often, in connection with Tabal, also long assumed to have been Phrygians. Probably, the Phrygian kingdom comprised a confederation of peoples, united against the Assyrian kingdom. As we read in the Urartian chapter, Urartians followed pretty much the same policies against Assyrians.
We are not quite sure yet, when and to which parts of Anatolia Phrygians migrated. However, we know that they settled in Central Anatolia on a land covering Ankara, Sinop, Alacahoyuk, Pazarli, Hattusas, Konya and Melidia on eastern Anatolia and Manisa on the west. Generally agreed that the Phrygians were among those migrating peoples known as "Sea Peoples" who destroyed the Hittite Empire that was already weakened by the Kashka people from the north. Later in the Hellenistic period, Phrygian lands were settled by Galatians, a tribe from eastern Europe, and renamed as Galatia, nevertheless this territory was, for a long time, known as Phrygia even later in the Hellenistic times.
Scholars believe that Phrygians established themselves as a strong and powerful kingdom only after 8th C. BCE. Because, from 8th C. BCE and on, Assyrian annals mention a nation under the name Mushki that is believed to be the same people as Phrygians. Greek sources tell that Phrygians had existed in Anatolia from 13th C. BCE. Homer's Iliad has provided the information that Phrygians were available in Anatolia in the time of the King Priamus of Troy, roughly 12th C. BCE. On the other hand historian Herodotus in his book tells that Phrygians, before they came into Anatolia, lived in Macedonia area and by that time they were called Brygians. Herodotus also mentions the first kings, Gordios, Midas and Adrastus and he says Phrygians lived on the left hand of the river Halys and the area between Lydia and Cappadocia is called Phrygia. The information given by Herodotus is supported by the Phrygian style burial mounds and monuments found in this area. What makes us believe that Phrygians have never been an important nation before the 8th C. BCE. is that nowhere in Anatolia has Phrygian monument or pottery before that century.
Phrygians, between 12th and 8th C. BCE., they lived in Anatolia, but as small clans and tribes, only after the 8th C. BCE., they became a noticeable political and military power. Nevertheless, Phrygians have never been able to control the whole part of Anatolia. For example, one of the newly emerging powers in Anatolia, Lydian Kingdom has survived through the Phrygian period and there is no evidence that Lydians lived under the Phrygian hegemony. Another point that leads us to believe that Phrygians did not control Anatolia totally, is the lack of Phrygian towns along the Aegean and Mediterranean coastlines. Excavations at ancient cities on the Aegean and Mediterranean coasts have provided no Phrygian pottery and objects.
As Phrygian state was at its peak, under the king Midas, Anatolia was invaded by a new flog of people. This people were known as Gommers in the old testament, as Gimmirais in Assyrian records and Cimmerois in Greek sources, now we call the Cimmerians. Cimmerians, as told by Herodotus, lived on the Crimean peninsula to the north of Black Sea. When their land was attacked by Scythians, a wild and powerful people, they, in large groups, entered Anatolia and destroyed Urartian kingdom in the eastern Anatolia.
Assyrian king Sargon II, carried out many defense wars against Cimmerians, another Assyrian king Asahardon, agreed with Scythians, and drove Cimmerians from eastern to central Anatolia. Cimmerians, first time met Phrygians in this area, and defeated Phrygians in a battle in the year 676 BCE after which the king Midas killed himself by drinking bull blood.
The burial mound at Gordion is believed to be the king Midas'. The body found inside the burial chamber is of a short man at the age 60s. What surprised the archaeologists, who excavated this tomb, was the lack of gold in the burial chamber, because the king Midas was famous for his rich treasures. One of the reasons for that might be the Cimmerians, who probably looted the riches of Midas. About the same time, Gordion the capital city was burned and destroyed.
After destroying the Phrygians, Cimmerians continuing their march towards west, destroyed and sacked many Ionian cities including Miletus and Smyrna. Cimmerian invasion lasted for 80 years, and this period of 80 years in Anatolia was known as a period of terror and fear. The Assyrian king Asarhaddon gave Cimmerians a heavy attack in the year 679 BCE, and the remains of this people were destroyed by the Lydian king Alyattes in 609 BCE.
http://www.ancientanatolia.com/welcome.html
The Iron Age Background to the Formation of the Phrygian State
OSCAR WHITE MUSCARELLA
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
1000 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10028
Recent excavations at Gordion have revealed below the destroyed Phrygian city (ca. 700 B.C.) an early Iron Age settlement with handmade coarse ware, which is followed by a settlement that contains the earliest Phrygian pottery forms. The handmade ware relates to that from Troy and the Balkans and is considered firm evidence of the historically recorded migration of the Brygians into Anatolia. A suggested chronology for the two early settlements is posited, based primarily on information from Troy. This chronology is then examined together with the information derived from preserved ancient traditions. A hypothesis is generated regarding the chronology of the establishment of kingship in Phrygia. This event is posited to have occurred in the late ninth century B.C., and the historical King Midas is considered to have been the fourth Phrygian king to reign.
From the modern scholarly perspective, the Anatolian Iron Age is said to begin with the destruction and collapse of the Hittite and neighboring states, in the years around 1200-1180 B.C., a chronology derived from texts from Boğazköy, Ugarit, Meskene-Emar, and Egypt (for a summary of the evidence see Hoffner 1992; Yon 1992; Caubet 1992; also Astour 1965; Freu 1988; Otten 1976- 1977; 1983).
Destructions of the Mycenaean centers occurred about the same time--and may have resulted from some of the same causes. In both regions thereafter writing ceased to exist until the eighth century B.C., giving rise to the alternative term "Dark Age" for the period (e.g., Akurgal 1983; Muscarella 1988 : 417).
But whereas in the Aegean during the postdestruction centuries, artifacts, burials, and ar
chitecture are archaeologically documented, indicating the continuous presence of a population, material remains are lacking in most areas of Anatolia. Such a condition signifies for Anatolia a darker Dark Age and a less comprehensible cultural and historical situation than that which existed in the west.
Burned or abandoned settlements have been recorded at practically every Late Bronze Age site
excavated in central, southern, and eastern Anatolia ( Akurgal 1983 : 75-78; Bittel 1976-1977 : 39-43, 48-49; 1983: 26-28, 30-35, 37-39; Muscarella 1988 : 417-19; Drews 1993b : 8-11, fig. 1). The magnitude of the political and social disruption is indicated by the fact that not a single site is recognized to have been directly reoccupied; this process of resettlement did not begin in most cases until centuries later.1
The identity of the forces that destroyed the Hittite polity still remains unknown--although a number of candidates, e.g., the Sea Peoples (specifically named as the destroyers by Rameses III), Muski, Kashka, or alliances of these powers have been tendered and supported by various scholars. To date neither archaeology nor textual remains in fact furnish definite answers or even clues on this issue ( Akurgal 1983 : 72; Bittel 1983 : 27; Hoffner 1992 : 49; Drews 1993b : 48-61). While indeed texts from destruction levels at Boğazköy and Ugarit refer to military threats by land and sea against the Hittite and allied states, it is uncertain if one may attribute them specifically to the final destructions; and names of enemies for this time have not been recovered ( Astour 1965; Otten 1976-1977; 1983, Hoffner 1992).
A text written in the eighth regnal year of the Egyptian pharaoh Rameses III, ca. 1180/1176 B.C., is both the last written reference to the Hittite state and a post
-91-
Questia Media America, Inc.
www.questia.com
Publication Information: Article Title: The Iron Age Background to the Formation of the Phrygian State. Contributors: Oscar White Muscarella - author. Journal Title: Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. Volume: a. Issue: 299/300. Publication Year: 1995. Page Number: 91.
http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=95260535
King Midas
In the winter of 1985-6, Dr Veli Sevin of Istanbul University visited Richard Neave to enquire about the reconstruction process.
He seemed most interested in the technique, especially the problems associated with the soft parts of the face. He finally confessed the reason for this interest - he believed that he had the skull of Midas, king of the Phrygians in the late eighth and early seventh century BC. As well as the story of his golden touch, the other story most famously associated with King Midas is that of his "asses ears". Legend has it that he received them as punishment from the god Apollo for failing to pronounce him the champion in a music contest.The skull in question came from the burial mound commonly called the "Midas Mound" outside the ancient Phrygian capital of Gordion in central Turkey. The mound contained a very wealthy burial, and a skeleton in excellent condition. Was this King Midas? And what of the asses ears?
The skull did not answer this latter question - there was no evidence for any condition which might lead to such a description. However, Dr Roger Wood, Reader in Genetics at Manchester University, suggested a possible solution - a condition known as "hairy pinnae" which is only passed through the male line, and causes hair to sprout on the outer or upper edges of the ear (or both). Tomb of King Midas Reconstruction in the Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, Ankara, Turkey
Found Brigian settlement
Pasko Kuzman ,most famous archeologist in Macedonia(He have discovered Macedonian artefacts and golden mask in the old Lychnidos today Ohrid changing the map of Macedonia up to area of lake Ohrid previousely regarded for Ilirian culture)have annaunced new important discovery.
In Ohrid area, on the border beetween Ohrid and village Leskoec have been found first Brigian settlement and in these days are imediate exavations.Dating of the settlement is from 3500 Years.
Findings are for begining promising,have been found burial area,and a lot of pottery.Found is in the area of hill,and it is posible tomb area.
Brigians have been regarded to be mithical people who have been moved by famous king Midas in Phrigia,where they have given the name of the kingdom and the area.It will be wery interesting to see difference beetween Brigian and phrigian settlement because have been questionable for various reasons.It will be important to see culture of the most old pelasgians and their relations with other ancient people and specialy with Macedonians.
Ancient Macedonian Language_Phrygian Glossary
Results of genetic research from Turkey showed a low level of V-13 genetic markers.
This means that Greeks and Albanians have never settled the coast of Turkey and they don’t have any links with Phrygians.
continue...
WIDGETIZE
How to use Quote function: