"V for Vendetta" Author Angry At "impotent American liberal" Re-write
Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:42:26 AM
"V for Vendetta" was specifically about things like fascism and anarchy.
Those words, "fascism" and "anarchy," occur nowhere in the film. It's been turned into a Bush-era parable by people too timid to set a political satire in their own country. In my original story there had been a limited nuclear war, which had isolated Britain, caused a lot of chaos and a collapse of government, and a fascist totalitarian dictatorship had sprung up. Now, in the film, you've got a sinister group of right-wing figures — not fascists, but you know that they're bad guys — and what they have done is manufactured a bio-terror weapon in secret, so that they can fake a massive terrorist incident to get everybody on their side, so that they can pursue their right-wing agenda. It's a thwarted and frustrated and perhaps largely impotent American liberal fantasy of someone with American liberal values [standing up] against a state run by neo-conservatives — which is not what "V for Vendetta" was about. It was about fascism, it was about anarchy, it was about [England]. The intent of the film is nothing like the intent of the book as I wrote it. And if the Wachowski brothers had felt moved to protest the way things were going in America, then wouldn't it have been more direct to do what I'd done and set a risky political narrative sometime in the near future that was obviously talking about the things going on today?"
As I said in previous posts, their is a real fascist threat in the world today. There is a real theocratic threat in the world today. Hollywood continues to pretend that America is fascist and theocratic while ignoring the real threats.
"V for Vendetta" celebrates terrorism while we are at war with terrorism; the hero blows up Parliament with a subway train full of explosives, reminiscent of the attack on the Pentagon with a 747 and the London subway bombings. Didn't anyone making the movie think about the message of the movie? V is a terrorist at war with evil neo-cons, V uses the same tactics at Islamists, terrorism is the answer to political differences. Objectively, I think the makers of this movie aren't on our side.
Jeez.









WillYum # Wednesday, March 29, 2006 6:42:43 AM
They were quite simply terrorists and the Throne would have quickly executed them had they been captured and 'tried'.
Before we condemn anyone who uses the loaded 'Terror' word we should look at the very place we came from.
Unregistered user # Friday, August 4, 2006 3:46:18 AM
WillYum # Friday, August 4, 2006 11:14:42 PM
To say that American Revolutionaries did not execute prisoners is a fallacy I'd be glad to debate.
Yum
Unregistered user # Thursday, August 10, 2006 3:29:19 PM
Unregistered user # Friday, August 11, 2006 6:43:16 PM
WillYum # Friday, August 11, 2006 8:21:12 PM
Yum
Unregistered user # Wednesday, December 6, 2006 11:26:52 PM