Skip navigation.

Nedprioritert Blog

Uglyness

Feed the hungry, kill the poor.
As the day progresses my heart is sore
Slowly dragged along the low gravity curb
As serenity pulls me closer being surd.

Your Eyes

Your eyes, winter in a mid-summers night.
Glowing, with eternal spotless light.
Who, am I to dispare on evil days.
When, all I am is found in you perfect ways.

Decisions of catclysmic proportions

Over the sky and into the blue
ocean, as the filibuster takes over
the pulpit of the world fading away towards
darkness. Beyond evil, beyond life and beyond
criticism of continuing annoyance. Fingering moronic
presence avoiding spiritual dual life in beauty from the dust and
into the blue.

Snø

snø er hvit
snø blir grå
snø blir svart
setninger blir lengre
ettersom verselinjene øker i antall
men er det alltid sånn da?
det var d visst ikke
Er d sånn med andre ting også?
At det ikke alltid blir som man tror
for eksempel kjærlighet
eller død
liv?

Hau ju d>:in?

Overskriften er et forsøk på å traskribere på data. Ikke SÅ lett uten de rette fonemiske tegna.
Altså som tiden går i en retning, går også håret, musklene, fettet og hukommelsen i sin retning...
Men betyr det at jeg skal la naturen gå sin gang uten å ta roret, nei så klart ikke.
Likedan går også Verden og Menneskene rundt meg i en retning...
Betyr det at verden skal få slippe at jeg blander meg, å nejdu...
Men hvordan kan jeg best "styre" verden? Gjennom å fortelle verden hva den skal gjøre? Gjennom å tvinge med øks, kaste på bål, hugge hender av naboen og hans hus, tvinge i kne ved bruk av power fister, cattleproder og gauss pistoler? (De tre siste var til O.G.)
Neida, verden skal ikke styres, den skal henge seg på og ledes...Men hvilke ledere er vi egentlig?
Hvem vil følge etter en dust som overhodet ikke har karisma og utstrålig, glede og positivitet er essensiellt hvis du vil at Verden rundt deg skal bli bedre. Det er ikke alle andre som må forande seg for at du skal få det som du vil ha det, det er deg, dvs...meg for min verden, du for din:)

Exam in American History

My last exam:)
I will not sum up the history in an essay, it will be close to impossible. Therefore I will use key words to sum up important events:
Puritan work ethic, belief in education, good business relations, Harvard.
British colonies: indentured servants, headright system, no taxes and religious freedom poplulated the colonies.
French: Fur trade, good Amerindian relations, catholic.
All colonies headed by trading companies.
British control of Am. trade, taxation etc. annoyed colonists. Governor much in control.
Southern society became slave society.
-------------
The war for indipendence
New state constitutions
Design of state: Thomas Pain(simple) vs. John Adams(complex)
countervailing force: Checks and Balances.
Federalists: weaknesses in articles of confederation; could not defend am. trade, foreign affairs inefficiency, not gov. only leauge of nations since not ratified by the people, too strong states.
First party system: formed because of issues like economic dependence on Britain and attitudes towards the french revolution. (Federalists vs. Democratic Republicans)
Jefferson: reduce nat. debt, reduce beurocracy.
Marshall vs. Madison - supreme court as interpreter of the constitution.
Louisiana Purchase.
--------------------
Boston Associtates
regional specialization.
Currency crisis of 1810- U.S. Second national bank, demanded all debt to be paid with federal money, backed their money with capital, forced out the state banks.
Tariff came in 1816 to hinder British selling at CHEAP prices. (Sectional interests)
Henry Clay's American system - Protective tariff, strong national bank and internal improvements.
Panic of 1819 - Dumped prices--> Depression --> Agrarian unrest.(blamed on 2nd national bank)
Missouri comprimise of 1820
Monroe doctrine.

Andrew jackson (1829-37) - Democrat: decentralization, negative to american system. Kicked out the beurocrats and put the people in charge, democratization, voting rights expanded to all white males. Wanted to give the president judiciary power, "King Andrew", populism, hard currency, lower tariffs.

South Carolina Exposition and Protest by Calhoun ("Tariff is unjust! States could disagree with union laws, states could ceceed from union")
Nullification crisis-South Carolina nullified tariff bills, threatened to seceed if federal taxes were forced on them. President forced them back by threatening with military action if sucession.

State Charters: Defined company gov., the extent of comp. ownership and gave rights like limited liability to companies. It helped bulid the states.

Second Party System: Professional politicians, campaigning, Party platforms. (Democrats vs. Whigs) Shadow: regional interests broke apart both parties.

Whigs: American system, paper currency, national bank, higher tariffs, intelligentsia+Second great awakening.
------------
Slavery: Chattle slavery, slaves=higher status, fear of rebellion.
Nature vs. progress.
Second Great Awakening: America=New Jerusalem, Individual free will (heaven or hell), democratic, seperation of church and state. Many preachers also became abolishionist, temperance leaders etc.

Abolishionists: pamplets, petitions etc. Southerners: "Who are you to tell me what to believe?".
Blacks in north and south, The Gag rule of 1836. Free-soil vs. Abolishionists.

The Wilmot Provosio raised public awareness on the future of slavery by declaring no area won from the mexicans to be slave.

I'll just read the rest on my own.........
Bye for now.

Exam in immigration and ethnicity...arg...

What is the most annoying thing in the world? Write 3 hours in exam preperations and then having the whole thing deleted because a stupid program didn't open a NEW window in Firefox but used the one I was writing in. Exactly that happened to me on this glorious thursday evening...funfunfun...

Oh, well here is an outline for the first exercise in my exam tomorrow:

Chinese Immigration to America:
1.Introduction: Chinese immigration applied to historiographic models to better understand
their experience.

2.First male sojourners
2.1.Who/why leave China?
2.2.Stage migration
2.3.Uprootedness definition. (Handlin)
2.4.Uprootedness linked to the experience in America.
2.5.Nativism rose from dual construction of National Identity and Ethnicity (Conzen)
Ethnogenisis – the beginning of a hybridized ethnicity made through cultural
conversations. "racial uniform" (Takaki)
2.6.Localization (Imperfect assimilation- Higham)
2.7.Immigrants now arriving faced a different reality.

3.Immigrants coming after the Chinese exclusion act of 1882
3.1.New experience of immigration as transplantation (John Bodnar)
3.2.Women (Hookers - real uprootedness), (Bachelor society)
3.3.Assimilation arose as problem, lack of space. (LA, New York and Boston Chinatowns grew,
other Chinatowns became smaller)
3.4.Earthquake in 1906 (municipal records)
3.5.Families developing (Chain migration) Still, very few Chinese women in America 80% male.
3.6.Growing antagonism (National Origins Quotas – 1924, based on census from 1790.)

4.Second wave, post-1965.
4.1.Communism; Equality in the world but not in America? Therefore:
4.2.Raised ban on non-Caucasian naturalization 1952.
4.3.Immigration act of 1965: family reunification, vertical and horizontal, resident aliens
could bring families. Chain migration.
4.4.Increase in female immigration.
4.5.Increase in step migration.
4.6.Refugees also came.
4.7.“Model Minority”?

5.Second Generation
5.1.Two schools, American and Chinese.
5.2.“Islanded” between two cultural islands.
5.3.Hunt to find an identity.
5.4.Not accepted in American society.
5.5.Constant struggle to find an identity allowing them to be both Chinese AND American.

Exam in American popular culture

My very good friend Gaau has adviced me to use the oppurtunity of this blog to do some thinking around my upcoming exams, consequently, comes the following little passage of thoughts and conceptualizations.

Firstly, I will address cultural theories concerning televison. Stuart Hall is probably the most important theorist in this area. He presented three stages of meaning; a mediums account of a raw social event, then creating a discourse open to polysemi etc. and at last the decoding through ideological filters made by the recipient of the discourse. The meaning is therefore not a one time produced entity but a continuingly developing concept, first by the producers, then by the recievers. Hall said that the audience decodes the discourse in several different ways depending on their social status. Another theorist set Halls theories into reality and found that the concept of different interpretations not only depended on social class but on cultural thoughts and context in relation to preconcieved ideas and thoughts. Halls three classes of interpretation were the dominant hegemonic code, the negotiated code and the oppositional code. I am fairly well aware of the content of each code and will therefore countinue without elaborating these issues in order to save time.
Other issues concerning TV is that it has a social context as well as an individual function. TV can be used as a way of cutting yourself away from the world, or socializing together with family and friends while all watching and talking about the same TV show.
Some theorists have also argued that meaning is an ongoing process, even after the show in question is over. This was tested through interviews with women watching the TV series "Crossroads". Another study on women watching "Dallas" showed that there was a clear dennotation and a connotation. The fans identified with the show emotionally, others declined it as ideologically immoral and therefore not worth watching, another group found it entertaining to watch because it was mass-produced and therefore of low quality.
One last aspect of TV is the aspect of financial(incorporation and homogenization) vs. cultural(resistance and difference) economy.

Now on to fiction in popular culture. Fiction developed as part of the american popular culture with the emergance of self help novels in the 1920's. Prior to this fiction was considered part of high culture and not as part of the popular culture. The self-help books was naturally set in the light of the econimic and cultural sprit of the era and presented financial success through a life devoted to christian values. More technically and theoritically fiction is seen trough different eyes. Some theorists view fiction symtomatically. That is that they do a double reading, the text itself and then the meaning in between the lines of the text. That is representation and figuration.
Another way of viewing fiction is to see it through reception theory. That is that meaning is ALWAYS produced when reading a text. Predjudices and beliefs contribute to the interpretation of any discourse. Historic settings also influnce the meaning. The meaning is therefore constructed through interpretations.
A third view concerning fiction is the view of reading formations. That is the belief in inter-textuality. Text and Context always creating the meaning together.
One last part is about romance reading, that is crap! So I will ignore it with pleasure:)

My third area of focus is film. Structuralism is the most important part of film in popular culture. That is the idea of a signifier and a signified making a sign. ("cat"+concept cat=hairy four-legged animal.) This form of structuralism can also be extended into a secondary signification. That is the connotation of cat, "female super-gossiper". Link this to cultural studies and you can understand denotation and connotation of a text. That is exactly what stuctruralists does, they link laguage to cultural studies as an analogy. (Fun istn't it? I bet nobody will ever read this far, so goncratulations if you ever read this, please let me know:)
Hollywood as a mythmaker: Myths are created to make reality easier to understand by discrediting contradictions in society. Ex. The Am. dream, money=happiness, The cowboy etc. They are often created on binary oppositions Ex. Evil/Good, Hot/Cold, Dark/Light etc.
I'm sorry to have to mentions this, but I guess it is important. The "male gaze" was an invention made populr by the feminist movement. It is the main theory of the concept of sex-objects etc. (crap)...
Meanings is to some theorists produced through negotiations; Escapism, Identification and Consumerism. blablabla...

Newspapers and Magazines: Weee, fun fun...
Well you can devide them into three parts, official press, popular press and alternative press.
offical press writes in a analytical code while the popular press writes in a storytelling code.
Official press is said to uphold the stuctures of society while popular press is progressive and often accusing to the power-bloc. The alternative press is the only part of the press that usually can talk about radical issues.
Relavance and demand controls this part of popular culture.
I will not talk about the womens magazines, because I don't give a rats ass...

Popular Music:
Now this is interesting, but with the lack of time I will be very brief. Important isuues: standardization and passive listening. Political economy - fails to see that music is consumer controled in the way that cunsomers make the cultural value. It also neglects the textuality and the consumption of music.weee...
Music now represents subgroups in society. Why? Historical context? Only I know...:wink:

Globalization:
Oh happy day. Here comes the day of wierd terminology: Indigenization, Americanization, creolization, deterritorialization and globalization. And in addition lets throw on some other terms that I havn't menitioned allready: Hegemony, stucture and agency, High and low culture, Rockwell, Koon and Warhol, star trek, I Love Lucy, Amos and Andy, negero spirituals, minstral shows, jazz, blues, smooth jazz, swing, bebop, rocknroll, elvis, youth culture, feminism, gap between culture and society, civil rights movement, sencorship, vogville, radio, Film Noir, Victorian values, drugs, rolling stones, bruce springsteen, eric clapton and so on....

I hope my exam tomorrow morning turn out better than this outburst of thoughts:)

Have a nice day!

Andre ting

Fikk igjen en essay i dag.
Utrolig hvor mye man kan lære av å prøve og feile. I alle livets faser, enten det er på universitetet eller på "livets skole". ALARM-KLISJÈ-ALARM!
Men seriøst, jeg lærte f.eks at når jeg skriver engelsk essay litt for fort glemmer jeg å bruke komma. Jeg hadde faktisk nesten ingen kommaer i min 5 siders essay. LOL, jeg får det virkelig til:)
Det var sikkert fint for seminarlederen min da, hun fikk jo laget masse kommaer. Og det er jo dritfet å lage kommaer;)

Sånn hva klisjèen ovenfor angår er jo det sant også da. Jeg lærer hver dag gjennom mine prøvelser.
Jippi:) Kom alle prøvelser og feil, jeg elsker kunnskap!

Mye å gjøre

Altså, er endel å henge hendene i for tiden eller for å si det på en annen måte er det mange bøker stappe hudet ned i, vri det rundt og legge tankene i tørt.

Som en følge av dette har jeg desverre hatt lite tid til blogging. Jeg skal for eksempel nå på KRIK
og må dermed gå.
Du skjønner sikkert at jeg som en videre følge av dette vil komme sterkt tilbake med mer blogging.
Jeg vet at denne tankerekken ikke er logisk, men sånn er livet, ikke alt er logisk.

Snakkes:)
November 2009
S M T W T F S
October 2009December 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30